Abstract
Outdoor workers who occupationally spend large periods of time exposed to ultraviolet irradiance are at increased risk of developing certain types of non-melanoma skin cancer in addition to being prone to erythema and eye damage. UV exposure to workers is affected by a number of factors including geographic location, season, individual biological factors and the local surroundings. Urban environments can provide surrounds that contain surfaces that reflect UV radiation which can enhance UV exposure to construction workers, in both the vertical as well as horizontal plane. However it was unknown how different constructed configurations of the surfaces may additionally influence UV exposure for a worker, such as corners opposed to walls. This study shows that for highly UV reflective surfaces the influence on erythemal UV exposure is approximately the same regardless of constructive type, but there is statistically significant difference observed for lower UV reflecting surfaces in conjunction with constructive type. This is comparable to influence of body site on relative UV exposure, and together may provide a method that may assist in reduction in UV exposures. Regression analysis provides a more effective means to determine a UV reflective factor for a surface type, than previously used averaging methods. Additionally, this knowledge may be used by workers, workplaces and advisory bodies to assist with developing further protective strategies that aim to provide more moderate UV exposures to outdoor workers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A. R., Webb, Who, what, where and when - influences on cutaneous vitamin D synthesis Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2006 92 17–25
M. F., Holick, Vitamin D: a millenium perspective J. Cell. Biochem. 2003 88 296–307
K., Rajakumar, Solar ultraviolet radiation and vitamin D: a historical perspective Am. J. Public Health 2007 97 1746–1754
J., Reichrath, The challenge resulting from positive and negative effects of sunlight: how much solar UV exposure is appropriate to balance between risks of vitamin D deficiency and skin cancer? Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2006 92 9–16
R. P. Gallagher and T. K., Lee, Adverse effects of ultraviolet radiation: a brief review Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 2006 92 119–131
IARC, Solar and ultraviolet radiation, in IARC Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, Secretariat of the World Health Organisation, Lyon, France, 1992
B. K. Armstrong and A., Kricker, The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 2001 63 8–18
V. Hammond, A. I. Reeder and A., Gray, Patterns of real-time occupational ultraviolet radiation exposure among a sample of outdoor workers in New Zealand Public Health 2009 123 182–187
L. Fritschi and T., Driscoll, Cancer due to occupation in Australia Aust. N. Z. J. Public Health 2006 30 213–219
J. M. Elwood, Who gets skin cancer: individual risk factors, in Prevention of skin cancer, ed. D. Hill, J. M. Elwood and D. R. English, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004
H. P. Gies and J., Wright, Measured solar ultraviolet radiation exposures of outdoor workers in Queensland in the building and construction industry Photochem. Photobiol. 2003 78 342–348
H. P. Gies, C. R. Roy, S. Toomey, R. MacLennan and M., Watson, Solar UVR exposures of three groups of outdoor workers on the sunshine coast, Queensland Photochem. Photobiol. 1995 62 1015–1021
A. Milon, P. E. Sottas, J. L. Bulliard and D., Vernez, Effective exposure to solar UV in building workers: influence of local and individual factors J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2007 17 58–68
ARPANSA, Occupational exposure to ultraviolet radiation, ed. A. R. P. a. N. S. Agency, Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency, 2006
ICNIRP ICNIRP Guidelines on limits of exposure to ultraviolet radiation of wavelength between 100 nm and 400 nm (incoherent optical radiation) Health Phys. 2004 87 171–186
M. G. Kimlin and T. D., Tenkate, Occupational exposure to ultraviolet radiation: the duality dilemma Rev. Environ. Health 2007 22 1–37
T. L. Diepgen and V., Mahler, The epidemiology of skin cancer Br. J. Dermatol. 2002 146 1–6
D. R. English, B. K. Armstrong, A. Kricker and C., Fleming, Sunlight and cancer Cancer Cause Control 1997 8 271–283
C., Young, Solar ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer Occup. Med. 2009 59 82–88
J. M. Elwood and J., Jopson, Melanoma and sun exposure: an overview of published studies Int. J. Cancer 1997 73 198–203
J. Turner and A. V., Parisi, Measuring the influence of UV reflection from vertical metal surfaces on humans Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2009 8 62–69
J. Turner and A., Parisi, Improved method of ultraviolet radiation reflection measurement for non-horizontal urban surfaces Meas. Sci. Technol. 2012 23 1–8
J. Turner and A., Parisi, Ultraviolet reflection irradiances and exposures in the constructed environment for horizontal, vertical and inclined surfaces Photochem. Photobiol. 2013 89 730–736
R. McPeters, Ozone Monitoring Instrument, NASA
B. L. Diffey, Ultraviolet radiation dosimetry with polysulphone film, in Radiation measurement in Photobiology, Academic Press, New York, 1989, pp. 136-159
G. Seckmeyer, M. Klingebiel, S. Riechelmann, I. Lohse, R. McKenzie, J. Liley, M. Allen, A. Siani and G., Casale, A critical assessment of two types of personal UV dosimeters Photochem. Photobiol. 2012 88 215–222
CIE, Erythema Reference Action Spectrum and Standard Erythema Dose, CIE, 1998, vol. S007/E-1998, pp. 1-4
A. R. Webb, H. Slaper, P. Koepke and A., Schmalwieser, Know your standard: clarifying the CIE erythema action spectrum Photochem. Photobiol. 2011 87 483–486
J. C. Van Der Leun, R. D. Piacentini and F. R. De Gruijl Climate change and human skin cancer Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2008 7 730–733
A. V. Parisi and N., Downs, Cloud cover and horizontal plane eye damaging solar UV exposures Int. J. Biometeorol. 2004 49 130–136
ICNIRP, Protecting workers from ultraviolet radiation, International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, 2007
J. Turner, A. V. Parisi and D. J., Turnbull, Reflected solar radiation from horizontal, vertical and inclined surfaces: ultraviolet and visible spectral and broadband behaviour due to solar zenith angle, orientation and surface type J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 2008 92 29–37
I. Foyo-Moreno, I. Alados, F. Olmo, J. Vida and L. Alados-Arboledas On the use of a cloud modification factor for solar UV (290-385 nm) spectral range Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2001 68 41–50
A. Parisi, D. J. Turnbull and J., Turner, Calculation of cloud modification factors for the horizontal plane eye damaging ultraviolet radiation Atmos. Res. 2007 86 278–285
J. C. F. Wong, D. K. Airey and R. A., Fleming, Annual reduction of solar UV exposure to the facial area of outdoor workers in Southeast Queensland by wearing a hat Photodermatol., Photoimmunol. Photomed. 1996 12 131–135
J. Cioffi, L. Wilkes and J. Hartcher-O’Brien Outdoor workers and sun protection: knowledge and behaviour Aust. J. Constr. Econ. Build. 2002 2 10–14
P. Madgwick, J. Houdmont and R., Randall, Sun safety measures among construction workers in Britain Occup. Med. 2011 61 430–433
K. Glanz, D. B. Buller and M., Saraiya, Reducing ultraviolet radiation exposure among outdoor workers: state of the evidence and recommendations Environ. Health 2007 6 1–11
V. Hammond, A. I. Reeder, A. Gray and M. L., Bell, Are workers or their workplaces the key to occupational sun protection? Health Promot. J. Austr. 2008 19 97–101
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Turner, J., Parisi, A.V. Influence of reflected UV irradiance on occupational exposure from combinations of reflective wall surfaces. Photochem Photobiol Sci 12, 1589–1595 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3pp50059d
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c3pp50059d