The role of regional anaesthesia in patient outcome: thoracic and abdominal surgeries

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.trap.2008.09.003Get rights and content

This review focuses on the establishment and implementation of well-defined, evidence-based clinical pathways in thoracic and abdominal surgeries, to facilitate improved outcomes and avoid complications, enabling rapid recognition and treatment of complications. Ultimately, this will facilitate the recovery process and return to baseline activity. Patients scheduled for either thoracic or abdominal surgery often have compromised cardiopulmonary and metabolic functions before surgery, and the procedure itself may decrease patients' reserve. Postoperative pain acts as an additional insult to body reserve, and regional anesthesia can be the most efficient technique to attenuate this. The greatest postoperative challenge for anesthetists is to attenuate the stress response and pain sufficiently so that functions are not compromised even further. Even the best postoperative regional analgesic techniques require a smooth and timely transition to oral multimodal pain strategies to maximize their benefits.

Section snippets

Thoracic surgery

Thoracic surgery patients have compromised pulmonary function before surgery, and the surgery itself may decrease total lung capacity, forced expiratory volume, and forced vital capacity further as a consequence of resection. Postoperative pain acts as a further insult to pulmonary function by limiting the degree and frequency of chest wall expansion.1 The greatest postoperative challenge for anesthetists during this procedure is to attenuate pain sufficiently so that pulmonary function is not

Abdominal surgery

Regional anesthesia for abdominal surgery was introduced at the beginning of the 20th century and developed to become widely used. With advances in techniques and technology, regional anesthesia was extended in the postoperative period to provide good pain relief. It was only in the last 30 years that anesthesiologists started to study the impact of regional anesthesia techniques beyond the intraoperative period on some outcomes relevant to the recovery process.

Conclusions

With better knowledge of the pathophysiological mechanisms of organ dysfunction associated with surgery, anesthesiologists have devised interventions aimed at attenuating the surgical stress response and facilitating the immediate recovery process. Cardiorespiratory and metabolic outcomes have been identified, and perioperative measures have been adopted with the aim to accelerate the return to baseline. Regional anesthesia, by interacting with the transmission of nociceptive stimuli, is a

References (51)

  • C.L. Bong et al.

    Effects of preemptive epidural analgesia on post-thoracotomy pain

    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth

    (2005)
  • J. Takala

    Determinants of splanchnic blood flow

    Br J Anaesth

    (1996)
  • K. Holte et al.

    Epidural analgesia and risk of anastomotic leakage

    Reg Anesth Pain Med

    (2001)
  • H. Kehlet et al.

    Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome

    Am J Surg

    (2002)
  • F. Carli et al.

    Continuous epidural analgesia for colonic surgery: but what about the future?

    Reg Anesth Pain Med

    (2005)
  • M. Furrer et al.

    Thoracotomy and thoracoscopy: postoperative pulmonary function, pain and chest wall complaints

    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg

    (1997)
  • V.W. Chan et al.

    Analgesic and pulmonary effects of continuous intercostal nerve block following thoracotomy

    Can J Anaesth

    (1991)
  • R.P. Grant et al.

    Patient- controlled lumbar epidural fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous fentanyl for post-thoracotomy pain

    Can J Anaesth

    (1992)
  • S.S. Liu et al.

    Effects of perioperative central neuraxial analgesia on outcome after coronary artery bypass surgery: a meta-analysis

    Anesthesiology

    (2004)
  • A. Casati et al.

    A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral and epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine after lung resection surgery

    Eur J Anaesthesiol

    (2006)
  • H. Kehlet

    Effect of postoperative pain treatment on outcome-current status and future strategies

    Langenbecks Arch Surg

    (2004)
  • S.M. Dabu-Bondoc

    Regional anesthesia and perioperative outcome: what is new?

    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol

    (2004)
  • K. Olausson et al.

    Anti-ischemic and anti-anginal effects of thoracic epidural anesthesia versus those of conventional medical therapy in the treatment of severe refractory unstable angina pectoris

    Circulation

    (1997)
  • D.C. Warltier et al.

    Approaches to the prevention of perioperative myocardial ischemia

    Anesthesiology

    (2000)
  • E.M. Antman et al.

    Cardiac-specific troponin I levels to predict the risk of mortality in patients with acute coronary syndromes

    N Engl J Med

    (1996)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Perioperative management of a patient undergoing a novel mini-invasive percutaneous transcatheter left ventricular reconstruction procedure

      2016, Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
      Citation Excerpt :

      To the best of our knowledge there is no illustration on how to proceed with anesthesia and postoperative analgesia in patients with MS undergoing a LIVE procedure using anchoring system. Patients scheduled for this surgery should be informed of the postoperative pain management considering that mini-thoracotomies are painful and can trigger considerable surgery-related stress [11]. Pain and surgical stress in patients with MS can trigger metabolic and hormonal changes, which could lead to a postoperative exacerbation of such neurological disease [9].

    • Management of postoperative ileus?

      2010, Praticien en Anesthesie Reanimation
    • Coupling effect of double lungs on a VCV ventilator with automatic secretion clearance function

      2019, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text