- Original Article
- Published:
Combining forest structure data and fuel modelling to classify fire hazard in Portugal
Combinaison des données de structure forestière et de modélisation de la disponibilité en combustible pour classer les risques d’incendie de forêt au Portugal
Annals of Forest Science volume 66, page 415 (2009)
Abstract
-
• Fire management activities can greatly benefit from the description of wildland fuel to assess fire hazard.
-
• A forest typology developed from the Portuguese National Forest Inventory that combines cover type (the dominant overstorey species) and forest structure defined as a combination of generic stand density (closed or open) and height (low or tall) is translated into fuel models. Fire behaviour simulations that accounted for the fire environment modification induced by stand structure resulted in an objective and quantitative assessment of fire hazard for 19 forest types.
-
• The range of fire risk is similar between and within cover types. Stand structure, rather than cover type, is the major determinant of fire vulnerability. This indicates a potentially prominent role of stand and fuel management in wildfire mitigation. Four fire hazard groups are defined: (1) open and tall forest types, and closed and tall Quercus suber and diverse forests; (2) closed, low woodlands of deciduous oaks, Q. suber and diverse forests, closed and tall Pinus pinaster woodland and tall Eucalyptus globulus plantations; (3) open and low forest types; (4) dense low stands of P. pinaster, E. globulus and Acacia. Potential fire risk increases from (1) to (4).
Résumé
-
• Les activités de gestion des risques d’incendie peuvent grandement bénéficier de la description du combustible forestier.
-
• Une typologie forestière développée à partir de l’Inventaire Forestier National Portugais combinant type de couvert (espèces de l’étage dominant) et structure de la forêt définie comme une combinaison de la densité générique du peuplement (fermé ou ouvert) et de la hauteur (haute ou basse) est traduite en modèles de disponibilité en combustible. Les simulations de comportement du feu prenant en compte les modifications induites par la structure des peuplements ont abouti à une évaluation objective et quantitative des risques d’incendie pour 19 types de forêts.
-
• La gamme de risques d’incendie est similaire entre et dans les types de couvert. La structure des peuplements, plutôt que le type de couvert, est le principal déterminant de la vulnérabilité à l’incendie, ce qui indique un rôle potentiellement important de la gestion des peuplements et du combustible dans la lutte contre les feux de forêts. Quatre groupes de risque d’incendie sont distingués : (1) forêts hautes et ouvertes, et couverts fermés et hauts de Quercus suber; (2) peuplements bas et fermés de chênes décidus, de Q. suber et de diverses essences, grands bois fermés de Pinus pinaster et plantations de grands Eucalyptus globulus; (3) forêts ouvertes et basses ; (4) peuplements bas et denses de P. pinaster, E. globulus et Acacia. risque potentiel d’incendie s’accroît de (1) à (4).
References
Agee J.K. and Skinner C., 2005. Basic principles of forest fuel reduction treatments. For. Ecol. Manage. 211: 83–96.
Alexander M., 2007. Simple question; difficult answer: how much fuel is acceptable? Fire Management Today 67: 6–11.
Allgöwer B., Harvey S., and Rüegsegger M., 1998. Fuel models for Switzerland: description, spatial pattern, index for torching and crowning. In: Viegas D.X. (Ed.), Proc. 3rd International Conference on Forest Fire Research & 14th Fire and Forest Meteorology Conference, ADAI, Coimbra, pp. 2605–2620.
Allgöwer B., Calogine D., Camia A., Cuiñas P., Fernandes P., Francesetti A., Hernando C., Kötz B., Koutsias N., Lindberg H., Molina D., Morsdorf F., Ribeiro L., Rigolot E., and Séro-Guillaume O., 2004. Methods for wildland fuel description and modeling: a state of the art, Deliverable D-02-01, EUFIRELAB: Euro-Mediterranean Wildland Fire Laboratory, a “wall-less” Laboratory for Wildland Fire Sciences and Technologies in the Euro-Mediterranean Region, Contract No. EVR1-CT-2002-40028.
Anderson H.E., 1982. Aids to determining fuel models for estimating fire behaviour, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, 22 p.
Andrews P., Bevins C., and Seli R., 2005. BehavePlus Fire Modeling System, version 3.0: user’s guide, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, 134 p.
Bachmann A. and Allgöwer B., 2000. The need for a consistent wildfire risk terminology. In: Gollberg G.E. (Ed.), Crossing the millenium: integrating spatial technologies and ecological principles for a new age in fire management, University of Idaho and International Association of Wildland Fire, Boise, pp. 67–77.
Brown J.K., 1981. Bulk densities of nonuniform surface fuels and their application to fire modeling. For. Sci. 27: 667–683.
Burgan R. and Rothermel R., 1984. BEHAVE: fire behavior prediction and fuel modeling system — FUEL subsystem, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, 137p.
Byram G.M., 1959. Combustion of forest fuels. In: Davis K.P. (Ed.), Forest fire: control and use, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 90–123.
Castro F.X., Tudela A., Gabriel E., Montserrat D., Canyameros E., and Segarra M., 2006. Evolution of live fuel moisture in Mediterranean forests. In: Viegas D.X. (Ed.), Proceedings V International Conference on Forest Fire Research, Elsevier B.V., CDROM, Amsterdam.
Choung Y., Lee B., Cho J., Lee K., Jang I., Kim S., Hong S., Jung H., and Choung H., 2004. Forest responses to the large-scale east coast fires in Korea. Ecol. Res. 19: 43–54.
Cohen M., Cuiñas P., Diez C., Fernandes P., Guijarro M., and Moro C., 2003. Wildland fuel particles characterization database content, Deliverable D6-03-A1, Fire Star: a decision support system for fuel management and fire hazard reduction in Mediterranean wildland — urban interfaces, Contract No. EVG1-CT-2001-00041.
Countryman C., 1974. Can Southern California Wildland Conflagrations be Stopped? USDA Forest Service, Berkeley, 11 p.
Cruz M.G., 2005. Guia fotográfico para identificação de combustíveis florestais — região Centro de Portugal, CEIF, ADAI, Coimbra. 26p.
Cruz M.G., Alexander M.E., and Wakimoto R.H., 2003. Assessing canopy fuel stratum characteristics in crown fire prone fuel types of western North America. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 12: 39–50.
Cruz M.G. and Fernandes P.M., 2008. Development of fuel models for fire behaviour prediction in maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) stands. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 17: 194–204.
Cumming S.G., 2001. Forest type and wildfire in the Alberta boreal mixedwood: what do fires burn? Ecol. Appl. 11: 97–110.
DGF, 2001. Inventário Florestal Nacional: Portugal Continental 3a revisão, DGF, Lisboa.
DGRF, 2006. Incêndios florestais, relatório de 2005, Divisão de Defesa da Floresta Contra Incêndios, DGRF, Lisboa.
Dimitrakopoulos A.P., 2002. Mediterranean fuel models and potential fire behaviour in Greece. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 11: 127–130.
Fernandes P.M. and Botelho H.S., 2003. A review of prescribed burning effectiveness in fire hazard reduction. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 12: 117–128.
Fernandes P.M. and Botelho H.S., 2004. Analysis of the prescribed burning practice in the pine forest of northwestern Portugal. J. Env. Manage. 70: 15–26.
Fernandes P.M. and Rigolot E., 2007. Fire ecology and management of maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). For. Ecol. Manage. 241: 1–13.
Finney M., 1998. FARSITE: Fire Area Simulator — model development and evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Ogden, 47 p.
Godinho-Ferreira P., Azevedo A., and Rego F., 2005. Carta da tipologia florestal de Portugal Continental. Silva Lusitana 13: 1–34.
Godinho-Ferreira P., Azevedo A., Vaz P., and Rego F., 2006. Composition, configuration and vertical structure of Portuguese forests: implications in wildfire probability. In: Viegas D.X. (Ed.), Proceedings V International Conference on Forest Fire Research, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, CD-ROM.
González J.R., Palahí M., Trasobares A., and Pukkala T., 2006. A fire probability model for forest stands in Catalonia (north-east Spain). Ann. For. Sci. 63: 169–176.
González J.R., Trasobares A., Palahí M., and Pukkala T., 2007a. Predicting stand damage and tree survival in burned forests in Catalonia (North-East Spain). Ann. For. Sci. 64: 733–742.
González J.R., Kolehmainen O., and Pukkala T., 2007b. Using expert knowledge to model forest stand vulnerability to fire. Comput. Electron. Agric. 55: 107–114.
Graham R., McCaffrey S., and Jain T., 2004. Science basis for changing forest structure to modify wildfire behavior and severity, USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, 43 p.
Hardy C.C., 2005. Wildland fire risk and hazard: problems, definitions and concepts. For. Ecol. Manage. 211: 73–82.
Hardy C.C., Schmidt K.M., Menakis J.P., and Sampson R.N., 2001. Spatial data for national fire planning and fuel management. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 10: 353–372.
Hély C., Flannigan M., and Bergeron Y., 2003. Modeling tree mortality following wildfire in the Southeastern Canadian mixed-wood boreal forest. For. Sci. 49: 566–576.
Hirsch K.G. and Martell D.L., 1996. A review of initial attack fire crew productivity and effectiveness. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 6: 199–215.
Hough W.A. and Albini F.A., 1978. Predicting fire behavior in palmettogalberry fuel complexes, USDA Forest Service, Asheville, 44 p.
ICONA, 1990. Clave fotografica para la identificación de modelos de combustible, Defensa contra incendios forestales, MAPA, Madrid.
Johnson R.A. and Wichern D.W., 1982. Applied multivariate statistical analysis, Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 800 p.
Lentile L.B., Smith F.W., and Shepperd W.D., 2006. Influence of topography and forest structure on patterns of mixed severity fire in ponderosa pine forests of the South Dakota Black Hills, USA. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 15: 55
Moreira F., Rego F., and Ferreira P.G., 2001. Temporal (1958–1995) pattern of change in a cultural landscape of northwestern Portugal: implications for fire occurrence. Land. Ecol. 16: 557–567.
Pollet J. and Omi P.N., 2002. Effect of thinning and prescribed burning on crown fire severity in ponderosa pine forests. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 11: 1–10.
Rothermel R.C., 1972. A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, 40 p.
Rothermel R.C., Wilson R.A., Morris G.A., and Sackett S.S., 1986. Modeling moisture content of fine dead wildland fuels, USDA Forest Service, Ogden, 61 p.
Sandberg D.V., Ottmar R.D., and Cushon G.H., 2001. Characterizing fuels in the 21st century. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 10: 381–387.
Scott J.H. and Reinhardt E.D., 2001. Assessing crown fire potential by linking models of surface and crown fire behavior. USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, 59 p.
Silva T., Pereira J.C., Paúl J., Santos M.N., and Vasconcelos M.P., 2006. Estimativa de emissões atmosféricas originadas por fogos rurais em Portugal. Silva Lusitana 14: 239–263.
Van Wagner C., 1977. Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire. Can. J. For. Res. 3: 373–378.
Viegas D.X., Viegas M.T., and Ferreira A.D., 1992. Moisture content of fine forest fuels and fire occurrence in Central Portugal. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 2: 69–86.
Viegas D.X., Piñol J., Viegas M.T., and Ogaya R., 2001. Estimating live fine fuels moisture content using meteorologically-based indices. Int. J. Wildl. Fire 10: 223–240.
Wang G.G., 2002. Fire severity in relation to canopy composition within burned boreal mixedwood stands. For. Ecol. Manage. 163: 85–92.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fernandes, P.M. Combining forest structure data and fuel modelling to classify fire hazard in Portugal. Ann. For. Sci. 66, 415 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009013
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009013