Am J Perinatol 2022; 39(11): 1159-1165
DOI: 10.1055/a-1785-9290
SMFM Fellowship Series Article

Indication Creep of Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids

1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Kyla Wilkinson
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Rebecca Crowe
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Jill C. Newman
2   Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Mallory Alkis
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Rebecca Wineland
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
,
Matthew M. Finneran
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
› Author Affiliations
Funding None.

Abstract

Objective While antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) administered in the late preterm period have been shown to reduce respiratory morbidity, this finding was demonstrated in a well-designed randomized controlled trial (the Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery [ALPS]) with strict inclusion/exclusion criteria that may differ from clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there has been indication creep since use of late preterm ACS became standard of care.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study of pregnant women who received late preterm ACS between 2016 and 2019 were identified and separated into epochs of 2016 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019 based on year of exposure. The primary outcome was rate of inappropriate ACS exposure, defined as nonadherence to the inclusion/exclusion criteria of the ALPS trial. Secondary outcomes were rates of nonoptimal ACS exposure (delivery >7 days from ACS or term delivery). Logistic regression was used to generate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) between epochs for the primary outcome adjusting for confounders.

Results There were 660 women who received late preterm ACS during the study period with 229 (34.6 %) deemed inappropriate exposures. The most common reason for inappropriate treatment was preterm premature rupture of membrane (PPROM; 29.0%) with exclusionary cervical examination or contraction frequency. No difference was observed in inappropriate ACS exposure between epochs (aOR = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59–1.2). However, there was a reduction in nonoptimal exposure over time (aOR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.47–0.97) . Women receiving inappropriate ACS were more likely to deliver at term if indicated for maternal/fetal status (50.0 vs. 19.5%, p < 0.001) and preterm labor (66.0 vs. 41.9%; p = 0.015). Further, inappropriate exposure in preterm labor had higher rates of exposure latency >7 days (62.3 vs. 39.1%, p = 0.006) with a longer latency to delivery (3 vs. 16 days; p < 0.001).

Conclusion Over one-third of women received late preterm ACS for an indication that could be classified as indication creep. Depending on indication, inappropriate administration is associated with higher rates of nonoptimal exposure.

Key Points

  • There is potential for indication creep of ACS administration.

  • One third of late preterm ACS exposures in our study were inappropriate.

  • Utilizing clinical criteria can aid in identifying patients who best benefit from late preterm ACS.

Note

This research was presented virtually at the Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Annual Meeting on January 2021, poster no.: 804.




Publication History

Received: 20 August 2021

Accepted: 18 February 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
02 March 2022

Article published online:
10 June 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Correia C, Rocha G, Flor-de-Lima F, Guimarães H. Respiratory morbidity in late preterm infants. Minerva Pediatr 2018; 70 (04) 345-354
  • 2 Kugelman A, Colin AA. Late preterm infants: near term but still in a critical developmental time period. Pediatrics 2013; 132 (04) 741-751
  • 3 Gyamfi-Bannerman C, Thom EA, Blackwell SC. et al; NICHD Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk for late preterm delivery. N Engl J Med 2016; 374 (14) 1311-1320
  • 4 Committee SP. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) Publications Committee. Implementation of the use of antenatal corticosteroids in the late preterm birth period in women at risk for preterm delivery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (02) B13-B15
  • 5 Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no. 713: antenatal corticosteroid therapy for fetal maturation. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (02) e102-e109
  • 6 Riggs KR, Ubel PA. The role of professional societies in limiting indication creep. J Gen Intern Med 2015; 30 (02) 249-252
  • 7 Battarbee AN, Clapp MA, Boggess KA. et al. Practice variation in antenatal steroid administration for anticipated late preterm birth: a physician survey. Am J Perinatol 2019; 36 (02) 200-204
  • 8 Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Lackritz EM. Epidemiology of late and moderate preterm birth. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2012; 17 (03) 120-125
  • 9 Roberts D, Brown J, Medley N, Dalziel SR. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3 (03) CD004454
  • 10 Razaz N, Skoll A, Fahey J, Allen VM, Joseph KS. Trends in optimal, suboptimal, and questionably appropriate receipt of antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis. Obstet Gynecol 2015; 125 (02) 288-296
  • 11 Adamkin DH. Committee on Fetus and Newborn. Postnatal glucose homeostasis in late-preterm and term infants. Pediatrics 2011; 127 (03) 575-579
  • 12 Ogunyemi D, Friedman P, Betcher K. et al. Obstetrical correlates and perinatal consequences of neonatal hypoglycemia in term infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30 (11) 1372-1377
  • 13 Star J, Hogan J, Sosa MEB, Carpenter MW. Glucocorticoid-associated maternal hyperglycemia: a randomized trial of insulin prophylaxis. J Matern Fetal Med 2000; 9 (05) 273-277
  • 14 Schumacher A, Sidor J, Bühling KJ. Continuous glucose monitoring using the glucose sensor CGMS in metabolically normal pregnant women during betamethasone therapy for fetal respiratory distress syndrome [in German]. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2006; 210 (05) 184-190
  • 15 Kerstjens JM, Bocca-Tjeertes IF, de Winter AF, Reijneveld SA, Bos AF. Neonatal morbidities and developmental delay in moderately preterm-born children. Pediatrics 2012; 130 (02) e265-e272
  • 16 Adamkin DH. Neonatal hypoglycemia. Curr Opin Pediatr 2016; 28 (02) 150-155
  • 17 Kaiser JR, Bai S, Gibson N. et al. Association between transient newborn hypoglycemia and fourth-grade achievement test proficiency: a population-based study. JAMA Pediatr 2015; 169 (10) 913-921
  • 18 Kamath-Rayne BD, Rozance PJ, Goldenberg RL, Jobe AH. Antenatal corticosteroids beyond 34 weeks gestation: What do we do now?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016; 215 (04) 423-430
  • 19 Stutchfield PR, Whitaker R, Gliddon AE, Hobson L, Kotecha S, Doull IJM. Behavioural, educational and respiratory outcomes of antenatal betamethasone for term caesarean section (ASTECS trial). Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2013; 98 (03) F195-F200
  • 20 Souter V, Kauffman E, Marshall AJ, Katon JG. Assessing the potential impact of extending antenatal steroids to the late preterm period. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217 (04) 461.e1-461.e7
  • 21 NCC-WCH. Preterm labour and birth. NICE Guideline 25: Methods, evidence and recommendations.. Accessed March 21, 2022 at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK327571/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK327571.pdf