Product-level life-cycle assessments together with global-level integrative scenario assessments can guide the cellular agriculture development process towards greater environmental sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Transition to cellular agriculture reduces agriculture land use and greenhouse gas emissions but increases demand for critical materials
Communications Earth & Environment Open Access 31 January 2024
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 digital issues and online access to articles
$119.00 per year
only $9.92 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Rischer, H., Szilvay, G. R. & Oksman-Caldentey, K.-M. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 61, 128–134 (2020).
Mattick, C. S. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 11941–11949 (2015).
Järviö, N., Maljanen, N.-L., Kobayashi, Y., Ryynänen, T. & Tuomisto, H. L. Sci. Total Environ. 776, 145764 (2021).
Kobayashi, Y. et al. Sci. Total Environ. 808, 151990 (2022).
Järviö, N. et al. Nat. Food 2, 1005–1013 (2021).
Behm, K. et al. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 27, 1017–1034 (2022).
Spiller, M. et al. Water Res 171, 115406 (2020).
Sillman, J. et al. Glob. Food Secur. 22, 25–32 (2019).
Tuomisto, H. L., Allan, S. J. & Ellis, M. J. Sci. Total Environ. 851, 158051 (2022).
Post, M. J. et al. Nat. Food 1, 403–415 (2020).
Schaubroeck, T. et al. Sustainability 13, 7386 (2021).
Golroudbary, S. R. et al. Sci. Total Environ. 832, 155022 (2022).
Humpenoder, F. et al. Nature 605, 90–96 (2022).
Sun, Z. et al. Nat. Food 3, 29–37 (2022).
Hayek, M. N. et al. Nat. Sustain. 4, 21–24 (2021).
Finnigan, T. J. A. et al. Curr. Dev. Nutr. 3, nzz021 (2019).
Klöckner, C. et al. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 6, 847931 (2022).
Pakseresht, A. et al. Appetite 170, 105829 (2022).
Upcraft, T. et al. Green Chem 23, 5150–5165 (2021).
Stødkilde, L. et al. Animal 13, 1817–1825 (2019).
Okamoto, Y. et al. Biotechnol. Prog. 36, 2941 (2020).
Ritala, A. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2009 (2017).
Kopfmüller, J. et al. Energies 14, 1580 (2021).
Yang, Y. J. Clean. Prod. 127, 274–281 (2016).
Poore, J. & Nemecek, T. Science 360, 987–992 (2018).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Food thanks Sarah McLaren and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tuomisto, H.L. Challenges of assessing the environmental sustainability of cellular agriculture. Nat Food 3, 801–803 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00616-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00616-6
This article is cited by
-
Transition to cellular agriculture reduces agriculture land use and greenhouse gas emissions but increases demand for critical materials
Communications Earth & Environment (2024)
-
Cellular agriculture for milk bioactive production
Nature Reviews Bioengineering (2023)