Hand Reconstruction Using Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap by Terminal Perforator-to-Digital Artery Anastomosis: Retrospective Analysis

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze cases of anterolateral thigh (ALT) free flap used for hand reconstruction with terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis. Patients who underwent ALT free flap placement with terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis for hand reconstruction between January 2011 and August 2021 were included. The number, length, and diameter of the perforators and veins, flap size, and operative time were investigated through a retrospective review of charts and photographs. The occurrences of arterial thrombosis, venous thrombosis, arterial spasm, and flap necrosis were analyzed. In total, 50 patients were included in this study. The mean diameter and length of the perforators were 0.68 mm and 3.25 cm, respectively, and the mean number of veins anastomosed was 1.88, with a mean diameter of 0.54 mm. Complications included four cases of arterial thrombosis, one case of venous thrombosis, seven cases of partial necrosis, and one case of total flap failure. Regression analysis showed that a longer perforator was associated with arterial thrombosis whereas larger flap size and number of anastomosed veins were associated with partial necrosis (p < 0.05). The terminal perforator-to-digital artery anastomosis offers advantages in using compact free flaps with short pedicle lengths to cover small hand defects.

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization: J.S.K.

Data curation: H.H.L. and K.J.L.

Formal analysis: H.H.L.

Methodology: S.Y.R.

Writing – original draft: H.H.L. and D.C.L.

Writing – review & editing: S.H.K.

Ethical Approval

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Review Board of our hospital (IRB no. KIRB 2023-N-001), and informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to the procedure.

Patient Consent

Written and informed consent was obtained from patient.

Publication History

Received: 19 May 2023

Accepted: 26 August 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
29 August 2023

Article published online:
07 February 2024

© 2024. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

• References

• 1 Holm A, Zachariae L. Fingertip lesions. An evaluation of conservative treatment versus free skin grafting. Acta Orthop Scand 1974; 45 (03) 382-392
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Kozin ED, Sethi RK, Herr M. et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between the supraclavicular artery island flap and fasciocutaneous free flap. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016; 154 (01) 66-72
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Doh G, Kim B, Lee D. et al. Hemodynamic principles in free tissue transfer: Vascular changes at the anastomosis site. Arch Hand Microsurg 2021; 26: 285-292
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 4 Valdatta L, Tuinder S, Buoro M, Thione A, Faga A, Putz R. Lateral circumflex femoral arterial system and perforators of the anterolateral thigh flap: an anatomic study. Ann Plast Surg 2002; 49 (02) 145-150
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Yang JW, Kim JS, Lee DC. et al. The radial artery superficial palmar branch flap: a modified free thenar flap with constant innervation. J Reconstr Microsurg 2010; 26 (08) 529-538
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Lee DC, Kim JS, Ki SH, Roh SY, Yang JW, Chung KC. Partial second toe pulp free flap for fingertip reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (03) 899-907
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Min K, Hong JP, Suh HP. Risk factors for partial flap loss in a free flap: a 12-year retrospective study of anterolateral thigh free flaps in 303 lower extremity cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2022; 150 (05) 1071e-1081e
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Velazquez-Mujica J, Losco L, Aksoyler D, Chen HC. Perforator-to-perforator anastomosis as a salvage procedure during harvest of a perforator flap. Arch Plast Surg 2021; 48 (04) 467-469
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Diaz-Abele J, Hayakawa T, Buchel E. et al. Anastomosis to the common and proper digital vessels in free flap soft tissue reconstruction of the hand. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (01) 21-25
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Hong MK, Park J, Koh SH. et al. Analysis of outcomes of tamai zone I digital replantation in cases of severe crushing injury. Arch Hand Microsurg 2020; 25: 297-303
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 11 Hattori Y, Doi K, Sakamoto S, Yamasaki H, Wahegaonkar A, Addosooki A. Fingertip replantation. J Hand Surg Am 2007; 32 (04) 548-555
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Masoomi H, Clark EG, Paydar KZ. et al. Predictive risk factors of free flap thrombosis in breast reconstruction surgery. Microsurgery 2014; 34 (08) 589-594
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Lese I, Biedermann R, Constantinescu M, Grobbelaar AO, Olariu R. Predicting risk factors that lead to free flap failure and vascular compromise: a single unit experience with 565 free tissue transfers. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2021; 74 (03) 512-522
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Biben JA, Atmodiwirjo P. Free flap thrombosis in patients with hypercoagulability: a systematic review. Arch Plast Surg 2019; 46 (06) 572-579
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Chang EI, Zhang H, Liu J, Yu P, Skoracki RJ, Hanasono MM. Analysis of risk factors for flap loss and salvage in free flap head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck 2016; 38 (Suppl. 01) E771-E775
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Venkatramani H, Sabapathy SR. Fingertip replantation: technical considerations and outcome analysis of 24 consecutive fingertip replantations. Indian J Plast Surg 2011; 44 (02) 237-245
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Suyama Y, Yagi S, Fukuoka K. et al. Risk factors of free flap complications in reconstruction for head and neck cancer. Yonago Acta Med 2022; 65 (03) 215-225
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Acland R. Thrombus formation in microvascular surgery: an experimental study of the effects of surgical trauma. Surgery 1973; 73 (05) 766-771
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Bentz ML, Sheppeck RA, Macpherson T. et al. Vasospasm and platelet deposition in human arteries: effects of topical methylene blue. Plast Reconstr Surg 1991; 88 (05) 851-859
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Johnson PC, Barker JH. Thrombosis and antithrombotic therapy in microvascular surgery. Clin Plast Surg 1992; 19 (04) 799-807
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Morris SF, Tang M, Almutari K, Geddes C, Yang D. The anatomic basis of perforator flaps. Clin Plast Surg 2010; 37 (04) 553-570, xi -xi.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Matthews JLK, Alolabi N, Farrokhyar F, Voineskos SH. One versus 2 venous anastomoses in free flap surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2018; 26 (02) 91-98
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Saint-Cyr M, Wong C, Schaverien M, Mojallal A, Rohrich RJ. The perforasome theory: vascular anatomy and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124 (05) 1529-1544
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Suondoh MS, Sulaiman WAW, Halim AS. et al. Distribution of anterolateral thigh flap perforator vessels and its clinical applications in Malaysian population. Arch Hand Microsurg 2020; 25: 219-224
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 25 Wei FC, Mardini S. Free-style free flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 114 (04) 910-916
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar