Serious Complications of the Percutaneous A1 Pulley Release: Case Reports and Literature Review

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Percutaneous first annular pulley (A1 pulley) release, which has been increasingly used to treat trigger fingers, has been widely established as a safe and simple procedure. Multiple studies have reported positive results of percutaneous A1 pulley release. In this study, however, we report cases of patients who developed complications after undergoing percutaneous A1 pulley release at local clinics. A total of six patients visited our hospital for infectious complications after percutaneous A1 pulley release. Various sequelae such as damage to normal structures, insufficient procedure, and tissue necrosis were observed during the exploration. A retrospective study was conducted to identify the cause and trend of the observed complications by instruments (HAKI knife or needle). In the HAKI knife group, there was a tendency for damage to normal structures, while in the needle group, an insufficient release or serious soft tissue necrosis was observed. Based on these cases, our findings confirm the existence and characteristics of infectious complications following the percutaneous A1 pulley release. We further identify that the type of instrument used predicts the nature of complications. Thus, reliable and skilled performance of the procedure by experts is essential for safe treatment.

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization: D.C.L., Data curation: H.H.L., K.J.L.

Methodology: J.S.K., S.Y.R., Writing - original draft: H.H.L.

Writing - review & editing: D.C.L., S.H.K.

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Board of our hospital (IRB no. KIRB 2022-N-005), and informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the procedure.

Patient Consent

Written and informed consent was obtained from patients.

Publication History

Received: 04 April 2023

Accepted: 19 September 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
21 September 2023

Article published online:
07 February 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Jou IM, Chern TC. Sonographically assisted percutaneous release of the A1 pulley: a new surgical technique for treating trigger digit. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31 (02) 191-199
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Cebesoy O, Kose KC, Baltaci ET, Isik M. Percutaneous release of the trigger thumb: is it safe, cheap and effective?. Int Orthop 2007; 31 (03) 345-349
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Pope DF, Wolfe SW, Scott W. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous trigger finger release. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20 (02) 280-283
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Gilberts EC, Beekman WH, Stevens HJ, Wereldsma JC. Prospective randomized trial of open versus percutaneous surgery for trigger digits. J Hand Surg Am 2001; 26 (03) 497-500
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Lorthioir Jr J. Surgical treatment of trigger-finger by a subcutaneous method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1958; 40-A (04) 793-795
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Eastwood DM, Gupta KJ, Johnson DP. Percutaneous release of the trigger finger: an office procedure. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17 (01) 114-117
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Abdoli A, Asadian M, Banadaky SHS, Sarram R. A cadaveric assessment of percutaneous trigger finger release with 15° stab knife: its effectiveness and complications. J Orthop Surg Res 2021; 16 (01) 426
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Hoang D, Lin AC, Essilfie A. et al. Evaluation of percutaneous first annular pulley release: efficacy and complications in a perfused cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 2016; 41 (07) e165-e173
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Ha KI, Park MJ, Ha CW. Percutaneous release of trigger digits. A technique and using a specially designed knife. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2001; 2001 (83-B): 75-77
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 10 Qiu Z, Li H, Shen Y. et al. Safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release using a needle knife: an anatomical study. Front Surg 2022; 9: 967400
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Aksoy A, Sir E. Complications of percutaneous release of the trigger finger. Cureus 2019; 11 (02) e4132
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Safa B, Lee DC, Park J. et al. Reconstruction of digit soft tissue defects with the fourth common digital artery perforator flap. J Hand Surg Am 2022; 47 (11) 1115.e1-1115.e7
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Park K-H, Jung J-U, Yang S-W. et al. A prospective study of bowstringing after a1 pulley release of trigger thumb: percutaneous versus open technique. Arch Hand Microsurg 2018; 23 (01) 20-27
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 14 Bamroongshawgasame T. A comparison of open and percutaneous pulley release in trigger digits. J Med Assoc Thai 2010; 93 (02) 199-204
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Lee SH, Choi YC, Kang HJ. Comparative study of ultrasonography-guided percutaneous A1 pulley release versus blinded percutaneous A1 pulley release. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2018; 26 (02) 2309499018772368
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Phillips CS, Falender R, Mass DP. The flexor synovial sheath anatomy of the little finger: a macroscopic study. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20 (04) 636-641
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Chan E, Robertson BF, Johnson SM. Kanavel signs of flexor sheath infection: a cautionary tale. Br J Gen Pract 2019; 69 (683) 315-316
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Bain GI, Turnbull J, Charles MN, Roth JH, Richards RS. Percutaneous A1 pulley release: a cadaveric study. J Hand Surg Am 1995; 20 (05) 781-784 , discussion 785–786
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar