Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Communication
  • Published:

Variation in the application of methods used for predicting energy requirements in acutely ill adult patients: a survey of practice

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition volume 57, pages 1530–1535 (2003)Cite this article

Abstract

Objective: To determine current methods used by dietitians for estimating the energy requirement of a chronically and acutely ill adult patient and the variation in the application of methods.

Design: A cross-sectional survey including a case study.

Setting: Acute care adult hospitals in Australia.

Subjects: A total of 307 dietitians (66.2% response rate).

Interventions: Surveys were posted to hospitals. A reminder letter was sent to all hospitals 2 weeks after the initial posting and a follow-up survey was sent 6 weeks after the initial posting to non-respondents.

Results: Respondents calculated a mean energy requirement for the case study of 9780±1410 kJ/day. One-third of respondents calculated energy requirement within ±500 kJ of the mean. Respondents primarily used the Schofield equations (67.4%) followed by the Harris–Benedict equations (25.9%) to estimate energy requirement. Estimates using the Schofield equations calculated the highest mean energy requirement. The median injury factor used in the calculations was 1.3 (1.0–1.5). The values and reasons for the selection of injury factors varied widely. Calculated energy requirement did not differ with the aims of nutritional care—maintaining current weight (9700±1370 kJ/day) or increasing weight (9790±1380 kJ/day).

Conclusion: There was considerable variation in the methods and factors used for estimating energy requirement, resulting in a wide range of calculated requirements. The application of prediction methods to individuals in acute care does not appear to be universally understood among dietitians. Dietitians require an understanding of the correct application, appropriate use, and limitations of these prediction methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad A, Duerksen DR, Munroe S & Bistrian BR (1999): An evaluation of resting energy expenditure in hospitalized, severely underweight patients. Nutrition 15, 384–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Case KO, Brahler CJ & Heiss C (1997): Resting energy expenditures in Asian women measured by indirect calorimetry are lower than expenditures calculated from prediction equations. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 97, 1288–1292.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coss-Bu JA, Jefferson LS, Walding D, David Y, Smith EO & Klish WJ (1998): Resting energy expenditure in children in a pediatric intensive care unit: comparison of Harris–Benedict and Talbot predictions with indirect calorimetry values. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 67, 74–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daly JM, Heymsfield SB, Head CA, Harvey LP, Nixon DW, Katzeff H & Grossman GD (1985): Human energy requirements: overestimation by widely used prediction equation. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 42, 1170–1174.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elia M (1990): Artificial nutritional support. Med. Int. 82, 3392–3396.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO/WHO/UNU (1985): Energy and Protein Requirements. Geneva: World Health Organisation.

  • Flancbaum L, Choban PS, Sambucco S, Verducci J & Burge JC (1999): Comparison of indirect calorimetry, the Fick method, and prediction equations in estimating the energy requirements of critically ill patients. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69, 461–466.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foster GD, Wadden TA, Mullen JL, Stunkard AJ, Wang J, Feurer ID, Pierson RN, Yang MU, Presta E & Van Itallie TB (1988): Resting energy expenditure, body composition, and excess weight in the obese. Metabolism 37, 467–472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibney ER (2000): Energy expenditure in disease: time to revisit? Proc. Nutr. Soc. 59, 199–207.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern SL (1987): Quick Reference to Clinical Nutrition: A Guide for Physicians. Philadelphia: J.B. Lippincott Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris JA & Benedict FG (1919): A Biometric Study of Basal Metabolism in Man. Washington DC: Carnegie Institution of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter DC, Jaksic T, Lewis D, Benotti PN, Blackburn GL & Bistrian BR (1988): Resting energy expenditure in the critically ill: estimations versus measurement. Br. J. Surg. 75, 875–878.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson CJ & Furnham A (2000): Designing and Analysing Questionnaires and Surveys: a Manual for Health Professionals and Administrators. London: Whurr Publishers Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jequier E & Schutz Y (1983): Long-term measurements of energy expenditure in humans using a respiration chamber. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 38, 989–998.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Long CL, Schaffel N, Geiger JW, Schiller WR & Blakemore WS (1979): Metabolic response to injury and illness: estimation of energy and protein needs from indirect calorimetry and nitrogen balance. J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 3, 452–456.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mifflin MD, St Jeor ST, Hill LA, Scott BJ, Daugherty SA & Koh YO (1990): A new predictive equation for resting energy expenditure in healthy individuals. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 51, 241–247.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ottery FD (1996): Definition of standardized nutritional assessment and interventional pathways in oncology. Nutrition 12, S15–S19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owen OE, Holup JL, D'Alessio DA, Craig ES, Polansky M, Smalley KJ, Kavle EC, Bushman MC, Owen LR & Mozzoli MA (1987): A reappraisal of the caloric requirements of men. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 46, 875–885.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owen OE, Kavle E, Owen RS, Polansky M, Caprio S, Mozzoli MA, Kendrick ZV, Bushman MC & Boden G (1986): A reappraisal of caloric requirements in healthy women. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 44, 1–19.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reeves MM & Capra S (2003): Predicting energy requirements: are current methods evidence based? Nutr. Rev. (in press).

  • Roza AM & Shizgal HM (1984): The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting energy requirements and the body cell mass. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 40, 168–182.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schofield WN (1985): Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum. Nutr. Clin. Nutr. 39, 5–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Soares MJ, Sheela ML, Kurpad AV, Kulkarni RN & Shetty PS (1989): The influence of different methods on basal metabolic rate measurements in human subjects. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 50, 731–736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • The Australian Hospitals Directory (2000). North Sydney: ATA Professional Services Pty Ltd.

  • Vinken AG, Bathalon GP, Sawaya AL, Dallal GE, Tucker KL & Roberts SB (1999): Equations for predicting the energy requirements of healthy adults aged 18–81 y. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 69, 920–926.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick PM (1989): Predicting food energy requirements from estimates of energy expenditure. Austral. J. Nutr. Diet. 46, S3–S28.

    Google Scholar 

  • White MS (1998): The calculation of the energy requirement of a critically ill child: a dietitian's survey. Austral. J. Nutr. Diet. 55, 82–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilmore DW (1977): The Metabolic Management of the Critically Ill. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all the respondents who willingly completed the surveys.

Author information

Author notes

  1. M M Reeves: Guarantor: MM Reeves.

  2. M M Reeves and S Capra: Contributors: MMR was the main author of the paper, initiated and designed the study, and carried out statistical analyses, interpretation and discussion of results. SC assisted in design of the study, interpretation and discussion of results, and contributed to writing the paper.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Public Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

    M M Reeves & S Capra

Authors
  1. M M Reeves
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S Capra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M M Reeves.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reeves, M., Capra, S. Variation in the application of methods used for predicting energy requirements in acutely ill adult patients: a survey of practice. Eur J Clin Nutr 57, 1530–1535 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601721

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601721

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links