Original articleReliability and concurrent validity of two instruments for measuring cervical range of motion: effects of age and gender
References (0)
Cited by (120)
Normative cervical spine kinematics of a circumduction task
2021, Journal of Electromyography and KinesiologyIntrarater and Interrater Reliability of the Flexion Rotation Test and Cervical Range of Motion in People With Migraine
2020, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological TherapeuticsNormative values of cervical range of motion for both children and adults: A systematic review
2020, Musculoskeletal Science and PracticeCitation Excerpt :The CROM device has been reported to be both reliable and valid in several systematic reviews (de Koning et al., 2008; Williams et al., 2010). The CROM device was the most commonly used device (n = 12) to determine normative values (Hole et al., 1995; Swinkels and Swinkels-Meewisse, 2014; Arbogast et al., 2007; Chi et al., 2005; Davies et al., 2016; Hamilton and Gatherer, 2014; Hamilton et al., 2014; Lynch-Caris et al., 2008; Nyland and Johnson, 2004; Schenkman et al., 1996; Smith et al., 2016; Youdas et al., 1992). Most studies were rated as low RoB studies (Hole et al., 1995; Swinkels and Swinkels-Meewisse, 2014; Arbogast et al., 2007; Chi et al., 2005; Davies et al., 2016; Lynch-Caris et al., 2008; Nyland and Johnson, 2004; Smith et al., 2016; Youdas et al., 1992).
Is there a difference in response to manual cranial bone tissue assessment techniques between participants with cervical and/or temporomandibular complaints versus a control group?
2019, Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies