Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Paper
  • Published:

Induction of complement attack on human cells by Gal(alpha1,3)Gal xenoantigen expression as a gene therapy approach to cancer

Abstract

Galactose(α1,3)galactose on the surface of cells of non-primate organs is the major xenoantigen responsible for hyperacute rejection in xenotransplantation. The antigen is synthesised by (α1,3)galactosyl transferase. Humans lack this enzyme and their serum contains high levels of pre-existing natural antibody which recognises the structure and activates complement. We have evaluated in vitro the potential for delivery of this enzyme to sensitise human cells to complement attack as a gene therapy approach to cancer. Retrovirus-mediated delivery of (α1,3)galactosyl transferase resulted in high level expression which led to serum-mediated lysis of five human cell targets, including endothelial and primary melanoma cells. Lysis was specific for those cells expressing the antigen in a mixed cell population. The mechanism of cell lysis mimicked that involved in hyperacute rejection: activation of the classical complement pathway by natural antibody specific for galactose(α1,3)galactose. The degree of lysis was determined by both the level of specific antibody and the expression of glycophosphatidylinositol-linked complement regulatory proteins. We conclude that expression of (α1,3)galactosyl transferase is a promising new therapeutic approach for cancer gene therapy, avoiding toxicity problems associated with application of prodrugs and with the potential to elicit further immunological responses.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Platt JL et al. Immunopathology of hyperacute xenograft rejection in a swine-to-primate model Transplantation 1991 52: 214–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dalmasso AP et al. Mechanism of complement activation in the hyperacute rejection of porcine organs transplanted into primate recipients Am J Pathol 1992 140: 1157–1166

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Sandrin MS, Vaughan HA, Dabkowski PL, McKenzie IFC . Anti-pig IgM antibodies in human serum react predominantly with Gal(alpha1,3)Gal epitopes Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993 90: 11391–11395

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Vaughan HA, Loveland BE, Sandrin MS . Gal-alpha(1,3)-Gal is the major xenoepitope expressed on pig endothelial cells recognized by naturally occurring cytotoxic human antibodies Transplantation 1994 58: 879–882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vaughan HA, Dabkowski PL, McKenzie IFC, Sandrin MS . Biochemical analysis of pig xenoantigens detected by human antibodies Transplantation Proc 1993 25: 2919–2920

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Paulson JC, Colley KJ . Glycosyltransferases: structure, localization, and control of cell type-specific glycosylation J Biol Chem 1989 264: 17615–17618

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galili U et al. Evolutionary relationship between the natural anti-Gal antibody and the Gal alpha1–3 Gal epitope in primates Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987 84: 1369–1373

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Galili U et al. Interaction between human natural anti-alpha-galactosyl immunoglobulin G and bacteria of the human flora Infect Immunol 1988 56: 1730–1737

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Galili U . Interaction of the natural anti-Gal antibody with alpha-galactosyl epitopes: a major obstacle for xenotransplantation in humans Immunol Today 1993 14: 480–482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Galili U et al. One percent of human circulating B lymphocytes are capable of producing the natural anti-Gal antibody Blood 1993 82: 2485–2493

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Galili U, Rachmilewitz EA, Peleg A, Flechner I . A unique natural human IgG antibody with anti-alpha-galactosyl specificity J Exp Med 1984 160: 1519–1531

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. McMorrow IM, Comrack CA, Sachs DH, DerSimonian H . Heterogeneity of human anti-pig natural antibodies cross-reactive with the Gal(alpha1,3)Galactose epitope Transplantation 1997 64: 501–510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Takeuchi Y et al. Sensitization of cells and retroviruses to human serum by (alpha 1–3) galactosyltransferase Nature 1996 379: 85–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Reed DJ et al. Alteration of glycosylation renders HIV sensitive to inactivation by normal human serum J Immunol 1997 159: 4356–4361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sandrin MS et al. Enzymatic remodelling of the carbohydrate surface of a xenogeneic cell substantially reduces human antibody binding and complement-mediated cytolysis Nature Med 1995 1: 1261–1267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Osman N, McKenzie IFC, Mouhtouris E, Sandrin MS . Switching amino-terminal cytoplasmic domains of alpha(1,2)fucosyl transferase and alpha(1,3)galactosyl transferase alters the expression of H substance and Gal-alpha(1,3)-Gal J Biol Chem 1996 271: 33105–33109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rother RP et al. A novel mechanism of retrovirus inactivation in human serum mediated by anti-α-galactosyl natural antibody J Exp Med 1995 182: 1345–1355

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cairns T et al. Inhibition of the pig to human xenograft reaction using soluble GALα1–3GAL and GALβ1–3GALβ1-GlcNAc Transplantation 1995 60: 1202–1207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan BP, Meri S . Membrane proteins that protect against complement lysis Springer Semin Immunopathol 1994 15: 369–396

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cozzi E, White DJ . The generation of transgenic pigs as potential organ donors for humans Nature Med 1995 1: 964–966

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. McCurry KR et al. Human complement regulatory proteins protect swine-to-primate cardiac xenografts from humoral injury Nature Med 1995 1: 423–427

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Collins BH et al. Cardiac xenografts between primate species provide evidence for the importance of the alpha-galactosyl determinant in hyperacute rejection J Immunol 1995 154: 5500–5510

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McMorrow IM et al. Relationship between ABO blood group and levels of Gal-alpha1,3-Galactose-reactive human immunoglobulin G Transplantation 1997 64: 546–549

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Maenpaa A et al. Expression of complement membrane regulators membrane cofactor protein (CD46), decay accelerating factor (CD55), and protectin (CD59) in human malignant gliomas Am J Pathol 1996 148: 1139–1152

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bjorge L et al. Complement-regulatory proteins in ovarian malignancies Int J Cancer 1997 70: 14–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. LaTemple DC, Henion TR, Anaraki F, Galili U . Synthesis of alpha-galactosyl epitopes by recombinant alpha1,3galactosyl transferase for opsonization of human tumor cell vaccines by anti-galactose Cancer Res 1996 56: 3069–3074

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Galili U, LaTemple DC . Natural anti-Gal antibody as a universal augmenter of autologous tumor vaccine immunogenicity Immunol Today 1997 18: 281–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang L, Anaraki F, Henion TR, Galili U . Variations in activity of the human natural anti-Gal antibody in young and elderly populations J Gerontol 1995 50A: M227–M233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel PM et al. Generation of interleukin-2-secreting melanoma cell populations from resected metastatic tumors Hum Gene Ther 1994 5: 577–584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Strahan KM et al. cDNA sequence and chromosome location of pig alpha1,3 galactosyltransferase Immunogenetics 1995 41: 101–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dranoff G et al. Vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete murine granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting anti-tumor immunity Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993 90: 3539–3543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Cosset F-L et al. High titre packaging cells producing recombinant retroviruses resistant to human serum J Virol 1995 69: 7430–7436

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Davies A et al. CD59, an LY-6-like protein expressed in human lymphoid cells, regulates the action of complement membrane attack complex in homologous cells J Exp Med 1989 170: 637–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Armitage P, Berry G . Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 2nd edn Blackwell Scientific: Oxford 1987

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr Kenth Gustafsson for helpful discussion and for supplying the plasmid pSα13GT, under an agreement with BioTransplant Inc.; Dr Ian Titley for flow sorting transduced cell populations; Dr Kevin Davies for analysis of serum components and complement activity; Dr Philip Judson for provision of sera and antibodies BRIC216/229; and Dr Peter Lachmann for antibody YTH53.1. We are grateful to Professors Mary Collins, Chris Marshall and Robin Weiss for support and critical discussion. This work was funded by the Medical Research Council.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jäger, U., Takeuchi, Y. & Porter, C. Induction of complement attack on human cells by Gal(alpha1,3)Gal xenoantigen expression as a gene therapy approach to cancer. Gene Ther 6, 1073–1083 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300934

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.gt.3300934

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links