Abstract
Heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) and its co-chaperones promote cancer, and targeting Hsp90 holds promise for cancer treatment. Most of the efforts to harness this potential have focused on targeting the Hsp90 N-terminus ATP binding site. Although newer-generation inhibitors have shown improved efficacy in aggressive cancers, induction of the cellular heat shock response (HSR) by these inhibitors is thought to limit their clinical efficacy. Therefore, Hsp90 inhibitors with novel mechanisms of action and that do not trigger the HSR would be advantageous. Here, we investigated the mechanism by which capsaicin inhibits Hsp90. Through mutagenesis, chemical modifications, and proteomic studies, we show that capsaicin binds to the N-terminus of Hsp90 and inhibits its ATPase activity. Consequently, capsaicin and its analogs inhibit Hsp90 ATPase-dependent progesterone receptor reconstitution in vitro. Capsaicin did not induce the HSR, instead, it promoted the degradation of Hsp70 through the lysosome-autophagy pathway. Remarkably, capsaicin did not induce degradation of the constitutively expressed cognate Hsc70, indicating selectivity for Hsp70. Combined treatments of capsaicin and the Hsp90 inhibitor 17-AAG improved the anti-tumor efficacy of 17-AAG in cell culture and tridimensional tumor spheroid growth assays using breast and prostate cancer models. Consistent with this, in silico docking studies revealed that capsaicin binding to the ATP binding site of Hsp90 was distinct from classical N-terminus Hsp90 inhibitors, indicating a novel mechanism of action. Collectively, these findings support the use of capsaicin as a chemical scaffold to develop novel Hsp90 N-terminus inhibitors as well as its ability to be a potential cancer co-therapeutic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
The chaperome is composed of chaperone and co-chaperone proteins that safeguard cellular proteostasis and thus plays a key role in determining cancer phenotypes. Cancer cells over-express molecular chaperones and co-chaperones, including Hsp90, Hsp70, Hsp90/Hsp70 organizing protein (HOP), Hsp40, p23, and CDC37, that are necessary to fold mutant proteins and other highly expressed proteins1,2,3. Early studies have shown that heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) is enriched in dynamic complexes with co-chaperones in tumor tissues compared to normal tissue4,5. Consistent with this, recent findings revealed the existence of a more complex molecular rewiring of the Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperone networks to form a highly integrated complex, referred to as the epichaperome, in cancer cells. This pathologic protein–protein interaction network has been shown to promote cancer cell survival and aggressiveness of certain tumors6. The epichaperome may also be amenable to drug targeting7.
Hsp90 has been recognized as a therapeutic target for cancer therapy for decades1. Extensive efforts have led to the discovery of multiple Hsp90 inhibitors. Compounds of a diverse chemical nature, including geldanamycin derivatives, resorcinol group-containing compounds, purine and purine-like analogs, and others, have been established as potent inactivators of Hsp90 through binding to the ATP binding pocket in the N-terminal domain. However, many of these agents induce the cellular heat shock response (HSR), which is characterized by the up-regulation of the anti-apoptotic proteins, Hsp70 and Hsp278,9,10,11,12. Over-expression of Hsp70 and Hsp27 is thought to lower the efficacy of Hsp90 inhibitors as therapeutics13,14,15,16,17,18. PU-H71, a purine-based Hsp90 inhibitor, has shown improved preclinical and clinal efficacy and is a promising application as a theragnostic platform for precision medicine targeting the epichaperome7,19. Furthermore, preclinical and clinical data indicate that 4-(1H-pyrazolo[3,4-b]pyridine-1-yl)benzamide TAS-116 (Pimitespib), a selective oral inhibitor of cytosolic Hsp90α and β, exhibits a potent anti-tumor activity in various cancers with minimal side effects, including visual disturbances20,21,22,23. Pimitespib has recently been approved for clinical use in Japan. However, to date, no Hsp90 inhibitor is approved by the FDA, and the full clinical potential of Hsp90 inhibition for treating cancers remains to be harnessed.
To this end, alternative strategies of Hsp90 inhibition are being pursued to improve efficacy, including targeting the Hsp90 middle domain, which binds client proteins, and the C-terminal ATP binding domain24. For example, Novobiocin, a C-terminal ATP binding inhibitor25, is currently being used as a chemical scaffold to develop more specific and potent inhibitors of Hsp901,26. Interestingly, Hsp90 C-terminal inhibitors do not induce the HSR, and NCT-58 triggers the death of rapidly proliferating and stem-like cells of trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer models through down-regulation of HER2 and Heat Shock Factor 1 (HSF1). Alternatively, inactivation of Hsp90 could be achieved through inhibition of specific co-chaperone interactions or post-translational modifications of Hsp901,27. Attempts to abrogate the HSR by developing inhibitors of Hsp27, Hsp70, and the HSF1 transcription factor are also being pursued28,29,30.
Capsaicin (8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide) is the primary pungent ingredient of hot peppers of the genus Capsicum. Capsaicin is an agonist of transient receptor potential vanilloid-1 (TRPV1) that triggers both the sensations of burning and pain, but also promotes the desensitization of peripheral nerves to noxious stimuli31. Capsaicin is approved by the FDA for topical use in pain management of arthritis, diabetic neuropathy, and neuralgia and also to treat post-surgical neuropathic pain in cancer patients32. Numerous reports have shown that capsaicin induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cancer cell lines33 and autophagy in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells34. Interestingly, co-treatment of cancer cells with capsaicin and capsazepine (a TRPV1 antagonist) showed that cells still die by apoptosis35, suggesting that cytotoxicity was independent of TRPV1 activation, which was confirmed in an oral cancer model36. Several mechanisms of action have been proposed for the cytotoxic properties of capsaicin, including NF-κB inactivation37, estrogen receptor (ER) stress-mediated apoptosis38, generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), disruption of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential39, inactivation of the EGFR/HER-2 pathway40, cyclin-dependent kinase blockade41, anti-angiogenic activity by direct inhibition of Src kinase42 and the VEFG pathway43, and inactivation of the E2F-Rb pathway44, among others.
Our data suggest that the cytotoxic effects of capsaicin in cancer cells may also involve the inactivation of Hsp90, and most of the inactivated pathways above are driven by protein clients of Hsp90. We have previously shown that capsaicin treatment destabilizes several Hsp90 client proteins45. In this report, we demonstrate that Hsp90 is a critical target of capsaicin in cancer cells. Specifically, we show that capsaicin binds to the N-terminal domain of Hsp90 in a manner unique from classical Hsp90 N-terminus inhibitors, and rather than inducing Hsp70 and the HSR, capsaicin triggers the lysosomal degradation of Hsp70 in various cancer cell lines. Remarkably, capsaicin treatment did not affect Hsc70, which shares ~ 85% amino acid sequence identity with Hsp7046. Further, low concentrations of doses of capsaicin enhanced 17-AAG tumor-cell killing using two-dimensional and spheroid culture systems. These data support the use of capsaicin as a scaffold to develop novel N-terminal Hsp90 inhibitors that circumvent over-expression of the Hsp70 protein and/or use it as a co-therapeutic.
Results
Hsp90 is a target of capsaicin in cancer cells
CAP-OH was prepared by etherification of phenolic hydroxyl of capsaicin with t-BOC-protected tetra-ethylene glycol amine, followed by trifluoroacetic acid deprotection of the amino group. CAP-NH2 was made by acylation of vanillylamine with 10-azidodecanoyl chloride with subsequent reduction of the azido functionality (see “Methods”). The two capsaicin derivatives were immobilized on Sepharose resin using divinylsulfone chemistry as previously described47. This resin was used in pulldown experiments to identify proteins that bind capsaicin in MCF7 cells.
Cell lysates from human breast cancer MCF7 cells were incubated with Cap-OH (Fig. 1A) or control resins overnight at 4 °C. Bound proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and stained with Coomassie blue. Visibly stained bands were then identified by mass spectrometry. As shown in Fig. 1B, cytosolic Hsp90α (399 peptides) and β (112 peptides) were pulled down by Cap-OH resin, indicating that Hsp90 and capsaicin interact. In the 90 kDa molecular weight band, the importin subunit beta-1 (KPNB1) (59 peptides) and isoform 1 of Transportin-1 (TNPO1) (17 peptides) were also identified. Two additional substantial proteins at different molecular weights were identified: Fatty acid synthase (FASN) (250 kDa) and Tubulin beta-2C chain + alpha-4A chain TUBB2C (50 kDa). We also identified minor traces of the clathrin heavy chain (CLTC). However, it remains undetermined if these proteins interact directly with capsaicin or if they are pulled down as components of the Hsp90 complexes. Consistent with the latter possibility, tubulin48,49 and FASN50 have been shown to interact with Hsp90, and importin β1 forms a complex with Hsp90 to facilitate the nuclear trafficking of nuclear receptors and telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT)51,52.
To validate Hsp90 as a cellular target of capsaicin, we used the cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA) to evaluate drug target engagement in cells53. Human Hs578T breast cancer cells were treated with 200 µM capsaicin for 1 h. Cell protein extracts were heated in a thermocycler using a temperature gradient from 52.5 to 68.8 °C to cause protein melting and denaturation. Cell extracts were then centrifuged to remove precipitated proteins. If Hsp90 is a target of capsaicin in cells, binding would promote Hsp90 stability and resistance to temperature-induced denaturation. As shown in Fig. 1C, treatment with capsaicin attenuated Hsp90β loss, indicating that capsaicin binds to Hsp90 in Hs578T cells.
To test capsaicin selectivity and direct binding to Hsp90, Cap-OH resin was used to pull down purified human cytosolic Hsp90α and β as well as the yeast (Hsp82) and bacterial (HtpG) orthologs. HtpG was expressed in E. coli but yeast and human proteins were expressed in insect sf9 cells. As shown in Fig. 1D, minimal to no binding was observed using HtpG and yeast hsp82, but both human Hsp90α and β bind the Cap-OH resin.
To determine the functional impact of capsaicin on Hsp90 in vitro, we tested the ability of capsaicin to inhibit the Aha1-stimulated ATPase activity of Hsp90. As shown in Fig. 1E, capsaicin reduced the ATPase activity of Hsp90, albeit to a lesser extent than the classical Hsp90 inhibitor 17AAG; capsaicin (100 µM) only inhibited about 50% of the ATPase activity. Importantly, as shown below, this level of inhibition correlates with the overall efficacy of capsaicin in terms of cell killing, hsp90 client destabilization45, and reduction of Hsp70 protein levels.
To delineate the capsaicin binding site on Hsp90, we used capsaicin resins to pull down full-length hsp90α and β as well as the N-terminal and C-terminal domains (Fig. 2A). Interestingly, the C-terminal fragment (616-Ct) showed no significant binding, but the N-terminal ATP-binding domain (amino acid residues 1–212) was efficiently pulled down by the Cap-OH resin. This was confirmed by analysis via in silico molecular docking, which predicted capsaicin binding to the ATP site of the N-terminal domain (Fig. 2B). These predicted docking interactions were unique from those for the Hsp90 inhibitor PU3. Interestingly, both capsaicin and PU3 formed hydrogen bonds with Asp93 of Hsp90, but PU3 was also predicted to interact with Phe138 and Leu107 (Fig. 2C).
Docking studies also suggested that flexibility of the aliphatic chain of capsaicin is important for Hsp90 binding. Consistent with this, immobilization of capsaicin via the aliphatic side chain to generate Cap-NH2 resin (Fig. 1A) dramatically reduced Hsp90 binding compared to capsaicin immobilization through the C3-OH on the vanilloid ring (Fig. 2A). These results agree with the in silico-estimated affinities of − 62.8 kcal/mol and − 76.38 kcal/mol for Cap-NH2 and Cap-OH, respectively (Fig. 2C). Furthermore, analysis using derivatives of capsaicin54,55 confirmed that binding with the vanilloid ring could tolerate substantial chemical modifications (Fig. 2D). However, the incorporation of multiple 3 methoxy groups in positions 2, 3, 4 and 5 significantly reduced the ability of capsaicin to inhibit progesterone receptor (PR) reconstitution, which was used as a biomarker for Hsp90-mediated client protein folding, indicating that these bulky modifications are unfavorable for the Hsp90 binding.
Capsaicin induces lysosomal (or autophagic) degradation of Hsp70
Capsaicin treatment had a distinct impact on cancer cells when compared to 17-AAG. Our previous studies showed that, like 17-AAG, capsaicin reduced the cellular levels of Hsp90 client proteins including the steroid receptors (androgen receptor (AR), glucocorticoid receptor (GR), and progesterone receptor (PR)), and kinases (CDK4, ChK1, Raf1, ILK, and HER2)45. However, increased expression of HSR biomarkers, including Hsp70, was not observed in HeLa, MCF7, U2OS, or LnCaP human cancer cell lines. Rather, the level of Hsp70 protein was reduced after capsaicin treatment in all cell lines tested (Fig. 3A). However, the protein level of Hsc70 showed no change upon capsaicin treatment (Fig. 3A). Hsp70 and Hsc70 share ~ 85% amino acid sequence identity56, indicating that capsaicin selectively affected Hsp70. Together, these data indicate that capsaicin inhibits Hsp90 chaperoning by binding to the N-terminus ATP binding site and does not trigger the HSR response typified by Hsp70 induction as observed with classical N-terminus inhibitors45.
Capsaicin-mediated down-regulation of Hsp70 (Fig. 3A) could result from repression of Hsp70 gene transcription, translation, or destabilization of Hsp70 protein. The level of Hsp70 mRNA was increased after capsaicin treatment (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 and 3), while the protein level was decreased (Fig. 3C, lanes 1 and 3). However, the increase in Hsp70 mRNA caused by capsaicin treatment was minimal compared to the marked up-regulation caused by 17-AAG (Fig. 3B, lanes 1 and 2), which was further induced when cells were treated with capsaicin and 17-AAG (Fig. 3A, lane 4). Consistent with the effect of capsaicin on Hsp70 protein, induction of Hsp70 by 17-AAG was drastically attenuated by capsaicin co-treatment (Fig. 3C, lanes 2 and 4).
The roles of the proteasomal and lysosomal degradation pathways in mediating capsaicin-induced Hsp70 degradation were then studied. MCF7 cells were treated with capsaicin in the presence of a proteasome inhibitor (MG132) or autophagy inhibitor (3MA). As shown in Fig. 3C (lanes 5 and 7), 6 h treatment with MG132 did prevent about 16% and 44% of Hsp70 degradation with capsaicin treatment, alone or in combination with 17-AAG, respectively (Fig. 3C lanes 6 and 8). However, treatment with 3MA promoted almost full recovery (97%) of Hsp70 induced by 17-AAG (Fig. 3C lanes 10 and 12). Of note, the profile of Hsp70 mRNA was consistent with and without 3MA treatment (Fig. 3B). Accumulation of LC3II indicated that both 17-AAG and capsaicin-induced autophagy in MCF7 cells (Fig. 3C lane 3). Interestingly, a significantly higher accumulation of LC3II occurred when capsaicin was combined with 17-AAG compared to capsaicin alone (Fig. 3C lanes 3 and 4), suggesting that capsaicin-mediated lysosomal degradation was further accentuated by 17-AAG, which correlated with the drastic loss of Hsp70 protein level in the capsaicin-17-AAG co-treatment group (Fig. 3C lanes 2 and 4). As expected, 3MA reduced LC3II accumulation (Fig. 3C lanes 9–12), and together, these data suggest that co-treatment of capsaicin and 17-AAG stimulates autophagy, which promotes Hsp70 degradation. Autophagy induction (Fig. 4A) and Hsp70 degradation (Fig. 3A) were also observed in LNCaP cells treated with capsaicin.
Consistent with the paradigm above, light microscopic analysis of MCF7 cells showed that capsaicin-treated cells developed vacuoles (Fig. 4B), which were further resolved using transmission electron microscopy as double-membrane lining structures, indicative of autophagosomes, (Fig. 4C). Interestingly, the mitochondria in capsaicin-treated cells were also deformed, exhibiting irregular membranes (Fig. 4C). Specifically, the normal pattern of mitochondrial cristae (inner mitochondrial membrane) was lost, and unhealthy mitochondria were present in autophagosome structures, suggesting active mitophagy as well (Fig. 4C). This was further confirmed using immunocytochemistry analysis showing a reduction in staining by Cox4, a mitochondrial marker, and co-localization of Cox4 with LC3A puncta in the capsaicin-treated cells (Fig. 4D). These findings agree with two reports showing that capsaicin treatment induces macro-autophagy in MCF7 breast cancer cells57 and that dihydrocapsaicin (a saturated analog of capsaicin) induces mito-autophagy in HCT 116 colon cancer cells58.
Capsaicin prevented 17AAG-induced over-expression of Hsp70 and improved 17-AAG anti-tumor activity
Pharmacological inhibition of Hsp90 by N-terminal inhibitors, including 17-AAG, induces the HSR, which is thought to reduce the efficacy of Hsp90 inhibitors through up-regulation of the anti-apoptotic proteins Hsp70 and Hsp2759,60. We therefore further tested whether capsaicin-dependent inhibition of 17-AAG-induced Hsp70 expression would affect tumor cell killing. MCF7 and LNCaP cells were treated with 50, 100, and 200 μM capsaicin with and without 100 nM 17-AAG. In a concentration-dependent manner, capsaicin abolished the 17-AAG-induced over-expression of Hsp70 in the co-treated group compared to 17-AAG alone (Fig. 5A, Quantification in Supplementary data). Indeed, in the presence of 17-AAG, 200 µM capsaicin reduced the Hsp70 level to that of DMSO control; 35% and 33% respectively compared to 17-AAG alone. The impact of capsaicin is even more in LNCaP where Hsp70 is reduced to 1/3 of the level of control DMSO; 11% and 34% respectively compared to 17-AAG alone.
As shown in Fig. 5B, the viability of LNCaP cells treated for 48 h with capsaicin (50 µM) and 17-AAG (800 nM) was markedly lower than for either capsaicin or 17-AAG alone. This result was further demonstrated using MCF7 cells where enhanced killing occurred at concentrations of 12.5, 25, and 50 µM capsaicin combined with 17-AAG (800 nM); Fig. 5B). A similar effect of capsaicin was observed using a tridimensional (3D) spheroid growth assay with MCF7 and the prostate cancer cell line PC3. As shown in Fig. 5C,D, the combination of capsaicin and 17-AAG produced significantly greater cell killing of MCF7 and PC3 3D-spheroids as indicated by Ethidium Homodimer-1 (EthD-1) staining (Fig. 5D), a marker for dead cells.
Discussion
Capsaicin has been shown to trigger a variety of signaling events in cancer cell lines. The mechanism by which capsaicin induces apoptosis in cancer cells is not well understood, but it appears to be independent of the TRPV1 receptor as neither capsazepine, a TRPV1 antagonist, nor intracellular Ca2+ chelators have been found to inhibit apoptosis35,36,61,62. In contrast, Reilly and coworkers have shown that TRPV1 may play a more dominant role in capsaicinoid toxicity in non-cancerous lung cells, and some role in human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) cells, which were more sensitive to the cytotoxic effect of capsaicin than human hepatocarcinoma (HepG2) cells, which expressed less TRPV1 receptor55,63. Regardless, capsaicin can block the activity of many oncogenic signaling proteins including NF-κB, ER, EGFR/HER2, CDK4, Src, VEGF, and PI3K/Akt, among others. Thus, there exists considerable pleiotropy with regard to the mechanism of capsaicin-induced cancer cell death64. Importantly, however, many of the signaling proteins inactivated by capsaicin are clients of Hsp90, which is consistent with capsaicin binding and inactivating Hsp90 as shown in this report. Hence, it is reasonable to propose that the seemingly pleiotropic effects of capsaicin may, in part, result from the inhibition of Hsp90 in cancer cells.
This hypothesis is supported by our previous report showing that treatment of several cancer cell lines with capsaicin resulted in dose-dependent degradation of Hsp90 client proteins, including the steroid receptors AR, PR, and GR, and HER2, Akt, Raf, CDK4, and Chk1 kinases45. Pulldown experiments coupled with mass spectrometry analysis strongly suggest that cytosolic Hsp90α and β are crucial cellular targets of capsaicin and that capsaicin interacts with the N-terminus ATP binding domain of Hsp90 to promote cancer cell death through autophagy. This domain is the target of Hsp90 inhibitors including geldanamycin and its derivatives, 17-AAG, resorcinol compounds, and ATP-based structures such as PU and others. The apo N-terminal domain of Hsp90 has a highly flexible lid segment formed by residues 107 to 14165 and can be significantly affected by ligand binding66. Structural comparison of N-terminal domain interaction with ligands showed that the main structural variations are limited to the conformation of residues 104 to 111 located in the α-helix 3 domain67. This region can adopt a helical or more open conformation in yeast Hsp90, but it is structured as an extended loop that closes the binding site of human Hsp9068. The key residues for ligand binding in all Hsp90 orthologs are centered around residue Asp93. These include Asn51, Ser52 (Ala38 in yeast), Ala55, Met98, and Thr184. These structural changes are potentially important to the selective binding of capsaicin to Hsp90α and β compared to yeast and bacterial Hsp90. However, more structural studies are needed to better define the molecular motifs underlying this selectivity. It remains intriguing and potentially significant to understand how capsaicin binding the N-terminus of Hsp90 does not induce the HSR akin to classical N-terminal binding inhibitors of Hsp90. Indeed, It is well known that 17-AAG and other Hsp90 ATP competitors induce HSF169 through dissociation of the Hsp90:HSF1 complex and prolongation of Hsp70 promoter activation. However, cell treatment with capsaicin selectively down-regulated Hsp70 protein in various cancer models, including HeLa, MCF7, U2OS, and LNCaP cell lines (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, the combination of capsaicin and 17-AAG amplified the activation of HSF1 as indicated by the large accumulation of Hsp70 mRNA. However, the Hsp70 protein was efficiently degraded, which is predicted to deprive cells of the pro-survival activities of Hsp70, including inhibition of apoptosis11.
The ability of capsaicin to selectively reduce Hsp70, but not Hsc70, was also intriguing. The two isoforms share more than ~ 85% amino acid sequence identity, and their overall structures are remarkably similar. However, some structural differences do occur in their carboxy-terminal domains (amino acids 510–641), which show only 70.5% amino acid identity. These differences between Hsp70 and Hsc70 could impact their activities. For example, Menoret and coworkers measured the peptide-binding affinities of purified Hsp70 and Hsc70 using three different radiolabeled peptides under a variety of buffer conditions in vitro70. They found that Hsp70 binds to peptides with higher affinity than Hsc70 does. Whether these differences play a role in the capsaicin-induced selective degradation of Hsp70 remains to be determined. It is also possible that this selectivity between the two isoforms is regulated by differences in the complex pattern of chaperones' posttranslational modifications, known as chaperone code, including phosphorylation, acetylation, ubiquitination, AMPylation, and ADP-ribosylation71,72.
Our data show that capsaicin treatment induced autophagy and mitophagy in MCF7 cells (Fig. 4C). In capsaicin-treated cells, mitochondrial cristae were visibly compromised. The mitochondrial cristae constitute the inner mitochondrial membrane, which harbors protein complexes I–V of the electron transport system (ETS). Using BxPC-3 and AsPC-1 (pancreatic cancer) cell lines, Srivastava and coworkers showed that capsaicin blocked enzymatic activity and reduced protein levels of complexes I and III, thus disrupting the mitochondrial ETS. This resulted in increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which subsequently disrupted mitochondrial transmembrane potential, leading to apoptosis73. Several other reports have also documented that capsaicin disrupted mitochondrial function and induced ROS production in cancer cells, leading to death39,74,75,76,77,78,79. Importantly, Hsp90 impacts mitochondrial ETS function, and inhibition of Hsp90 causes mitochondrial dysfunction80.
How Hsp70 is degraded in a lysosomal-dependent manner, as indicated by the rescue of Hsp70 with 3MA, remains unknown. Interestingly, over-expression of Hsp70 prevented starvation-induced autophagy by up-regulation of the mTOR-Akt pathway81. George and coworkers showed that inhibition of Hsp70 by the small molecule compound PES resulted in marked induction of autophagy82. These data seem to indicate that Hsp70 is necessary for the suppression of autophagy under normal physiological conditions. Hsp70, however, is not the only protein that suppresses autophagy, as Hsp70.1.3−/− mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) maintain basal levels of autophagy83. It is important to study how capsaicin induces autophagy and to further test how this leads to the degradation of Hsp70 without the degradation of the classical autophagic flux p62/SQSTM1 (Fig. 4A).
Hsp70 is a major anti-apoptotic protein known to be up-regulated in many cancers84,85,86,87. 17-AAG and other N-terminal Hsp90 inhibitors cause over-expression of Hsp70 as a side effect. Our data show that co-treatment of capsaicin with 17-AAG prevented the 17-AAG-mediated up-regulation of Hsp70, which translated into more potent cytotoxicity and killing of multiple cancer cell types using both standard and 3D culture models. These findings suggest that capsaicin could potentially be used in combination with N-terminal Hsp90 inhibitors to induce a synergistic anti-tumor effect.
Methods
General methods for capsaicin derivative synthesis
Organic solvents were dried and distilled before use; tetrahydrofuran was distilled from sodium/benzophenone ketyl. Other reagents were obtained from Aldrich or VWR and used as received, unless otherwise noted. Flash chromatography was performed using 40–63 µm silica gel. All NMR spectra were recorded in CDCl3 using a 400 MHz instrument.
Synthesis of CAP-OH
tert-Butyl (E)-(2-(2-(2-(2-(2-methoxy-4-((8-methylnon-6-enamido)methyl)phenoxy) ethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)ethyl)carbamate (2)
2,2-dimethyl-4-oxo-3,8,11,14-tetraoxa-5-azahexadecan-16-yl 4-methyl benzenesulfonate (1)1 (0.915 g, 2.05 mmol) and potassium carbonate (0.181 g, 1.31 mmol) were added to a solution of capsaicin (0.400 g, 1.31 mmol) in DMF (13 mL). The reaction mixture was stirred at 75 °C overnight, cooled down to room temperature and extracted with diethyl ether (250 mL). The organic layer was washed with water (5 × 50 mL), brine (100 mL), and dried over MgSO4. The solvent was evaporated in a vacuum and the crude product was purified by chromatography (silica gel/ethyl acetate) to give 624 mg (80%) of capsaicin derivative 2 as a white amorphous solid.
1H-NMR: 6.85–6.87 (m, 1H), 6.77–6.80 (m, 2H), 5.83 (s, 1H), 5.04 (s, 1H), 4.36–4.37 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 4.16–4.18 (t, 2H), 3.86–3.89 (t, 2H), 3.83 (s, 3H), 3.73–3.75 (m, 2H), 3.60–3.68 (m, 6H), 3.50–3.53 (t, 2H), 3.26–3.28 (m, 2H), 2.18–2.22 (t, 2H), 1.63–1.67 (m, 2H), 1.43 (s, 9H), 1.36–1.29 (m, 12H), 0.85–0.89 (t, 3H).
13C-NMR: 173.12, 156.19, 149.98, 147.89, 131.99, 120.26, 114.09, 111.96, 79.35, 71.04, 70.82, 70.75, 70.45, 70.38, 69.84, 68.90, 56.12, 43.56, 40.55, 37.04, 32.00, 29.53, 29.52, 29.35, 28.62, 26.00, 22.83, 14.28.
(E)-N-(4-(2-(2-(2-(2-aminoethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)ethoxy)-3-methoxybenzyl)-8-methylnon-6-enamide (CAP-OH)
Trifluoroacetic acid (409 mg, 3.6 mmol) was added to a solution of the capsaicin derivative (2, 510 mg, 0.9 mmol) in DCM (5 mL) at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred overnight, quenched with saturated sodium bicarbonate (50 mL), and extracted with DCM (200 mL). The organic layer was washed with brine and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate; the solvent was removed in a vacuum, and the crude product was purified by chromatography (silica gel, 15:1 to 5:1 DCM: MeOH) to give 328 mg (78%) of CAP-OH as a white powder. M.P. 73–75 °C.
1H-NMR: 6.77–6.84 (m, 3H), 6.07 (s, 1H), 4.34–4.35 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 4.31 (s, 1H), 4.14–4.17 (t, 2H), 3.83–3.86 (m, 5H), 3.70–3.72 (m, 2H), 3.64–3.68 (m, 6H), 3.58–3.60 (t, 2H), 2.91–2.93 (t, 2H), 2.17–2.21 (t, 2H), 1.62–1.65 (m, 2H), 1.25–1.28 (m, 10H), 0.84–0.88 (t, 3H).
13C-NMR: 173.31, 149.28, 147.01, 132.43, 120.00, 113.49, 111.62, 70.72, 70.51, 70.39, 70.02, 69.53, 68.55, 55.78, 43.00, 40.90, 36.56, 31.78, 29.33, 29.13, 25.83, 22.59, 14.06.
Synthesis of CAP-NH2
10-azido-N-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzyl)decanamide (3)2
A solution of vanillylamine hydrochloride (0.600 g, 3.2 mmol) in DMF (2 mL) was placed in a flame-dried round bottom flask under Ar atmosphere. 5 M aqueous solution of NaOH (0.696 mL, 3.48 mmol) was added drop-wise at room temperature. The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at 35 °C, cooled to 0 °C, and 10-azidodecanoyl chloride (6 mL, 0.6 M) was added dropwise. The ice bath was removed and the reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with water (5 mL) and extracted with ethyl acetate (3 × 75 mL). The organic layer was dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate, solvents were removed in a vacuum, and the crude product was purified by chromatography (silica gel; 1:1 to 1:3 hexanes: ethyl acetate) to afford 287 mg (26%) of compound 3 as a colorless oil.
1H-NMR: 6.81–6.83 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (s, 1H), 6.70–6.72 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.9 Hz, 1H), 6.19 (s, 1H), 6.08 (s, 1H), 4.29–4.31 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.20–3.24 (t, 2H), 2.15–2.19 (t, 2H), 1.54–1.63 (m, 4H), 1.26–1.31 (m, 10H).
13C-NMR: 173.21, 146.91, 145.26, 130.35, 120.74, 114.57, 110.86, 55.97, 51.52, 43.55, 36.80, 29.37, 29.32, 29.30, 29.13, 28.87, 26.74, 25.85.
10-amino-N-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzyl)decanamide (CAP-NH2)
Triphenyl-phosphine (291 mg, 1.11 mmol) was added to a solution of 10-azido-N-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzyl) decanamide (3, 276 mg, 0.792 mmol) in tetrahydrofuran (THF) (2 mL). After 10 min, deionized water (20 µL, 1.11 mmol) was added to the flask, and the reaction mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. The reaction mixture was concentrated in a vacuum, and the residue was purified by chromatography (silica gel; 15:1 to 1:1 DCM: MeOH) to yield 182 mg (71%) of CAP-NH2 as a light brown oil.
1H-NMR: 6.80–6.85 (m, 2H), 6.74–6.76 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 5.79 (s, 1H), 4.34–4.36 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 2H), 3.86 (s, 3H), 3.16 (s, 2H), 2.66–2.70 (t, 2H), 2.17–2.21 (t, 2H), 1.62–1.65 (m, 2H), 1.40–1.44 (m, 2H), 1.25 (s, 10H).
13C-NMR: 173.07, 147.35, 145.65, 130.42, 120.91, 115.06, 111.12, 56.06, 43.68, 42.22, 37.02, 33.56, 29.57, 29.48, 29.44, 29.37, 26.97, 26.01.
Antibodies
Anti-β-actin was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (sc-47778); anti-Hsp70 from Enzo Life Sciences (catalog no. ADI-SPA-810); anti-Hsc70 from StressMarq Biosciences Inc (catalog no. SMC-151) or anti-Hsp70 (BB70, Dr. David Toft, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN); anti-Hsp90β (H90.10, Dr. David Toft); anti-LC3B (Cell Signaling Technology, 3868S);, anti-cleaved LC3A (LC3AII) (Abgent Antibody, Abcepta, San Diego, CA, AP1805a); anti-GAPDH (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, sc-166545); and p62/SQSTM1 from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc (catalog no. sc-28359).
Chemicals
17-AAG (Selleckchem), Capsaicin (Cayman Chemical) and Ethidium Homodimer-1 (Thermo Fisher).
Protein purification
Bacterial Hsp90 (HtpG) was expressed in E. coli and purified as previously described88. Yeast Hsp90 (Hsp82), and cytosolic human Hsp90α and β were expressed in insect sf9 cells and purified as previously described89.
Cell proliferation assays and drug treatments
Cell proliferation was monitored using The CellTiter 96 AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay (MTS) (Promega #G3580). Cells were grown to 40–60% confluency on 96-well tissue culture plates (Corning #3599, Glendale, AZ) followed by treatment with capsaicin or DMSO control. For protein analysis by Western blot, cancer cell lines were grown for at least 48 h to be at 40–60% confluent in 6-well plates (Corning #3516) before drug treatment was started. Cells were then harvested at specified times, and cell lysates were made. For Western blotting, 15 μg of protein lysate was analyzed using the following specific antibodies.
Cell lines
HeLa. MCF7, Hs578T, U2OS, LnCaP and PC3 cell lines were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) within the last 5 years. Large stocks were made and stored in liquid nitrogen. All cell lines are regularly tested at least quarterly for mycoplasma using the Genetica Inc mycoplasma test and MycoAlert PLUS Mycoplasma Detection Kits.
Western blotting
Cells were lysed with buffer A (10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 137 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, 1% Nonident P-40) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche Applied Science, catalog no. 11 836 170 001) on ice for 30 min, shaking every 5 min. The lysate was centrifuged at 16,000×g for 10 min. Clarified lysates (15 μg) were run on SDS-PAGE (10% gel) and transferred to PVDF membranes. Proteins were detected by Western blotting using indicated antibodies against specific proteins. All primary antibodies were used at 1/1000 dilution with overnight incubation at 4 °C.
Spheroid formation assay
The general protocol described by Edner et al. was generally followed90. Stable LNCaP and DU145 cell lines containing control or UNC45A shRNA were seeded in a low-adhesion 96-well plate at a density of 5 × 103 cells/well, while stable control and UNC45A sh RNA PC3 cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well. The cells were cultured in serum- and antibiotic-free medium supplemented with B27, N2, insulin, transferrin, selenium, hEGF, and FGF for 8 days. After this time, cells were stained with 0.5 µM EthD-1 and (1:5000 dilution) of Hoechst dyes to distinguish between dead and live cells. Confocal microscopy was used to capture images of the cell spheroids. t-test was used for unpaired analysis comparing average expression between conditions. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant90.
Immunocytochemistry and fluorescence microscopy
The indicated cells were grown in 24-well plates (Corning #3337) on micro-cover glasses (Electron Microscopy Sciences) to about 50% confluency in MEM, 1X (Cellgro #10–010-CV) medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. Cells were treated with indicated concentrations of 17-AAG, capsaicin, or DMSO control for 24 or 48 h. Cells were fixed with 0.1 M PIPES, pH 6.95; 1 mM EGTA, pH 8.0; 3 mM MgSO4; and 3% paraformaldehyde, then permeabilized with 0.1% triton X-100, blocked with 2% fetal bovine serum, 5% goat serum and 5% glycerol, and stored at 4 °C. The primary antibodies against LC3B, as well as mouse and rabbit secondary antibodies, were prepared in the blocking buffer.
Microscopy
In each well of a 6-well tissue culture plate, 100,000 MCF7 cells were grown to 60% confluence. Cells were treated with 200 μM capsaicin or DMSO control (1.5% total DMSO concentration) for 15 h. Cells were fixed and imaged using a light microscope (Carl Zeiss). Mr. Brendan Marshall from the Electron Microscopy & Histology Core Laboratory at Augusta University performed the electron microscopic study of MCF7 cells.
Immunoprecipitation from cell lysates
Monoclonal Hsp70 antibody (BB70) was incubated with 30 μL slurry of protein A/protein G-agarose beads (Pierce Protein A Agarose, # 20334 and Pierce Protein G Agarose, # 20399) for 2 h at room temperature. Following incubation, cell extracts (200 μg of protein) from MCF7 cells were added to each sample and incubated overnight at 4 °C with gentle rotation. The samples were then washed three times with 1X RIPA buffer along with protease inhibitors (Roche Applied Science, #11836170001), 10 mm NaF, 2 mm sodium pyrophosphate, 2 mm β-glycerophosphate, and 1 mm sodium orthovanadate, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (PMSF) and eluted with 2× sample buffer at 95 °C for 5 min. Protein complexes were eluted using SDS-PAGE sample buffer and analyzed by Western blot.
CETSA
To analyze the engagement of capsaicin and Hsp90 protein, a cellular thermal shift assay was performed. 1 × 107 Hs578T cells were seeded in 10 cm culture dishes. After 24 h, cells were treated with DMSO (1%) or capsaicin (200 μM) for 1 h. Following treatment, cells were trypsinized and collected with PBS containing protease inhibitors and transferred to PCR tubes. All samples were heated at 52–60 °C for 2 min using a Bio-Rad C1000 thermal cycler and lysed with 3–4 freeze–thaw cycles using liquid nitrogen. For each freeze–thaw cycle, the cells were exposed to liquid nitrogen for 1 min and placed in a water bath at 30 °C for 1 min. Precipitated proteins and cell debris were then pelleted by centrifugation at 16,400 rpm for 15 min at 4 °C and the cleared cell lysates were analyzed by Western blotting.
Capsaicin derivative immobilization on Sepharose resin and pull-down experiments
Capsaicin derivatives solubilized in 5% DMSO were covalently linked to Sepharose 4B as described previously by Cornillot et al.47. The Cap-NH2 immobilization was implemented at pH 10, and Cap-OH immobilization was done at pH 6. Sepharose resin subjected to Divinyl sulfone activation and blocking with ethanolamine was used as a control. To test the binding of Hsp90 and its fragments to capsaicin derivative resins, 15 µL of resin and 10 µg of protein were used in a final reaction volume of 200 µL of incubation buffer [10 mM Tris, 100 mM KCl, 0.02% NP40, 2.5% glycerol, and 2 mM DTT (pH 7.5)]. Samples were incubated for 30 min at 30 °C and washed four times with 1 ml of buffer. Bound proteins were extracted with sample buffer, resolved by SDS–PAGE, and stained with Coomassie Blue.
Progesterone receptor (PR) reconstitution assay
Purified PR was adsorbed onto PR22 antibody-protein A-Sepharose resin beads and was assembled into complexes, as described previously91. Rabbit reticulocyte lysate (RRL) was used to refold the PR. Briefly, approximately 0.05 μM PR was incubated with 1.4 μM Hsp70, 0.8 μM Hsp90β, 0.2 μM Hsp40 (Ydj), 0.08 μM HOP, and 2.6 μM p23 in reaction buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl, pH 7.5, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM DTT, 0.01% NP-40, 50 mM KCl, and 5 mM ATP). After incubation for 30 min at 30 °C, 0.1 μM [3H]-progesterone (American Radiolabeled Chemicals, Inc, #ART 0063, St. Louis, MO) was added. Samples were incubated on ice for 3 h at 4 °C. Complexes were then washed three times with 1 ml of reaction buffer and assessed for bound progesterone by liquid scintillation counting using a PerkinElmer Microbeta plate reader. PR activity is expressed in radioactive count per minute (CPM).
Molecular docking
Discovery Studio 2.5 software was used to carry out docking simulations using the Hsp90 crystal structure co-crystalized with the selective inhibitor PU3 (PDB accession number: 1UYM)68. The protein and ligand were optimized with force field: CHARMm, Partial charge: MMFF94, and the radius of receptor active site employed: 4.030776, 10.9669, 24.5626, 9.0. Our results showed that the superimposition of the docked poses with the bioactive ligand conformations yields a low root mean square deviation (RMSD) of 0.095 Å, indicating that molecular docking can accurately reproduce the ligand conformation in the Hsp90 crystal structures.
Data availability
Raw data generated during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. All the raw data generated by mass spectrometry analysis and large files of images used to generate Figs. 4B–D, and 5C are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Trepel, J., Mollapour, M., Giaccone, G. & Neckers, L. Targeting the dynamic HSP90 complex in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10, 537–549. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2887 (2010).
Schopf, F. H., Biebl, M. M. & Buchner, J. The HSP90 chaperone machinery. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18, 345–360. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm.2017.20 (2017).
Gray, P. J. Jr., Prince, T., Cheng, J., Stevenson, M. A. & Calderwood, S. K. Targeting the oncogene and kinome chaperone CDC37. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8, 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc2420 (2008).
Woodford, M. R. et al. Mps1 mediated phosphorylation of Hsp90 confers renal cell carcinoma sensitivity and selectivity to Hsp90 inhibitors. Cell Rep. 14, 872–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.12.084 (2016).
Kamal, A. et al. A high-affinity conformation of Hsp90 confers tumour selectivity on Hsp90 inhibitors. Nature 425, 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01913 (2003).
Rodina, A. et al. The epichaperome is an integrated chaperome network that facilitates tumour survival. Nature 538, 397–401. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19807 (2016).
Sugita, M. et al. Targeting the epichaperome as an effective precision medicine approach in a novel PML-SYK fusion acute myeloid leukemia. NPJ Precis. Oncol. 5, 44. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41698-021-00183-2 (2021).
Saleh, A., Srinivasula, S. M., Balkir, L., Robbins, P. D. & Alnemri, E. S. Negative regulation of the Apaf-1 apoptosome by Hsp70. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 476–483. https://doi.org/10.1038/35019510 (2000).
Beere, H. M. et al. Heat-shock protein 70 inhibits apoptosis by preventing recruitment of procaspase-9 to the Apaf-1 apoptosome. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 469–475. https://doi.org/10.1038/35019501 (2000).
Ravagnan, L. et al. Heat-shock protein 70 antagonizes apoptosis-inducing factor. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 839–843. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb0901-839 (2001).
Garrido, C. et al. Heat shock proteins 27 and 70: Anti-apoptotic proteins with tumorigenic properties. Cell Cycle 5, 2592–2601 (2006).
Bruey, J. M. et al. Hsp27 negatively regulates cell death by interacting with cytochrome c. Nat. Cell Biol. 2, 645–652. https://doi.org/10.1038/35023595 (2000).
Davenport, E. L. et al. Targeting heat shock protein 72 enhances Hsp90 inhibitor-induced apoptosis in myeloma. Leukemia 24, 1804–1807. https://doi.org/10.1038/leu.2010.168 (2010).
Frese, S. et al. Cell death induced by down-regulation of heat shock protein 70 in lung cancer cell lines is p53-independent and does not require DNA cleavage. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 126, 748–754 (2003).
Nylandsted, J. et al. Eradication of glioblastoma, and breast and colon carcinoma xenografts by Hsp70 depletion. Cancer Res. 62, 7139–7142 (2002).
Nylandsted, J. et al. Selective depletion of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) activates a tumor-specific death program that is independent of caspases and bypasses Bcl-2. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97, 7871–7876 (2000).
Kaur, J. & Ralhan, R. Induction of apoptosis by abrogation of HSP70 expression in human oral cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer 85, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(20000101)85:1%3c1::AID-IJC1%3e3.0.CO;2-O (2000).
Powers, M. V., Clarke, P. A. & Workman, P. Dual targeting of HSC70 and HSP72 inhibits HSP90 function and induces tumor-specific apoptosis. Cancer Cell 14, 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2008.08.002 (2008).
Pillarsetty, N. et al. Paradigms for precision medicine in epichaperome cancer therapy. Cancer Cell 36, 559-573.e557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccell.2019.09.007 (2019).
Ohkubo, S. et al. TAS-116, a highly selective inhibitor of heat shock protein 90alpha and beta, demonstrates potent antitumor activity and minimal ocular toxicity in preclinical models. Mol. Cancer Ther. 14, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-14-0219 (2015).
Kawazoe, A. et al. TAS-116 (Pimitespib), an oral HSP90 inhibitor, in combination with nivolumab in patients with colorectal cancer and other solid tumors: An open-label, dose-finding, and expansion phase Ib trial (EPOC1704). Clin. Cancer Res. 27, 6709–6715. https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-1929 (2021).
Ikebe, E. et al. TAS-116 (pimitespib), a heat shock protein 90 inhibitor, shows efficacy in preclinical models of adult T-cell leukemia. Cancer Sci. 113, 684–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.15204 (2022).
Kihara, T. et al. Pimitespib is effective on cecal GIST in a mouse model of familial GISTs with KIT-Asp820Tyr mutation through KIT signaling inhibition. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 123, 104692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexmp.2021.104692 (2021).
Chiosis, G., Vilenchik, M., Kim, J. & Solit, D. Hsp90: The vulnerable chaperone. Drug Discov. Today 9, 881–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(04)03245-3 (2004).
Marcu, M. G., Chadli, A., Bouhouche, I., Catelli, M. & Neckers, L. M. The heat shock protein 90 antagonist novobiocin interacts with a previously unrecognized ATP-binding domain in the carboxyl terminus of the chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 37181–37186. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M003701200 (2000).
Donnelly, A. & Blagg, B. S. Novobiocin and additional inhibitors of the Hsp90 C-terminal nucleotide-binding pocket. Curr. Med. Chem. 15, 2702–2717 (2008).
Li, Y., Zhang, T., Schwartz, S. J. & Sun, D. New developments in Hsp90 inhibitors as anti-cancer therapeutics: Mechanisms, clinical perspective and more potential. Drug Resist. Updat. 12, 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drup.2008.12.002 (2009).
Gestwicki, J. E. & Shao, H. Inhibitors and chemical probes for molecular chaperone networks. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 2151–2161. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.TM118.002813 (2019).
McConnell, J. R. & McAlpine, S. R. Heat shock proteins 27, 40, and 70 as combinational and dual therapeutic cancer targets. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23, 1923–1928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2013.02.014 (2013).
Whitesell, L. & Lindquist, S. Inhibiting the transcription factor HSF1 as an anticancer strategy. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 13, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.1517/14728220902832697 (2009).
Caterina, M. J. et al. The capsaicin receptor: A heat-activated ion channel in the pain pathway. Nature 389, 816–824. https://doi.org/10.1038/39807 (1997).
Bode, A. M. & Dong, Z. The two faces of capsaicin. Cancer Res. 71, 2809–2814. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-3756 (2011).
Clark, R. & Lee, S. H. Anticancer properties of capsaicin against human cancer. Anticancer Res. 36, 837–843 (2016).
Wu, L. et al. Capsaicin inhibits the stemness of anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells by triggering autophagy-lysosome mediated OCT4A degradation. Phytother. Res. 36, 938–950. https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.7361 (2022).
Kim, C. S. et al. Capsaicin, a spicy component of hot pepper, induces apoptosis by activation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma in HT-29 human colon cancer cells. J. Med. Food 7, 267–273. https://doi.org/10.1089/1096620041938713 (2004).
Gonzales, C. B. et al. Vanilloids induce oral cancer apoptosis independent of TRPV1. Oral Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2013.12.023 (2014).
Mori, A. et al. Capsaicin, a component of red peppers, inhibits the growth of androgen-independent, p53 mutant prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66, 3222–3229. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0087 (2006).
Oh, S. H. & Lim, S. C. Endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated autophagy/apoptosis induced by capsaicin (8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide) and dihydrocapsaicin is regulated by the extent of c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase activation in WI38 lung epithelial fibroblast cells. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 329, 112–122. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.108.144113 (2009).
Macho, A. et al. Selective induction of apoptosis by capsaicin in transformed cells: The role of reactive oxygen species and calcium. Cell Death Differ. 6, 155–165. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400465 (1999).
Thoennissen, N. H. et al. Capsaicin causes cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in ER-positive and -negative breast cancer cells by modulating the EGFR/HER-2 pathway. Oncogene 29, 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2009.335 (2010).
Chen, D., Yang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhu, G. & Wang, X. Capsaicin induces cycle arrest by inhibiting cyclin-dependent-kinase in bladder carcinoma cells. Int. J. Urol. 19, 662–668. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02981.x (2012).
Pyun, B. J. et al. Capsiate, a nonpungent capsaicin-like compound, inhibits angiogenesis and vascular permeability via a direct inhibition of Src kinase activity. Cancer Res. 68, 227–235. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2799 (2008).
Min, J. K. et al. Capsaicin inhibits in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis. Cancer Res. 64, 644–651 (2004).
Brown, K. C. et al. Capsaicin displays anti-proliferative activity against human small cell lung cancer in cell culture and nude mice models via the E2F pathway. PLoS ONE 5, e10243. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010243 (2010).
Patwardhan, C. A., Alfa, E., Lu, S. & Chadli, A. Progesterone receptor chaperone complex-based high-throughput screening assay: Identification of capsaicin as an inhibitor of the Hsp90 machine. J. Biomol. Screen. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087057114549147 (2014).
Stricher, F., Macri, C., Ruff, M. & Muller, S. HSPA8/HSC70 chaperone protein: Structure, function, and chemical targeting. Autophagy 9, 1937–1954. https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.26448 (2013).
Cornillot, J. D., Caron, M., Joubert-Caron, R. & Bladier, D. Use of an immobilized human endogenous lectin for the purification of complementary ligands. Int. J. Biochem. 24, 1585–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-711x(92)90174-y (1992).
Garnier, C. et al. Heat-shock protein 90 (hsp90) binds in vitro to tubulin dimer and inhibits microtubule formation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 250, 414–419 (1998).
Weis, F., Moullintraffort, L., Heichette, C., Chretien, D. & Garnier, C. The 90-kDa heat shock protein Hsp90 protects tubulin against thermal denaturation. J. Biol. Chem. 285, 9525–9534. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.096586 (2010).
Falsone, S. F., Gesslbauer, B., Tirk, F., Piccinini, A. M. & Kungl, A. J. A proteomic snapshot of the human heat shock protein 90 interactome. FEBS Lett. 579, 6350–6354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2005.10.020 (2005).
Jeong, Y. Y., Her, J., Oh, S. Y. & Chung, I. K. Hsp90-binding immunophilin FKBP52 modulates telomerase activity by promoting the cytoplasmic retrotransport of hTERT. Biochem. J. 473, 3517–3532. https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160344 (2016).
Echeverria, P. C. et al. Nuclear import of the glucocorticoid receptor-hsp90 complex through the nuclear pore complex is mediated by its interaction with Nup62 and importin beta. Mol. Cell Biol. 29, 4788–4797. https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00649-09 (2009).
Jafari, R. et al. The cellular thermal shift assay for evaluating drug target interactions in cells. Nat. Protoc. 9, 2100–2122. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.138 (2014).
Thomas, K. C. et al. Structure-activity relationship of capsaicin analogs and transient receptor potential vanilloid 1-mediated human lung epithelial cell toxicity. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 337, 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1124/jpet.110.178491 (2011).
Reilly, C. A. et al. Reactive intermediates produced from the metabolism of the vanilloid ring of capsaicinoids by p450 enzymes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 26, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1021/tx300366k (2013).
Kabani, M. & Martineau, C. N. Multiple hsp70 isoforms in the eukaryotic cytosol: Mere redundancy or functional specificity?. Curr. Genomics 9, 338–248. https://doi.org/10.2174/138920208785133280 (2008).
Choi, C. H., Jung, Y. K. & Oh, S. H. Autophagy induction by capsaicin in malignant human breast cells is modulated by p38 and extracellular signal-regulated mitogen-activated protein kinases and retards cell death by suppressing endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis. Mol. Pharmacol. 78, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.1124/mol.110.063495 (2010).
Oh, S. H. et al. Dihydrocapsaicin (DHC), a saturated structural analog of capsaicin, induces autophagy in human cancer cells in a catalase-regulated manner. Autophagy 4, 1009–1019 (2008).
Guo, F. et al. Abrogation of heat shock protein 70 induction as a strategy to increase antileukemia activity of heat shock protein 90 inhibitor 17-allylamino-demethoxy geldanamycin. Cancer Res. 65, 10536–10544. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1799 (2005).
McCollum, A. K., Teneyck, C. J., Sauer, B. M., Toft, D. O. & Erlichman, C. Up-regulation of heat shock protein 27 induces resistance to 17-allylamino-demethoxygeldanamycin through a glutathione-mediated mechanism. Cancer Res. 66, 10967–10975. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-1629 (2006).
Lee, Y. S., Nam, D. H. & Kim, J. A. Induction of apoptosis by capsaicin in A172 human glioblastoma cells. Cancer Lett. 161, 121–130 (2000).
Athanasiou, A. et al. Vanilloid receptor agonists and antagonists are mitochondrial inhibitors: How vanilloids cause non-vanilloid receptor mediated cell death. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 354, 50–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.12.179 (2007).
Reilly, C. A. & Yost, G. S. Metabolism of capsaicinoids by P450 enzymes: A review of recent findings on reaction mechanisms, bio-activation, and detoxification processes. Drug Metab. Rev. 38, 685–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/03602530600959557 (2006).
Bley, K., Boorman, G., Mohammad, B., McKenzie, D. & Babbar, S. A comprehensive review of the carcinogenic and anticarcinogenic potential of capsaicin. Toxicol. Pathol. 40, 847–873. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192623312444471 (2012).
Zhang, H. et al. A dynamic view of ATP-coupled functioning cycle of Hsp90 N-terminal domain. Sci. Rep. 5, 9542. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09542 (2015).
Amaral, M. et al. Protein conformational flexibility modulates kinetics and thermodynamics of drug binding. Nat. Commun. 8, 2276. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02258-w (2017).
Stebbins, C. E. et al. Crystal structure of an Hsp90-geldanamycin complex: Targeting of a protein chaperone by an antitumor agent. Cell 89, 239–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80203-2 (1997).
Wright, L. et al. Structure-activity relationships in purine-based inhibitor binding to HSP90 isoforms. Chem. Biol. 11, 775–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chembiol.2004.03.033 (2004).
Kijima, T. et al. HSP90 inhibitors disrupt a transient HSP90-HSF1 interaction and identify a noncanonical model of HSP90-mediated HSF1 regulation. Sci. Rep. 8, 6976. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25404-w (2018).
Callahan, M. K., Chaillot, D., Jacquin, C., Clark, P. R. & Menoret, A. Differential acquisition of antigenic peptides by Hsp70 and Hsc70 under oxidative conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 33604–33609. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M202890200 (2002).
Nitika Porter, C. M., Truman, A. W. & Truttmann, M. C. Post-translational modifications of Hsp70 family proteins: Expanding the chaperone code. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 10689–10708. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.REV120.011666 (2020).
Backe, S. J., Sager, R. A., Woodford, M. R., Makedon, A. M. & Mollapour, M. Post-translational modifications of Hsp90 and translating the chaperone code. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 11099–11117. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.REV120.011833 (2020).
Pramanik, K. C., Boreddy, S. R. & Srivastava, S. K. Role of mitochondrial electron transport chain complexes in capsaicin mediated oxidative stress leading to apoptosis in pancreatic cancer cells. PLoS ONE 6, e20151. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020151 (2011).
Macho, A., Blazquez, M. V., Navas, P. & Munoz, E. Induction of apoptosis by vanilloid compounds does not require de novo gene transcription and activator protein 1 activity. Cell Growth Differ. 9, 277–286 (1998).
Kim, S. & Moon, A. Capsaicin-induced apoptosis of H-ras-transformed human breast epithelial cells is Rac-dependent via ROS generation. Arch. Pharm. Res. 27, 845–849 (2004).
Lee, Y. S., Kang, Y. S., Lee, J. S., Nicolova, S. & Kim, J. A. Involvement of NADPH oxidase-mediated generation of reactive oxygen species in the apototic cell death by capsaicin in HepG2 human hepatoma cells. Free Radic. Res. 38, 405–412 (2004).
Tsou, M. F. et al. Involvement of Bax, Bcl-2, Ca2+ and caspase-3 in capsaicin-induced apoptosis of human leukemia HL-60 cells. Anticancer Res. 26, 1965–1971 (2006).
Sanchez, A. M., Sanchez, M. G., Malagarie-Cazenave, S., Olea, N. & Diaz-Laviada, I. Induction of apoptosis in prostate tumor PC-3 cells and inhibition of xenograft prostate tumor growth by the vanilloid capsaicin. Apoptosis 11, 89–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10495-005-3275-z (2006).
Wu, C. C. et al. Capsaicin induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in human esophagus epidermoid carcinoma CE 81T/VGH cells through the elevation of intracellular reactive oxygen species and Ca2+ productions and caspase-3 activation. Mutat. Res. 601, 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2006.06.015 (2006).
Kang, B. H. et al. Regulation of tumor cell mitochondrial homeostasis by an organelle-specific Hsp90 chaperone network. Cell 131, 257–270 (2007).
Dokladny, K. et al. Regulatory coordination between two major intracellular homeostatic systems: Heat shock response and autophagy. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 14959–14972. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M113.462408 (2013).
Leu, J. I., Pimkina, J., Frank, A., Murphy, M. E. & George, D. L. A small molecule inhibitor of inducible heat shock protein 70. Mol. Cell 36, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.023 (2009).
Yang, Y. et al. Acetylated hsp70 and KAP1-mediated Vps34 SUMOylation is required for autophagosome creation in autophagy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 6841–6846. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217692110 (2013).
Abe, M. et al. Plasma levels of heat shock protein 70 in patients with prostate cancer: a potential biomarker for prostate cancer. Clin. Prostate Cancer 3, 49–53 (2004).
Chuma, M. et al. Expression profiling in multistage hepatocarcinogenesis: Identification of HSP70 as a molecular marker of early hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 37, 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1053/jhep.2003.50022 (2003).
Hwang, T. S. et al. Differential, stage-dependent expression of Hsp70, Hsp110 and Bcl-2 in colorectal cancer. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18, 690–700 (2003).
Lazaris, A. et al. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen and heat shock protein 70 immunolocalization in invasive ductal breast cancer not otherwise specified. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 43, 43–51 (1997).
Huai, Q. et al. Structures of the N-terminal and middle domains of E. coli Hsp90 and conformation changes upon ADP binding. Structure 13, 579–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2004.12.018 (2005).
Patwardhan, C. A. et al. Gedunin inactivates the co-chaperone p23 protein causing cancer cell death by apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 7313–7325. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M112.427328 (2013).
Eder, T. et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts modify the response of prostate cancer cells to androgen and anti-androgens in three-dimensional spheroid culture. Int. J. Mol. Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms17091458 (2016).
Kosano, H., Stensgard, B., Charlesworth, M. C., McMahon, N. & Toft, D. The assembly of progesterone receptor-hsp90 complexes using purified proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 273, 32973–32979 (1998).
Acknowledgements
We thank Yangjie Wei for his technical assistance in the early stages of this project. We thank Dr. Rhea-Beth Markowitz for editing the manuscript. This work was originally supported in parts by NIH R01 grants GM102443-01 and 1 R01 CA249178-A1 for Ahmed Chadli.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.C. conceived and designed experiments. C.A.P., V.K.K., T.L., D.S., E.A., S.P., H.K., and A.C. performed the experiments. A.C., S.P., V.P., and C. A.R. analyzed and interpreted the data. A.C., C.A.P., S.P., V.P., and C. A.R. contributed to the preparation of the manuscript. A. H. provided reagents.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Patwardhan, C.A., Kommalapati, V.K., Llbiyi, T. et al. Capsaicin binds the N-terminus of Hsp90, induces lysosomal degradation of Hsp70, and enhances the anti-tumor effects of 17-AAG (Tanespimycin). Sci Rep 13, 13790 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40933-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40933-9
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.