Abstract
During cataract surgery, the intraocular temperature changes when irrigating low-temperature fluid and ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs) are inserted in the anterior chamber, and such a temperature variation affects the unfolding of the intraocular lens (IOL). A porcine eye holder was developed for simulating temperature conditions in clinical surgery by maintaining the ocular temperature close to the body temperature. An aluminum holder was designed to fit porcine eyes and maintain the ocular temperature at approximately 36 °C, while surgery was performed at a room temperature of 20 °C. Intraocular temperature was monitored using a thermocouple sensor placed close to the posterior capsule in the vitreous cavity. Temperatures and microscopic image of the anterior chamber were simultaneously recorded. With the use of the eye holder system, the intraocular temperature unstable during surgery was observed, and there were significant reductions during hydrodissection, irrigation and aspiration, OVD insertion in the capsule, and OVD removal after IOL implantation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Enucleated porcine eyes have been used in the ex vivo evaluation of the performance and effects of phacoemulsification and aspiration (PEA)1,2, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery3,4, ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs)5,6,7, and implantation of intraocular lens (IOL)8,9. Porcine eyes are usually preserved at low temperatures, whereas balanced salt solution (BSS) and OVDs used in the ex vivo experiments are stored at lower temperatures in the surgery room or laboratory, such as 20–25 °C or 68–77 degrees Fahrenheit. Hence, the temperature of the porcine eyes during the experiments is lower than that of the live eyes, which is closer to the body temperature. As viscoelastic behavior depends on temperature, this temperature difference could affect the ex vivo evaluation in cataract surgery. The unfolding time of the hydrophobic acrylic IOLs is shortened by increasing the ambient temperature10,11, whereas prompt IOL unfolding is important when using toric IOLs to avoid spontaneous rotation occurring shortly after implantation12,13. However, to our knowledge, the temperature difference between ex vivo and clinical conditions has not been addressed in cataract surgery. Hence, we developed an eye holder that brought the ocular temperature to the body temperature and measured the intraocular temperature during cataract surgery.
Results
Figure 1 shows the time-course of the changes in the intraocular temperature observed in a typical case (Case #1 in Table 1) together with the microscopic surgery images. Surgery was started when the intraocular temperature was stable (at approximately 3 min 25 s). In the microscopic surgery images, a thermocouple sensor was found in the vitreous cavity. The temperature was stable during the insertion of the OVD into the anterior chamber and continuous curvilinear capsulorrhexis (CCC). During hydrodissection, the intraocular temperature decreased by 6.5 °C when the inserted BSS reached the posterior capsule. After the procedure, the temperature gradually increased to 32.9 °C. After a slight decrease at the end of PEA, there was a steep decrease by 10 °C at the beginning of irrigation and aspiration (I/A), followed by a quick recovery by 6 °C at the end of the procedure. During insertion of the OVD in the capsule, the temperature decreased by 5 °C, but recovered gradually. No obvious decrease was observed during IOL insertion. During the removal of the OVD, the temperature drastically changed, as observed in the I/A procedure.
Notable temperature changes were observed during the hydrodissection, I/A, insertion of the OVD in the capsule, and removal of the OVD procedures. Table 1 shows the changes in the intraocular temperature during these procedures observed in four porcine eyes. During hydrodissection, the intraocular temperature changed from approximately 34 °C to 19.8–27.5 °C, which indicated that the insertion of BSS into the posterior capsule decreased the intraocular temperature by 6.5–15.0 °C. One the other hand, the changes were not consistent during the I/A and OVD insertion procedures. During OVD removal, the temperatures decreased from the range of 32.5–34.9 °C to the range of 22.4–24.0 °C.
Discussion
We developed a temperature-controlled porcine eye holder and measured intraocular temperature during cataract surgery. This first experiments revealed that the intraocular temperature decreased during hydrodissection, I/A, OVD insertion in the capsule, and OVD removal. Previous measurements before membrane peeling in 36 human eyes showed that the mean intraocular temperature behind the crystalline lens and in the middle of the vitreous cavity was 32.4 °C (standard deviation [SD]: 1.41) and 33.8 °C (SD: 0.95), respectively14, which was consistent with the current results before hydrodissection. It was demonstrated that the eye holder would simulate a temperature condition similar to that of live eyes as well as changes in the intraocular temperature during cataract surgery in patients.
No significant temperature change was observed when the low-temperature fluid was inserted into the anterior chamber, except during hydrodissection, I/A, OVD insertion in the capsule, and OVD removal. When the OVD was filled in the anterior chamber before hydrodissection, the crystalline lens was placed anteriorly to prevent direct contact between the OVD and vitreous cavity. During PEA and IOL implantation, the capsule was still filled with the previously inserted OVD; hence, the vitreous cavity was not affected by the insertion of the low-temperature BSS into the anterior chamber. We speculated that the presence of a crystalline lens or warm fluid could provide insulation from the low-temperature fluid in the anterior chamber. Further investigations are warranted to confirm this.
Either rapid or gradual recovery of the intraocular temperature was observed after the temperature reduction. Rapid increase in the intraocular temperature was observed after I/A and OVD removal, while gradual increase was observed after hydrodissection and OVD insertion in the capsule. Rapid changes were observed when there was no or a slight amount of OVD in the anterior chamber. Before PEA, the anterior chamber was filled with the OVD, and most of them was aspirated during PEA. Before OVD removal, the OVD was in the capsule, but it was diluted during IOL implantation. In contrast, gradual increase in the intraocular temperature was observed in the presence of elastic materials such as a crystalline lens and OVD in the anterior chamber. The heat capacity of an elastic material is higher than that of a liquid such as BSS; therefore, it takes more time for the temperature to increase. The heat capacity of the BSS and OVD should be measured to confirm this.
The current measurements resulted that the use of low-temperature BSS and OVD induced a decrease in the intraocular temperature. It is anticipated that the temperature decrease could be reduced further by using warmed BSS or OVD. Warmed OVD effectively shortens the unfolding time after IOL insertion10,11. Because it is difficult to increase the temperature of the surgical room, it would be more practical to warm the OVD before surgery. Utilizing a tube heating system within an aspiration line would be effective in warming the BSS to the desired temperature. Further considerations are required to control the temperatures of the BSS or OVD in use.
There are some limitations. First, there are fundamental differences in temperature changes between porcine eyes in the holder and live human eyes. Temperatures of a human eye is maintained by the arteries in in the choroid coat and abundant arteries are placed in the uvea. On contrast, the porcine eye in the holder is maintained from the sclera, so that recovery to the body temperature in live human eye would be faster. Size of eye ball would influence: larger size of porcine eye require longer time to change intraocular temperature. While it is hard to compare such differences, the current setup would be useful to stimulate and understand the temperature condition during surgery. Next, the number of eyes examined was insufficient, and research using enough porcine eyes is required. Moreover, the holder-preserved BSS flowed out from the eyes, causing the pooled BSS in the tray to disturb the temperature control. The temperature on the side face of the aluminum holder was measured and maintained at approximately 36 °C, but it occasionally decreased to 27–30 °C when the BSS flowed out from the eyes. The eye holder system should be improved by adding drains to the tray. Lastly, we could not investigate the effect of the decrease in the intraocular temperature on the IOL unfolding because of the iris. Porcine eyes without the iris4 are needed to observe the IOL behavior in the capsule.
Methods
Temperature-controlled porcine eye holder
As temperatures of a human eye is maintained by the arteries in the choroid coat, our eye holder is designed to maintain temperatures of the entire sclera. An aluminum eye holder with a semispherical hole on the top was designed for the placement of the eye. It was placed on a temperature-controlled breadboard (PTC1/M, Thorlabs, Newton, NJ, USA) with an interposing tray of aluminum foil between the holder and breadboard for reserving the fluid used in surgery (Fig. 2). The breadboard was equipped with thermoelectric coolers with a maximum heat load of 18 W to regulate the temperature in increments of 0.1 °C, and the breadboard temperature was set at 36 °C. The side faces of the aluminum holder were covered with a heat-insulation seat to minimize the influence of low ambient temperatures. On the top face, there was a heat-insulation seat for opening the cornea.
Four porcine eyes enucleated within 5 h were obtained from a local slaughterhouse (Tokyo Metropolitan Central Wholesale Market, Tokyo, Japan). Each eye was placed in the eye-holder and OVD was inserted into gaps between an eye and the eye-holder. A thermocouple sensor was inserted into the vitreous cavity of the porcine eye to measure the intraocular temperature. The sensor tip was placed close to the crystalline lens posterior for avoiding direct contact with the lens capsule14. Intraocular temperature was recorded using a temperature logger (TC0309, Perfect Prime, London, UK) at 1-s intervals. It was intended to place the tip of the sensor inside the vitreous cavity behind the crystalline lens to avoid direct contact with the lens capsule14.
Cataract surgery
The cataract surgery was performed on the porcine eyes for stimulating intraocular temperature during cataract surgery. The surgical experiments were carried out using enucleated porcine eyes (commercially available) and not on live human and animal eyes.
After confirming that the intraocular temperature was stabilized close to the body temperature, the surgery was started. Both the intraocular temperature and video images of the microscopic surgery were recorded. Through a clear corneal incision, conventional cataract surgery was performed by one surgeon (S.Y.) using CENTURION® system (Alcon Laboratory, Fort Worth, TX, USA). PEA settings were an aspiration rate of 35 mL/min, vacuum limit of 380 mm Hg, and ultrasonic oscillation setting of 30%. As the BSS and OVD had been preserved for a couple of days in the surgical room, it was assumed that their temperatures would be the same as the room temperature (approximately 20 °C). The surgical procedures comprised OVD insertion into the anterior chamber, CCC, hydrodissection, coaxial PEA, I/A, insertion of the OVD in the capsule, insertion of a hydrophobic acrylic IOL (SN60WF, 25.5 D, Alcon Laboratory) using a Monarch injector, and removal of the OVD.
Analysis
Changes in the intraocular temperature during each surgical procedure were examined by referring to the video and temperature records. If obvious changes in terms of reduction were found during certain procedures, the decreased temperatures were measured.
Data availability
The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Suzuki, H., Oki, K., Igarashi, T., Shiwa, T. & Takahashi, H. Temperature in the anterior chamber during phacoemulsification. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 40, 805–810 (2014).
Kunzmann, B. C., Wenzel, D. A., Bartz-Schmidt, K. U., Spitzer, M. S. & Schultheiss, M. Effects of ultrasound energy on the porcine corneal endothelium—Establishment of a phacoemulsification damage model. Acta Ophthalmol. 98, e155–e160 (2020).
Ibarz, M. et al. Porcine model to evaluate real-time intraocular pressure during femtosecond laser cataract surgery. Curr. Eye Res. 41, 507–512 (2016).
Yaguchi, S., Bissen-Miyajima, H., Ota, Y., Oki, S. & Minami, K. Efficacy of femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy: Experimental evaluation using the zonular dehiscence model. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 9, 7 (2020).
Oshika, T. et al. Retention and removal of a new viscous dispersive ophthalmic viscosurgical device during cataract surgery in animal eyes. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 90, 485–487 (2006).
Kawasaki, S. et al. Influence of elevated intraocular pressure on the posterior chamber-anterior hyaloid membrane barrier during cataract operations. Arch. Ophthalmol. 129, 751–757 (2011).
Wüst, M., Matten, P., Nenning, M. & Findl, O. Thickness of the protective layers of different ophthalmic viscosurgical devices during lens surgery in a porcine model. Transl. Vis. Sci. Technol. 11, 28. https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.11.2.28 (2022).
Kurosaka, D., Yoshino, M., Kurosaka, H. & Nakamura, K. Effect of posterior convexity of intraocular lenses on lens epithelial cell migration. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 47, 332–337 (2003).
Nanavaty, M. A. & Kubrak-Kisza, M. Evaluation of preloaded intraocular lens injection systems: Ex vivo study. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 43, 558–563 (2017).
Eom, Y. et al. A simple method to shorten the unfolding time of prehydrated hydrophobic intraocular lens. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 49, 382–387 (2014).
Minami, K., Miyata, K., Nagai, N. & Sasaki, H. Use of a warmed ophthalmic viscoelastic device to accelerate the unfolding of 1-piece intraocular lenses in the capsular bag. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg. 41, 2332–2333 (2015).
Takaku, R., Nakano, S., Iida, M. & Oshika, T. Influence of frosted haptics on rotational stability of toric intraocular lenses. Sci. Rep. 11, 15099. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94293-3 (2021).
Inoue, Y., Takehara, H. & Oshika, T. Axis misalignment of toric intraocular lens: Placement error and postoperative rotation. Ophthalmology 124, 1424–1425 (2017).
Shinoda, K. et al. Intraocular temperature distribution in eyes undergoing different types of surgical procedures during vitreous surgery. J. Clin. Med. 11, 2053. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11072053 (2022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
K.M. designed the study. K.M. and S.Y. collected all data. K.M. and S.Y. analyzed and interpreted the data. K.M. wrote the first draft of the paper, and all authors revised the work and approved the final version of the manuscript. K.M. had full access to all data and takes responsibility for data integrity and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
This research was partially supported by research grants from Alcon Japan Ltd., Japan. Dr. Minami and Yaguchi have no financial disclosures. Dr. Bissen-Miyajima has received honorarium for lecturing from Alcon Japan, Johnson and Johnson Surgical Vision, HOYA corporation, and Santen Pharmaceutical. She has consulted for Alcon, Johnson and Johnson Surgical Vision, Zeiss, HOYA, and Santen Pharmaceutical.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Minami, K., Yaguchi, S. & Bissen-Miyajima, H. Temperature-controlled porcine eye holder for observing intraocular temperature during cataract surgery. Sci Rep 13, 4331 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31070-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31070-4
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.