The Influence of Age on Eye Movements during Reading in Early Elementary School Children

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose Eye movement disorders have been observed in many eye diseases, such as amblyopia and developmental dyslexia. The detection of pathological eye movement behaviour is difficult and requires more data for comparison. Therefore, the main purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of age, school level, gender, and mother tongue on eye movements while reading.

Methods One hundred and twenty-seven normally sighted children aged 7 – 12 were recruited from grades 2 – 5. The children were asked to read aloud two texts of The New International Reading Speed Text (IReST) of similar difficulty. Eye movements while reading were recorded by eyetracking technology (SMI RED 250, SensoMotoric Instruments, Teltow, Germany). The eye movement parameters were obtained from 118 children, and reading speed (words/minute), number of saccades, number of fixations, reading errors, and influence of school grade were analyzed.

Results We showed a significant influence of age in all eye movement parameters. The main finding of this study is that younger children performed more saccades, a higher number of fixations per word, and more reading errors while taking more time to read the text than older children in higher grades. In early grades, non-native German speakers read more slowly and performed more saccades and fixations, but no more differences were seen by grade 5. Overall, there was no significant influence of gender or school system on reading parameters.

Conclusion This study highlights the need for an age-appropriate normative database for eye movements during reading.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund Augenbewegungsstörungen wurden bei vielen Augenkrankheiten beobachtet, z. B. bei Amblyopie und Legasthenie. Der Nachweis eines pathologischen Augenbewegungsmusters ist schwierig und erfordert mehr Normwerte zum Vergleich. Daher war das Hauptziel dieser Studie, den Einfluss von Alter, Schulstufe, Geschlecht und Muttersprache auf die Augenbewegungen beim Lesen zu untersuchen.

Methode Insgesamt wurden 127 Primarschulkinder (2. – 5. Klasse) im Alter von 7 – 12 Jahren untersucht. Die Kinder wurden gebeten, zwei Texte des New International Reading Speed Texts (IReST) mit ähnlichem Schwierigkeitsgrad laut vorzulesen. Die Augenbewegungen während des Lesens wurden mit der Eye-Tracking-Technologie (SMI RED 250, SensoMotoric Instruments, Teltow, Deutschland) aufgezeichnet. Die Augenbewegungsparameter von 118 Kindern wurden analysiert in Bezug auf die Lesegeschwindigkeit (Wörter/Minute), Anzahl der Sakkaden und Fixationen, Lesefehler und Einfluss der Schulstufe.

Ergebnis Wir konnten einen signifikanten Einfluss des Alters auf alle Augenbewegungsparameter nachweisen. Das Hauptergebnis dieser Studie ist, dass jüngere Kinder mehr Sakkaden, eine höhere Anzahl von Fixationen pro Wort und mehr Lesefehler zeigten, sowie mehr Zeit zum Lesen des Textes benötigten als ältere Kinder in höheren Klassenstufen. In den ersten Klassenstufen lasen Nichtmuttersprachler langsamer und führten mehr Sakkaden und Fixationen aus, aber in der fünften Klasse wurden keine Unterschiede mehr festgestellt. Insgesamt zeigte sich kein signifikanter Einfluss des Geschlechts oder des Schulsystems auf die Leseparameter.

Diskussion Diese Studie veranschaulicht den Bedarf an altersgerechten normativen Daten zur Beurteilung von Augenbewegungen beim Lesen.

Publication History

Received: 28 July 2022

Accepted: 14 February 2023

Article published online:
25 April 2023

© 2023. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Cain K. Reading Development and Difficulties: An Introduction. BPS Textbooks in Psychology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010
  Google Scholar
• 2 Rayner K. The role of eye movements in learning to read and reading disability. Remed Spec Educ 1985; 6: 53-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Erdmann B, Dodge R. Psychologische Untersuchungen über das Lesen auf experimenteller Grundlage. Zeitschrift für Psychologie und Physiologie der Sinnesorgane 1898; 358-366
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing. Psychol Bull 1978; 85: 618-660
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Rayner K. Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychol Bull 1998; 124: 372-422
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Vinuela-Navarro V, Erichsen JT, Williams C. et al. Saccades and fixations in children with delayed reading skills. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2017; 37: 531-541
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Rayner K, Chace KH, Slattery TJ. et al. Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Sci Stud Read 2006; 10: 241-255
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Rayner K. Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2009; 62: 1457-1506
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Rayner K, Slattery TJ, Bélanger NN. Eye movements, the perceptual span, and reading speed. Psychon Bull Rev 2010; 17: 834-839
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Seassau M, Bucci MP. Reading and visual search: a developmental study in normal children. PLoS One 2013; 8: e70261
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Rayner K. Eye movements and the perceptual span in beginning and skilled readers. J Exp Child Psychol 1986; 41: 211-236
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Rayner K, McConkie GW, Ehrlich S. Eye movements and integrating information across fixations. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1978; 4: 529-544
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Buswell G. Fundamental Reading Habits: A Study of their Development. University of Chicago Press; 1922
  Google Scholar
• 14 McConkie GW, Rayner K. Asymmetry of the perceptual span in reading. Bull Psychon Soc 1976; 8: 365-368
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Rayner K, Well AD, Pollatsek A. Asymmetry of the effective visual field in reading. Percept Psychophys 1980; 27: 537-544
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Häikiö T, Bertram R, Hyönä J. et al. Development of the letter identity span in reading: evidence from the eye movement moving window paradigm. J Exp Child Psychol 2009; 102: 167-181
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Hyönä J, Bertram R, Pollatsek A. Are long compound words identified serially via their constituents? Evidence from an eye-movement-contingent display change study. Mem Cognit 2004; 32: 523-532
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Rayner K, Murphy LA, Henderson JM. et al. Selective attentional dyslexia. Cogn Neuropsychol 1989; 6: 357-378
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Shaywitz SE, Morris R, Shaywitz BA. The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood. Annu Rev Psychol 2008; 59: 451-475
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Rutter M, Caspi A, Fergusson D. et al. Sex differences in developmental reading disability: new findings from 4 epidemiological studies. JAMA 2004; 291: 2007-2012
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Bucci MP, Nassibi N, Gerard CL. et al. Immaturity of the oculomotor saccade and vergence interaction in dyslexic children: evidence from a reading and visual search study. PLoS One 2012; 7: e33458
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Koitzsch AM, Dürrwächter U. et al. Eye movements in German-speaking children with and without dyslexia when reading aloud. Acta Ophthalmol 2010; 88: 681-691
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Trauzettel-Klosinski S, Dietz K. IReST Study Group. Standardized assessment of reading performance: the New International Reading Speed Texts IReST. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2012; 53: 5452-5461
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 La Paro KM, Pianta RC. Predicting childrenʼs competence in the early school years: A meta-analytic review. Rev Educ Res 2000; 70: 443-484
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Wertli J, Schötzau A, Trauzettel-Klosinski S. et al. Feasibility of eye movement recordings with the smi tracking bar in 10- to 11-year-old children performing a reading task. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2020; 237: 510-516
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Bach M. The Freiburg Visual Acuity test–automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 1996; 73: 49-53
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 Niehorster DC, Cornelissen THW, Holmqvist K. et al. What to expect from your remote eye-tracker when participants are unrestrained. Behav Res Methods 2018; 50: 213-227
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Landerl K, Wimmer H, Moser E. Salzburger Lese- und Rechtschreibtest (SLRT). Verfahren zur Differentialdiagnose von Störungen des Lesens und Schreibens für die 1. und 4. Schulstufe. 1997. Accessed March 21, 2023 at: https://uni-salzburg.elsevierpure.com/en/publications/salzburger-lese-und-rechtschreibtest-verfahren-zur-differentialdi
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 Daane MC. Progress NAoE, Statistics NCfE. Fourth-grade students reading aloud: Naep 2002 special study of oral reading. National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences; 2005. Accessed March 21, 2023 at: https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006469
  Google Scholar
• 30 Vagge A, Cavanna M, Traverso CE. et al. Evaluation of ocular movements in patients with dyslexia. Ann Dyslexia 2015; 65: 24-32
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Schotter ER, Rayner K. The Work of the Eyes during Reading. The Oxford Handbook of Reading. New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press; 2015: 44-59
  Google Scholar
• 32 Linder M, Grissemann H. Zürcher Lesetest – ein Testverfahren zur Erfassung leseschwacher Kinder. Bern: Huber; 1980
  Google Scholar
• 33 Küspert P, Schneider W. Die Würzburger Leise Leseprobe (WLLP). Diagnostik von Lese- und Rechtschreibschwierigkeiten. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 2000: 81-89
  Google Scholar
• 34 Hedges L, Nowell A. Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science 1995; 269: 41-45
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Marks GN. Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Rev Educ 2008; 34: 89-109
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar