Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Expert assessment of exposure to carcinogens in Norway's offshore petroleum industry

Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology volume 18, pages 175–182 (2008)Cite this article

Abstract

This study presents and evaluates an expert group's assessment of exposure to carcinogens for defined job categories in Norway's offshore petroleum industry, 1970–2005, to provide exposure information for a planned cohort study on cancer. Three university and five industry experts in occupational hygiene individually assessed the likelihood of exposure to 1836 combinations of carcinogens (n=17), job categories (n=27) and time periods (n=4). In subsequent plenary discussions, the experts agreed on exposed combinations. Agreement between the individual and the panel assessments was calculated by Cohen's κ index. Using the panel assessment as reference, sensitivity and specificity were estimated. The eight experts assessed 63% of the 1836 combinations in plenary, resulting in 265 (14%) convened exposed combinations. Chlorinated hydrocarbons, benzene and inhalation of mineral oils had the highest number of exposed job categories (n=14, 9 and 10, respectively). The job categories classified as exposed to the highest numbers of carcinogens were the mechanics (n=10), derrick workers (n=6) and process technicians (n=5). The agreement between the experts’ individual assessments and the panel assessment was κ=0.53–0.74. The sensitivity was 0.55–0.86 and specificity 0.91–0.97. For these parameters, there were no apparent differences between the university experts and the industry experts. The resulting 265 of 1836 possible exposure combinations convened as “exposed” by expert assessment is presented in this study. The experts’ individual ratings highly agreed with the succeeding panel assessment. Correlation was found between years of experience of the raters and agreement with the panel. The university experts and the industry experts’ assessments had no apparent differences. Further validation of the exposure assessment is suggested, such as by new sampling data or observational studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altman D.G. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall/CRC: New York, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong B. A simple estimator of minimum detectable relative risk, sample size, or power in cohort studies. Am J Epidemiol 1987: 126: 356–358.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benke G., Sim M., Forbes A., and Salzberg M. Retrospective assessment of occupational exposure to chemicals in community-based studies: validity and repeatability of industrial hygiene panel ratings. Int J Epidemiol 1997: 26: 635–642.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Benke G., Sim M., Fritschi L., Aldred G., Forbes A., and Kauppinen T. Comparison of occupational exposure using three different methods: hygiene panel, job exposure matrix (JEM), and self reports. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 2001: 16: 84–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boers D., Zeegers M.P.A., Swaen G.M., Kant I.J., and van den Brandt P.A. The influence of occupational exposure to pesticides, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, diesel exhaust, metal dust, metal fumes, and mineral oil on prostate cancer: a prospective cohort study. Occup Environ Med 2005: 62: 531–537.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cancer Registry of Norway. Cancer in Norway 2005. Cancer Incidence, Mortality, Survival and Prevalence in Norway. Cancer Registry of Norway: Oslo, 2006 Available from URL: http://www.kreftregisteret.no/forekomst_og_overlevelse_2005/cin2005.pdfaccessed 2 March 2007.

  • Cottle M.K.W., and Guidotti T.L. Process chemicals in the oil and gas industry: potential occupational hazards. Toxicol Ind Health 1990: 6: 41–56.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson R.G., Evans M.J., Hamlin J.W., and Saunders K.J. Occupational hygiene aspects of the use of oil-based drilling fluids. Ann Occup Hyg 1988: 32: 325–332.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eide I. A review of exposure conditions and possible health effects associated with aerosol and vapour from low-aromatic oil-based drilling fluids. Ann Occup Hyg 1990: 34: 149–157.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott D., and Grieve A.M. The offshore oil and gas industry. In: Harrington JM editor. Recent Advances in Occupational Health. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, 1987, 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flegal K.M., Brownie C., and Haas J.D. The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. Am J Epidemiol 1986: 123: 736–751.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleiss J.L. Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. Wiley: New York, 1981, 212–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner R. Overview and characteristics of some occupational exposures and health risks on offshore oil and gas installations. Ann Occup Hyg 2003: 47: 201–210.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glass D.C., Adams G.G., Manuell R.W., and Bisby J.A. Retrospective exposure assessment for benzene in the Australian petroleum industry. Ann Occup Hyg 2000: 44: 301–320.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grieve A. Oil: toxicity of drilling mud. Occup Health (London) 1988: 40: 736–739.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gun R.T., Pratt N., Ryan P., and Roder D. Update of mortality and cancer incidence in the Australian petroleum industry cohort. Occup Environ Med 2006: 63: 476–481.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins N.C., and Evans J.S. Subjective estimation of toluene exposures: a calibration study of industrial hygienists. Appl Ind Hyg 1989: 4: 61–68.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Health and Safety Executive. Occupational Exposure to Benzene, Toluene, Xylene and Ethylbenzene during Routine Offshore Oil and Gas Production Operations. HSE Offshore Technology Report OTO 1999 088. Health and Safety Executive: London, 2000a.

  • Health and Safety Executive. Drilling Fluids Composition and use within the UK Offshore Drilling Industry HSE offshore Technology Report — OTO 1999 089. Health and Safety Executive: London, 2000b.

  • Hudgins C.M. Chemical Usage in North Sea Oil and Gas Production and Exploration Operations. Petrotech Consultants Inc.: Houston, p. 622.24:665.6:66, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • IARC. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer: Lyon, 2006 Available from: URL: http://monographs.iarc.fraccessed 22 October 2006..

  • The International Association of Oil & Gas Producers. UK. 2006 Available from URL: http://www.ogp.org.ukaccessed 22 October 2006.

  • James R.W., Schei T., Navestad P., Geddes T.A., Nelson M.G., and Webster D. Improving the working environment and drilling economics through better understanding of oil-based drilling fluid chemistry. SPE Drilling Completion 2000: 15: 254–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkeleit J., Riise T., Bråtveit M., and Moen B.E. Benzene exposure on a crude oil production vessel. Ann Occup Hyg 2006: 50: 123–129.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van Loon A.J., Kant I.J., Swaen G.M., Goldbohm R.A., Kremer A.M., and van den Brandt P.A. Occupational exposure to carcinogens and risk of lung cancer: results from the Netherlands cohort study. Occup Environ Med 1997: 54: 817–824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Petroleum and Energy. Facts 2006 — the Norwegian Petroleum Sector. Ministry of Petroleum and Energy: Oslo, 2005 Available from URL: http://www.dep.no/filarkiv/278568/Fakta-eng2.pdfaccessed 22 October 2006.

  • Post W., Kromhout H., Heederik D., Noy D., and Duijzentkunst R.S. Semiquantitative estimates of exposure to methylene chloride and styrene: the influence of quantitative exposure data. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 1991: 6: 197–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau M.C., Straif K., and Siemiatycki J. IARC carcinogen update. Environ Health Perspect 2005: 113: A580–A581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemiatycki J., Richardson L., Straif K., Latreille B., Lakhani R., Campbell S., et al. Listing occupational carcinogens. Environ Health Perspect 2004: 112: 1447–1459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith T.J., Stewart P.A., and Herrick R.F. Retrospective exposure assessment. In: Gardiner K, Harrington JM, editors. Occupational Hygiene, 3rd edn. Blackwell: Oxford, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistics Norway. Principal Figures for Extraction of Crude Oil and Natural Gas 1998–2004 2006, Statistics Norway: Oslo, 2006, Available from URL: http://www.ssb.no/english/subjects/10/06/20/oljev_en/tab-2006-02-28-01-en.htmlaccessed 22 October 2006.

  • Steinsvåg K., Bråtveit M., and Moen B.E. Exposure to oil mist and oil vapour during offshore drilling in Norway, 1979–2004. Ann Occup Hyg 2006a: 50: 109–122.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinsvåg K., Bråtveit M., and Moen B.E. Exposure to carcinogens for defined job categories in Norway's offshore petroleum industry 1970–2005. Occup Environ Med 2006b [E-pub ahead of print].

  • Steinsvåg K., Bråtveit M., Moen B.E., and Kromhout H. Interrater agreement in the assessment of exposure to carcinogens in the offshore petroleum industry. OccupEnviron Med 2007 [E-pub ahead of print].

  • Strand L.Å., and Andersen A. Kartlegging av kreftrisiko og årsaksspesifikk dødelighet blant ansatte i norsk offshorevirksomhet. Innsamling av bakgrunnsdata og etablering av kohort [Survey of cancer risk and cause-specific mortality of Norwegian offshore oil industry workers. Collection of background data and establishment of a cohort]. Cancer Registry of Norway: Oslo, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschke K. Exposure surrogates: job–exposure matrices, self-reports, and expert evaluations. In: Nieuwenhuijsen MJ, (Ed.) Exposure assessment in Occupational and Environmental Epidemiology. Oxford University Press: Oxford, 2003, 118–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschke K., Olshan A.F., Daniels J.L., De Roos A.J., Parks C.G., Schulz M., et al. Occupational exposure assessment in case–control studies: opportunities for improvement. Occup Environ Med 2002: 59: 575–594.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teschke K., Hertzman C., Dimich-Ward H., Ostry A., Blair J., and Hershler R. A comparison of exposure estimates by worker raters and industrial hygienists. Scand J Work Environ Health 1989: 5: 424–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Tongeren M., Nieuwenhuijsen M.J., Gardiner K., Armstrong B., Vrijheid M., Dolk H., et al. A job–exposure matrix for potential endocrine-disrupting chemicals developed for a study into the association between maternal occupational exposure and hypospadias. Ann Occup Hyg 2002: 46: 465–477.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeegers M.P.A., Swaen G.M.H., Kant I., Goldbohm R.A., and van den Brandt P.A. Occupational risk factors for male bladder cancer: results from a population based case cohort study in the Netherlands. Occup Environ Med 2001: 58: 590–596.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Norwegian Oil Industry Association (OLF) and the Norwegian Research Council funded this study. Special thanks to project consultant Berit Larsen, University of Bergen, for taking care of the practical issues when arranging the expert meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, Section for Occupational Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

    Kjersti Steinsvåg, Magne Bråtveit & Bente Moen

  2. Statoil ASA, Stavanger, Norway

    Li V-Torill Austgulen & Jakob Nærheim

  3. X-lab, Bergen, Norway

    Bjørg Eli Hollund

  4. Norsk Hydro ASA, Oil and Energy Operations, Bergen, Norway

    Inger Margrethe Haaland

  5. Department of Industrial Economics and Technology Management, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway

    Kristin Svendsen

  6. Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Hans Kromhout

Authors
  1. Kjersti Steinsvåg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Magne Bråtveit
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bente Moen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Li V-Torill Austgulen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bjørg Eli Hollund
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Inger Margrethe Haaland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jakob Nærheim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kristin Svendsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hans Kromhout
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kjersti Steinsvåg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steinsvåg, K., Bråtveit, M., Moen, B. et al. Expert assessment of exposure to carcinogens in Norway's offshore petroleum industry. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol 18, 175–182 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jes.7500578

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jes.7500578

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links