Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2315-7612
Original Research

Effect of Facial Feminization Surgery (FFS) on Eyelid Anatomic Features

Hanna N. Luong 
1   Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, Arizona
,
Alice S. Liu
2   Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Basel A. Sharaf
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Uldis Bite
3   Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
,
Lilly H. Wagner
4   Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Facial feminization surgery (FFS) improves gender dysphoria. The brows and eyes are crucial in perceived gender, yet brow and eyelid surgeries are relatively underutilized. This study aimed to determine rates of brow and eyelid surgeries as part of FFS and characterize pre- and postoperative periocular features. We conducted a retrospective review to identify all patients with the diagnosis of gender dysphoria who underwent FFS at a single academic institution from 2019 to 2022. Thirty-four patients comprising 38 surgical cases were included. Twelve (35%) eyelid surgeries and 27 (79%) brow lifts were performed. Baseline eyelid measurements did not differ between brow lift and nonbrow lift cases. Those undergoing brow lift and eyelid surgery were older in age (p = 0.022), had a higher rate of negative canthal tilt (p = 0.050), and smaller baseline margin-reflex distance 1 (p = 0.014) than patients who had brow lift alone. Brow lift increased tarsal platform show (p ≤ 0.001) and lash-to-brow distance (p ≤ 0.001), and upper blepharoplasty increased tarsal platform show (p = 0.01). Rates of brow lift are high at our institution, and patients are appropriately selected for eyelid surgery in FFS. Brow lift and upper blepharoplasty can feminize anatomical features when using standards described for cisgender cohorts. The impact of periocular features on gender perception in transgender patients warrants further study.

Keywords

facial feminization surgery - gender-affirming surgery - brow lift - blepharoplasty - eyelid


Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
27 April 2024

Article published online:
28 May 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Chaya BF, Berman ZP, Boczar D. et al. Current trends in facial feminization surgery: an assessment of safety and style. J Craniofac Surg 2021; 32 (07) 2366-2369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Morrison SD, Capitán-Cañadas F, Sánchez-García A. et al. Prospective quality-of-life outcomes after facial feminization surgery: an international multicenter study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020; 145 (06) 1499-1509
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Fisher M, Lu SM, Chen K, Zhang B, Di Maggio M, Bradley JP. Facial feminization surgery changes perception of patient gender. Aesthet Surg J 2020; 40 (07) 703-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Perrillat A, Coiante E, SidAhmed M, Graillon N, Hersant B, Meningaud JP. Conservative approach to facial upper third feminisation: a retrospective study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2023; 51 (02) 98-106
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Brown E, Perrett DI. What gives a face its gender?. Perception 1993; 22 (07) 829-840
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Siringo NV, Berman ZP, Boczar D. et al. Techniques and trends of facial feminization surgery: a systematic review and representative case report. Ann Plast Surg 2022; 88 (06) 704-711
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Cronin BJ, Fadich S, Lee JC. Assessing preferences of facial appearance in transgender and gender nonbinary patients. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2024; 48 (04) 621-632
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Sedgh J. The aesthetics of the upper face and brow: male and female differences. Facial Plast Surg 2018; 34 (02) 114-118
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Warren RJ. Upper blepharoplasty and brow rejuvenation in men. Clin Plast Surg 2022; 49 (02) 197-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wang TT, Wessels L, Hussain G, Merten S. Discriminative thresholds in facial asymmetry: a review of the literature. Aesthet Surg J 2017; 37 (04) 375-385
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 David AP, House AE, Targ S, Park AM, Seth R, Knott PD. Objective outcomes of trichophytic brow lift and hairline advancement in facial feminization surgery. Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med 2022; DOI: 10.1089/fpsam.2022.0136.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pansritum K. Forehead and hairline surgery for gender affirmation. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2021; 9 (03) e3486
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Prantl L, Heidekrueger PI, Broer PN, Knoll S, Thiha A, Gründl M. Female eye attractiveness - where beauty meets science. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2019; 47 (01) 73-79
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Dang BN, Hu AC, Bertrand AA. et al. Evaluation and treatment of facial feminization surgery: part I. Forehead, orbits, eyebrows, eyes, and nose. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (05) 503-510
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kurian K, Hao Y, Boczar D. et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of facial anthropometric variations among cisgender females of different ethnicities: implications for feminizing facial gender affirming surgery. J Craniofac Surg 2023; 34 (03) 949-954
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Blake CR, Lai WW, Edward DP. Racial and ethnic differences in ocular anatomy. Int Ophthalmol Clin 2003; 43 (04) 9-25
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Rhee SC, Woo KS, Kwon B. Biometric study of eyelid shape and dimensions of different races with references to beauty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2012; 36 (05) 1236-1245
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar