Semin Neurol 2008; 28(4): 395-406
DOI: 10.1055/s-0028-1083697
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques: fMRI, DWI, and PWI

Samantha J. Holdsworth1 , Roland Bammer1
  • 1Lucas MRS/I Center, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 October 2008 (online)

ABSTRACT

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a noninvasive technique which can acquire important quantitative and anatomical information from an individual in any plane or volume at comparatively high resolution. Over the past several years, developments in scanner hardware and software have enabled the acquisition of fast MRI imaging, proving extremely useful in various clinical and research applications such as in brain mapping or functional MRI (fMRI), perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). These techniques have revolutionized the use of MRI in the clinics, providing great insight into physiologic mechanisms and pathologic conditions. Since these relatively new areas of MRI have relied on fast scanning techniques, they have only recently been widely introduced to clinical sites. As such, this review article is devoted to the technological aspects of these techniques, as well as their roles and limitations in neuroimaging applications.

REFERENCES

  • 1 Ogawa S, Lee T M, Nayak A S, Glynn P. Oxygenation-sensitive contrast in magnetic resonance image of rodent brain at high magnetic fields.  Magn Reson Med. 1990;  14 68-78
  • 2 Crank J. The Mathematics of Diffusion. New York, NY; Oxford University Press 1956
  • 3 Basser P J, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo.  J Magn Reson B. 1994;  103 247-254
  • 4 Basser P J. Inferring microstructural features and the physiological state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images.  NMR Biomed. 1995;  8(7–8) 333-344
  • 5 Moseley M E, Kucharczyk J, Mintorovitch J et al.. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of acute stroke: correlation with T2-weighted and magnetic susceptibility-enhanced MR imaging in cats.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1990;  11 423-429
  • 6 Lansberg M G, Norbash A M, Marks M P et al.. Advantages of adding diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging to conventional magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating acute stroke.  Arch Neurol. 2000;  57 1311-1316
  • 7 Warach S, Chien D, Li W, Ronthal M, Edelman R R. Fast magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging of acute human stroke.  Neurology. 1992;  42 1717-1723
  • 8 Skare S, Andersson J L. On the effects of gating in diffusion imaging of the brain using single shot EPI.  Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;  19 1125-1128
  • 9 Poncelet B P, Wedeen V J, Weisskoff R M, Cohen M S. Brain parenchyma motion: measurement with cine echo-planar MR imaging.  Radiology. 1992;  185 645-651
  • 10 Butts K, de Crespigny A, Pauly J M, Moseley M. Diffusion-weighted interleaved echo-planar imaging with a pair of orthogonal navigator echoes.  Magn Reson Med. 1996;  35 763-770
  • 11 Baird A E, Warach S. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute stroke.  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1998;  18 583-609 , Published erratum appears in J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998 Oct;18(10):preceding 1047
  • 12 Calamante F, Thomas D L, Pell G S, Wiersma J, Turner R. Measuring cerebral blood flow using magnetic resonance imaging techniques.  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999;  19 701-735
  • 13 Barber P A, Davis S M, Darby D G et al.. Absent middle cerebral artery flow predicts the presence and evolution of the ischemic penumbra.  Neurology. 1999;  52 1125-1132
  • 14 Ostergaard L, Sorensen A G, Kwong K K et al.. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part II: Experimental comparison and preliminary results.  Magn Reson Med. 1996;  36 726-736
  • 15 Ostergaard L, Weisskoff R M, Chesler D A, Gyldensted C, Rosen B R. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I: Mathematical approach and statistical analysis.  Magn Reson Med. 1996;  36 715-725
  • 16 Calamante F, Gadian D G, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition.  Magn Reson Med. 2000;  44 466-473
  • 17 Sorensen A G, Buonanno F S, Gonzalez R G et al.. Hyperacute stroke: evaluation with combined multisection diffusion-weighted and hemodynamically weighted echo-planar MR imaging.  Radiology. 1996;  199 391-401
  • 18 Beaulieu C, de Crespigny A, Tong D C et al.. Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of perfusion and diffusion in stroke: evolution of lesion volume and correlation with clinical outcome [see comments].  Ann Neurol. 1999;  46 568-578
  • 19 Barber P A, Darby D G, Desmond P M et al.. Prediction of stroke outcome with echoplanar perfusion- and diffusion-weighted MRI.  Neurology. 1998;  51 418-426
  • 20 Schlaug G, Benfield A, Baird A E et al.. The ischemic penumbra: operationally defined by diffusion and perfusion MRI.  Neurology. 1999;  53 1528-1537
  • 21 Albers G W, Thijs V N, Wechsler L et al.. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study.  Ann Neurol. 2006;  60 508-517
  • 22 Detre J A, Leigh J S, Williams D S, Koretsky A P. Perfusion imaging.  Magn Reson Med. 1992;  23 37-45
  • 23 Detre J A, Zhang W, Roberts D A et al.. Tissue-specific perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling.  NMR Biomed. 1994;  7(1–2) 75-82
  • 24 Williams D S, Detre J A, Leigh J S, Koretsky A P. Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992;  89 212-216
  • 25 Calamante F, Gadian D G, Connelly A. Quantification of perfusion using bolus tracking magnetic resonance imaging in stroke: assumptions, limitations, and potential implications for clinical use.  Stroke. 2002;  33 1146-1151

Roland BammerPh.D. 

Lucas MRS/I Center, Department of Radiology, Stanford University

1201 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305-5488

Email: rbammer@stanford.edu

    >