CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2024; 12(01): E23-E33
DOI: 10.1055/a-2204-8316
Review

Intraductal radiofrequency ablation plus biliary stent versus stent alone for malignant biliary obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
,
Diogo Turiani Hourneaux de Moura
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
,
2   Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, United States (Ringgold ID: RIN12228)
,
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
,
Rômulo Sérgio Araújo Gomes
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
,
Davi Lucena Landim
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
,
Felipe Giacobo Nunes
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
,
Tomazo Antônio Prince Franzini
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
,
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
,
Wanderley Marques Bernardo
3   Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
,
Eduardo Guimarães Hourneaux de Moura
1   Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, University of Sao Paulo Hospital of Clinics, Sao Paulo, Brazil (Ringgold ID: RIN117265)
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Background and study aims Recurrent biliary stent occlusion and tumor ingrowth remain a major concern among patients with malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) with significant impact on patient morbidity and survival. Intraductal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has emerged as a promising treatment that seeks to extend stent patency. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of RFA on overall survival (OS) and stent patency among patients with unresectable MBO.

Methods A comprehensive search of electronic databases was performed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing RFA plus biliary stent (RFA+S) versus biliary stent alone (S-alone). Outcomes assessed included overall survival, stent patency, and adverse events (AEs) with mean difference (MD) calculated from pooled proportions. Subgroup analyses were performed for hilar strictures and cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

Results Six RCTs (n=481 patients) were included and demonstrated improved survival among patients who received RFA+S (MD 85.70 days , 95% confidence interval [CI] 34.29–137.10; I2=98%; P =0.001). The pooled MD for total stent patency was 22.25 days (95% CI –17.38–61.87; I2=97%; P=0.27). There was no difference in AEs between RFA+S vs S-alone (P >0.05). On subgroup analyses, RFA+S was associated with improved stent patency (MD 79.25 days; 95% CI 50.77–107.73; I2=59%; P <0.00001) and OS (MD 83.14 (95% CI 29.52–136.77; I2=97%; P <0.01] for CCA. For hilar strictures, stent patency was improved among patients with RFA+S [MD 83.71 days (95% CI 24.85–142.56; I2=84%; P <0.01].

Conclusions RFA+S improved OS in the treatment of MBO when compared with S-alone. Moreover, the RFA therapy prolonged stent patency in hilar strictures and CCA, with similar rates of AEs.

Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 30 July 2023

Accepted after revision: 24 October 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
06 November 2023

Article published online:
05 January 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Adler D, Byrne K. Endoscopic stenting for malignant biliary obstruction. Post TW, ed UpToDate Waltham, MA: UpToDate Inc. Accessed March 05, 2023 at: https://www.uptodate.com
  • 2 Chandrasekar VT, Faigel D. Diagnosis and treatment of biliary malignancies: biopsy, cytology, cholangioscopy and stenting. Mini-invasive Surgery 2021; DOI: 10.20517/2574-1225.2021.12.
  • 3 Canakis A, Kahaleh M. Endoscopic palliation of malignant biliary obstruction. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2022; 14: 581-596 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v14.i10.581. (PMID: 36303806)
  • 4 Dumonceau JM, Tringali A, Papanikolaou IS. et al. Endoscopic biliary stenting: Indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated October 2017. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 910-930 DOI: 10.1055/a-0659-9864. (PMID: 30086596)
  • 5 Zorrón Pu L, De Moura EGH, Bernardo WM. et al. Endoscopic stenting for inoperable malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2015; 21: 13374-13385
  • 6 Yan X, Zou H, Lai Y. et al. Efficacy and safety of first-line targeted treatment and immunotherapy for patients with biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 15: 39
  • 7 Weismüller TJ. Role of intraductal RFA: a novel tool in the palliative care of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Visc Med 2021; 37: 39-47 DOI: 10.1159/000513970. (PMID: 33718482)
  • 8 Inoue T, Yoneda M. Updated evidence on the clinical impact of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Digest Endosc 2022; 34: 345-358 DOI: 10.1111/den.14059. (PMID: 34107114)
  • 9 Sharaiha RZ, Natov N, Glockenberg KS. et al. Comparison of metal stenting with radiofrequency ablation versus stenting alone for treating malignant biliary strictures: Is there an added benefit?. Dig Dis Sci 2014; 59: 3099-310
  • 10 Liang H, Peng Z, Cao L. et al. Metal stenting with or without endobiliary radiofrequency ablation for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Cancer Ther 2015; 06: 981-992
  • 11 Oh D, Chong J, Song TJ. et al. The usefulness of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation before metal stent placement in unresectable malignant hilar obstruction. J Gastroenter Hepatol (Australia) 2022; DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15967.
  • 12 Xia MX, Wang SP, Yuan JG. et al. Effect of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation on the survival of patients with inoperable malignant biliary strictures: A large cohort study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022; 29: 693-702
  • 13 Inoue T, Naitoh I, Kitano R. et al. Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation combined with gemcitabine and cisplatin in patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Curr Oncology 2022; 29: 2240-2251
  • 14 Qumseya BJ, Jamil LH, Elmunzer BJ. et al. ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the management of malignant hilar obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 222-234.e22
  • 15 Nakai Y, Isayama H, Wang HP. et al. International consensus statements for endoscopic management of distal biliary stricture. J Gastroenterol Hepatol (Australia) 2020; 35: 967-979 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.14955. (PMID: 31802537)
  • 16 Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M. et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Revista Espanola de Nutricion Humana y Dietetica 2016; 20: 148-160 DOI: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1. (PMID: 25554246)
  • 17 GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool Software. McMaster University and Evidence Prime, 2023. Accessed January 01, 2000 at: https://gradepro.org
  • 18 The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan) Computer program. Version 5.4. 2020 DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_158_21
  • 19 Yang J, Wang J, Zhou H. et al. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A randomized trial. Endoscopy 2018; 50: 751-760 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-124870. (PMID: 29342492)
  • 20 Kang H, Chung MJ, Cho IR. et al. Efficacy and safety of palliative endobiliary radiofrequency ablation using a novel temperature-controlled catheter for malignant biliary stricture: a single-center prospective randomized phase II TRIAL. Surg Endosc 2021; 35: 63-73 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07689-z. (PMID: 32488654)
  • 21 Gao DJ, Yang JF, Ma SR. et al. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus plastic stent placement versus stent placement alone for unresectable extrahepatic biliary cancer: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 94: 91-100.e2
  • 22 Andrasina T, Rohan T, Panek J. et al. The combination of endoluminal radiofrequency ablation and metal stent implantation for the treatment of malignant biliary stenosis - Randomized study. Eur J Radiol 2021; 142 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109830. (PMID: 34230002)
  • 23 Kang H, Han SY, Cho JH. et al. Efficacy and safety of temperature-controlled intraductal radiofrequency ablation in advanced malignant hilar biliary obstruction: A pilot multicenter randomized comparative trial. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022; 29: 469-478 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1082. (PMID: 34800357)
  • 24 Albers D, Schmidt A, Schiemer M. et al. Impact of endobiliary radiofrequency ablation on biliary drainage in patients with malignant biliary strictures treated with uncovered self-expandable metal stents: a randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2022; DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2022.05.022.
  • 25 Hu B, Gao D-J, Zhang X. et al. 21 Endobiliary radiofrequency ablation improve overall survival of cholangiocarcinoma: a multi-center randomized control study. Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 83: AB126
  • 26 Yang J, Wang J, Zhou H. et al. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus a novel oral 5-fluorouracil compound versus radiofrequency ablation alone for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 92: 1204-1212.e1
  • 27 Cha BH, Jang MJ, Lee SH. Survival benefit of intraductal radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Clin Endosc 2021; 54: 100-106 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2020.254. (PMID: 33445841)
  • 28 Sofi AA, Khan MA, Das A. et al. Radiofrequency ablation combined with biliary stent placement versus stent placement alone for malignant biliary strictures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2018; 87: 944-951.e1
  • 29 Song S, Jin H, Cheng Q. et al. Local palliative therapies for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: radiofrequency ablation combined with stent or biliary stent alone? An updated meta-analysis of nineteen trials. Surg Endosc 2022; 36: 5559-5570 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09181-2. (PMID: 35296949)
  • 30 Khizar H, Hu Y, Wu Y. et al. Efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation plus stent versus stent-alone treatments for malignant biliary strictures. J Clin Gastroenterol 2023; 57: 335-345 DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001810. (PMID: 36628465)
  • 31 Zheng X, Bo ZY, Wan W. et al. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation may be preferable in the management of malignant biliary obstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dig Dis 2016; 17: 716-724 DOI: 10.1111/1751-2980.12429. (PMID: 27768835)
  • 32 Kanno Y, Ito K, Nakahara K. et al. Suprapapillary placement of plastic versus metal stents for malignant biliary hilar obstructions: A multicenter randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2023; DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.03.007.
  • 33 Kovács N, Pécsi D, Sipos Z. et al. Suprapapillary biliary stents have longer patency times than transpapillary stents – a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 2023; 12: 898 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12030898.