Download PDF
J Reconstr Microsurg 2023; 39(05): 367-373
DOI: 10.1055/a-1939-5742
Original Article

Outcomes and Risk Factors in Microsurgical Forefoot Reconstruction

Michael S Mayr-Riedler
1   Department for Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Munich Clinic, Bogenhausen, Germany
,
Alexander Wacker
1   Department for Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Munich Clinic, Bogenhausen, Germany
,
Florian Gedrich 
1   Department for Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Munich Clinic, Bogenhausen, Germany
2   Department for Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
,
Milomir Ninkovic
1   Department for Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Munich Clinic, Bogenhausen, Germany
,
Hans-Günther Machens
2   Department for Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
,
Mirko Dozan
2   Department for Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
,
P. Niclas Broer
1   Department for Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand and Burn Surgery, Munich Clinic, Bogenhausen, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
   Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Defects at the forefoot frequently require microsurgical reconstruction; however, reconstructive failure can lead to results inferior to primary amputation. The purpose of this study was to identify independent factors affecting surgical outcomes and hospitalization time in these patients.

Methods All patients that underwent free flap reconstruction of the forefoot between 2008 and 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Statistical evaluation included binary logistic regression and correlation analysis.

Results A total of 93 free flap procedures were performed in 87 patients. The most common defect etiologies were acute trauma (30 cases; 32.3%), diabetic foot syndrome (20 cases; 21.5%), and infection (17 cases; 18.3%). Muscle flaps were used in 50 cases (53.8%) and fasciocutaneous flaps were used in 43 cases (46.2%). Major complications occurred in 24 cases (25.8%) including 11 total flap losses and 2 partial flap losses. Minor complications occurred in 38 cases (40.9%). Patients aged 60 years or above were at significant higher risk of major complications (p = 0.029). Use of fasciocutaneous flaps (odds ratio [OR]: 14.341; p = 0.005), arterial hypertension (OR: 18.801; p = 0.014), and operative time (min) (OR: 1.010; p = 0.029) were identified as individual risk factors for major complications. Two venous anastomoses significantly reduced the risk of major complications (OR: 0.078; p = 0.022). Multiresistant bacterial wound colonization (OR: 65.152; p < 0.001) and defect size (OR: 1.007; p = 0.045) were identified as independent risk factors for minor complications. The median hospital stay was 28 days (7–85 days). Age significantly correlated with the length of hospital stay (r = 0.405, p < 0.01).

Conclusion Our study identified independent risk factors that might help to make individual decisions whether to target microsurgical forefoot reconstruction or primary amputation. Two venous anastomoses should be performed whenever feasible, and muscle free flaps should be preferred in patients at higher risk of major surgical complications.

Keywords

microsurgical forefoot reconstruction - free flap - risk factors - comorbidities - complications


Publication History

Received: 15 April 2022

Accepted: 03 August 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
08 September 2022

Article published online:
14 November 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Gottlieb LJ, Krieger LM. From the reconstructive ladder to the reconstructive elevator. Plast Reconstr Surg 1994; 93 (07) 1503-1504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Black CK, Ormiston LD, Fan KL, Kotha VS, Attinger C, Evans KK. Amputations versus salvage: reconciling the differences. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 32-41
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Busse JW, Jacobs CL, Swiontkowski MF, Bosse MJ, Bhandari M. Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group. Complex limb salvage or early amputation for severe lower-limb injury: a meta-analysis of observational studies. J Orthop Trauma 2007; 21 (01) 70-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Akula M, Gella S, Shaw CJ, McShane P, Mohsen AM. A meta-analysis of amputation versus limb salvage in mangled lower limb injuries–the patient perspective. Injury 2011; 42 (11) 1194-1197
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Nehler MR, Coll JR, Hiatt WR. et al. Functional outcome in a contemporary series of major lower extremity amputations. J Vasc Surg 2003; 38 (01) 7-14
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Norvell DC, Turner AP, Williams RM, Hakimi KN, Czerniecki JM. Defining successful mobility after lower extremity amputation for complications of peripheral vascular disease and diabetes. J Vasc Surg 2011; 54 (02) 412-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Suckow BD, Goodney PP, Cambria RA. et al; Vascular Study Group of New England. Predicting functional status following amputation after lower extremity bypass. Ann Vasc Surg 2012; 26 (01) 67-78
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Maynard C, Czerniecki JM, Caps MT, Sangeorzan BJ. Survival following lower-limb amputation in a veteran population. J Rehabil Res Dev 2001; 38 (03) 341-345
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Engel H, Lin CH, Wei FC. Role of microsurgery in lower extremity reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (Suppl. 01) 228S-238S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Wukich DK, Raspovic KM. What role does function play in deciding on limb salvage versus amputation in patients with diabetes?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2016; 138 (3, Suppl): 188S-195S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Suh HP, Park CJ, Hong JP. Special considerations for diabetic foot reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (01) 12-16
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Pu LLQ. A comprehensive approach to lower extremity free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2017; 5 (02) e1228
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ulusal AE, Lin CH, Lin YT, Ulusal BG, Yazar S. The use of free flaps in the management of type IIIB open calcaneal fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121 (06) 2010-2019
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Özkan O, Coşkunfirat OK, Ozgentaş HE. Reliability of free-flap coverage in diabetic foot ulcers. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (02) 107-112
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Osiogo FO, Lai CS, Wang WH, Chye YF, Lin SD. Retrospective review of free gracilis muscle flaps in the management of nonhealing diabetic foot ulceration. J Foot Ankle Surg 2006; 45 (04) 252-260
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Langstein HN, Chang DW, Miller MJ. et al. Limb salvage for soft-tissue malignancies of the foot: an evaluation of free-tissue transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109 (01) 152-159
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Schirmer S, Ritter RG, Fansa H. Vascular surgery, microsurgery and supramicrosurgery for treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers to prevent amputations. PLoS One 2013; 8 (09) e74704
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kolbenschlag J, Hellmich S, Germann G, Megerle K. Free tissue transfer in patients with severe peripheral arterial disease: functional outcome in reconstruction of chronic lower extremity defects. J Reconstr Microsurg 2013; 29 (09) 607-614
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Xiong L, Gazyakan E, Kremer T. et al. Free flaps for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in lower extremity: a meta-analysis on microsurgical outcome and safety. Microsurgery 2016; 36 (06) 511-524
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ehrl D, Heidekrueger PI, Ninkovic M, Broer PN. Effect of preoperative medical status on microsurgical free flap reconstructions: a matched cohort analysis of 969 cases. J Reconstr Microsurg 2018; 34 (03) 170-175
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Oh TS, Lee HS, Hong JP. Diabetic foot reconstruction using free flaps increases 5-year-survival rate. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2013; 66 (02) 243-250
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Kim HB, Altiparmak M, Pak CJ, Suh HP, Hong JP. Reconstruction using free flaps for diabetic heel defects: outcomes and risk factor analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2020; 36 (07) 494-500
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Lee YK, Park KY, Koo YT. et al. Analysis of multiple risk factors affecting the result of free flap transfer for necrotising soft tissue defects of the lower extremities in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2014; 67 (05) 624-628
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Kantar RS, Rifkin WJ, David JA. et al. Diabetes is not associated with increased rates of free flap failure: analysis of outcomes in 6030 patients from the ACS-NSQIP database. Microsurgery 2019; 39 (01) 14-23
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Las DE, de Jong T, Zuidam JM, Verweij NM, Hovius SER, Mureau MAM. Identification of independent risk factors for flap failure: a retrospective analysis of 1530 free flaps for breast, head and neck and extremity reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2016; 69 (07) 894-906
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Wettstein R, Schürch R, Banic A, Erni D, Harder Y. Review of 197 consecutive free flap reconstructions in the lower extremity. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61 (07) 772-776
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Heidekrueger PI, Heine-Geldern A, Ninkovic M. et al. Microsurgical reconstruction in patients greater than 80 years old. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (06) 546-551
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Üstün GG, Aksu AE, Uzun H, Bitik O. The systematic review and meta-analysis of free flap safety in the elderly patients. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (05) 442-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lip GY. Hypertension and the prothrombotic state. J Hum Hypertens 2000; 14 (10-11): 687-690
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Park J-W, Mun G-H. Comparative analysis of the effect of antihypertensive drugs on the survival of perforator flaps in a rat model. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (03) 310-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Sanati-Mehrizy P, Massenburg BB, Rozehnal JM, Ingargiola MJ, Hernandez Rosa J, Taub PJ. Risk factors leading to free flap failure: analysis from the national surgical quality improvement program database. J Craniofac Surg 2016; 27 (08) 1956-1964
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Wong AK, Joanna Nguyen T, Peric M. et al. Analysis of risk factors associated with microvascular free flap failure using a multi-institutional database. Microsurgery 2015; 35 (01) 6-12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Reece EM, Bonelli MA, Livingston T. et al. Factors in free fasciocutaneous flap complications: a logistic regression analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; 136 (01) 54e-58e
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Ozkan O, Ozgentas HE, Islamoglu K, Boztug N, Bigat Z, Dikici MB. Experiences with microsurgical tissue transfers in elderly patients. Microsurgery 2005; 25 (05) 390-395
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Serletti JM, Higgins JP, Moran S, Orlando GS. Factors affecting outcome in free-tissue transfer in the elderly. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106 (01) 66-70
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Alolabi N, Matthews J, Farrokhyar F, Voineskos SH. One versus two venous anastomoses in free flap surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015; •••: 17-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Dodd SX, Morzycki A, Nickel KJ, Campbell S, Guilfoyle R. One or two venous pedicles by anastomoses for free flaps in reconstruction of the lower extremity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microsurgery 2021; 41 (08) 792-801
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hanasono MM, Kocak E, Ogunleye O, Hartley CJ, Miller MJ. One versus two venous anastomoses in microvascular free flap surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126 (05) 1548-1557
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Ahmadi I, Herle P, Rozen WM, Leong J. One versus two venous anastomoses in microsurgical free flaps: a meta-analysis. J Reconstr Microsurg 2014; 30 (06) 413-418
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Stranix JT, Lee Z-H, Anzai L. et al. Optimizing venous outflow in reconstruction of Gustilo IIIB lower extremity traumas with soft tissue free flap coverage: are two veins better than one?. Microsurgery 2018; 38 (07) 745-751
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Cho EH, Shammas RL, Carney MJ. et al. Muscle versus fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity traumatic reconstruction: a multicenter outcomes analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018; 141 (01) 191-199
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Paro J, Chiou G, Sen SK. Comparing muscle and fasciocutaneous free flaps in lower extremity reconstruction—does it matter?. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (Suppl. 03) S213-S215
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Yazar S, Lin C-H, Lin Y-T, Ulusal AE, Wei F-C. Outcome comparison between free muscle and free fasciocutaneous flaps for reconstruction of distal third and ankle traumatic open tibial fractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117 (07) 2468-2475 , discussion 2476–2477
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Lee Z-H, Abdou SA, Daar DA. et al. Comparing outcomes for fasciocutaneous versus muscle flaps in foot and ankle free flap reconstruction. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (09) 646-651
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Lakhiani C, DeFazio MV, Han K, Falola R, Evans K. Donor-site morbidity following free tissue harvest from the thigh: a systematic review and pooled analysis of complications. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (05) 342-357
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Huemer GM, Dunst KM, Maurer H, Ninkovic M. Area enlargement of the gracilis muscle flap through microscopically aided intramuscular dissection: ideas and innovations. Microsurgery 2004; 24 (05) 369-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Heidekrueger PI, Ehrl D, Ninkovic M. et al. The spreaded gracilis flap revisited: Comparing outcomes in lower limb reconstruction. Microsurgery 2017; 37 (08) 873-880
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Koepple C, Kallenberger A-K, Pollmann L. et al. Comparison of fasciocutaneous and muscle-based free flaps for soft tissue reconstruction of the upper extremity. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (12) e2543
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Spindler N, Pieroh P, Spiegl U. et al. Free flap reconstruction of the extremities in patients who are ≥65 years old: a single-center retrospective 1-to-1 matched analysis. Clin Interv Aging 2021; 16: 497-503
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar