Nationwide Provision of Radiologically-guided Interventional Measures for the Supportive Treatment of Tumor Diseases in Germany – An Analysis of the DeGIR Registry Data

 

 Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Purpose In addition to direct oncologic therapy, interventional radiology plays an important supportive role in oncologic therapy primarily guided by other disciplines. These supporting measures include diagnostic punctures, drainages, biliary interventions, central venous access including port implantations, osteoplasties, pain therapies etc.). This study investigated the extent to which these radiologically guided supportive measures are available in Germany.

Material and Methods All interventional procedures documented in the DeGIR-registry (excluding transhepatic portosystemic shunts) of the years 2018 and 2019 were recorded (DeGIR-module C). A breakdown of the documented interventions was performed based on federal states as well as 40 individual regions (administrative districts and former administrative districts).

Results A total of 136,328 procedures were recorded at 216 centers in DeGIR Module C in 2018 and 2019. On average, 389 cases were documented per hospital in 2018 and 394 cases in 2019; the increase per hospital from 2019 is not statistically significant but is relevant in the aggregate when new participating centers are included, with an overall increase of 10 % (6,554 more cases than the previous year). Normalized to one million inhabitants, an average of 781 procedures took place across Germany in 2018 and 860 in 2019. Districts with no registered procedures are not found for Module C.

Indications for Module C interventions were mostly interdisciplinary in 2018 and 2019. In this context, the quality of outcome was very high; for the procedures drain placement, marking and biopsy the technical success was 99 %, while the complication rate was lower than 1 %.

Conclusion The structural analysis of this work concludes that in Germany there is good nationwide availability of radiologically guided supportive measures in oncological therapy. Accordingly, the training situation for prospective interventional radiologists is good, as the distribution to centers with high experience is excellent. In addition, the overall outcome quality of radiology-guided interventions is very high.

Key Points:

• In Germany, there is good nationwide coverage of radiologically guided supportive interventions in oncological therapy.

• The training situation for prospective interventional radiologists is good, as the distribution to centers with high experience is excellent.

• The overall outcome quality of radiology-guided interventions is very high.

Citation Format

• Nadjiri J, Schachtner B, Bücker A et al. Nationwide Provision of Radiologically-guided Interventional Measures for the Supportive Treatment of Tumor Diseases in Germany – An Analysis of the DeGIR Registry Data. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 993 – 1002

Publication History

Received: 03 November 2021

Accepted: 03 January 2022

Article published online:
10 March 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• References

• 1 Onkologie L. S3-Leitlinie Kolorektales Karzinom, Langversion 2.1, 2019, AWMF Registrierungsnummer: 021/007OL. 2019
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 Onkologie L. Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie für die Früherkennung, Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms Langversion 4.2. (August 2019). Im Internet (Stand: 10.01.2019): https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Leitlinien/Mammakarzinom_4_0 / Version_4_2019
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Seufferlein T, Porzner M, Becker T. et al. S3-Leitlinie zum exokrinen Pankreaskarzinom. Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie 2013; 51: 1395-1440
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Veltri A, Bargellini I, Giorgi L. et al. CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous needle biopsy (PNB). Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2017; 40: 1501-1513
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Tsoumakidou G, Too CW, Koch G. et al. CIRSE guidelines on percutaneous vertebral augmentation. Cardiovascular and interventional radiology 2017; 40: 331-342
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Link B-C, Yekebas EF, Bogoevski D. et al. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangiodrainage as rescue therapy for symptomatic biliary leakage without biliary tract dilation after major surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2007; 11: 166-170
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Neslihan Ilkaz R, Emine Iyigun R. Evaluation of Central Venous Catheter Location in Terms of Pain, Comfort and Patient Satisfaction. International Journal of Caring Sciences 2020; 13: 424-430
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Huang Z, Chen H, Liu Z. The 100 top-cited systematic reviews/meta-analyses in central venous catheter research: A PRISMA-compliant systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 2020; 57: 102803
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Kubo S, Kinoshita H, Hirohashi K. et al. Risk factors for and clinical findings of liver abscess after biliary-intestinal anastomosis. Hepato-gastroenterology 1999; 46: 116-120
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Elias D, Di Pietroantonio D, Gachot B. et al. Liver abscess after radiofrequency ablation of tumors in patients with a biliary tract procedure. Gastroenterologie clinique et biologique 2006; 30: 823-827
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Njoku VC, Howard TJ, Shen C. et al. Pyogenic liver abscess following pancreaticoduodenectomy: risk factors, treatment, and long-term outcome. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery 2014; 18: 922-928
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Dariushnia SR, Mitchell JW, Chaudry G. et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Quality Improvement Standards for Image-Guided Percutaneous Drainage and Aspiration of Abscesses and Fluid Collections. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2020; 31: 662-666.e664
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Thanos L, Mylona S, Stroumpouli E. et al. Percutaneous CT-guided nephrostomy: a safe and quick alternative method in management of obstructive and nonobstructive uropathy. Journal of endourology 2006; 20: 486-490
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Nadjiri J, Schachtner B, Bücker A. et al. Flächendeckende Versorgung mit radiologisch durchgeführten gefäßverschließenden Maßnahmen zur interventionellen Behandlung von Blutungen in Deutschland in den Jahren 2016 und 2017 Eine Analyse der DeGIR-Registerdaten. Rofo 2020; 952-960
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Berlis A, Morhard D, Weber W. Flächendeckende Versorgung des akuten Schlaganfalls im Jahr 2016 und 2017 durch Neuro-Radiologen mittels mechanischer Thrombektomie in Deutschland anhand des DeGIR/DGNR-Registers. Rofo 2019; 191: 613-617
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Rohde S, Weber W, Berlis A. et al. Acute Endovascular Stroke Treatment in Germany in 2019. Clinical Neuroradiology 2021; 31: 11-19
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Mahnken AH, Nadjiri J, Schachtner B. et al. Availability of interventional-radiological revascularization procedures in Germany–an analysis of the DeGIR Registry Data 2018/19. In: RöFo-Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren. Georg Thieme Verlag KG; 2021
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Schulte B. Regierungsbezirke Deutschlands 1981–2008. 2009 https://commons.wikimedia.org/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 R: RCT. A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 OʼConnor OJ, Buckley J, Maher MM. Interventional radiology in oncology. Imaging in Oncology 2008; 493-511
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Coldwell DM, Sewell PE. The expanding role of interventional radiology in the supportive care of the oncology patient: From diagnosis to therapy. Seminars in oncology. Elsevier 2005; 32: 169-173
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 LaRoy JR, White SB, Jayakrishnan T. et al. Cost and morbidity analysis of chest port insertion: interventional radiology suite versus operating room. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2015; 12: 563-571
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar