Your browser does not support JavaScript!
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com
1887

Assessment of performance-driven investment strategies of distribution systems using reference networks

Assessment of performance-driven investment strategies of distribution systems using reference networks

For access to this article, please select a purchase option:

Buy article PDF
£12.50
(plus tax if applicable)
Buy Knowledge Pack
10 articles for £75.00
(plus taxes if applicable)

IET members benefit from discounts to all IET publications and free access to E&T Magazine. If you are an IET member, log in to your account and the discounts will automatically be applied.

Learn more about IET membership 

Recommend Title Publication to library

You must fill out fields marked with: *

Librarian details
Name:*
Email:*
Your details
Name:*
Email:*
Department:*
Why are you recommending this title?
Select reason:
 
 
 
 
 
IEE Proceedings - Generation, Transmission and Distribution — Recommend this title to your library

Thank you

Your recommendation has been sent to your librarian.

Distribution systems are inherent monopolies and therefore they have generally been regulated to protect customers and to ensure cost-effective operation. In the UK this is one of the functions of the Office of Gas and Electricity Markets (OFGEM). Initially the regulation was based on the value of assets but there is now a trend towards performance-based regulation. To achieve this, a methodology is needed that enables the reliability performance associated with alternative investment strategies to be compared with the investment cost of these strategies. At present there is no accepted approach for such assessments. An approach based on the concept of reference networks is proposed. The essential idea is to analyse a small number of networks that represent the real feeders of the system being considered. The main stages are: to classify the real feeders into coherent clusters, to construct a representative network for each cluster, to assess the reliability of these representative networks and to re-aggregate the results to give those for the overall system. These representative networks are then analysed repetitively for different investment scenarios and the corresponding reference networks derived. The approach can be used to assess individual companies on an absolute basis or to compare the relative performance between companies. The approach, its implementation in conjunction with a number of distribution companies, and its effectiveness when approach using the underground part of a real system are described.

References

    1. 1)
    2. 2)
      • R. Billinton , R.N. Allan . (1988) Reliability assessment of large electric power systems.
    3. 3)
      • OFGEM: ‘Information and incentives project: Comparing quality of supply performance’, http://www.ofgem.gov.uk., accessed October 2002.
    4. 4)
      • B. Everitte . (1980) Cluster analysis.
    5. 5)
      • CNE, Madrid, Spain: ‘Royal Decree 1955/2000, dated December 1st, regulating transmission, distribution, trading and supply activities and authorisation procedures for electric power installations’, http://www.cne.es., accessed December 2001.
    6. 6)
    7. 7)
      • R. Allan , R. Billinton . Power system reliability and its assessment. III. Distribution systems and economic considerations. Power Eng. J. , 4 , 185 - 192
    8. 8)
      • Commission for Energy Regulation, Ireland: distribution price review proposals, July 2001, http://www.cer.ie., accessed December 2001.
    9. 9)
      • Douglas, J.A.K., Castro, F.: `Sayas: Setting of targets for continuity of supply through benchmarking', Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Electricity Distribution, 2003, Barcelona, Spain, p. 2/78.1–2/78.6.
    10. 10)
      • OFGEM: ‘Information and incentives project: Output measures and monitoring delivery between reviews — Initial proposal’, June 2000, http://www.ofgem.gov.uk, accessed June 2000.
    11. 11)
      • H. Spath . (1980) Cluster analysis algorithms for data reduction and classification of objects.
    12. 12)
      • R. Billinton , R.N. Allan . (1984) Reliability evaluation of power systems.
    13. 13)
    14. 14)
      • Holzenthal, M., Osterholt, A., Prause, U.: `Reliability based planning: Reducing the re-investment needs of an urban utility', Proc. 17th Int. Conf. on Electricity Distribution, 2003, Barcelona, Spain, p. 5/34.1–5/34.5.
    15. 15)
      • `Regulations concerning financial and technical reporting, permitted income for network operations and transmission tariffs', March 1999.
    16. 16)
      • `Report on distribution and transmission system performance', , Published annually.
    17. 17)
    18. 18)
      • Council of European Energy Regulators: ‘Quality of electricity supply: Initial benchmarking on actual levels, standards and regulatory strategies’, http://www.ceer-eu.org, accessed December 2001.
    19. 19)
    20. 20)
      • G. Strbac , R. Allan . Performance regulation of distribution systems using reference networks. Power Eng. J. , 295 - 303
    21. 21)
      • OFGEM: ‘Information and incentives project: Incentive schemes – final proposal’, December 2001, http://www.ofgem.gov.uk., accessed December 2001.
    22. 22)
      • M.H.J. Bollen . Method for reliability analysis of industrial distribution systems. IEE Proc. Gener. Transm. Distrib. , 6 , 497 - 502
    23. 23)
      • Victoria, ESC.: ‘Australia: Electricity distribution business comparative report’, 2001, http://www.esc.vic.gov.au., accessed December 2001.
    24. 24)
      • Finish Energy Market Authority: ‘Summary: considerations of efficiency in the assessments of the reasonableness of distribution pricing’, June 2002, http://www.energiamarkkinavirasto.fi., accessed October 2002.
http://iet.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1049/ip-gtd_20041109
Loading

Related content

content/journals/10.1049/ip-gtd_20041109
pub_keyword,iet_inspecKeyword,pub_concept
6
6
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address