Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Efficiency and capacity mechanisms can coexist in cognitive training

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. von Bastian, C. C. et al. Mechanisms underlying training-induced cognitive change. Nat. Rev. Psychol. 1, 30–41 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sauce, B., Wiedenhoeft, J., Judd, N. & Klingberg, T. Change by challenge: A common genetic basis behind childhood cognitive development and cognitive training. NPJ Sci. Learn. 6, 16 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lövdén, M., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., Schaefer, S. & Schmiedek, F. A theoretical framework for the study of adult cognitive plasticity. Psychol. Bull. 136, 659–676 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cowan, N. Working memory development: a 50-year assessment of research and underlying theories. Cognition 224, 105075 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wass, C. et al. Dopamine D1 sensitivity in the prefrontal cortex predicts general cognitive abilities and is modulated by working memory training. Learn. Mem. 20, 617–627 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wass, C., Sauce, B., Pizzo, A. & Matzel, L. D. Dopamine D1 receptor density in the mPFC responds to cognitive demands and receptor turnover contributes to general cognitive ability in mice. Sci. Rep. 8, 4533 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Esposito, M. & Postle, B. R. The cognitive neuroscience of working memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 66, 115–142 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Barulli, D. & Stern, Y. Efficiency, capacity, compensation, maintenance, plasticity: emerging concepts in cognitive reserve. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 502–509 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Constantinidis, C. & Klingberg, T. The neuroscience of working memory capacity and training. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 17, 438–449 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Salmi, J., Nyberg, L. & Laine, M. Working memory training mostly engages general-purpose large-scale networks for learning. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 93, 108–122 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Da-Wei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, DW., Sauce, B. Efficiency and capacity mechanisms can coexist in cognitive training. Nat Rev Psychol 2, 127 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00146-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-022-00146-9

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing