Zahnmedizinische Prophylaxe in Zeiten der COVID-19-Pandemie – eine kritische Analyse/Nachbetrachtung

 

 Buy Article Permissions and Reprints

Publication History

Article published online:
16 February 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

• Literatur

• 1 WHO. Eröffnungsrede der WHO-Generaldirektorin bei der Medienkonferenz zu COVID-19 – 11.03.2020. Im Internet (Stand: 02.02.2021): https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19-11-march-2020
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 2 BLZK/KZVB – Die bayerischen Zahnärzte. Aufrechterhaltung der zahnmedizinischen Versorgung ab 02. November 2020, Rundschreiben vom 29.10.2020. Im Internet (Stand: 02.02.2021): https://www.kzvb.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Wichtig_Aktuell/Infoschreiben_an_alle_Zahnaerzte.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 [Anonym] Rückgang um 40 Prozent. dzw 2020; 11: 2
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Estrich CG, Mikkelsen M, Morrissey R. et al. Covid-19 prevalence and infection control practices among US dentists. JADA 2020; 151: 815-824
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 5 Meng L, Hua F, Bian Z. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19): Emerging and Future Challenges for Dental and Oral Medicine. J Dent Res 2020; 99: 481-487
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Dannewitz B, Frankenberger R. Welche Rolle spielt die Mundgesundheit bei SARS-CoV-2?. Im Internet (Stand: 17.07.2020): https://www.zm-online.de/news/zahnmedizin/welche-rolle-spielt-die-mundgesundheit-bei-sars-cov-2/
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Bundes Zahnärzte Kammer (BZK). Corona-Vorbeugung einer Übertragung. Rundschreiben vom 07.04.2020. Im Internet (Stand: 02.02.2021): https://www.bzaek.de/berufsausuebung/sars-cov-2covid-19.html
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 8 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Krankenhaushygiene e.V.. Tröpfchen und Aerosole-(k) ein Widerspruch bei der Übertragung von Covid-19 vom 01.09.2020. Im Internet (Stand: 02.02.2021): https://www.krankenhaushygiene.de/informationen/785
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 9 Graetz C, Tillner A, Sälzer S. Aerosol in der zahnärztlichen Prophylaxe-eine unterschätzte Gefahr?. ZMK 2020; 36: 645-661
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 10 Duguid JP. The size and the duration of air-carriage of respiratory droplets and droplet-nuclei. J Hyg (Lond) 1946; 44: 471-479
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Ransjö U. Masks: a ward investigation and review of the literature. J Hosp Infect 1986; 7: 289-294
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 McCluskey F. Does wearing a face mask reduce bacterial wound infection? A literature review. Br J Theatre Nurs 1996; 6: 18-20
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 13 Stadnytskyi V, Bax CE, Bax A. et al. The airborne lifetime of small speech droplets and their potential importance in SARS-CoV-2 transmission. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020; 117: 11875-11877
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Lahrtz S. Neue Züricher Zeitung (NZZ): 1000 Partikel reichen für eine Infektion – was das für Weihnachtsfeiern bedeutet. 26.11.2020 zitiert wird Andreas Bergthaler vom CeMM Forschungszentrum für Molekulare Medizin in Wien. Im Internet (Stand: 02.02.2021): https://www.nzz.ch/panorama/coronavirus-1000-partikel-reichen-fuer-eine-infektion-was-das-fuer-weihnachtsfeiern-bedeutet-ld.1588857
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 15 Prentiss M, Chu A, Berggren KK. Superspreading Events Without Superspreaders: Using High Attack Rate Events to Estimate N₀ for Airborne Transmission of COVID-19. medRxiv 2020; DOI: 10.1101/2020.10.21.20216895.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Anfinrud P, Stadnytskyi V, Bax CE. et al. Visualizing Speech-Generated Oral Fluid Droplets with Laser Light Scattering. The New England journal of medicine N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 2061-2063
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Asadi S, Wexler AS, Cappa CD. et al. Aerosol emission and super emission during human speech increase with voice loudness. Sci Rep 2019; 9: 2348
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 18 Asadi S, Wexler AS, Cappa CD. et al. Effect of voicing and articulation manner on aerosol particle emission during human speech. PloS One 2020; 15: e0227699
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Lu J, Gu J, Li K. et al. COVID-19 Outbreak Associated with Air Conditioning in Restaurant, Guangzhou, China, 2020. Emerg Infect Dis 2020; 26: 1628-1631
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Li Y, Qian H, Huang J. et al. Evidence for probable aerosol transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in a poorly ventilated restaurant. medRxiv 2020; DOI: 10.1101/2020.04.16.20067728.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Tellier R, Li Y, Cowling BJ. et al. Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary. BMC Infect Dis 2019; 19: 101
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Morawska L, Cao J. Airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2: The world should face the reality. Environ Int 2020; 139: 105730
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 23 Mürbe D, Fleischer M, Lange J. et al. Aerosol emission is increased in professional singing. OSF Pre-prints 2020; DOI: 10.31219/osf.io/znjeh.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 24 Morawska L, Johnson GR, Ristovski ZD. et al. Size distribution and sites of origin of droplets expelled from the human respiratory tract during expiratory activities. J Aerosol Sci 2009; 40: 256-269
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 25 Ji Y, Qian H, Ye J. et al. The impact of ambient humidity on the evaporation and dispersion of exhaled breathing droplets: A numerical investigation. J Aerosol Sci 2018; 115: 164-172
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 26 Lednicky JA, Lauzardo M, Fan ZH. et al. Viable SARS-CoV-2 in the air of a hospital room with COVID-19 patients. Med Rxiv 2020; DOI: 10.1101/2020.08.03.20167395.
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 27 van Doremalen N, Bushmaker T, Morris DH. et al. Aerosol and Surface Stability of SARS-CoV-2 as Compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med 2020; 382: 1564-1567
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 28 Umweltbundesamt. Das Risiko einer Übertragung von SARS-CoV-2 in Innenräumen lässt sich durch geeignete Lüftungsmaßnahmen reduzieren. Im Internet (Stand: 12.08.2020): https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/sites/default/files/medien/2546/dokumente/irk_stellungnahme_lueften_sars-cov-2_0.pdf
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 29 WHO. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2: implications for infection prevention precautions. Scientific Brief. Im Internet (Stand: 09.07.2020): https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/modes-of-transmission-of-virus-causing-covid-19-implications-for-ipc-precaution-recommendations
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 30 Donnet M, Mensi M, Bastendorf KD. et al. Die bakterielle Kontamination der Raumluft während einer Airflow-Behandlung. zm 2020; 100: 24-26
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 31 Roberge RJ. Face shields for infection control: A review. J Occup Environ Hyg 2016; 13: 235-242
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 32 Baehni P. Anwendung von Mundspülungen im Dentalbereich. Prophylaxedialog 2008/2009; 1/2: 17 – 19.
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 33 Saini R. Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinse containing dioxide in reduction of viable bacterial count in dental aerosols during ultrasonic scaling: A double blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Dent Hypotheses 2015; 6: 65-71
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 34 Gupta G, Mitra D, Ashok KP. et al. Efficacy of preprocedural mouth rinsing in reducing aerosol contamination produced by ultrasonic scaler: a pilot study. J Periodontol 2004; 85: 562-568
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 35 Harrel SK. Airborne spread of disease–the implications for dentistry. J Calif Dent Assoc 2004; 32: 901-906
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 36 Narayana TV, Mohanty L, Sreenath G. et al. Role of preprocedural rinse and high volume evacuator in reducing bacterial contamination in bioaerosols. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol 2016; 20: 59-65
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 37 Herrera D, Serrano J, Roldán S. et al. Is the oral cavity relevant in SARS-CoV-2 pandemic?. Clin Oral Investig 2020; 24: 2925-2930
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 38 Xu H, Zhong L, Deng J. et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci 2020; 12: 8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 39 Peng X, Xu X, Li Y. et al. Transmission routes of 2019-nCoV and controls in dental practice. Int J Oral Sci 2020; 12: 9
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 40 Eggers M, Koburger-Janssen T, Eickmann M. et al. In Vitro Bactericidal and Virucidal Efficacy of Povidone-Iodine Gargle/Mouthwash Against Respiratory and Oral Tract Pathogens. Infect Dis Ther 2018; 7: 249-259
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 41 Meister TL, Brüggemann Y, Todt D. et al. Virucidal Efficacy of Different Oral Rinses Against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2. J Infect Dis 2020; 222: 1289-1292
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 42 Marui VC, Souto MLS, Rovai ES. et al. Efficacy of preprocedural mouthrinses in the reduction of microorganisms in aerosol: A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2019; 150: 1015-1026
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 43 Galván M, Gonzalez S, Cohen CL. et al. Periodontal effects of 0.25% sodium hypochlorite twice-weekly oral rinse. A pilot study. J Periodontal Res 2014; 49: 696-702
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 44 Popkin DL, Zilka S, Dimaano M. et al. Cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) exhibits potent, rapid activity against influenza viruses in vitro and in vivo. Pathog Immun 2017; 2: 253-269
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 45 Pranab KM, Frank E, Buchheit K. et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel dual-action oral topical formulation against upper respiratory infections. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17: 74
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 46 Mukherjee PK, Esper F, Buchheit K. et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to assess the safety and effectiveness of a novel dual-action oral topical formulation against upper respiratory infections. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17: 74
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 47 Lussi A. Prophylaxe-Facts & Fake. DENTASTIC 2020; 05: 20. Veröffentlichung zum Vortrag am 16. September 2020. (Fortbildung Rosenberger)
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 48 Reitemeier B, Jesinghaus S, Neumann K. Effektive Reduktion des Spraynebelrückpralls – Möglichkeiten und Grenzen. ZMK 2020; 26: 662-673
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 49 Jacks ME. A laboratory comparison of evacuation devices on aerosol reduction. J Dent Hyg 2002; 76: 202-206
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 50 Graetz C, Bielfeldt J, Tillner A. et al. Splatter contamination in dental practices–how can it be prevented?. Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat 2014; 118: 1122-1134
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 51 Sawhney A, Venugopol S, Babu G. et al. Aerosols how dangerous they are in clinical practice. J Clin Diagn Res 2015; 9: ZC52-ZC57
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 52 Tillner A. In-Vitro-Studie zur Effektivität der Saugleistung mittels einer neu entwickelten Saugkanüle während der Biofilmentfernung [Dissertation an der Medizinischen Fakultät der Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel]. Im Internet (Stand: 11.11.2019): https://macau.uni-kiel.de/receive/diss_mods_00021278?lang=de
  PubMedGoogle Scholar
• 53 Kim MJ, Noh H, Oh HY. Efficiency of professional tooth brushing before ultrasonic scaling. Int J Dent Hyg 2015; 13: 125-131
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar