Int J Sports Med 2013; 34(06): 497-501
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1327661
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Measurement Accuracy of Heart Rate and Respiratory Rate during Graded Exercise and Sustained Exercise in the Heat Using the Zephyr BioHarnessTM

J.-H. Kim
1   NPPTL/NIOSH/CDC, Technology Research Branch, Pittsburgh, United States
,
R. Roberge
1   NPPTL/NIOSH/CDC, Technology Research Branch, Pittsburgh, United States
,
J. B. Powell
1   NPPTL/NIOSH/CDC, Technology Research Branch, Pittsburgh, United States
,
A. B. Shafer
2   Exercise Science, Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh, United States
,
W. Jon Williams
3   NIOSH/CDC, Technology Research Branch, Pittsburhg, United States
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 13 September 2012

Publication Date:
22 November 2012 (online)

Abstract

The Zephyr BioHarnessTM was tested to determine the accuracy of heart rate (HR) and respiratory rate (RR) measurements during 2 exercise protocols in conjunction with either a laboratory metabolic cart (Vmax) or a previously validated portable metabolic system (K4b2). In one protocol, HR and RR were measured using the BioHarness and Vmax during a graded exercise up to V˙O2max (n=12). In another protocol, HR and RR were measured using the BH and K4b2 during sustained exercise (30% and 50% V˙O2max for 20 min each) in a hot environment (30 °C, 50% relative humidity) (n=6). During the graded exercise, HR but not RR, obtained from the BioHarness was higher compared to the Vmax at baseline and 30% V˙O2max (p<0.05), but showed no significant difference at other stages with high correlation coefficients for both HR (r=0.87–0.96) and RR (r=0.90–0.99 above 30% V˙O2max). During the exercise in the heat, there were no significant differences between the BioHarness and K4b2 system. Correlation coefficients between the methods were low for HR but moderately to highly correlated (0.49–0.99) for RR. In conclusion, the BioHarness is comparable to Vmax and K4b2 over a wide range of V˙O2 during graded exercise and sustained exercise in the heat.

 
  • References

  • 1 Adams W. Measurement of breathing rate and volume in routinely performed daily activities. California Environmental protection Agency Air Resource Board Research Division Contract No, A033-205. Available from: http://www,arb,ca,gov/research/apr/past/a033-205.pdf Accessed on November 14, 2011. 1993
  • 2 Al-Khalidi F, Saatchi R, Burke D, Elphick H, Tan S. Respiration rate monitoring methods: A review. Ped Pulmonol 2011; 46: 523-529
  • 3 Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res 1999; 8: 135-160
  • 4 Caruana-Montaldo B, Gleeson K, Zwillich CW. The control of breathing in clinical practice. Chest 2000; 117: 205-225
  • 5 Coca A, Roberge RJ, Williams WJ, Landsittel DP, Powell JB, Palmiero A. Physiological monitoring in firefighter ensembles: wearable plethysmographic sensor vest versus standard equipment. J Occup Environ Hyg 2010; 7: 109-114
  • 6 Cubitt C. Zephyr Technology Premarketing Notification Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/cdrh_docs/pdf10/K100040.pdf Accessed on September 6, 2011 2009;
  • 7 Dodds D, Purdy J, Moulton C. The PEP transducer: a new way of measuring respiratory rate in the non-intubated patient. J Accid Emerg Med 1999; 16: 26-28
  • 8 Hailstone J, Kilding AE. Reliability and validity of the Zephyr BioHarness to measure respiratory responses to exercise. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2011; 15: 293-300
  • 9 Harriss D, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
  • 10 Larsson C, Staun P. Evaluation of a new fibre-optical monitor for respiratory rate monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput 1999; 15: 295-298
  • 11 Lee CM, Gorelick M, Mendoza A. Accuracy of an infrared LED device to measure heart rate and energy expenditure during rest and exercise. J Sports Sci 2011; 29: 1645-1653
  • 12 Lovett PB, Buchwald JM, Sturmann K, Bijur P. The vexatious vital: neither clinical measurements by nurses nor an electronic monitor provides accurate measurements of respiratory rate in triage. Ann Emerg Med 2005; 45: 68-76
  • 13 McArdle W, Katch F, Katch V. Exercise Physiology: Energy, Nutrition, and Human Performance. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2001
  • 14 McLaughlin JE, King GA, Howley ET, Bassett Jr DR, Ainsworth BE. Validation of the COSMED K4 b2 portable metabolic system. Int J Sports Med 2001; 22: 280-284
  • 15 Miyamoto T, Oshima Y, Ikuta K, Kinoshita H. The heart rate increase at the onset of high-work intensity exercise is accelerated by central blood volume loading. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006; 96: 86-96
  • 16 Terbizan D, Dolezal B, Albano C. Validity of seven commercially available heart rate monitors. Meas Phys Educ Exerc Sci 2002; 6: 243-247
  • 17 West BJ, Griffin LA, Frederick HJ, Moon RE. The independently fractal nature of respiration and heart rate during exercise under normobaric and hyperbaric conditions. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2005; 145: 219-233
  • 18 Witt JD, Fisher JR, Guenette JA, Cheong KA, Wilson BJ, Sheel AW. Measurement of exercise ventilation by a portable respiratory inductive plethysmograph. Respir Physiol Neurobiol 2006; 154: 389-395