Main

Erosion of enamel by non-carbonated soft drinks with and without toothbrushing abrasion C. A. Hemingway, D. M. Parker, M. Addy and M. E. Barbour Br Dent J 2006; 201: 447–450

Comment

This study assessed depth of enamel loss after an erosive challenge alone and after a combined erosive/abrasive challenge using a non-fluoridated tooth paste in vitro.

This work confirmed the low erosive potential of Ribena ToothKind and reported on the significant erosive potential of cranberry juice after one hour. The latter had the lowest pH of the six drinks and apart from an apple drink, the lowest calcium concentration. The two drinks with the lowest calcium concentrations had the greatest erosive potential whereas phosphate concentration was not associated with enamel loss. The authors concluded that pH was a more important predictor of erosive potential than titratable acidity but highlighted that this occurred under their experimental conditions. This is a valuable point to make. Ranking erosive potential can be misleading, not only because it is dependent on study design, but also because patients' drinking habits will vary significantly. Furthermore, the authors recognised that in vitro erosion studies are more aggressive than in vivo work because of salivary protection and the nature of the substrate, polished enamel being rapidly eroded.

That enamel softened by erosion is readily susceptible to tooth brush abrasion is not new. The greatest added loss of enamel from tooth brush abrasion over an hour, to a mean depth of 2.16 μm, was for an apple drink. This study also found that the drinks with the greatest enamel surface loss also caused the greatest sub-surface softening. The distribution of tooth wear into dentine in epidemiological studies on school children, however, shows greater prevalence on incisal, occlusal and palatal surfaces,1,2,3 rather than cervical, buccal and labial sites which arguably may be more readily abraded by tooth brushing. Furthermore, girls brush more frequently than boys yet have less erosion, whilst the relationship between social class and tooth brushing (more common in higher socio-economic groups) is uncertain.4,5 Attrition and tongue abrasion, rather than tooth brush abrasion, may have a greater influence on the distribution of exposed dentine in vivo.

This study provides further evidence that acidic soft drinks have erosive potential, can soften the subsequent sub-surface and that tooth brushing immediately after an acid challenge will abrade away the softened area leading to additional enamel loss.