Abstract
Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing protein 2 (NOD2) recognizes muramyl dipeptide (MDP) of bacterial cell walls, triggering NFκB-induced pro-inflammation. As most human pathogenic filariae contain Wolbachia endobacteria that synthesize the MDP-containing cell wall precursor lipid II, NOD2’s role during infection with the rodent filaria Litomosoides sigmodontis was investigated. In NFκB reporter-cells, worm-extract containing Wolbachia induced NOD2 and NOD1. NOD2-deficient mice infected with L. sigmodontis had significantly more worms than wildtype controls early in infection. Increased worm burden was not observed after subcutaneous infection, suggesting that protective NOD2-dependent immune responses occur within the skin. Flow cytometry demonstrated that neutrophil recruitment to the skin was impaired in NOD2−/− mice after intradermal injection of third stage larvae (L3), and blood neutrophil numbers were reduced after L. sigmodontis infection. PCR array supported the requirement of NOD2 for recruitment of neutrophils to the skin, as genes associated with neutrophil recruitment and activation were downregulated in NOD2−/− mice after intradermal L3 injection. Neutrophil depletion before L. sigmodontis infection increased worm recovery in wildtype mice, confirming that neutrophils are essential against invading L3 larvae. This study indicates that NOD-like receptors are implemented in first-line protective immune responses against filarial nematodes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs) function as intracellular pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) and thus mediate cytosolic recognition of microbial molecules1. The NLR family contains 22 members in humans and 30 in mice2, with NOD1 and NOD2 being the best-known and well-studied NLRs (as reviewed in ref. 3). Studies demonstrated that both of these receptors sense bacterial peptidoglycan components, with NOD2 activated by muramyl-dipeptide (MDP), a common peptidoglycan component in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria4, whereas NOD1 recognizes di-aminopimelic acid containing peptides (DAP), found in Gram-negative bacteria5. Recently, biochemical evidence for the direct binding of MDP to the NOD2 receptor has been reported6. Activation of the NOD2 receptor leads to signaling via the proteinkinases RIP2 and TAK17,8, culminating in NFκB translocation to the nucleus and transcription of pro-inflammatory genes.
NOD2 is expressed in monocytes9, dendritic cells10, eosinophils11, and neutrophils12, but also in non-myeloid cell types including intestinal epithelial cells13 and keratinocytes14. Due to the ability of NOD2 to sense bacterial MDP, its role during bacterial infections and the induction of inflammatory responses has been widely studied. NOD2−/− mice are more susceptible to bacterial infections15,16 and often respond with an early delayed or impaired neutrophil recruitment phenotype17,18. A function of NOD2 in murine skin wound healing processes was recently reported, with NOD2 deficiency leading to a substantial defect in wound repair associated with an initial delay in neutrophil recruitment19. Furthermore, mutations in the NOD2 gene have been associated with inflammatory bowel diseases like Crohn’s20 or inflammatory skin disorder like Blau syndrome21.
The role of NOD2 during parasite infections has not been studied as extensively. During infections with the protozoan parasite Trypanosoma cruzi, studies indicated that NOD2 is not required for host protection22. A proposed role in protection against the intracellular protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii23 was refuted shortly after24. Human pathogenic nematodes like Onchocerca volvulus, the causative agent of onchocerciasis, or Wuchereria bancrofti, the major cause of lymphatic filariasis, are known to harbor endosymbiotic Wolbachia bacteria (reviewed in refs 25 and 26). Wolbachia are essential for development and survival of their nematode hosts and can induce a pro-inflammatory immune response with strong neutrophil involvement27,28,29,30, making them crucial in the pathogenesis of filarial infections31,32. It has been shown that these Gram-negative bacteria synthesize lipid II, a peptidoglycan precursor that contains MDP33, suggesting that Wolbachia are a source of NOD2 receptor ligands.
L. sigmodontis is a well-established model for human filariasis34,35, which causes a patent infection in BALB/c mice and develops into adult worms in semi-resistant C57BL/6 mice. Upon natural infection by the intermediate host, the tropical rat mite Ornithonyssus bacoti, infectious L3 larvae penetrate the skin and migrate within 5 days via the lymphatics to the thoracic cavity, where they molt into adult worms.
Our experiments demonstrate that crude extracts from Wolbachia-containing L. sigmodontis adult worms activate both NOD2 and NOD1 in vitro. As we had no access to NOD1−/− mice at the time of this study, we focused our in vivo experiments on L. sigmodontis infections in NOD2−/− mice. The in vivo studies revealed that naturally infected C57BL/6 NOD2−/− mice have a higher worm burden during the early and middle phases of infection than wildtype controls. This increased worm burden is due to delayed NOD2-dependent neutrophil recruitment into the skin during the initial phase of the infection. This is the first report demonstrating the impact of an NLR on protective immune responses against a filarial nematode infection, contributing to the still poorly understood protective immune responses within the skin during the initial phase of filarial infection.
Results
Wolbachia endosymbionts are a possible activator of NOD2 induced signaling
NOD ligands are derived from lipid II, the precursor of peptidoglycan in bacterial cell walls. It was previously demonstrated that all enzymes needed to synthesize lipid II are encoded in the Wolbachia genome (Fig. 1), and that the endobacteria synthesize lipid II33,36. Thus, the Wolbachia, essential endobacteria of filarial nematodes, are potential sources of NOD signaling during filarial infections. To assess whether endosymbiotic Wolbachia bacteria of L. sigmodontis are indeed activators of NOD1 and NOD2 induced signaling, NFκB-gene-reporter-assays were performed using lysates of L. sigmodontis adult worms containing Wolbachia or depleted of Wolbachia. NOD2-dependent NFκB signaling was induced when HEK293-cells transfected with murine NOD1 or NOD2 genes were stimulated with Wolbachia-containing crude extract of L. sigmodontis adult worms (Fig. 2), while extract from Wolbachia-depleted worms resulted in significantly lower activation of NOD1 and NOD2, respectively. Control stimulations with MDP for NOD2 activation and DAP for NOD1 activation validated the assay.
Lack of NOD2 results in an increased worm burden
Knowing that the intracellular PRR NOD2 can be activated by Wolbachia, the impact of NOD2 signaling on L. sigmodontis infection was investigated. To study the role of NOD2 during natural infection with L. sigmodontis, the worm burden was quantified at different time points after infection, i.e. after the molt to the L4 stage (15 dpi) as well as a time point when adult worms are present in wildtype (WT) controls (35 dpi).
Compared to WT controls, NOD2−/− mice had an increased worm burden at 15 dpi (Fig. 3a, p = 0.002) as well as at 35 dpi (Fig. 3b, p = 0.001). In addition to the worm burden, length, sex and developmental stage were examined. Worms isolated from NOD2−/− mice were significantly shorter than worms from WT mice (Fig. 3c,d). Furthermore, L4 larvae in NOD2−/− did not molt into the adult stage at the same rate as in WT controls, as by 30 dpi only 15.8% of the L4 larvae had successfully molted into the adult stage in NOD2−/− mice compared to 80.7% in WT mice (Fig. 3e). Differences in sex distribution were not found (data not shown).
The cellular composition and cytokine milieu were also examined at the site of infection, the thoracic cavity, 15 dpi. No differences were found in the absolute numbers of CD4+-T cells, B cells, macrophages, eosinophils, and neutrophils in the thoracic cavity of NOD2−/− mice and corresponding WT controls (Fig. 4a). Similarly, cytokine concentrations for IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10 in the thoracic cavity lavage did not show significant differences between the two groups (Fig. 4b).
An increased number of L3 larvae reach the site of infection in NOD2−/− mice
As the immunological analyses of the thoracic cavity lavage of mice infected for 15 days did not reveal differences that could account for the increased worm burden in the NOD2−/− mice, experiments were performed at 5 dpi, when L3 larvae reach the thoracic cavity, as well as during an early phase of infection (10 dpi). 5 dpi the worm burden in NOD2−/− mice was significantly higher than in WT controls (Fig. 5a, p = 0.008). A significantly higher worm burden was also seen 10 dpi (Fig. 5b, p = 0.0094).
Analysis of the cellular composition and cytokine profile of the thoracic cavity lavage was performed 5 dpi. The overall cell number in the thoracic cavity was lower compared to 15 dpi, with comparable absolute numbers of CD4+ T cells, macrophages, eosinophils, and neutrophils between NOD2−/− mice and WT controls (Fig. 5c). Reflecting the reduced total numbers of thoracic cavity cells 5 dpi, cytokine concentrations were lower in both groups compared to 15 dpi. NOD2−/− mice had significantly higher levels of IL-5 5 dpi (Fig. 5d, p = 0.02), while levels of IL-4, IL-6 and IL-10 did not differ compared to WT controls.
Subcutaneous injection of L3 larvae leads to a similar worm burden in NOD2−/− mice and WT controls
Because an increased number of L3 larvae had already reached the site of infection in NOD2−/− mice 5 dpi, we hypothesized that the NOD2 dependent mechanism causing the increased worm burden in NOD2−/− mice must occur within the first few days (<5) of infection. As the skin is one of the major immune barriers in the vertebrate host and has to be penetrated by the L3 larvae during natural infection, the worm burden was assessed 15 days after subcutaneous injection of 40 L3 larvae, thus avoiding the initial trapping of invading L3 larvae within the skin. The worm burden in the thoracic cavity in NOD2−/− mice was not different from that in WT controls (Fig. 6a, p = 0.2; median NOD2−/−: 4 worms, median WT: 6 worms), suggesting that the NOD2 dependent protective mechanism occurs within the skin.
Differences in the bacterial colonization of the skin between NOD2−/− and WT mice may account for the observed increased worm burden in NOD2−/− mice. Isolated bacteria from the skin of WT mice consisted of three different types of Gram-positive cocci (Fig. 6b). Flora of NOD2−/− mice included Gram-positive bacteria, but also a Gram-negative rod (Shewanella algae), which could be due to contamination of the skin with fecal flora (Fig. 6b). However, differences in the bacterial colonization of the skin seem not to cause the increased worm recovery in NOD2−/− mice, as co-housed NOD2−/− still harbored an increased worm burden 15 dpi compared to the co-housed WT controls (Fig. 6c).
NOD2 deficiency leads to impaired neutrophil recruitment to the site of infection in the skin
Neutrophils are one of the first immune cells to be recruited to the site of infection and NOD2 deficiency was previously reported to delay neutrophil recruitment17,18,19 following bacterial exposure or in wound healing processes. Therefore, neutrophil counts were analyzed during the initial phase of L. sigmodontis infection.
In comparison to uninfected controls, peripheral blood neutrophil frequencies increased 24 h following natural L. sigmodontis infection in both wildtype and NOD2 deficient mice (Fig. 7a). Nevertheless, the increase in neutrophil frequency was significantly lower in infected NOD2−/− mice compared to WT controls (Fig. 7a, p = 0.026). Knowing that neutrophils are involved in the initial immune response and having shown that it is the skin where the NOD2 dependent mechanism occurs, neutrophils and additional innate immune cells: eosinophils, mast cells and macrophages were analyzed from skin via flow cytometry following intradermal L3 injection. Similar to blood neutrophil frequencies following natural infection, intradermal injections of L. sigmodontis L3 larvae increased the frequency of CD11b+Gr1+ neutrophils within the skin compared to PBS treated controls (Fig. 7b). Recruitment of neutrophils in response to L3s was significantly decreased in NOD2−/− mice compared to WT controls (Fig. 7b, p < 0.05). Increased frequencies of eosinophils as well as macrophages were also detected 3 h after L3 injection in WT, but not NOD2−/− mice (Fig. 7c,d), while no differences were observed for mast cells (Fig. 7e). Histological analysis for neutrophil elastase activity further supported the reduced recruitment of neutrophils upon L3 injection in NOD2−/− mice (Suppl. Fig. 1).
Similar to the observed changes upon intradermal L3 challenge, intradermal L. sigmodontis extract (LsAg) injections increased the frequency of CD11b+Gr1+ neutrophils within the skin compared to PBS treated controls and this increase was less prominent in NOD2−/− mice (Fig. 7f, p < 0.001). To investigate whether the neutrophil recruitment to the skin is dependent on Wolbachia, additional skin analyses were performed using WT mice and intradermal injections of LsAg as well as extracts prepared from Wolbachia-depleted L. sigmodontis (LsAg –Wolb.). After injection of LsAg, a significant increase of neutrophils was observed within the skin tissue 3 h post injection compared to the PBS controls. This significant increase in neutrophil frequency was not observed in LsAg depleted from Wolbachia injected mice (Fig. 7g).
To further assess the role of neutrophils during L. sigmodontis infection, neutrophils were depleted using anti-Ly6G (clone: 1A8) antibody injections 24 h before L. sigmodontis infection. Infected WT mice depleted of neutrophils had a significantly increased worm burden in the thoracic cavity 15 dpi compared to isotype-treated WT controls (Fig. 7h). As expected, isotype-treated NOD2−/− mice had a significantly increased worm burden compared to isotype-treated WT controls and neutrophil depletion did not further increase the worm recovery in NOD2−/− mice. In NOD2−/−, the observed lower worm burden in the neutrophil depleted animals was not significantly different from the isotype control.
These results indicate that neutrophils are essential in protective immune responses against invading L3 larvae. Neutrophils of NOD2−/− mice exhibit a delayed recruitment to the site of filarial entry, which is associated with the Wolbachia endosymbionts of the filarial nematode.
Neutrophils of NOD2−/− mice are not functionally impaired
To evaluate whether neutrophils of NOD2−/− mice are functionally impaired, casein-induced neutrophils from NOD2−/− and WT mice were compared for their capacity to release diverse pro-inflammatory mediators and their chemotactic behavior. Myeloperoxidase activity and production of reactive oxygen species was comparable for neutrophils from NOD2−/− and WT mice in response to LsAg and LPS (Fig. 8a,b). Similarly, no difference in the activity of neutrophil elastase was observed (Fig. 8c) and the release of TNF, CXCL1 and CXCL2 in response to LsAg, LsAg of Wolbachia depleted adult worms, Pam3Cys, and LPS were similar (Fig. 8d–f). Furthermore, lack of NOD2 did not alter the dose-dependent in vitro migration of neutrophils towards CXCL1 and CXCL2 (Fig. 8g,h). These findings suggest that neutrophils from NOD2−/− mice are not functionally impaired.
Infectious L3 larvae induce a decreased inflammatory gene expression in NOD2−/− mice
For a more detailed evaluation of immune responses within the skin upon L. sigmodontis exposure, a PCR array was performed, measuring the expression of genes known to be involved in immune responses against filariae.
NOD2−/− mice and WT controls share a broad range of genes that are upregulated (fold change >1.5) after intradermal L3 injection compared to PBS injected WT controls (Fig. 9a). However, from the PCR array data several genes that are downregulated in L3 injected NOD2−/− mice compared to PBS treated WT controls were identified. None of the measured genes were downregulated in WT mice after L3 injection. When comparing gene expression of L3 injected NOD2−/− mice with L3 injected WT controls, a reduced inflammatory gene expression was detected in the NOD2−/− mice (Fig. 9b).
Genes significantly expressed at lower levels (fold change <−2) in NOD2−/− mice upon L3 injection compared to L3 injected WT controls (Fig. 9b) included elane, the gene encoding for neutrophil expressed elastase, ngp (neutrophilic granule protein), nos1 and nos2 (inducible nitrite oxide synthase I and II), which are also expressed by neutrophils as well as the helminthotoxic protein prg2 (proteoglycan 2), which is known to have neutrophil activation functions. Differential expression of these neutrophil-associated genes further supports the hypothesis that neutrophils play a major role in the NOD2-dependent mechanism causing the increased worm burden. Interestingly, eosinophil-associated genes encoding eosinophil peroxidase (epx) and siglecf as well as mast cell-related genes including histamine receptors hrh3 and hrh4 were also less strongly expressed in the skin of L3-injected NOD2−/− mice. Furthermore several genes encoding the cytokines il5, il9, il21, as well as ifnγ, gzmb (granzyme B) and the gene for resistin-like ß (retnlb) were significantly upregulated (p-values and fold regulation, see Fig. 9b) in WT controls after L3 injection compared to the NOD2−/− mice (full list of genes with fold regulations: see Supplementary Table 1). qRT-PCR results from skin tissue of L3 injected NOD2−/− mice and WT controls confirmed an increased expression of the eosinophil marker siglecf in L3-injected WT controls, while the expression of the mast cell marker ckit was not significantly different between the groups (Suppl. Fig. 2a,b). qRT-PCR analysis further demonstrated that L3-injected WT controls had a stronger expression of the pro-inflammatory mediators inos, il6, gzmb, as well as the type 2 inducing cytokine tslp (Suppl. Fig. 2c–f).
Genes identified in the PCR array that were significantly upregulated in L3-injected NOD2−/− mice compared to L3-injected WT controls included the chemokine cxcl2, the LPS detecting co-receptor cd14, and il1ß, suggesting that inflammatory responses are still occurring in the absence of the NOD2 receptor (Fig. 9b).
Summarizing, the data obtained from the PCR array and qRT-PCR analysis further support our observations on the cellular level, with NOD2−/− mice showing decreased inflammation in the skin compared to WT controls.
Discussion
Once described as an intracellular PRR exclusively involved in bacterial infections, several studies have suggested that NOD2 has a broader than expected role in the innate immune system19,37,38. Using L. sigmodontis, the murine model for human tissue invasive filarial infections, we provide the first evidence that NOD2 is also essential for the early immune response against incoming infectious larvae during infection with filarial nematodes.
Our study demonstrates that NOD2 is crucially involved during the skin stage of infection, as natural infection of NOD2−/− mice with L. sigmodontis leads to a significantly increased worm burden during the early phase of infection. This is due to impaired neutrophil recruitment within the skin against incoming infectious L3 larvae, suggesting that the often neglected skin stage of helminth infections is crucial for the establishment of filarial infections.
Previously it was demonstrated that deficiency of NOD2 led to changes in the gut microbiota and increased intestinal inflammation39, whereas colonization of NOD2−/− mice with the intestinal helminth Trichuris muris inhibited the gut colonization by inflammatory bacterial species40. In our study however, differences in the skin microbiota seemed not to mediate the increased worm recovery in NOD2−/− mice, as the increased worm burden in NOD2−/− mice was still present when those animals were co-housed with WT controls. Similar to our results obtained for the skin microbiota, lack of NOD2 (and NOD1) was not associated with changes in the overall composition of the gut microbiota under normal physiological settings41.
Wolbachia endosymbionts of the nematode seem to be involved in the recruitment of neutrophils to the skin, as injections using crude worm extracts with depleted Wolbachia failed to recruit neutrophils. The NOD2 deficiency resulted in an impaired neutrophil recruitment, and was also associated with a decreased expression of inflammatory genes in the skin. This included not only a significantly reduced expression of neutrophil-related genes, but also eosinophil and mast cell associated genes. Taken together with recent publications, our data support that the observed increased worm burden in NOD2−/− is not mediated by eosinophils and mast cells. IL-5 deficient mice which lack eosinophils do not have an increased worm burden 2 and 28 days post L. sigmodontis infection42, yet IL-5 is required for vaccine induced protection and during the late phase of infection42,43,44. Degranulation of mast cells on the other hand was previously associated with an increased vascular permeability which facilitates L. sigmodontis larval migration to the thoracic cavity45, suggesting that reduced expression of mast cell associated genes, as observed in NOD2−/− mice, is not the driving factor for the increased worm burden in NOD2−/− mice. However, it should be noted that the mast cell associated genes for the histamine receptors 2 and 4 have also been described to have functions in neutrophil recruitment46,47,48. One neutrophil-associated gene found to be downregulated in NOD2−/− mice was the gene expressing elastase. Histological analysis of neutrophil elastase activity within the skin further confirmed the suppression of neutrophils upon L3 challenge in NOD2−/− mice. This serine proteinase was shown to be part of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), which are formed by neutrophils to trap and destroy pathogens49. NETs were recently demonstrated to be involved in the defense against incoming larvae of Strongyloides stercoralis50. In human filarial nematode Onchocerca volvulus infections, NET formations were found around the adult worm containing nodules and the mechanism of NET formation was linked to the presence of Wolbachia and TLR2/651. The prominent role of neutrophils during the skin phase of L. sigmodontis infection in our study is in accordance with the study of Porthouse et al., which showed that the very early immune response against incoming Brugia pahangi larvae is dominated by neutrophils and IL-652. A recent study by Pionnier et al. using neutropenic mice also suggested a protective role of neutrophils during the early stage of L. sigmodontis infection53. Wolbachia endosymbionts are known to induce neutrophil activation and accumulation as shown in the in vivo model for ocular onchocerciasis54,55, in human onchocerciasis30 and in vitro in which neutrophils are directly activated by human filarial Wolbachia lipoproteins29. Our data supports the hypothesis that Wolbachia derived from incoming L3 larvae provoke neutrophil influx to the skin in a NOD2-dependent manner. As shown by Porthouse et al., only about 22% of injected B. pahangi L3 larvae are recovered three hours post injection. This high rate of larval death within the first hours of infection is likely to result in a sufficient release of Wolbachia to trigger neutrophil recruitment. Keratinocytes, the most abundant cell type of the skin, also express NOD2 and MDP was shown to be the strongest inducer of cytokines in this cell type7. Furthermore, phagocytosis of Wolbachia by recruited neutrophils can subsequently stimulate production of chemokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines that mediate further neutrophil recruitment and activation54. A delayed or impaired neutrophil recruitment in NOD2−/− mice has been described in several studies using bacterial infections17,18. In those studies, recruited neutrophils were not affected in their function, but the delayed recruitment led to an increased bacterial burden. Similarly, production of pro-inflammatory mediators like MPO, ROS, neutrophil elastase as well as cytokines/chemokines by neutrophils and neutrophil migration towards chemoattractants was not impaired in NOD2−/− mice of our study. Thus, the reduced recruitment of neutrophils to the site of infection within the skin in our study is unlikely due to an impaired chemotaxis of the neutrophils, but rather a reduced inflammatory response at the site of L3 injection.
In theory, resident APCs of the skin can also act as sources of NOD2 activation. However, a study by Cotton et al. demonstrated that L3 larvae of B. malayi failed to activate in vitro generated Langerhans cells and dermal dendritic cells, suggesting that L3 larvae can evade APC detection in human skin at least under in vitro conditions56. Similar to NOD2, keratinocytes were shown to functionally express NOD157, suggesting that NOD1 may be involved in cutaneous innate immunity. As it was observed that NOD1 also mediates neutrophil recruitment in vivo during early stages of immune responses58, a lack of the NOD1 gene may also lead to an impaired early immune response against invading L3 larvae in a Wolbachia-dependent manner, as our reporter assays also demonstrated Wolbachia-dependent NOD1 activation.
In addition to the increased number of infectious larvae reaching the thoracic cavity of NOD2−/− mice, retarded molting and impaired growth of larvae was observed in NOD2−/− mice. This may indicate that the lack of NOD2 may either reduce protective immune responses within the thoracic cavity that were not tested in this study or that immune responses during the migration of the larvae impact their subsequent development. Nevertheless, no microfilaremia developed in NOD2−/− C57BL/6 mice which occurred, for example, in Rag2IL-2Rγ−/− C57BL/6 mice, where the lack of T and B cells leads to an impaired immune response within the thoracic cavity and development of microfilaremia59, and the clearance of the filarial infection was comparable in NOD2−/− mice and WT controls.
To our knowledge only two other studies dealt with NOD2 in the context of helminth infections. Using Trichuris muris infection, Bowcutt et al. demonstrated that NOD2 deficiency leads to an increased worm burden. The authors concluded that the early immune response against T. muris is impaired due to the lack of NOD2 dependent recruitment of CD103+ dendritic cells, a cell type known to be involved in the clearance of T. muris38. A study by Wang et al. used T. muris infection in NOD1/NOD2 double-knockout mice. They demonstrated a significantly delayed parasite expulsion in the intestine of these mice. Their data provides evidence that NOD proteins are triggering goblet cell responses and mucus production in the context of enteric T. muris infection60. However, in contrast to the filarial nematode L. sigmodontis, T. muris does not harbor intracellular bacteria, e.g. Wolbachia, that would produce potential NOD2 ligands.
Wolbachia are endobacteria classified as Gram-negative, although a “classical” cell wall has not been detected. In the reduced genome of these bacteria, all genes necessary for the enzymatic machinery to synthesize the peptidoglycan precursor lipid II are retained61. In Gram-negative bacteria the lipid II molecule is formed by the disaccharide-peptide: GlcNAc-MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-A2pm-D-Ala-D-Ala62 and thus contains the precursor for both NOD1 and NOD2 ligands (Fig. 1). NOD1 can recognize several ligands (e.g. GlcNAc-MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-A2pm, MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-A2pm, UDP-MurNAc-L-Ala-D-Glu-A2pm or L-Ala-D-Glu-A2pm) in which the meso-diaminopimelate (A2pm) is necessary for the sensing. By contrast, NOD2 requires the intact sugar molecule MurNAc connected to the dipeptide L-Ala-D-Glu for recognition63. The only amino acid that can be synthesized by Wolbachia de novo is A2pm61,64, necessary for the third position of the pentapeptide chain of lipid II and the ligand of NOD1. Using isolated Wolbachia membranes, incubated with precursor molecules, we previously showed that lipid II is synthesized ex vivo. Additionally, we demonstrated that Wolbachia are depleted by fosfomycin, an antibiotic that targets an early step (MurA) in the lipid II production (Fig. 1). Thus the enzymatic pathway for the lipid II synthesis is functional and essential for these endobacteria33. The synthesis, recycling and further processing of the lipid II molecule results in the formation of the different NOD ligands and it can be assumed that MDP and A2pm are available in these bacteria (Fig. 1). This is supported by the results herein that indicate that both motifs that trigger NOD2 and NOD1 signaling are present in Wolbachia (Fig. 2). Bowcutt et al. speculated that NOD2 ligands are expressed on the worm itself. While the T. muris studies38,60 have shown that NOD2 activation does not always rely on the presence of MDP, future studies should investigate which nematode-derived molecules from Wolbachia-free species activate NOD2 signaling. Studies with filarial infected humans have not focused on the NOD2 receptor so far. The exception is a study by Babu et al., which reported that individuals with filarial lymphedema have a significantly increased expression of NOD2 and NOD1 mRNA after stimulation with B. malayi extract compared to asymptomatic individuals65. Since our in vitro experiments suggested that the Wolbachia endosymbionts are also a potential ligand for NOD1 signaling, the role of this receptor should be investigated in the future using NOD1−/− mice.
In conclusion, our study provides first in vivo evidence for the involvement of the NOD2 receptor during infection with a filarial nematode. NOD2−/− mice had an increased worm burden due to an impaired early immune response, characterized by significantly lower frequencies of recruited neutrophils in the skin. Hence, NLRs are not only essentially involved in protective immune responses against bacteria and linked to several autoimmune diseases, but may also be key players in the first line defense within the skin against invading infectious larvae.
Methods
Ethics Statement
Animal housing conditions and the experiments used in this work were performed according to the European Union animal welfare guidelines. All protocols had been approved by the Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz, Cologne, Germany (AZ 87-51.04.2011.A025/01; 84-02.04.2014.A327).
Reporter assays
HEK293 HEK-Blue cells, stably expressing murine NOD1 and NOD2 cells were obtained from Invivogen (San Diego, USA) and maintained according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were kept in culture with DMEM growth medium containing 4.5 g/l glucose, 10% FCS, 50 U/ml penicillin and 50 μg/ml streptomycin (all from PAA Pasching, Austria). Cells were passaged after reaching 70–80% confluency. To measure NOD1 and NOD2 stimulation, a cell suspension was prepared in HEK-Blue detection medium and added to a plate with L. sigmodontis adult worm extract (10 μg/ml), extract of Wolbachia-depleted L. sigmodontis adult worms (LsAg –Wolb, 10 μg/ml), positive (10 μg/ml MDP and DAP) and negative controls (10 μg/ml inactive MDP, H2O). The plate was then incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 10 hours and secreted embryonic alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) reporter protein activity was measured at 650 nm. To lower the background from endogenous alkaline phosphatase, L-homoarginine (Alfa Aesar, Heysham, UK) as a phosphatase-inhibitor was added to cells incubated with the worm extracts.
Mice and parasites
C57BL/6 J NOD2−/− mice (The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA) and corresponding C57BL/6 J WT controls (Janvier, Saint-Berthevin, France) were housed at the animal facility of the Institute of Medical Microbiology, Immunology and Parasitology, University Hospital of Bonn, Germany. Mice had access to food and water ad libitum. Age and sex matched mice were infected at 6–10 weeks of age with L. sigmodontis via natural infection by the intermediate host O. bacoti. Mice from both groups were exposed simultaneously to the same batch of O. bacoti mites containing infectious L. sigmodontis L3 larvae44.
For subcutaneous injection, L3 larvae were collected after being isolated from dissected mites 11 days post infection and injected subcutaneously.
Parasite recovery
Mice were euthanized with an overdose of isoflurane (AbbVie, Chicago, USA) 5, 10, 15, 35, and 60 days post infection. The thoracic cavity was flushed with 1 ml of RPMI 1640 (PAA Laboratories, Pasching, Austria) and adult worms or L3/L4 larvae were collected and counted, the sex determined of L4 as well as adult worms and the lengths measured. Measurements of larvae were made using one randomly selected worm per mouse for 15 dpi and 10 female worms per mouse, if present, at 30 dpi. For measurements, the microscope analysis software Diskus 4.6 (Buero Hilgers, Königswinter, Germany) was used.
Preparation of L. sigmodontis antigen
Preparation of L. sigmodontis extract (LsAg) was performed as previously described66. Briefly, freshly isolated adult L. sigmodontis worms were rinsed in sterile PBS before being mechanically homogenization under sterile conditions. Following centrifugation at 300 g for 10 min at 4 °C the supernatant was harvested and the protein concentration was determined by BCA protein assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, USA).
Flow cytometric analyses of thoracic cavity and skin cells
For analysis by flow cytometry, thoracic cavity cells were obtained by lavage of the thoracic cavity with 5 ml RPMI 1640 medium (PAA Laboratories). The first ml of the lavage was collected and cells were separated from the lavage fluid by centrifugation. After counting, cells were fixed over-night using fixation/permeabilization buffer (eBioscience, San Diego, USA). Cells were then blocked with PBS/1% BSA including 0.1% Fc block (Sigma, St. Louis, USA). Flow cytometric analysis was performed using the following antibody conjugates: CD4-PerCP-Cy5.5, F4/80-APC, SiglecF-PE, Gr1-Pe-Cy7, CD11b-FITC, B220-APC (all eBioscience).
For analysis of cells within the skin, before taking skin samples, hair was removed from a 1 cm × 1 cm area on the upper hind leg region of the mice using depilatory cream. L3 larvae or LsAg were then injected in the center of the shaved region. 3 h post injection, the 1 cm2 of skin tissue around the injection site was isolated and treated for 10 min with collagenase (Collagenase P, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) at 37 °C. Digested tissue was forced through a 70 μm strainer. The obtained single-cell suspension was subsequently washed, counted and prepared for flow cytometric analysis as described above. The gating strategy to identify neutrophils from skin tissue is shown in Suppl. Fig. 3.
For analysis of immune cells within the peripheral blood, blood was taken from the facial vein, incubated twice in 1 ml of red blood cell (RBC) lyses buffer (eBioscience) for 5 min, washed with PBS (400 g, 5 min) and prepared for flow cytometric analysis as described above.
Flow cytometry was performed using a BD FACS Canto I system and data were analyzed with the FACSDiva® 5.1 software (BD Biosciences, Heidelberg, Germany). During analysis, gates were set using the FMO (fluorescence minus one) approach.
Measurement of cytokines
Cytokine concentrations were determined within the first ml of thoracic cavity lavage by ELISA. Cytokines interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 (both BD Biosciences), IL-6, IL-10, and TNF (all eBioscience) were measured according to kit protocols.
Neutrophil function assays
For functional assays, neutrophils were isolated from casein injected mice. Casein solution was prepared using casein, PBS, NaOH, 10 mM CaCl2 and 5 mM MgCl2 and was autoclaved for 1 h at 125 °C. To recruit neutrophils in naïve mice, the casein solution was injected intraperitoneally. Peritoneal cells were isolated 18 h after injection by lavage, pelleted (400 g, 10 min) and counted. To purify neutrophils, peritoneal cells were blocked with PBS/1% BSA including 0.1% rat immunglobulin and then stained for 30 min with Ly6G-PE (clone: 1A8, BioLegend). Cells were then incubated for an additional 15 min with anti-PE MACS antibodies (Miltenyi). Neutrophils were then sorted using positive selection with an autoMACS (Miltenyi Biotech) and purity of Ly6G+ neutrophils was checked via flow cytometry, resulting in an average purity of 94%.
To measure the reactive oxygen species (ROS), 2.5 × 105 neutrophils were either unstimulated or stimulated for 2 h with LPS (100 ng/ml) or LsAg (50 μg/ml). After stimulation, cells were incubated per manufacturer’s protocol with CellRox Reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 30 min at a final concentration of 5 μM. Cells were then washed three times and ROS content was quantified as mean fluorescence intensity using flow cytometry.
Activity of myeloperoxidase (MPO) was analyzed using the MPO colorimetric activity assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, which determines the activity of the enzyme by hydrolysis of substrate to generate taurine chloramine. Samples containing 2 × 105 neutrophils and standard samples were incubated with the MPO substrate and assay buffer for 2 h in a 96-well plate. After stopping the reaction, the plate was measured at 412 nm in an EnVision Multilabel Reader (PerkinElmer, Waltham, MA, USA).
Activity of neutrophil elastase was measured using the neutrophil elastase activity kit (Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom). Standard and samples were added to the reaction mix containing neutrophil elastase substrate. After an incubation of 20 min at 37 °C, the activity was measured with a fluorescence microplate reader (EnVision Multilabel Reader, PerkinElmer) at a wavelengths of 380/500 nm (excitation/emission). Neutrophil elastase activity was calculated using a standard curve.
Chemotactic properties of neutrophils were measured using the CytoSelect 96-Well Cell Migration Assay (3 μm, Cellbio Labs). In this assay the cell suspension was placed in the upper chamber and cells were allowed to migrate through the polycarbonate membrane for 2 h towards the chemoattractants CXCL1 and CXCL2 (both Peprotech). Migratory cells cling to the bottom side of the membrane, while non-migratory cells stay in the upper chamber. Migratory cells were then dissociated from the membrane by the addition of a cell detachment buffer to the lower chamber. Migratory cells were then lysed and quantified using a fluorescent dye measured at 480/520 nm (excitation/emission) using an EnVision Multilabel Reader (PerkinElmer).
For cytokine/chemokine measurements, 1 × 106 purified neutrophils per well were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FCS, 1% Penicillin/Streptomycin and 1% L-Glutamine (all from PAA) and stimulated over-night using the following stimuli: E. coli LPS (300 ng/ml), Pam3Cys (10 ng/ml), LsAg (50 μg/ml), and LsAg prepared from Wolbachia depleted filariae (LsAg–Wolb.), both prepared as previously described67.
Neutrophil depletion
Neutrophils were depleted using an anti-Ly6G antibody (clone 1A8, BioXcell, West Lebanon, NH, USA) that was intraperitoneally injected (500 μg/mouse) 24 h prior to infection with L. sigmodontis. Control mice were injected with an equal volume of corresponding isotype control (BioXcell). Depletion was confirmed in peripheral blood using an anti-Gr1 (clone RB6-8C5) antibody by flow cytometry.
Skin microbiome
NOD2−/− and WT mice were shaved on the back and Columbia plates with 5% sheep blood were swabbed over the skin of the mice for half a minute. The plates were incubated for 72 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. All colonies were re-cultured on Columbia 5% sheep blood agar and analyzed by MALDI-TOF (Vitek® MS, BioMeriuex, France) and obtained spectral peeks were analyzed with the SARAMISTM database (Spectral Archive And Microbial Identification System, BioMérieux).
Immuno-histochemistry
For immuno-histochemistry, skin tissue was isolated three hours after L3 larvae injection and fixed in 4% formalin. Controls were injected with PBS. Skin tissue was embedded in paraffin and sections were cut at 5 μm. Sections were stained using an anti-mouse neutrophil-elastase kit (Clone NP57, Dako, Hamburg, Germany) using a 1:2000 dilution of the first antibody. Subsequent staining was done according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Afterwards, sections were additionally stained with Hemalaun. Neutrophil elastase activity was assessed by microscopy.
Gene expression analysis
Skin was isolated 3 h after intradermal injection of L. sigmodontis L3 larvae. Negative controls were injected with an equal volume of sterile PBS. Skin samples were homogenized (Precellys24, Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany), and RNA was isolated using Trizol extraction (ThermoFisher) and RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA was quantified using a NanoVue (GE Lifescience, Chalfont St Giles, Great Britain) and quality was assessed using an Experion microfluidic electrophoresis system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). cDNA was synthesized with the RT2 first strand kit (Qiagen). A customized RT2 PCR array (Qiagen, see Supplemental Table 1 for list of genes) was performed on cDNA using a Rotor Gene Q (Qiagen) according to the kit protocol. Data was analyzed and displayed using the online RT2 Profiler PCR Array data analysis 3.5 software on the SABiociences.com website (Qiagen). Gene expression was normalized to three housekeeping genes (actb, b2m, and gapdh).
To confirm and expand the results from the customized qRT-PCR array analysis, gene expression of selected genes were additionally analyzed using single quantitative real-time-PCRs. cDNA was synthesized as described above and samples were quantified using the PrimePCR™ SYBR® Green Assay (Bio-Rad) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Gene-specific synthetic DNA templates (Bio-Rad) as a positive PCR control were run simultaneously as standards with the test samples. qRT-PCR were performed using primers for the genes: ckit (qMmuCID0021259), tslp (qMmuCID0006874), il6 (qMmuCID0005613), siglecf (qMmuCID0026901). The primer pairs used for gzmb were “ctgctctgattacccatcgtc” and “gtgaatggacatgaagccagt” and for inos “cagctgggctgtacaaaccctt” and “cattggaagtgaagcctttcg”. Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene actb (qMmuCED0027505).
Statistics
Statistical analyses were performed with GraphPad Prism Software Version 5.03 (San Diego, USA). Differences between two unpaired groups were tested for significance with the Mann-Whitney-U-Test. Multiple unpaired groups were tested using Kruskal-Wallis-test with Dunn’s post-hoc test. The statistics from the PCR array data were analyzed using the software provided by SABioscience (Frederick, USA). Further analysis of Δ ct values was done by R (www.r-project.org) and packages from the Bioconductor project (www.bioconductor.org). P-values were calculated using the limma package and corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Additional Information
How to cite this article: Ajendra, J. et al. NOD2 dependent neutrophil recruitment is required for early protective immune responses against infectious Litomosoides sigmodontis L3 larvae. Sci. Rep. 6, 39648; doi: 10.1038/srep39648 (2016).
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
Shaw, M. H., Reimer, T., Kim, Y. G. & Nunez, G. NOD-like receptors (NLRs): bona fide intracellular microbial sensors. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 20, 377–382, doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.06.001 (2008).
Ye, Z. & Ting, J. P. NLR, the nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat containing gene family. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 20, 3–9, doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2008.01.003 (2008).
Moreira, L. O. & Zamboni, D. S. NOD1 and NOD2 Signaling in Infection and Inflammation. Front. Immunol. 3, 328, doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00328 (2012).
Girardin, S. E., Hugot, J.-P. & Sansonetti, P. J. Lessons from Nod2 studies: towards a link between Crohn’s disease and bacterial sensing. Trends Immunol. 24, 652–658, doi: 10.1016/j.it.2003.10.007 (2003).
Kufer, T. A. Signal transduction pathways used by NLR-type innate immune receptors. Mol. Biosyst. 4, 380–386, doi: 10.1039/b718948f (2008).
Grimes, C. L., Ariyananda, L. D. Z., Melnyk, J. E. & O’Shea, E. K. The Innate Immune Protein Nod2 Binds Directly to MDP, a Bacterial Cell Wall Fragment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 13535–13537, doi: 10.1021/ja303883c (2012).
Kim, J. Y., Omori, E., Matsumoto, K., Nunez, G. & Ninomiya-Tsuji, J. TAK1 Is a Central Mediator of NOD2 Signaling in Epidermal Cells. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 137–144, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704746200 (2007).
Hasegawa, M. et al. A critical role of RICK/RIP2 polyubiquitination in Nod-induced NF-κB activation. EMBO J. 27, 373–383, doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601962 (2008).
Ogura, Y. et al. Nod2, a Nod1/Apaf-1 Family Member That Is Restricted to Monocytes and Activates NF-κB. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 4812–4818, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M008072200 (2000).
Tada, H., Aiba, S., Shibata, K., Ohteki, T. & Takada, H. Synergistic effect of Nod1 and Nod2 agonists with toll-like receptor agonists on human dendritic cells to generate interleukin-12 and T helper type 1 cells. Infect. Immun. 73, 7967–7976, doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.12.7967-7976.2005 (2005).
Kvarnhammar, A. M. & Cardell, L. O. Pattern-recognition receptors in human eosinophils. Immunol. 136, 11–20, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2012.03556.x (2012).
Jeong, Y. J. et al. Nod2 and Rip2 contribute to innate immune responses in mouse neutrophils. Immunol. 143, 269–276, doi: 10.1111/imm.12307 (2014).
Hisamatsu, T. et al. CARD15/NOD2 functions as an antibacterial factor in human intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 124, 993–1000, doi: 10.1053/gast.2003.50153 (2003).
Voss, E. et al. NOD2/CARD15 mediates induction of the antimicrobial peptide human beta-defensin-2. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 2005–2011, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M511044200 (2006).
Kim, Y. G. et al. The cytosolic sensors Nod1 and Nod2 are critical for bacterial recognition and host defense after exposure to Toll-like receptor ligands. Immunity 28, 246–257, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.12.012 (2008).
Geddes, K. et al. Nod1 and Nod2 regulation of inflammation in the Salmonella colitis model. Infect. Immun. 78, 5107–5115, doi: 10.1128/IAI.00759-10 (2010).
Shimada, K. et al. The NOD/RIP2 pathway is essential for host defenses against Chlamydophila pneumoniae lung infection. PLoS Pathog. 5, e1000379, doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000379 (2009).
Frutuoso, M. S. et al. The pattern recognition receptors Nod1 and Nod2 account for neutrophil recruitment to the lungs of mice infected with Legionella pneumophila. Microbes Infect. 12, 819–827, doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2010.05.006 (2010).
Campbell, L., Williams, H., Crompton, R. A., Cruickshank, S. M. & Hardman, M. J. Nod2 deficiency impairs inflammatory and epithelial aspects of the cutaneous wound-healing response. J. Pathol. 229, 121–131, doi: 10.1002/path.4095 (2013).
Hugot, J.-P. et al. Association of NOD2 leucine-rich repeat variants with susceptibility to Crohn’s disease. Nature 411, 599–603 (2001).
Miceli-Richard, C. et al. CARD15 mutations in Blau syndrome. Nature genetics 29, 19–20, doi: 10.1038/ng711 (2001).
Silva, G. K. et al. Cutting edge: nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain 1-dependent responses account for murine resistance against Trypanosoma cruzi infection. J. Immunol. 184, 1148–1152, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0902254 (2010).
Shaw, M. H. et al. T cell-intrinsic role of Nod2 in promoting type 1 immunity to Toxoplasma gondii. Nat. Immunol. 10, 1267–1274, doi: 10.1038/ni.1816 (2009).
Caetano, B. C. et al. Intrinsic expression of Nod2 in CD4+ T lymphocytes is not necessary for the development of cell-mediated immunity and host resistance to Toxoplasma gondii. Eur. J. Immunol. 41, 3627–3631, doi: 10.1002/eji.201141876 (2011).
Nutman, T. B. Insights into the pathogenesis of disease in human lymphatic filariasis. Lymphat. Res. Biol. 11, 144–148, doi: 10.1089/lrb.2013.0021 (2013).
Hoerauf, A., Pfarr, K., Mand, S., Debrah, A. Y. & Specht, S. Filariasis in Africa–treatment challenges and prospects. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 17, 977–985, doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03586.x (2011).
Brattig, N. W. et al. The Major Surface Protein of Wolbachia Endosymbionts in Filarial Nematodes Elicits Immune Responses through TLR2 and TLR4. J. Immunol. 173, 437–445, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.173.1.437 (2004).
Taylor, M. J., Bandi, C. & Hoerauf, A. Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts of filarial nematodes. Adv. Parasitol. 60, 245–284 (2005).
Tamarozzi, F. et al. Human filarial Wolbachia lipopeptide directly activates human neutrophils in vitro. Parasite Immunol. 36, 494–502, doi: 10.1111/pim.12122 (2014).
Brattig, N. W., Büttner, D. W. & Hoerauf, A. Neutrophil accumulation around Onchocerca worms and chemotaxis of neutrophils are dependent on Wolbachia endobacteria. Microbes Infect. 3, 439–446 (2001).
Tamarozzi, F. et al. Onchocerciasis: the role of Wolbachia bacterial endosymbionts in parasite biology, disease pathogenesis, and treatment. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 24, 459–468, doi: 10.1128/CMR.00057-10 (2011).
Taylor, M. J., Hoerauf, A. & Bockarie, M. Lymphatic filariasis and onchocerciasis. Lancet 376, 1175–1185, doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60586-7 (2010).
Henrichfreise, B. et al. Functional conservation of the lipid II biosynthesis pathway in the cell wall-less bacteria Chlamydia and Wolbachia: why is lipid II needed? Mol. Microbiol. 73, 913–923, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06815.x (2009).
Allen, J. E. et al. Of mice, cattle, and humans: the immunology and treatment of river blindness. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2, e217, doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000217 (2008).
Hoffmann, W. et al. Litomosoides sigmodontis in Mice: Reappraisal of an Old Model for Filarial Research. Parasitol. Today 16, 387–389 (2000).
Vollmer, J. et al. Requirement of lipid II biosynthesis for cell division in cell wall-less Wolbachia, endobacteria of arthropods and filarial nematodes. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 303, 140–149, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.01.002 (2013).
Le Bel, M. & Gosselin, J. Leukotriene B(4) Enhances NOD2-Dependent Innate Response against Influenza Virus Infection. PloS one 10, e0139856, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139856 (2015).
Bowcutt, R. et al. A role for the pattern recognition receptor Nod2 in promoting recruitment of CD103+ dendritic cells to the colon in response to Trichuris muris infection. Mucosal Immunol. 7, 1094–1105, doi: 10.1038/mi.2013.125 (2014).
Ramanan, D., Tang, M. S., Bowcutt, R., Loke, P. & Cadwell, K. Bacterial sensor Nod2 prevents inflammation of the small intestine by restricting the expansion of the commensal Bacteroides vulgatus. Immunity 41, 311–324, doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.015 (2014).
Ramanan, D. et al. Helminth infection promotes colonization resistance via type 2 immunity. Science 352, 608–612, doi: 10.1126/science.aaf3229 (2016).
Robertson, S. J. et al. Nod1 and Nod2 signaling does not alter the composition of intestinal bacterial communities at homeostasis. Gut Microbes 4, 222–231, doi: 10.4161/gmic.24373 (2013).
Martin, C. et al. IL-5 is essential for vaccine-induced protection and for resolution of primary infection in murine filariasis. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 189, 67–74 (2000).
Le Goff, L. et al. Parasitology and immunology of mice vaccinated with irradiated Litomosoides sigmodontis larvae. Parasitology 120, 271–280 (2000).
Volkmann, L. et al. Murine filariasis: interleukin 4 and interleukin 5 lead to containment of different worm developmental stages. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 192, 23–31, doi: 10.1007/s00430-002-0155-9 (2003).
Specht, S. et al. CCL17 controls mast cells for the defense against filarial larval entry. J. Immunol. 186, 4845–4852, doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000612 (2011).
Kim, T. H. et al. The role of endogenous histamine on the pathogenesis of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced, acute lung injury: a pilot study. Inflammation 29, 72–80, doi: 10.1007/s10753-006-9001-3 (2005).
Takeshita, K., Sakai, K., Bacon, K. B. & Gantner, F. Critical role of histamine H4 receptor in leukotriene B4 production and mast cell-dependent neutrophil recruitment induced by zymosan in vivo. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 307, 1072–1078, doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.057489 (2003).
Takeshita, K., Bacon, K. B. & Gantner, F. Critical role of L-selectin and histamine H4 receptor in zymosan-induced neutrophil recruitment from the bone marrow: comparison with carrageenan. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 310, 272–280, doi: 10.1124/jpet.103.063776 (2004).
Branzk, N. et al. Neutrophils sense microbe size and selectively release neutrophil extracellular traps in response to large pathogens. Nat. Immunol. 15, 1017–1025, doi: 10.1038/ni.2987 (2014).
Bonne-Annee, S. et al. Extracellular traps are associated with human and mouse neutrophil and macrophage mediated killing of larval Strongyloides stercoralis. Microbes Infect. 16, 502–511, doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2014.02.012 (2014).
Tamarozzi, F. et al. Wolbachia endosymbionts induce neutrophil extracellular trap formation in human onchocerciasis. Sci. Rep. 6, 35559, doi: 10.1038/srep35559 (2016).
Porthouse, K. H., Chirgwin, S. R., Coleman, S. U., Taylor, H. W. & Klei, T. R. Inflammatory responses to migrating Brugia pahangi third-stage larvae. Infect. Immun. 74, 2366–2372, doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.4.2366-2372.2006 (2006).
Pionnier, N. et al. Neutropenic Mice Provide Insight into the Role of Skin-Infiltrating Neutrophils in the Host Protective Immunity against Filarial Infective Larvae. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 10, e0004605, doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004605 (2016).
Gillette-Ferguson, I. et al. Wolbachia-induced neutrophil activation in a mouse model of ocular onchocerciasis (river blindness). Infect. Immun. 72, 5687–5692 (2004).
Saint Andre, A. et al. The role of endosymbiotic Wolbachia bacteria in the pathogenesis of river blindness. Science 295, 1892–1895, doi: 10.1126/science.1068732 (2002).
Cotton, R. N. et al. Brugia malayi infective larvae fail to activate Langerhans cells and dermal dendritic cells in human skin. Parasite Immunol. 37, 79–91, doi: 10.1111/pim.12169 (2015).
Harder, J. & Núñez, G. Functional Expression of the Intracellular Pattern Recognition Receptor NOD1 in Human Keratinocytes. J. Invest. Dermatol. 129, 1299–1302, doi: 10.1038/jid.2008.395 (2009).
Masumoto, J. et al. Nod1 acts as an intracellular receptor to stimulate chemokine production and neutrophil recruitment in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 203, 203–213, doi: 10.1084/jem.20051229 (2006).
Layland, L. E. et al. Development of patent Litomosoides sigmodontis infections in semi-susceptible C57BL/6 mice in the absence of adaptive immune responses. Parasit. Vectors 8, 396, doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1011-2 (2015).
Wang, H. et al. New Role of Nod Proteins in Regulation of Intestinal Goblet Cell Response in the Context of Innate Host Defense in an Enteric Parasite Infection. Infect. Immun. 84, 275–285, doi: 10.1128/iai.01187-15 (2016).
Foster, J. et al. The Wolbachia genome of Brugia malayi: endosymbiont evolution within a human pathogenic nematode. PLoS Biol. 3, e121, doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030121 (2005).
van Heijenoort, J. Lipid intermediates in the biosynthesis of bacterial peptidoglycan. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71, 620–635, doi: 10.1128/mmbr.00016-07 (2007).
Girardin, S. E. et al. Peptidoglycan molecular requirements allowing detection by Nod1 and Nod2. J. Biol. Chem. 278, 41702–41708, doi: 10.1074/jbc.M307198200 (2003).
Wu, M. et al. Phylogenomics of the reproductive parasite Wolbachia pipientis wMel: a streamlined genome overrun by mobile genetic elements. PLoS Biol. 2, E69 (2004).
Babu, S. et al. Filarial lymphedema is characterized by antigen-specific Th1 and th17 proinflammatory responses and a lack of regulatory T cells. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 3, e420, doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000420 (2009).
Ziewer, S. et al. Immunization with L. sigmodontis microfilariae reduces peripheral microfilaraemia after challenge infection by inhibition of filarial embryogenesis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 6, e1558, doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001558 (2012).
Arumugam, S., Pfarr, K. M. & Hoerauf, A. Infection of the intermediate mite host with Wolbachia-depleted Litomosoides sigmodontis microfilariae: Impaired L1 to L3 development and subsequent sex-ratio distortion in adult worms. Int. J. Parasitol. 38, 981–987, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2007.12.006 (2008).
Acknowledgements
This project was funded by the European Commission: Enhanced Protective Immunity Against Filariasis (EPIAF), agreement number 242131; by the German Research Foundation (HU 2144/1-1); intramural funding by the University Hospital of Bonn (BONFOR, 2010-1-16 and 2011-1-10); and the People Programme (Marie Curie Actions) of the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007–2013 under Research Executive Agency Grant GA 276704. AH and KP are members of the German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), and of the Excellence Cluster Immunosensation (DFG, EXC 1023). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, or preparation of manuscript. We’d like to thank Dr. Andrea Hofmann for her valuable help in the analysis of the PCR array and statistics and Wiebke Stamminger for her assistance with the histology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived and designed the experiments: J.A., S.S., S.Z., A.H., M.H. Performed the experiments: J.A., S.Z., M.H., M.P., T.K., A.S. Analyzed the data: J.A., S.Z., S.S., M.P., K.P., M.H. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: A.S., K.P., T.K. Wrote the paper: J.A., M.H., K.P., A.S., A.H. Reviewed the manuscript: J.A., S.S., S.Z., A.S., M.P., K.P., T.K., A.H., M.H.
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
About this article
Cite this article
Ajendra, J., Specht, S., Ziewer, S. et al. NOD2 dependent neutrophil recruitment is required for early protective immune responses against infectious Litomosoides sigmodontis L3 larvae. Sci Rep 6, 39648 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39648
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep39648
This article is cited by
-
Cells within cells: Rickettsiales and the obligate intracellular bacterial lifestyle
Nature Reviews Microbiology (2021)
-
Susceptibility to L. sigmodontis infection is highest in animals lacking IL-4R/IL-5 compared to single knockouts of IL-4R, IL-5 or eosinophils
Parasites & Vectors (2019)
-
Jacalin capped platinum nanoparticles confer persistent immunity against multiple Aeromonas infection in zebrafish
Scientific Reports (2018)
-
Absence of IL-17A in Litomosoides sigmodontis-infected mice influences worm development and drives elevated filarial-specific IFN-γ
Parasitology Research (2018)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.