Cardiac Remodeling Following Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair – Initial Results Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose: Percutaneous mitral valve repair with the MitraClip device (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, California, USA) is a novel therapeutic option in patients with mitral regurgitation. This study evaluated the feasibility of cardiac volume measurements by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) to assess reverse myocardial remodeling in patients after MitraClip implantation.

Materials and Methods: 12 patients underwent CMR at baseline (BL) before and at 6 months follow-up (FU) after MitraClip implantation. Cine-CMR was performed in short- and long-axes for the assessment of left ventricular (LV), right ventricular (RV) and left atrial (LA) volumes.

Results: Assessment of endocardial contours was not compromised by the device-related artifact. No significant differences in observer variances were observed for LV, RV and LA volume measurements between BL and FU. LV end-diastolic (median 127 [IQR 96 – 150] vs. 112 [86 – 150] ml/m²; p = 0.03) and LV end-systolic (82 [54 – 91] vs. 69 [48 – 99] ml/m²; p = 0.03) volume indices decreased significantly from BL to FU. No significant differences were found for RV end-diastolic (94 [75 – 103] vs. 99 [77 – 123] ml/m²; p = 0.91), RV end-systolic (48 [42 – 80] vs. 51 [40 – 81] ml/m²; p = 0.48), and LA (87 [55 – 124] vs. 92 [48 – 137] ml/m²; p = 0.20) volume indices between BL and FU.

Conclusion: CMR enables the assessment of cardiac volumes in patients after MitraClip implantation. Our CMR findings indicate that percutaneous mitral valve repair results in reverse LV but not in RV or LA remodeling.

Key points:

• Volume measurements by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging are feasible following percutaneous mitral valve repair despite device-related artifacts.

• A significant reduction of left ventricular volume was found in terms of beneficial, reverse left ventricular remodeling after 6-month follow-up.

• No significant reduction was found in right ventricular or left atrial volumes after percutaneous mitral valve repair after 6-month follow-up.

Citation Format:

• Radunski UK, Franzen O, Barmeyer A et al. Cardiac Remodeling Following Percutaneous Mitral Valve Repair – Initial Results Assessed by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2014; 186: 951 – 958

Zusammenfassung

Ziel: Die perkutane Mitralklappenrekonstruktion mittels MitraClip (Abbott Vascular, Redwood City, Kalifornien, USA) stellt ein neues therapeutisches Verfahren dar bei Patienten mit Mitralklappeninsuffizienz. In dieser Studie wurde die Machbarkeit der Volumetrie mittels kardialer Magnetresonanztomografie (MRT) zur Beurteilung eines kardialen Remodelings bei Patienten nach MitraClip-Implantation untersucht.

Material und Methoden: Zwölf Patienten wurden vor sowie sechs Monate nach MitraClip-Implantation mittels kardialer MRT untersucht. Zur Beurteilung von linksventrikulärem (LV), rechtsventrikulärem (RV) und linksatrialem (LA) Volumen wurden Cine-MRT-Sequenzen in Kurzachsenschichten und Langachsenschichten durchgeführt.

Ergebnisse: Durch die perkutane Mitralklappenrekonstruktion bedingte Artefakte schränkten die Abgrenzbarkeit der endokardialen Konturen nicht ein. Es zeigten sich keine signifikanten Unterschiede in den Untersucherabweichungen der Messungen von LV-, RV- und LA-Volumen vor und nach MitraClip-Implantation. Hinsichtlich der Indices von enddiastolischem LV-Volumen (Median 127 [IQR 96 – 150] vs. 112 [IQR 86 – 150] ml/m²; p = 0,03) und endsystolischem LV Volumen (Median 82 [IQR 54 – 91] vs. 69 [IQR 48 – 99] ml/m²; p = 0,03) zeigte sich jeweils eine signifikante Reduktion nach 6 Monaten im Vergleich zur Erstuntersuchung. Es konnten keine signifikanten Veränderungen der Indices von enddiastolischem RV-Volumen (94 [75 – 103] vs. 99 [77 – 123] ml/m², p = 0,91), endsystolischem RV-Volumen (48 [42 – 80] vs. 51 [40 – 81] ml/m² p = 0,48) und LA-Volumen (87 [55 – 124] vs. 92 [48 – 137] ml/m², p = 0,20) 6 Monate nach MitraClip-Implantation nachgewiesen werden.

Schlussfolgerung: Die kardiale Magnetresonanztomografie erlaubt die Beurteilung kardialer Volumina bei Patienten nach MitraClip-Implantation. Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darüber hinaus auf ein reverses linksventrikuläres, nicht aber rechtsventrikuläres oder linksatriales Remodeling nach perkutaner Mitralklappenrekonstruktion hin.

Kernaussagen:

• Die kardiale Volumetrie mittels kardialer Magnetresonanztomografie ist nach MitraClip-Implantation trotz Artefakten machbar.

• Es ließ sich eine signifikante Reduktion der linksventrikulären Volumina 6 Monate nach perkutaner Mitralklappenrekonstruktion im Sinne eines günstigen, reversen Remodelings nachweisen.

• Signifikante Veränderungen der rechtsventrikulären oder linksatrialen Volumina ließen sich 6 Monate nach perkutaner Mitralklappenrekonstruktion nicht nachweisen.

• References

• 1 Trichon BH, Felker GM, Shaw LK et al. Relation of frequency and severity of mitral regurgitation to survival among patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2003; 91: 538-543
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Bonow RO, Masoudi FA, Rumsfeld JS et al. ACC/AHA classification of care metrics: performance measures and quality metrics: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures. Circulation 2008; 118: 2662-2666
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Alfieri O, Maisano F, De Bonis M et al. The double-orifice technique in mitral valve repair: a simple solution for complex problems. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001; 122: 674-681
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Feldman T, Wasserman HS, Herrmann HC et al. Percutaneous mitral valve repair using the edge-to-edge technique: six-month results of the EVEREST Phase I Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2005; 46: 2134-2140
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Feldman T, Foster E, Glower DD et al. Percutaneous repair or surgery for mitral regurgitation. N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 1395-1406
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Rudolph V, Knap M, Franzen O et al. Echocardiographic and clinical outcomes of MitraClip therapy in patients not amenable to surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: 2190-2195
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Achenbach S, Barkhausen J, Beer M et al. Konsensusempfehlungen der DRG/DGK/DPGK zum Einsatz der Herzbildgebung mit Computertomographie und Magnetresonanztomographie. Rofo 2012; 184: 345-368
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. Circulation 2010; 121: 2462-2508
  Google Scholar
• 9 Zoghbi WA, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E et al. Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2003; 16: 777-802
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Foster E, Wasserman HS, Gray W et al. Quantitative assessment of severity of mitral regurgitation by serial echocardiography in a multicenter clinical trial of percutaneous mitral valve repair. Am J Cardiol 2007; 100: 1577-1583
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD et al. Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 35
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Heiberg E, Sjogren J, Ugander M et al. Design and validation of Segment--freely available software for cardiovascular image analysis. BMC Med Imaging 2010; 10: 1
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification. Eur J Echocardiogr 2006; 7: 79-108
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Dubois D, Dubois EF. A formula to estimate the approximate surface area if height and weight are known. Arch Intern Med 1916; 17: 863-871
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Altiok E, Paetsch I, Jahnke C et al. Percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair: assessment of immediate post-procedural treatment effect using color 3-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58: e21
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Francis JM et al. Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005; 7: 775-782
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Luijnenburg SE, Robbers-Visser D, Moelker A et al. Intra-observer and interobserver variability of biventricular function, volumes and mass in patients with congenital heart disease measured by CMR imaging. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2009; 26: 57-64
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Mooij CF, de Wit CJ, Graham DA et al. Reproducibility of MRI measurements of right ventricular size and function in patients with normal and dilated ventricles. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008; 28: 67-73
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Robbers-Visser D, Boersma E, Helbing WA. Normal biventricular function, volumes, and mass in children aged 8 to 17 years. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009; 29: 552-559
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M et al. Reference right ventricular systolic and diastolic function normalized to age, gender and body surface area from steady-state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2879-2888
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Winter MM, Bernink FJ, Groenink M et al. Evaluating the systemic right ventricle by CMR: the importance of consistent and reproducible delineation of the cavity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2008; 10: 40
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Sievers B, Kirchberg S, Addo M et al. Assessment of left atrial volumes in sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation using the biplane area-length method and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging with TrueFISP. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2004; 6: 855-863
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Grothues F, Welte T, Grote HJ et al. Floating aortic thrombus in systemic aspergillosis and detection by transesophageal echocardiography. Crit Care Med 2002; 30: 2355-2358
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Jenkins C, Bricknell K, Chan J et al. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional echocardiography with sequential magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating left ventricular volume and ejection fraction over time in patients with healed myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2007; 99: 300-306
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Perry GJ, Wei CC, Hankes GH et al. Angiotensin II receptor blockade does not improve left ventricular function and remodeling in subacute mitral regurgitation in the dog. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 1374-1379
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Ross Jr J. Afterload mismatch in aortic and mitral valve disease: implications for surgical therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1985; 5: 811-826
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Gaasch WH, Meyer TE. Left ventricular response to mitral regurgitation: implications for management. Circulation 2008; 118: 2298-303
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Jurcut R, Giusca S, La Gerche A et al. The echocardiographic assessment of the right ventricle: what to do in 2010?. Eur J Echocardiogr 2010; 11: 81-96
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Tsang TS, Barnes ME, Gersh BJ et al. Left atrial volume as a morphophysiologic expression of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction and relation to cardiovascular risk burden. Am J Cardiol 2002; 90: 1284-1289
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Anne W, Willems R, Roskams T et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and atrial remodeling in patients with mitral valve disease and atrial fibrillation. Cardiovasc Res 2005; 67: 655-666
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Kuppahally SS, Akoum N, Burgon NS et al. Left atrial strain and strain rate in patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation: relationship to left atrial structural remodeling detected by delayed-enhancement MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3: 231-239
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Verheule S, Wilson E, Everett T et al. Alterations in atrial electrophysiology and tissue structure in a canine model of chronic atrial dilatation due to mitral regurgitation. Circulation 2003; 107: 2615-2622
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Borg AN, Pearce KA, Williams SG et al. Left atrial function and deformation in chronic primary mitral regurgitation. Eur J Echocardiogr 2009; 10: 833-840
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Oakes RS, Badger TJ, Kholmovski EG et al. Detection and quantification of left atrial structural remodeling with delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in patients with atrial fibrillation. Circulation 2009; 119: 1758-1767
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Wijffels MC, Kirchhof CJ, Dorland R et al. Atrial fibrillation begets atrial fibrillation. A study in awake chronically instrumented goats. Circulation 1995; 92: 1954-1968
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar