Download PDF
Endoscopy 2015; 47(S 01): E192-E194
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1377211
Cases and Techniques Library (CTL)
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Advanced rectal carcinoma caused by tumor cell implantation after curative endoscopic submucosal dissection of an intramucosal rectal carcinoma

Hakuei Shinhata
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Hironori Yamamoto
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Keijiro Sunada
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Yuji Ino
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Yoshikazu Hayashi
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Hiroyuki Sato
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Yoshimasa Miura
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Hirotsugu Sakamoto
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Aya Kitamura
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Takahito Takezawa
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Tomonori Yano
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Takashi Sakatani
2   Department of Pathology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
,
Kentaro Sugano
1   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
10 June 2015 (online)

Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

A 62-year-old man was referred for treatment of a large granular-type laterally spreading tumor in the distal rectum ([Fig. 1 a]). We diagnosed the tumor as being an intramucosal carcinoma using magnifying endoscopy. En bloc resection was performed by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) ([Fig. 1 b] and [Fig. 2]).

Zoom Image
Fig. 1 Endoscopic appearance of the distal rectum showing: a a granular-type laterally spreading tumor prior to treatment; b the ulcer bed after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD).
Zoom Image
Fig. 2 Macroscopic view of the specimen, which was resected en bloc and measured 82 × 58 mm. The area occupied by the tumor was 74 × 51 mm, of which an area of 25 × 22 mm was carcinomatous.

Histopathologic examination of the resected specimen showed an intramucosal adenocarcinoma with adenomatous components and tumor-free resection margins around the entire circumference of the tumor with no evidence of lymphovascular invasion ([Fig. 3 a, b]). The adenocarcinoma was limited to the mucosal layer reaching to the muscularis mucosa but not invading it. The vertical resection margin was also free of cancer around the entire lesion with the thinnest and thickest tumor-free submucosal depths being 360 μm and 1280 μm, respectively ([Fig. 3 c, d]). The procedure was considered to have been a curative resection (R0), and the patient was discharged without complications.

Zoom Image
Fig. 3 Histopathologic appearance of the resected specimen stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) showing: a an intramucosal adenocarcinoma with adenomatous components in low-power view; and b the same tissue in high-power view demonstrating tumor-free resection margins without lymphovascular invasion; c the thinnest submucosal depth under the resected carcinoma (360 μm); d the thickest submucosal depth under the resected carcinoma (1280 μm).

A follow-up colonoscopy performed 1 year later revealed a local recurrence at the ESD scar ([Fig. 4]). Surgical resection of the tumor was performed. Histopathologically, the carcinoma had invaded to the muscularis propria; however, the resected lymph nodes showed no evidence of metastasis.

Zoom Image
Fig. 4 Follow-up colonoscopy 13 months after the endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) was performed showing a recurrent rectal carcinoma at the site of the ESD scar.

Incomplete resection with residual tumor and tumor cell implantation have both been reported to be recognized causes of local recurrence after surgical resection of rectal carcinoma. Exfoliated free viable tumor cells in the remaining rectal lumen can implant at the anastomosis and on the raw surface [1] [2] [3]. In this case residual tumor was not seen near the ESD ulcer on video review. A post-ESD ulcer may, however, serve as a raw surface on which free viable tumor cells can implant. Therefore, local recurrence of the rectal carcinoma may have been caused by tumor cell implantation.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of a local recurrence of early rectal carcinoma after curative ESD in the absence of the usual risk factors for local recurrence of intramucosal carcinoma after endoscopic treatment, which include positive surgical margins and piecemeal resection.

Tajika et al. [4] reported a case of tumor cell implantation from a rectosigmoid colonic cancer at the endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) site of a synchronous rectal carcinoid. This report supports the concept of tumor cell implantation in an ESD ulcer. Endoscopists should be aware of this potential risk when performing ESD for large colorectal tumors.

Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AQ_2AD

 

  • References

  • 1 Matsuda A, Kishi T, Musso G et al. The effect of intraoperative rectal washout on local recurrence after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 856-863
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Morgan CN. Cancer of the rectum. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1951; 9: 13-24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Umpleby HC, Fermor B, Symes MO et al. Viability of exfoliated colorectal carcinoma cells. Br J Surg 1984; 71: 659-663
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Tajika M, Niwa Y, Bhatia V et al. A first report of tumor cell implantation after EMR in a patient with rectosigmoid cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 1117-1118
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar