Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Functional Outcome at Adolescence for Infants Less Than 801 G Birth Weight: Perceptions of Children and Parents

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare functional, emotional, and academic status of adolescents who had been extremely low birth weight (ELBW) with those who were full term.

STUDY DESIGN: Twenty-six adolescents who were born in 1983 to 1984 at less than 801 g birth weight were compared with 26 adolescents born at term. Adolescent-perceived status was assessed using the Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC-SR) and the Self-Perception Profile. Parents' perceptions were assessed using BASC Parent Report, Family Impact Questionnaire, and Functional Status Measure. Health status was obtained through written requests to primary care providers and parent interviews. Academic and attendance information was obtained through school records.

RESULTS: Compared to the term adolescents, the ELBW group had significantly lower function related to health status, increased need for special education, and tended to score lower on academic performance measures. However, ELBW adolescents' perceptions regarding their scholastic, athletic, or social competencies did not differ from the term group or national normative data. Parents of ELBWs reported lower adaptive skills, but no other behavioral differences from the term group.

CONCLUSION: ELBW survivors and their parents perceived outcome at adolescence positively in spite of evident limitations. Mechanisms that ELBW families use to cope may be important determinants for successful, long-term outcome.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhushan V, Paneth N, Kiely JL . Impact of improved survival of very low birth weight infants on recent secular trends in the prevalence of cerebral palsy. Pediatrics 1993; 91: 1094–100.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Emsley HC, Wardle SP, Sims DG, et al. Increased survival and deteriorating developmental outcome in 23 to 25 week old gestation infants, 1990–4 compared with 1984–9. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998; 78: F99–104.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Lorenz JM, Wooliever DE, Jetton JR, et al. A quantitative review of mortality and developmental disability in extremely premature newborns. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1998; 152: 425–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wood NS, Marlow N, Costeloe K, et al. Neurologic and developmental disability after extremely preterm birth. EPICure Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 378–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gregoire MC, Lefebvre F, Glorieux J . Health and developmental outcomes at 18 months in very preterm infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics 1998; 101: 856–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, et al. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993–1994. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 1216–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Klebanov PK, Brooks-Gunn J, McCormick MC . School achievement and failure in very low birth weight children. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1994; 15: 248–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hack M, Fanaroff AA . Outcomes of extremely-low-birth-weight infants between 1982 and 1988. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 1642–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Klein NK, Hack M, Breslau N . Children who were very low birth weight: development and academic achievement at nine years of age. J Dev Behav Pediatr 1989; 10: 32–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hack M, Taylor HG, Klein N, et al. School-age outcomes in children with birth weights under 750 g. N Engl J Med 1994; 331: 753–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Saigal S, Szatmari P, Rosenbaum P, et al. Intellectual and functional status at school entry of children who weighed 1000 grams or less at birth: a regional perspective of births in the 1980s. J Pediatr 1990; 116: 409–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Saigal S, Hoult LA, Streiner DL, et al. School difficulties at adolescence in a regional cohort of children who were extremely low birth weight. Pediatrics 2000; 105: 325–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rickards AL, Kelly EA, Doyle LW, et al. Cognition, academic progress, behavior and self-concept at 14 years of very low birth weight children. J Dev Behav Pediatr 2001; 22: 11–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hack M, Taylor HG, Klein N, et al. Functional limitations and special health care needs of 10- to 14-year-old children weighing less than 750 grams at birth. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 554–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Weisglas-Kuperus N, Koot HM, Baerts W, et al. Behaviour problems of very low-birthweight children. Dev Med Child Neurol 1993; 35: 406–16.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McCormick MC, Gortmaker SL, Sobol AM . Very low birth weight children: behavior problems and school difficulty in a national sample. J Pediatr 1990; 117: 687–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Noble-Jamieson CM, Lukeman D, Silverman M, et al. Low birth weight children at school age: neurological, psychological and pulmonary function. Semin Perinatol 1982; 6: 266–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saigal S, Stoskopf BL, Feeny D, et al. Differences in preferences for neonatal outcomes among health care professionals, parents, and adolescents. JAMA 1999; 281: 1991–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kilbride HW, Daily DK . Survival and subsequent outcome to five years of age for infants with birth weights less than 801 grams born from 1983–1989. J Perinatol 1998; 18: 102–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kilbride HW, Daily DK . 8-Year educational outcome of the <801 gm birth weight infant: relationship to assessment at 3 years of age. Pediatr Res 1996; 39: 269A

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hollingshead AB Four-Factor Index of Social Status. New Haven, CT: Department of Sociology, Yale University. 1975

    Google Scholar 

  22. Reynolds CR, Kamphaus RW Behavior Assessment System for Children Manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service. 1992

    Google Scholar 

  23. Harter S Manual for Self-Perception Profile for Adolescents. Denver, CO: University of Denver. 1998

    Google Scholar 

  24. Donenberg G, Baker BL . The impact of young children with externalizing behaviors on their families. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1993; 21: 179–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Stein RE Manual for the Functional Status IIR Measure. Bronx, NY: Albert Einstein College of Medicine. 1991

    Google Scholar 

  26. Stein RE, Jessop DJ . Functional status II(R): a measure of child health status. Med Care 1990; 28: 1041–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lorenz JM, Paneth N . Treatment decisions for the extremely premature infant. J Pediatr 2000; 137: 593–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tyson JE, Younes N, Verter J, et al. Viability, morbidity, and resource use among newborns of 501- to 800-g birth weight. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. JAMA 1996; 276: 1645–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Britton SB, Chir B, Fitzhardinge PM, et al. Is intensive care justified for infants weighing less than 801 gm at birth?. J Pediatr 1981; 99: 937–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lorenz JM . The outcome of extreme prematurity. Semin Perinatol 2001; 25: 348–59.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Saigal S, Feeny D, Rosenbaum P, et al. Self-perceived health status and health-related quality of life of extremely low-birth-weight infants at adolescence. JAMA 1996; 276: 453–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Miles MS, Holditch-Davis D . Parenting the prematurely born child: pathways of influence. Semin Perinatol 1997; 21: 254–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cronin CM, Shapiro CR, Casiro OG, Cheang MS . The impact of very low-birth-weight infants on the family is long lasting. A matched control study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 1995; 149: 151–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Chernoff RG, List DG, DeVet KA, Ireys HT . Maternal reports of raising children with chronic illnesses: the prevalence of positive thinking. Ambul Pediatr 2001; 2: 104–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This work was supported by a grant from the Katharine B. Richardson Research Endowment Fund and the Clinical Scholars Award at Children's Mercy Hospital.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brown, K., Kilbride, H., Turnbull, W. et al. Functional Outcome at Adolescence for Infants Less Than 801 G Birth Weight: Perceptions of Children and Parents. J Perinatol 23, 41–47 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210850

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7210850

Search

Quick links