Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Challenges of assessing the environmental sustainability of cellular agriculture

Product-level life-cycle assessments together with global-level integrative scenario assessments can guide the cellular agriculture development process towards greater environmental sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Comparison of the environmental sustainability of livestock products, peas and cellular agriculture products.

References

  1. Rischer, H., Szilvay, G. R. & Oksman-Caldentey, K.-M. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 61, 128–134 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mattick, C. S. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 11941–11949 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Järviö, N., Maljanen, N.-L., Kobayashi, Y., Ryynänen, T. & Tuomisto, H. L. Sci. Total Environ. 776, 145764 (2021).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kobayashi, Y. et al. Sci. Total Environ. 808, 151990 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Järviö, N. et al. Nat. Food 2, 1005–1013 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Behm, K. et al. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 27, 1017–1034 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Spiller, M. et al. Water Res 171, 115406 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sillman, J. et al. Glob. Food Secur. 22, 25–32 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tuomisto, H. L., Allan, S. J. & Ellis, M. J. Sci. Total Environ. 851, 158051 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Post, M. J. et al. Nat. Food 1, 403–415 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schaubroeck, T. et al. Sustainability 13, 7386 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Golroudbary, S. R. et al. Sci. Total Environ. 832, 155022 (2022).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Humpenoder, F. et al. Nature 605, 90–96 (2022).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun, Z. et al. Nat. Food 3, 29–37 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hayek, M. N. et al. Nat. Sustain. 4, 21–24 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Finnigan, T. J. A. et al. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 3, nzz021 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Klöckner, C. et al. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6, 847931 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pakseresht, A. et al. Appetite 170, 105829 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Upcraft, T. et al. Green Chem 23, 5150–5165 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Stødkilde, L. et al. Animal 13, 1817–1825 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Okamoto, Y. et al. Biotechnol. Prog. 36, 2941 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ritala, A. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2009 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kopfmüller, J. et al. Energies 14, 1580 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang, Y. J. Clean. Prod. 127, 274–281 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanna L. Tuomisto.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The author declares no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Food thanks Sarah McLaren and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tuomisto, H.L. Challenges of assessing the environmental sustainability of cellular agriculture. Nat Food 3, 801–803 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00616-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00616-6

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene