Abstract
The purpose of this exploratory research is to provide data on synaptopathy in the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD). Twelve patients with probable bvFTD were compared to 12 control participants and 12 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Loss of synaptic projections was assessed with [18F]UCBH-PET. Total distribution volume was obtained with Logan method using carotid artery derived input function. Neuroimages were analyzed with SPM12. Verbal fluency, episodic memory and awareness of cognitive impairment were equally impaired in patients groups. Compared to controls, [18F]UCBH uptake tended to decrease in the right anterior parahippocampal gyrus of bvFTD patients. Loss of synaptic projections was observed in the right hippocampus of AD participants, but there was no significant difference in [18F]UCBH brain uptake between patients groups. Anosognosia for clinical disorder was correlated with synaptic density in the caudate nucleus and the anteromedial prefrontal cortex. This study suggests that synaptopathy in bvFTD targets the temporal social brain and self-referential processes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) is a heterogeneous group of diseases that affect anterior brain regions associated with personality, behavior, executive functions and language deficits. The pathophysiology in most cases of FTLD includes an abnormal intracellular accumulation of disease specific proteins, such as tau or transactive response-DNA binding protein-43 (TDP-43). FTLD is associated with ventromedial and dorsolateral frontal and anterior temporal gray matter loss and glucose hypometabolism1. Even patients with very mild dementia may show atrophy in anterior cortical (comprising paralimbic frontal) and subcortical (striatal and thalamic) regions2. There is also a significant white matter degradation in association and commissural tracts (such as the uncinate and longitudinal fasciculi and the corpus callosum) in FTLD3. Using fMRI, the intrinsic connectivity network disrupted in the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD, a subgroup of FTLD, was shown to involve the anterior cingulate cortex, frontal insula and striatum, related to emotional salience processing capacities4.
Accumulating evidence indicates that neuronal death in neurodegenerative diseases is preceded by disruption of synapses. Abnormal brain connectivity (connectopathy) or synaptopathy have been described in FTLD5,6,7. Extensive synaptic loss and reduction in the number of spines have been documented post-mortem in the diseased cortex8,9,10. More precisely, a significant decrease in synaptic density measured with synaptophysin was reported in the superficial layers of the prefrontal cortex of FTLD cases compared with normal controls in some10, but not all studies11. In Pick’s disease, synaptophysin immunoreactivity was also reduced in the outer molecular layer of the hippocampal dentate gyrus12.
The aim of this study was to measure brain synaptic density in vivo using synaptic vesicle protein 2A-PET in patients with bvFTD13,14,15. SV2A-PET has been recently used to assess synaptopathy in different neuropsychiatric conditions13,14,15, and frontotemporal involvement was recently reported in a patient with C9orf72 mutation16. We anticipated loss of synaptic density in the frontal and temporal poles and we searched for precise regional loss of synaptic projections. We have a particular interest in anosognosia as an early marker of neurocognitive disorders17, and we anticipated that decreased awareness for clinical symptoms, a frequent behavioral disorder observed in about 85% of bvFTD patients18 would be related to frontal and/or temporal synaptopathy19.
Results
Neuropsychological assessments
All values for cognitive performance and anosognosia measures in bvFTD and AD patients were significantly different from those in controls (Table 1). There was no significant difference between AD and bvFTD groups.
SV2A comparisons
The brain distribution of [18F]UCB-H is illustrated in Fig. 1. For the bvFTD sample, there was a trend (PFWE corr = 0.077) for a decrease in the distribution volume of [18F]UCB-H in a right parahippocampal region (BA36), close to the amygdala (Fig. 2 and Table 2). Loss of Vt in the cluster, calculated as (mean patients − mean controls)/mean controls × 100, was 41% compared to the control value.
We ran a seed to voxel connectivity analysis using CONN toolbox implemented in MATLAB20 and resting-state fMRI from 27 healthy elderly volunteers from an independent sample (Supplemental Table 1), and the right parahippocampal seed, corresponding to the peak of decreased synaptic projections in the bvFTD group (Supplemental Fig. 1). It was largely connected to the bilateral temporal poles and the right orbitofrontal cortex (p < 0.05 False Discovery Rate-corrected at the voxel level).
For the AD sample, there was a trend (PFWE corr = 0.078) for a reduced synaptic density in the right hippocampus. Loss of Vt in the cluster was 33% compared to controls.
When patient groups were directly compared, there was a non-significant (but p < 0.001, uncorrected) decrease in Vt in the left precuneus (BA7) in AD compared to bvFTD.
SV2A correlations
For the bvFTD group, there was a significant negative correlation between anosognosia measured with the AQ-D and Vt in the right caudate head (r = − 0.89, pFWE = 0.023, Table 2 and Fig. 3) and a trend with Vt in the right frontal pole (r = − 0.87, pFWE = 0.058). The latter correlation was significant (pFWE = 0.009) when compared to controls or to AD participants.
We ran seed to voxel connectivity analysis using CONN toolbox and fMRI from our 27 healthy elderly volunteers, and caudate nucleus was connected with a large cluster centered on the anterior cingulate cortex, comprising the frontal pole (p < 0.05 FDR-corrected at the voxel level, Supplemental Fig. 2).
For the AD group, there was a trend for a negative correlation between anosognosia measured with the AQ-D and the left posterior hippocampus (pFWE = 0.088) when compared to controls.
VBM analyses
For the bvFTD group compared to controls, there was a trend for atrophy in the medial prefrontal cortex (p < 0.001 uncorrected at the voxel level and pFWE = 0.032 at the cluster level, Table 2).
For the AD group compared to control, there was an atrophy of the right posterior hippocampus (pFWE = 0.010) and the bilateral posterior associative cortices (pFWE = 0.036, Table 2).
The direct comparison between patient groups did not provide any significant difference. There was no significant correlation with the clinical data.
We computed a correlational analysis between frontal atrophy (GM density corrected for individual brain sizes) and medial temporal synaptic loss to properly show the distribution of individual values for both neuroimaging data (Fig. 4). The correlation is significant (R = 0.70 and p = 0.010).
Discussion
This exploratory study showed a trend for synaptic loss measured in vivo with SV2A-PET in the anterior parahippocampal gyrus of our sample of bvFTD patients, while atrophy was predominant in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex. The data in the AD sample were previously reported in a larger population21. Since comparison with bvFTD patients did not provide any significant differences, the results in AD will not be further discussed.
The anterior parahippocampal region corresponds to the rostral perirhinal cortex, that shows high probabilities of connection with the temporal pole, the orbital frontal regions and the frontal pole in the literature22 and in our connectivity analysis of fMRI in an independent sample of healthy elderly volunteers. The uncinate fasciculus is the connecting tract between those regions23 and its involvement in bvFTD would be related to loss of synaptic projections to the medial temporal lobe3. The right parahippocampal region (BA36), close to the amygdala, is part of the «social brain», involved in perception of socially salient stimuli24 and of the limbic network25. A relationship between atrophy in the perceptual social network and lack of attention to social cues was previously reported in bvFTD24.
Principal component analysis of FDG-PET previously showed that both frontal and temporal involvement are important in bvFTD26. The importance of temporal involvement in bvFTD was recently re-emphasized with TDP-43 studies27. TDP-43 pathology in bvFTD would be initiated in the orbitofrontal cortex and amygdala, progressing then to frontal and temporal cortices before affecting the motor system, visual cortex and cerebellum28. Patients with bvFTD are associated with TDP-43 type A, involving the frontal, temporal and parietal lobes and type B, involving the hippocampus29. The temporal lobes are shown to be critically affected in C9orf72 patients linked to TDP-43 pathology types A and B30, while medial temporal structures are less involved in GRN mutations28. Screening for C9orf72 abnormality was accepted by three patients in our sample but it was negative. Temporal involvement was also demonstrated in bvFTD with tau pathology31,32.
Atrophy was observed in the anteromedial prefrontal cortex. This is consistent with previous studies using MRI and FDG-PET18. Considering most (but not all) data reported from post-mortem brain tissue, the absence of significant frontal synaptic loss measured in vivo in bvFTD patients is surprising. Tentative explanations may be that FDG-PET and SV2A-PET do not measure the same biological phenomenon and that dementia stages are different in our living participants and in post-mortem studies. The frontal distribution of [18F]UCB-H was quite variable in our sample of participants (Fig. 5). At a macroscopic level, elevated connectivity was previously reported in a dorsal portion of the medial prefrontal cortex and in the frontal pole using resting fMRI in bvFTD patients33,34. At a microscopic level, SV2A-PET is considered as a proxy of synaptic density measurement, but it precisely targets one protein of synaptic vesicles. Interestingly, the number of vesicles per synapse was shown to be increased in postmortem brain sections from bvFTD patients with PGRN haploinsufficiency, relative to controls35. Why this would occur in frontal cortex and not in the anterior parahippocampal region is unclear. In a complementary analysis, we looked for a negative relationship between disease duration and the distribution volume of [18F]UCB-H, and there was no significant correlation that would have provided argument for an early increase of synaptic vesicles in the frontal lobe of our patients. Moreover, we did not observe PGRN mutation in our three patients who accepted genetic analyses, while loss of synaptic expression measured in the frontal cortex of postmortem brains of FTLD patients with SNAP-25 immunochemistry was reported to be influenced by different genetic factors11.
Our correlation analysis suggests that brain atrophy on MRI and synaptic loss on PET-SV2A reflect different but correlated pathological processes. Synaptic loss has been studied independently from neuronal loss in FTLD36. Staging of brain pathology was based on atrophy37 and on pathological protein deposits (mainly TDP43 or tau)28,38. Atrophy staging was related to neuron loss and gliosis, and not to synaptopathy39. Accordingly, information is currently lacking on the sequence of pathological involvement of neurons such as Von Economo ones, particularly affected in bvFTD40, and their synaptic projections.
Our second result was a significant correlation between greater anosognosia for the clinical symptoms in bvFTD patients and lower synaptic density in the caudate nucleus and the frontal pole. It is well recognized that beyond behavioral symptoms, patients with bvFTD often exhibit early and severe overestimation of cognitive abilities. In previous studies, anosognosia for cognitive impairment was correlated to atrophy in the subgenual cingulate cortex41. The correlation between anosognosia for behavioral symptoms in bvFTD and grey matter atrophy did not show any region surviving correction for multiple comparisons42, while negative correlation was observed with glucose uptake in the superior part of the temporal pole43. In studies where different patient groups were combined (including patients with bvFTD), impaired self-awareness was already correlated to medial prefrontal cortex atrophy44.
Functional connectivity between the head of the caudate nucleus and the medial prefrontal cortex was previously reported45, and recent connectomic analysis of the caudate nucleus demonstrated widespread connections with frontal associative cortical regions, comprising areas involved in self-awareness46. Our results are adding the head of the caudate nucleus in a network subserving self-awareness, where the caudate nucleus and the pregenual ventromedial prefrontal cortex would participate in self reference processing47, associating a value for the self to cognitive or behavioral information48. Disconnection in such a network was previously reported in bvFTD33, glucose metabolism was already shown to be decreased in caudate and medial frontal regions in bvFTD49, and our correlation analysis demonstrates this network’s involvement in impaired awareness of the patients.
There are several limitations to the study. The sample of bvFTD patients is limited and it comprises participants with a clinical diagnosis at a very mild to moderate stage, without genetic or pathological confirmation. Since plasma neuronal-derived exosomes levels of synaptotagmin and synaptophysin were shown to be decreased before dementia is diagnosed in patients with bvFTD50, participants at very early stages could be studied in the next future. We discussed trends for significance in our bvFTD sample, and we compared the results to data previously obtained in AD participants, but we did not observe significant between group differences. The PET methodology using carotid artery activity as an input function for kinetic modelling was previously described21,51. It certainly deserves further validation and currently it can only provide values of total distribution volume and not values of specific binding potential. A recent article on [11C]UCB-J PET acquisitions in AD showed that cerebellum could be used for calculating distribution volume ratio52. However, cerebellar changes have been reported in bvFTD53. Finally we used a validated measure of anosognosia that is certainly applicable to bvFTD but it does not allow to disentangle cognitive from emotional processes that are subserved by different brain regions.
In conclusion, loss of synaptic projections in our sample of bvFTD patients tended to be predominant in the right anterior parahippocampal gyrus, probably related to previously reported lesions of the uncinate fasciculus. The right anterior parahippocampal gyrus is part of the limbic network and the perceptive social brain, that are target functional networks in the disease. A validated measure of anosognosia, a characteristic but variable symptom in bvFTD, was related to synaptic density in two interconnected regions, caudate nucleus and anteromedial prefrontal cortex. The regions are involved in self-referential processes, that are important in developing awareness of clinical impairment. Further studies should localize decrease of synaptic projections in prodromal bvFTD and use other techniques, such as MRI with neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) to further explore the precise distribution of the synaptopathy.
Material and methods
Participants
Three groups of 12 older participants matched for age, sex and education were included in the study (Table 1). The first group comprised 12 participants (four women and eight men) with probable bvFTD18, followed in memory clinic. The age range was wide, from 63 to 83 years old. Disease duration was 5.2 ± 3.4 years. Apathy was observed in 11 participants, stereotyped behavior and anosognosia in eight, loss of empathy and dietary changes in five and disinhibition in three. Clinical Dementia Rating was very mild to moderate54. None had visuospatial deficits, but most complained of memory (n = 11) and executive (n = 8) difficulties. Familial history of neurodegenerative disorder was reported in seven participants. Visual examination of clinical [18F]FDG-PET showed frontal and/or temporal hypometabolism. Delay between [18F]FDG-PET and [18F]UCB-H-PET was highly variable, with a mean of 22.6 ± 23.5 (range 1–72) months. Accordingly, [18F]FDG-PET acquired on different clinical machines could not be compared to SV2A-PET data, and they were not analyzed as experimental data. One participant was amyloid-PET negative. Patients were offered genetic testing (tau, GRN, C9orf72), but only three accepted.
The second group comprised 12 amyloid-positive patients (five women and seven men) with very mild to mild probable Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The diagnosis was based on current NIA-AA criteria55. Disease duration was 6.2 ± 3.9 years. As part of the initial diagnostic process, [18F]FDG-PET was used as a biomarker of neurodegeneration in seven patients. Amyloid-β positivity was demonstrated in all patients by qualitative visual inspection of [18F]Flutemetamol-PET.
The third group was composed of 12 cognitively healthy older participants (CTRL, five women and seven men) with Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than 27/3056. In this control group, amyloid-negativity was confirmed in four participants using [18F]Flutemetamol-PET, while there was no biomarker-related information for the others. The AD and the control groups were selected from previously published populations21. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The study was conducted in accordance with the declaration of Helsinki. The study (2014/21) was approved by the Ethics Committee of our University (Comité d'Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire Universitaire de Liège-707).
Neuropsychological assessment
Global cognition was assessed with the MMSE. As diagnosis was done at the Memory Clinic, we focused our investigation on few tests and questionnaires guided by theoretical interest in the functions of the frontal and temporal brain areas. All participants performed a neuropsychological test known to be sensitive to early visual recognition memory deficits related to medial temporal lobe dysfunction, DMS4857. Phonological verbal fluency was measured with letter P during 2 min. Everyday life cognitive functioning and self-awareness were assessed by means of informant-based reports and participants’ reports with the Anosognosia Questionnaire for Dementia (AQ-D) that probes cognitive and behavioral changes58, and the Memory Awareness Rating scale-Memory Functioning Scale (MARS-FS) that addresses specifically memory impairment59.
Cerebral image acquisition
Dynamic PET acquisitions were performed using a Siemens/CTI (Knoxville, TN) ECAT EXACT HR + PET scanner. 155.93 ± 9.23 MBq of [18F]UCB-H60 were injected as an intravenous bolus (injected mass, 0.25 ± 0.22 μg). A thermoplastic mask was used to restrain motion during the acquisition. The timeframe of the dynamic PET was 6 × 10, 8 × 30, 5 × 120, and 17 × 300 s (total = 100 min). All PET images were reconstructed using a filtered backprojection algorithm (Hann filter, 4.9 mm FWHM) and corrected for attenuation using a 10 min transmission scan with Germanium-68 sources, dead time, random events, and scatter using standard software (ECAT 7.1, Siemens/CTI, Knoxville, TN). With these acquisition and reconstruction settings, the transaxial image resolution is 6.5 mm in the center of the axial field of view (FOV) and the voxel size 2.57 × 2.57 × 2.43 mm3. Blood samples were collected via a catheter inserted in an arm vein in ten subjects (two bvFTD, five AD, three CTRL) 3, 5, 15, 45, 60, and 90 min post injection in order to determine the plasmatic parent fraction with high performance liquid chromatography. A mean unchanged plasma fraction was calculated for each group and used for modelling51. Time by group interaction of plasma fraction was not significant. In addition, participants underwent a whole-brain quantitative MRI protocol on a 3 T Siemens (Erlangen, Germany) Prisma scanner. Multiparameter mapping was based on multi-echo 3D fast low angle shot at 1 mm isotropic resolution61. This included three datasets with T1, proton density (PD), and magnetization transfer (MT)–weighted contrasts imposed by the choice of the flip angle (FA = 6° for PD & MT, 21° for T1) and the application of an additional off-resonance Gaussian-shaped RF pulse for the MT-weighted acquisition.
Image processing
MRI multiparameter maps were processed with the Voxel-Based Quantification (VBQ) toolbox61 and SPM12 (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK) to obtain notably a quantitative MT map as well as segmented images (grey matter, white matter, CSF, “other”), normalized to the standard MNI space using unified segmentation62. Modulated normalized grey matter images, resized to 2 mm isotropic voxel size to approximate to PET images, were smoothed with an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 8 mm of full-width at half maximum and analyzed with voxel-based morphometry to identify atrophied regions in the patient groups. The modulated normalized grey matter images across the study sample were used to create a grey matter mask for the statistical analyses. The PET dynamic images were coregistered to the participant’s structural MT image (taking the sum of frames between 2 and 30 min as source image). Then, because of the low resolution of the PET scan and because of our main interest in small structures like the hippocampus, the images were corrected for partial volume effect (PVE) using the “iterative Yang” voxel-wise method implemented in the PETPVC toolbox63, with grey matter, white matter, CSF and “other” as ROI masks.
The ubiquitous distribution of [18F]UCB-H in the brain did not allow the identification of a “reference region” (with all its necessary characteristics) for a simplified modelling of the radiotracer distribution. Moreover, the need of an arterial input function (AIF) is a heavy discomfort for the patient. An alternative method using image-derived input function was shown to be comparable to that using the AIF for [18F]UCB-H PET imaging, even if the coefficient of variation for measurements was slightly increased51. So, the input function was derived from dynamic PET images. Briefly, the method extracts time series of radiotracer activity in the carotid arteries64. The identification of voxels belonging to the carotids is based on the computation of the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient between a “seeding region” and voxels in a mask containing the carotid. As, radioactivity is mainly localized in the vessels during the first 2 min, inducing a large spill-out effect, the signal was corrected for this spill-out effect using the geometric transfer matrix approach65. For each group, the extracted signal was then corrected using the corresponding mean unchanged plasma fraction to obtain the input function used for modelling. Kinetic modelling using PVE-corrected dynamic PET data and image-derived input function was done with PMOD (Version 3.7, PMOD Technologies, Zurich, Switzerland). Logan graphical analysis was used to calculate the distribution volume (Vt) map of [18F]UCB-H in the brain. The t* for Logan analysis was 25 min. Finally, the Vt map was normalized into the MNI space using transformation parameters obtained during structural MRI spatial normalization (2 mm isotropic voxel size).
Statistical analyses
For SPM12 statistical analyses, the normalized PVE-corrected Vt maps were smoothed with an isotropic Gaussian kernel of 8 mm of full-width at half maximum. These Vt maps for the three groups were entered in a factorial design matrix where two-sample t tests contrasted images 2 × 2. Parameters were estimated according to the general linear model at each voxel, using a grey matter mask. Patient-related regional synaptic loss was tested by a linear contrast (patients–controls) with a statistical threshold of p < 0.05 with a family-wise (FWE) correction for multiple comparisons at the voxel level (no minimal cluster size). Moreover, SPM12 multiple regression models allowed to test for correlation between regional [18F]UCB-H distribution volume and each cognitive measure (MMSE, DMS48 proportion of correct responses, verbal fluency score, discrepancy scores between patients’ and informants’ assessments regarding cognitive and behavioral functioning, indicative of anosognosia) with a statistical threshold of p < 0.05 FWE-corrected at the voxel level (no minimal cluster size). VBM was performed on MT images using SPM12 to compare gray matter images between groups.
Data availability
The data are available upon reasonable request.
References
Schroeter, M. L., Raczka, K., Neumann, J. & von Cramon, D. Y. Neural networks in frontotemporal dementia—A meta-analysis. Neurobiol. Aging 29, 418–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2006.10.023 (2008).
Seeley, W. W. et al. Frontal paralimbic network atrophy in very mild behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia. Arch. Neurol. 65, 249–255. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2007.38 (2008).
McMillan, C. T. et al. White matter imaging contributes to the multimodal diagnosis of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurology 78, 1761–1768. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825830bd (2012).
Zhou, J. et al. Divergent network connectivity changes in behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. Brain J. Neurol. 133, 1352–1367. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq075 (2010).
Borroni, B. et al. Biological, neuroimaging, and neurophysiological markers in frontotemporal dementia: Three faces of the same coin. J. Alzheimer’s Disease JAD 62, 1113–1123. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-170584 (2018).
Clare, R., King, V. G., Wirenfeldt, M. & Vinters, H. V. Synapse loss in dementias. J. Neurosci. Res. 88, 2083–2090. https://doi.org/10.1002/jnr.22392 (2010).
van der Ende, E. L. et al. Neuronal pentraxin 2: A synapse-derived CSF biomarker in genetic frontotemporal dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 91, 612–621. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2019-322493 (2020).
Ferrer, I. Neurons and their dendrites in frontotemporal dementia. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 10(Suppl 1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1159/000051214 (1999).
Lipton, A. M. et al. Contribution of asymmetric synapse loss to lateralizing clinical deficits in frontotemporal dementias. Arch. Neurol. 58, 1233–1239. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.58.8.1233 (2001).
Liu, X., Erikson, C. & Brun, A. Cortical synaptic changes and gliosis in normal aging, Alzheimer’s disease and frontal lobe degeneration. Dementia 7, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.1159/000106867 (1996).
Connelly, S. J. et al. Synaptic changes in frontotemporal lobar degeneration: Correlation with MAPT haplotype and APOE genotype. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol. 37, 366–380. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2990.2010.01150.x (2011).
Lippa, C. F. Synaptophysin immunoreactivity in Pick’s disease: Comparison with Alzheimer’s disease and dementia with Lewy bodies. Am. J. Alzheimers Dis. Other Demen. 19, 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/153331750401900606 (2004).
Chen, M. K. et al. Assessing synaptic density in Alzheimer disease with synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A positron emission tomographic imaging. JAMA Neurol. 75, 1215–1224. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1836 (2018).
Holmes, S. E. et al. Lower synaptic density is associated with depression severity and network alterations. Nat. Commun. 10, 1529. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09562-7 (2019).
Onwordi, E. C. et al. Synaptic density marker SV2A is reduced in schizophrenia patients and unaffected by antipsychotics in rats. Nat. Commun. 11, 246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-14122-0 (2020).
Malpetti, M. et al. Synaptic density in carriers of C9orf72 mutations: a [(11) C]UCB-J PET study. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.51407 (2021).
Salmon, E. et al. A comparison of unawareness in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 79, 176–179 (2008).
Rascovsky, K. et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain J. Neurol. 134, 2456–2477. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr179 (2011).
Munoz-Neira, C., Tedde, A., Coulthard, E., Thai, N. J. & Pennington, C. Neural correlates of altered insight in frontotemporal dementia: A systematic review. NeuroImage. Clin. 24, 102066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102066 (2019).
Whitfield-Gabrieli, S. & Nieto-Castanon, A. Conn: A functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connect. 2, 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2012.0073 (2012).
Bastin, C. et al. In vivo imaging of synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease with [18F]UCB-H positron emission tomography. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 47, 390–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04461-x (2020).
Zhuo, J. et al. Connectivity profiles reveal a transition subarea in the Parahippocampal region that integrates the anterior temporal-posterior medial systems. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 36, 2782–2795. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1975-15.2016 (2016).
Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Dell’Acqua, F., Valabregue, R. & Catani, M. Monkey to human comparative anatomy of the frontal lobe association tracts. Cortex J. Devoted Study Nervous Syst. Behav. 48, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.10.001 (2012).
Bickart, K. C. et al. Atrophy in distinct corticolimbic networks in frontotemporal dementia relates to social impairments measured using the Social Impairment Rating Scale. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 85, 438–448. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-304656 (2014).
Yeo, B. T. et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00338.2011 (2011).
Salmon, E. et al. Decomposition of metabolic brain clusters in the frontal variant of frontotemporal dementia. Neuroimage 30, 871–878 (2006).
Bueno, A. P. A., Bertoux, M., de Souza, L. C. & Hornberger, M. How predictive are temporal lobe changes of underlying TDP-43 pathology in the ALS-FTD continuum? Ann. Clin. Neurophysiol. 19, 101–112. https://doi.org/10.14253/acn.2017.19.2.101 (2017).
Brettschneider, J. et al. TDP-43 pathology and neuronal loss in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis spinal cord. Acta Neuropathol. 128, 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-014-1299-6 (2014).
Whitwell, J. L. et al. Does TDP-43 type confer a distinct pattern of atrophy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration?. Neurology 75, 2212–2220. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820203c2 (2010).
Snowden, J. S. et al. Distinct clinical and pathological characteristics of frontotemporal dementia associated with C9ORF72 mutations. Brain J. Neurol. 135, 693–708. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awr355 (2012).
Whitwell, J. L. et al. MRI correlates of protein deposition and disease severity in postmortem frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Neurodegener. Dis. 6, 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1159/000209507 (2009).
Cash, D. M. et al. Patterns of gray matter atrophy in genetic frontotemporal dementia: results from the GENFI study. Neurobiol. Aging 62, 191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.10.008 (2018).
Farb, N. A. et al. Abnormal network connectivity in frontotemporal dementia: Evidence for prefrontal isolation. Cortex J. Devoted Study Nervous Syst. Behav. 49, 1856–1873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.09.008 (2013).
Rytty, R. et al. GroupICA dual regression analysis of resting state networks in a behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 461. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00461 (2013).
Tapia, L. et al. Progranulin deficiency decreases gross neural connectivity but enhances transmission at individual synapses. J. Neurosci. Off. J. Soc. Neurosci. 31, 11126–11132. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6244-10.2011 (2011).
Brun, A., Liu, X. & Erikson, C. Synapse loss and gliosis in the molecular layer of the cerebral cortex in Alzheimer’s disease and in frontal lobe degeneration. Neurodegenerat. J. Neurodegenerat. Disord. Neuroprotect. Neuroregenerat. 4, 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1006/neur.1995.0021 (1995).
Broe, M. et al. Staging disease severity in pathologically confirmed cases of frontotemporal dementia. Neurology 60, 1005–1011. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000052685.09194.39 (2003).
Irwin, D. J. et al. Deep clinical and neuropathological phenotyping of Pick disease. Ann. Neurol. 79, 272–287. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24559 (2016).
Kril, J. J. & Halliday, G. M. Pathological staging of frontotemporal lobar degeneration. J. Mol. Neurosci. MN 45, 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12031-011-9528-0 (2011).
Seeley, W. W. Selective functional, regional, and neuronal vulnerability in frontotemporal dementia. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 21, 701–707. https://doi.org/10.1097/WCO.0b013e3283168e2d (2008).
Massimo, L. et al. Self-appraisal in behavioural variant frontotemporal degeneration. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 84, 148–153. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2012-303153 (2013).
Zamboni, G., Grafman, J., Krueger, F., Knutson, K. M. & Huey, E. D. Anosognosia for behavioral disturbances in frontotemporal dementia and corticobasal syndrome: A voxel-based morphometry study. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 29, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1159/000255141 (2010).
Ruby, P. et al. Social mind representation: Where does it fail in frontotemporal dementia? J. Cognit. Neurosci. 19, 671–683 (2007).
Rosen, H. J. et al. Neuroanatomical correlates of cognitive self-appraisal in neurodegenerative disease. Neuroimage 49, 3358–3364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.11.041 (2010).
Di Martino, A. et al. Functional connectivity of human striatum: A resting state FMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 18, 2735–2747. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn041 (2008).
Cacciola, A. et al. A connectomic analysis of the human basal ganglia network. Front. Neuroanat. 11, 85. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnana.2017.00085 (2017).
Lieberman, M. D., Straccia, M. A., Meyer, M. L., Du, M. & Tan, K. M. Social, self, (situational), and affective processes in medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC): Causal, multivariate, and reverse inference evidence. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 99, 311–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.021 (2019).
D’Argembeau, A. et al. Valuing one’s self: Medial prefrontal involvement in epistemic and emotive investments in self-views. Cereb. Cortex 22, 659–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr144 (2012).
Delvecchio, G. et al. Structural and metabolic cerebral alterations between elderly bipolar disorder and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia: A combined MRI-PET study. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 53, 413–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867418815976 (2019).
Goetzl, E. J. et al. Decreased synaptic proteins in neuronal exosomes of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. FASEB J. Off. Publ. Feder. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. 30, 4141–4148. https://doi.org/10.1096/fj.201600816R (2016).
Bahri, M. A. et al. Measuring brain synaptic vesicle protein 2A with positron emission tomography and [(18)F]UCB-H. Alzheimers Dement. 3, 481–486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2017.08.004 (2017).
Mecca, A. P. et al. In vivo measurement of widespread synaptic loss in Alzheimer’s disease with SV2A PET. Alzheimer’s Dementia https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.12097 (2020).
Chen, Y., Kumfor, F., Landin-Romero, R., Irish, M. & Piguet, O. The cerebellum in frontotemporal dementia: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Neuropsychol. Rev. 29, 450–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-019-09414-7 (2019).
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W. L., Coben, L. A. & Martin, R. L. A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. Br. J. Psychiatry J. Mental Sci. 140, 566–572 (1982).
McKhann, G. M. et al. The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dementia 7, 263–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005 (2011).
Folstein, M. F., Robins, L. N. & Helzer, J. E. The mini-mental state examination. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 40, 812. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790060110016 (1983).
Didic, M. et al. Impaired visual recognition memory in amnestic mild cognitive impairment is associated with mesiotemporal metabolic changes on magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. J. Alzheimer’s Disease JAD 22, 1269–1279. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-2010-101257 (2010).
Migliorelli, R. et al. Anosognosia in Alzheimer’s disease: A study of associated factors. J. Neuropsychiatry Clin. Neurosci. 7, 338–344. https://doi.org/10.1176/jnp.7.3.338 (1995).
Clare, L., Wilson, B. A., Carter, G., Roth, I. & Hodges, J. R. Assessing awarenes in early stage Alzheimer’s disease: development and piloting of the Memory Awareness Rating Scale. Neuropsychol. Rehabil. 12, 341–362 (2002).
Warnier, C. et al. Enabling efficient positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2A (SV2A) with a robust and one-step radiosynthesis of a highly potent (18)F-labeled ligand ([(18)F]UCB-H). J. Med. Chem. 59, 8955–8966. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00905 (2016).
Draganski, B. et al. Regional specificity of MRI contrast parameter changes in normal ageing revealed by voxel-based quantification (VBQ). Neuroimage 55, 1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.052 (2011).
Ashburner, J. & Friston, K. J. Unified segmentation. Neuroimage 26, 839–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.018 (2005).
Thomas, B. A. et al. PETPVC: A toolbox for performing partial volume correction techniques in positron emission tomography. Phys. Med. Biol. 61, 7975–7993. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/22/7975 (2016).
Schain, M. et al. Arterial input function derived from pairwise correlations between PET-image voxels. J. Cerebral Blood Flow Metab. Off. J. Int. Soc. Cerebral Blood Flow Metab. 33, 1058–1065. https://doi.org/10.1038/jcbfm.2013.47 (2013).
Rousset, O. G., Ma, Y. & Evans, A. C. Correction for partial volume effects in PET: Principle and validation. J. Nuclear Med. Off. Publ. Soc. Nucl. Med. 39, 904–911 (1998).
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the participants and their relatives and the members of the GIGA CRC, who helped with the study.
Funding
This work was supported by the SAO-FRA (Grant 2018-0019), the National Fund for Scientific Research (F.R.S.-FNRS PDR T 0193.16), the Fondation Roi Baudouin (Fonds Maria-Elisa and Guillaume de Beys), and the University of Liège (FSR-S-SS-17/27). AP is a Research Director, CB is a Research Associate and ED is a postdoctoral researcher at F.R.S.-FNRS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
E.S., A.L. and C.B. contributed to the study conception and design. All authors contributed to material preparation, data collection or analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by E.S. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Salmon, E., Bahri, M.A., Plenevaux, A. et al. In vivo exploration of synaptic projections in frontotemporal dementia. Sci Rep 11, 16092 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95499-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95499-1
This article is cited by
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.