Correction to: Nature Methods https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0574-9, published online 27 September 2019.
In the version of this Article originally published, at the end of the caption for Fig. 3f, the text ‘measured in GLOX/MEA’ was missing; this has now been corrected. Additionally, Supplementary Tables 3 and 4 were missing from the Supplementary Information, and their citations were missing from the main text. The Supplementary Information file has now been updated; and citations have been added in the main text to the sentence beginning “We thus extended our counting references...”, for Supplementary Table 3; and in the sentences beginning “Example images for all labels...” and “Typical acquisition parameters can be found...” for Supplementary Table 4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thevathasan, J.V., Kahnwald, M., Cieśliński, K. et al. Publisher Correction: Nuclear pores as versatile reference standards for quantitative superresolution microscopy. Nat Methods 16, 1332 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0659-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0659-5