Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Nuclear morphology is shaped by loop-extrusion programs

Abstract

It is well established that neutrophils adopt malleable polymorphonuclear shapes to migrate through narrow interstitial tissue spaces1,2,3. However, how polymorphonuclear structures are assembled remains unknown4. Here we show that in neutrophil progenitors, halting loop extrusion—a motor-powered process that generates DNA loops by pulling in chromatin5—leads to the assembly of polymorphonuclear genomes. Specifically, we found that in mononuclear neutrophil progenitors, acute depletion of the loop-extrusion loading factor nipped-B-like protein (NIPBL) induced the assembly of horseshoe, banded, ringed and hypersegmented nuclear structures and led to a reduction in nuclear volume, mirroring what is observed during the differentiation of neutrophils. Depletion of NIPBL also induced cell-cycle arrest, activated a neutrophil-specific gene program and conditioned a loss of interactions across topologically associating domains to generate a chromatin architecture that resembled that of differentiated neutrophils. Removing NIPBL resulted in enrichment for mega-loops and interchromosomal hubs that contain genes associated with neutrophil-specific enhancer repertoires and an inflammatory gene program. On the basis of these observations, we propose that in neutrophil progenitors, loop-extrusion programs produce lineage-specific chromatin architectures that permit the packing of chromosomes into geometrically confined lobular structures. Our data also provide a blueprint for the assembly of polymorphonuclear structures, and point to the possibility of engineering de novo nuclear shapes to facilitate the migration of effector cells in densely populated tumorigenic environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Halting loop extrusion activates a neutrophil-specific gene program.
Fig. 2: Depletion of NIPBL leads to the assembly of polymorphonuclear structures.
Fig. 3: Halting loop extrusion produces a chromatin architecture that mirrors that of differentiated neutrophils.
Fig. 4: Halting loop extrusion induces the assembly of mega-loops.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data that support the findings of the present study are available from the corresponding authors upon request. RNA-seq, ChIP–seq, ATAC-seq, scRNA-seq and Hi-C datasets generated in the current study were deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession codes GSE211817, GSE211818, GSE211819, GSE211820, GSE232064 and GSE235645. The published datasets used were GSE93127, GSM5029339 and GSE109467Source data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Friedl, P. & Weigelin, B. Interstitial leukocyte migration and immune function. Nat. Immunol. 9, 960–969 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rowat, A. C. et al. Nuclear envelope composition determines the ability of neutrophil-type cells to passage through micron-scale constrictions. J. Biol. Chem. 288, 8610–8618 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kalukula, Y., Stephens, A. D., Lammerding, J. & Gabriele, S. Mechanics and functional consequences of nuclear deformations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 583–602 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Georgopoulos, K. In search of the mechanism that shapes the neutrophil’s nucleus. Genes Dev. 31, 85–87 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nasmyth, K. & Haering, C. H. Cohesin: its roles and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Genet. 43, 525–558 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cavaillon, J. The historical milestones in the understanding of leucocyte biology initiated by Elie Metchnikoff. J. Leuc. Biol. 90, 413–424 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Metchnikoff, E. Über eine Sprosspilzkrankheit der Daphnien. Beitrag zur Lehre über den Kampf der Phagozyten gegen Krankheitserreger. Arch. Pathol. Anat. Physiol. Klin. Med. 96, 177–195 (1884).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schultze, M. Ein heizbarer Objecttisch und seine Verwendung bei Untersuchungen des Blutes. Arch. Mikrosc. Anat. 1, 1–42 (1865).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoffmann, K. et al. Mutations in the gene encoding the lamin B receptor produce an altered nuclear morphology in granulocytes (Pelger–Huët anomaly). Nat. Genet. 31, 410–414 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shultz, L. D. et al. Mutations at the mouse ichthyosis locus are within the lamin B receptor gene: a single gene model for human Pelger–Huët anomaly. Hum. Mol. Gen. 12, 61–69 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bolzer, A. et al. Three-dimensional maps of all chromosomes in human male fibroblast nuclei and prometaphase rosettes. PLoS Biol. 3, e157 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoencamp, C. et al. 3D genomics across the tree of life reveals condensing II as a determinant of architecture type. Science 372, 984–989 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Keenan, C. R. et al. Chromosomes distribute randomly to, but not within, human nuclear lobes. iScience 24, 102161 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Waugh, B. et al. Three-dimensional deconvolution processing for STEM cryotomography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 27374–27380 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Sedat, J. W. et al. A proposed unified interphase nucleus chromosome structure: preliminary preponderance of evidence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2119107119 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289–293 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Dixon, et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376–380 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hafner, A. et al. Loop stacking organizes genome folding from TADs to chromosomes. Mol. Cell 83, 1377–1392 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yatskevich, S., Rhodes, J. & Nasmyth, K. Organization of chromosomal DNA by SMC complexes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 53, 445–482 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schwartzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromatin organization revealed by cohesin removal. Nature 551, 51–56 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rao, S. S. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665–1680 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Haarhuis, J. H. et al. The cohesin release factor WAPL restricts chromatin loop extension. Cell 169, 693–707 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Sykes, D. B. & Kamps, M. P. Estrogen-dependent E2A/Pbx1 myeloid cell lines exhibit conditional differentiation that can be arrested by other leukemic oncoproteins. Blood 98, 2308–2318 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, Y. et al. Comprehensive characterization of neutrophil genome topology. Genes Dev. 31, 141–153 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Grieshaber-Bouyer, R. et al. The neutrotime transcriptional signature defines a single continuum of neutrophils across biological compartments. Nat. Commun. 12, 2856 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu, Y., Denholtz, M., Lu, H. & Murre, C. Calcium signaling instructs NIPBL recruitment at active enhancers and promoters via distinct mechanisms to reconstruct genome compartmentalization. Genes Dev. 35, 65–81 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Nabet, B. et al. The dTAG system for immediate and target-specific protein degradation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 431–441 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Khoyratty, T. E. et al. Distinct transcription factor networks control neutrophil-driven inflammation. Nat. Immunol. 22, 1093–1106 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hu, Y. et al. Super-enhancer reprogramming drives a B cell-epithelial transition and high-risk leukemia. Genes Dev. 30, 1971–1990 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Heinz, S. et al. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophages and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38, 576–589 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Martinon, F., Burns, K. & Tschopp, J. The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-β. Mol. Cell 10, 417–426 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Thomas, P. G. et al. The intracellular sensor NLRP3 mediates key innate and healing responses to influenza A virus via the regulation of caspase-1. Immunity 30, 566–575 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Li, M. T. et al. Negative regulation of RIG-I mediated innate antiviral signaling by SEC14L1. J. Virol. 87, 10037-46 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Braunholz, D. et al. Isolated NIPBL-missense mutations that cause Cornelia de Lange syndrome alter MAU2 interaction. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 20, 271–276 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Chao, W. C. H. et al. Structural studies reveal the functional modularity of the Scc2-Scc4 cohesin loader. Cell Rep. 12, 719–725 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Seki, A. & Rutz, S. Optimized RNP transfection for highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout in primary T cells. J. Exp. Med. 215, 985–997 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hendel, A. et al. Chemically modified guide RNAs enhance CRISPR–Cas genome editing in human primary cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 33, 985–989 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Xie, X. et al. Single-cell transcriptome profiling reveals neutrophil heterogeneity in homeostasis and infection. Nat. Immunol. 21, 1119–1133 (2020).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Rao, S. S. et al. Cohesin loss eliminates all loop domains. Cell 171, 305–320 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Calderon, L. et al. Cohesin-dependence of neuronal gene expression relates to chromatin loop length. eLife 11, e76539 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Cuartero, S. et al. Control of inducible gene expression links cohesin to hematopoietic progenitor self-renewal and differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 9, 932–941 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kalukula, Y., Stephens, A. D., Lammerding, J. & Gabriele, S. Mechanisms and functional consequences of nuclear deformations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 23, 583–602 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Mohana, G. et al. Chromosome-level organization of the regulatory genome in the Drosophila nervous system. Cell 186, 3826–3844 (2023).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Bashkirova, E. & Lomvardas, S. Olfactory receptor genes make the case for inter-chromosomal interactions. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 55, 106–113 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Hu, Y. et al. Lineage specific 3D genome organization is assembled at multiple scales by Ikaros. Cell 186, 5260–5289 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Andrews, S. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Bioinformatics http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc (2010).

  47. Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics 29, 15–21 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Robinson, M. D. et al. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 26, 139–40 (2010).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Raudvere, U. et al. gProfiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversion of gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W191–W198 (2019).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Yu, G., Wang, L. & He, Q. ChIPseeker: an R/Bioconductor package for ChIP peak annotation, comparison and visualization. Bioinformatics 31, 2382–2383 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Robinson, J. T. et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 24–26 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Zhang, et al. Fast alignment and preprocessing of chromatin profiles with Chromap. Nat. Commun. 12, 6566 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Yang, et al.HiCRep: assessing the reproducibility of HiC data using a stratum-adjusted correlation coefficient. Genome Res. 11, 1939–1949 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Kuleshov, M. V. et al. Enrichr: a comprehensive gene set enrichment analysis web served 2016 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W90–W97 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587 (2021).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Blondel, V. D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. Fast unfolding of communities in large networks. J. Stat. Mech. Theory Exp. 2008, P10008 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Lange, M. et al. CellRank for directed single-cell fate mapping. Nat. Methods 19, 159–170 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Gulati, G. S. et al. Single-cell transcriptional diversity is a hallmark of developmental potential. Science 367, 405–411 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

C.M. was supported by NSF-BSF2019280, NIH DK107977, NIH AI102853 and BIOREMC. Microscopy was supported by funds from the NIH (S10 OD030417) and an Imaging Scientist Grant from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (2019−198153). DNA sequencing was supported by funding from the NIH (S10 OD026929). M.H. was funded by funds from the NIH, including R35HG011922 and UM1HG011585. C.S.C. was supported by funds from the NIH, including R56AG074591, U01DA056006, UM1DA051411, R33DA047032, R61DA047032, R01DA051889 and U01DA0502. K.M.F. was supported by 2UL1TR001442-08 (CTSA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.M. conceived the study. I.P. and C.M. designed experiments. I.P. performed the vast majority of experiments and analysed data. M.Z., H.L., A.B., A.P., Z.M., C.S.C., K.M.F. and M.H. analysed data, provided technical support and clarified concepts. H.L. analysed ATAC-seq data. M.Z. and C.S.C. analyzed scRNA-seq data. S. McArdle performed nuclear volume measurements. H.-Y.W. identified and quantified neutrophil subsets. L.L., S. Mishra and M.H. performed the Hi-C analysis. The study was supervised by C.S.C., K.M.F., M.H. and C.M. I.P., M.H. and C.M. wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Kathleen M. Fisch, Ming Hu or Cornelis Murre.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature thanks Paul Kubes, Ralph Stadhouders and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Declines in SMC1, SMC3a and RAD21 expression in differentiating neutrophils.

a, Left images represent Wright–Giemsa staining of ECOMG progenitors cultured in the presence (top images) or absence (bottom images) of β-oestradiol (n = 500 cells). Scale bars, 20 µm (left image) and 10 µm (right image). Right images represent Wright–Giemsa staining of CD11b−/+Ly6G neutrophil progenitors (upper image) and CD11b+Ly6G+ differentiated neutrophils (lower image) isolated from the bone marrow. Scale bars, 10 µm. b, Volcano plot shows relative transcript abundance in ECOMG progenitors cultured in the absence versus presence of β-oestradiol. Upregulated transcripts are shown in red while downregulated transcripts are indicated in blue. Genes closely associated with a neutrophil-specific gene program are highlighted. c, Volcano plot highlights transcripts encoding for transcription factors that instruct neutrophil cell fate. Volcano plots represent the results of the limma-voom differential expression analysis displayed as the log2 fold change by the −log10 of the adjusted P value of each gene. Upregulated genes defined Padj < 0.05 and log2-transformed fold change > 1 are represented in red. Downregulated genes defined as Padj < 0.05 and log2-transformed fold change < −1 are represented in blue. d, Western blot analysis of SMC1a, SMC3, RAD21 and NIPBL protein levels in ECOMG progenitors and differentiated neutrophils are shown. e, Heat map indicating normalized transcript counts (DESeq2) and the genome browser tracks (IGV) of RNA-seq indicating transcript abundance for factors that instruct loop extrusion in neutrophil progenitors and differentiated neutrophils derived from mouse bone marrow are shown.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 2 Depletion of the loop-extrusion loading factors NIPBL and MAU2 instructs cell-cycle arrest and orchestrates distinct neutrophil-specific gene programs.

a, Flow cytometry analyses of propidium iodide staining for NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP ECOMG cells cultured for 72 h in the absence or presence of dTAG-13 are shown. b, Intracellular staining of the proliferation marker Ki-67 in NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP cells cultured for 72 h in the absence or presence of dTAG-13 is shown. c, Heat map indicating mRNA abundance encoding for factors involved in structuring the nuclear envelope in ECOMG progenitors and NIPBL-depleted ECOMG progenitors. d, Volcano plot represents the differential expression of transcripts in ECOMG progenitors carrying MAU2-FKBP12F36V-mScarlett cassettes were cultured for 72 h with β-oestradiol in the absence or presence of dTAG-13. Upregulated genes defined by Padj < 0.05 and log2-transformed fold change > 1 are represented in red. Downregulated genes defined by Padj < 0.05 and log2-transformed fold change < −1 are represented in blue. e, Depletion of MAU2 activates the expression of genes encoding for transcription factors that instruct neutrophil cell fate. f, GO-based functional classification of differentially expressed transcripts in MAU2-depleted cells. Representative pathways that relate to neutrophil differentiation and inflammation are shown. g, Depletion of both NIPBL plus MAU2 activates a neutrophil-specific transcription signature. Volcano plot shows differential transcript levels in ECOMG progenitors carrying both NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP and MAU2-FKBP12F36V-mScarlet cassettes that were cultured for 72 h with β-oestradiol and in the absence or presence of dTAG-13. Genes closely associated with a neutrophil-specific gene program are highlighted. Upregulated genes defined as Padj < 0.05 and log2-transformed fold change > 1 are represented in red. Downregulated genes defined as Padj < 0.05 and log2-transformed fold change < −1 are represented in blue. h. Volcano plot highlights transcripts encoding for neutrophil-signature transcription factors. i, GO-based functional classification of differentially expressed transcripts in cells depleted for both NIPBL and MAU2. Representative pathways that relate to neutrophil differentiation and inflammation are shown.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 3 Depletion of NIPBL interferes with RAD21 occupancy.

a, NIPBL depletion modulates Rad21 occupancy. NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP progenitors were cultured with β-oestradiol in the absence or presence of dTAG-13. RAD21 occupancy was analysed using ChIP–seq analysis and presented as tornado plots. Cluster I is comprised of RAD21-binding sites that were enriched upon depletion of NIPBL. Cluster II consists of RAD21-binding sites that were depleted upon removal of NIPBL. In NIPBL-depleted cells 9,293 RAD21-binding sites were lost, 531 binding sites were gained and 7,773 binding sites were shared. RAD21 peaks were generated using FDR <1e-25 and fold enrichment > 5. b, Cis elements associated with 9,293 RAD21-bound sites that were depleted in NIPBL-depleted cells. P values for motif enrichment and matched transcription-factor-binding sites are indicated. c, Cis elements associated with 531 RAD21-bound sites that were gained upon removal of NIPBL expression. d, Genome browser tracks represent ChIP–seq reads in ECOMG progenitors cultured in the absence or presence of dTAG-13. IGV Tracks for Spi1, Nfil3, Ikzf1, Cebpa, Nlrp3 and Lcn2 loci are shown.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 4 Depletion of RAD21 instructs the assembly of polymorphonuclear structures.

a, ECOMG cells carrying RAD21-FKBP12F36V-EYFP cassettes integrated into the endogenous RAD21 loci were cultured for 36 h with β-oestradiol in the absence or presence of dTAG-13. Flow cytometry analysis shows gating of live cells using FSC-A and SSC-A. Gated, live single cells were used for the analysis of EYFP, CD11b and Ly6G expression. b, Wright–Giemsa staining of RAD21-FKBP12F36V-EYFP ECOMG cells cultured with β-oestradiol alone (top images) or in the presence of both β-oestradiol and dTAG-13 (bottom images). Objectives used were 40× (left) and 100× (right). Scale bars, 20 µm (left) and 10 µm (right).

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 5 Depletion of NIPBL increases chromatin accessibility at neutrophil-specific promoters and enhancers.

a, NIPBL depletion increases chromatin accessibility across enhancer and promoter elements. NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP ECOMG progenitors were cultured with β-oestradiol in the absence or presence of dTAG-13. Changes in chromatin accessibility of cells cultured in the absence (0 h) or presence of dTAG-13 (6 and 72 h) were analysed and presented as tornado plots. Clusters were generated using K-means clustering (n = 2). The number of regions associated with neutrophil-specific promoters (H3K4me3), active enhancers (H3K27Ac and H3K4me1) or weak enhancers (H3K4me1) and transcriptionally silent regions are shown. Tornado plots were generated by sorting maximum signal strength intensities for ATAC-seq reads. Colour scale intensities represent normalized read scores (reads per 10 million uniquely mapped reads per base pair). b, Cis elements associated with increased chromatin accessibility at enhancers and promoters are shown. P values for motif enrichment and matched transcription-factor-binding sites are indicated. c, NIPBL depletion decreases chromatin accessibility across a subset of enhancer and promoter elements. Changes in chromatin accessibility of cells cultured in the absence (0 h) or presence of dTAG-13 (6 and 72 h) were analysed and presented as tornado plots. d, Cis elements associated with decreased chromatin accessibility at enhancers and promoters are shown. e, Genome browser tracks depicting RNA-seq, ChIP–seq and ATAC-seq reads at the Myc, Spi1 and Il1b loci are shown.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 6 Halting loop extrusion leads to widespread changes in chromatin folding to orchestrate an inflammatory gene program.

a, Scatter plot shows A versus B compartmentalization (50 kbp resolution) in NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP ECOMG cells cultured in the absence (x axis) or presence of dTAG-13 (y axis). b, Box plot represents differential segregation scores (50 kbp resolution) for cells cultured in the absence versus presence of dTAG-13. one-sided P < 0.05. In each box, the upper edge, horizontal centre line and lower edge represent the 75th percentile, median and 25th percentile, respectively. The upper whiskers represent the 75th percentile + 1.5× the IQR. The lower whiskers represent the 25th percentile - 1.5× the IQR. c, Venn diagram indicates number of gained or lost chromatin loops in NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP ECOMG cultured in the absence versus presence of dTAG-13. d, Transcript abundance correlates with the assembly of loops in NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP cells cultured in the absence versus the presence of dTAG-13. Mean change and corresponding distribution of loops associated with transcriptional silencing or activation log2 FC > = 2 or log2 FC < = −2) in NIPBL-depleted cells are shown. e, GO-based functional classification of differentially expressed transcripts that are associated with gained paired promoter and enhancer elements in NIPBL-depleted cells. f, Cis elements associated with increased chromatin accessibility at enhancers and promoters are shown. P values for motif enrichment and matched transcription-factor-binding sites are indicated. g, Genome browser tracks indicate RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and Hi-C reads across the Myc locus for NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP ECOMG cells cultured in the absence or presence of dTAG-13. h, Genome browser tracks indicate RNA-seq, ATAC-seq and Hi-C reads across the Nlrp3 and Nfil3 loci for NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP cells cultured in the absence or presence of dTAG-13.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 7 Structure of a mega-loop body pairing the NLRP3 and SEC14l1 loci into a common hub.

a, Ten kb resolution (left) and 5 kbp resolution (right) KR-normalized Hi-C contact matrices indicating loop bodies that span Nlrp3 and Sec14l1 loci across chromosome 11 are shown in ECOMG progenitors (-dTAG−13) and NIPBL-depleted cells (+dTAG-13). b, Box plot shows the sum of KR-normalized-interaction frequencies across a gained mega-loop body spanning the Nlrp3 and Sec14l1 loci in ECOMG progenitors (-dTAG) and NIPBL-depleted cells (+dTAG). Two-sided two-sample T-test was performed. P = 1.72 × 10−9. In each box, the upper edge, horizontal centre line and lower edge represent the 75th percentile, median and 25th percentile, respectively. The upper whiskers represent the 75th percentile + 1.5× the IQR. The lower whiskers represent the 25th percentile − 1.5× the IQR. c,d, Genome browser tracks depicting RNA-seq, ChIP–seq and ATAC-seq reads at mega-loop interactions involving the Nlrp3 (c) and Sec14l1 (d) loci in cells cultured with β-oestradiol and in the absence or presence of dTAG-13. Note that ChIP–seq reads were derived from ECOMG cells cultured in the presence of β-oestradiol (Pro) versus absence of β-oestradiol (Neu)24.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 8 Halting loop extrusion enriches for interchromosomal interactions and reduces nuclear volume.

a, Proportions of interchromosomal contacts detected for NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP cells cultured in the presence versus absence of dTAG-13 are shown (see Methods). b, Table depicts the frequency of interchromosomal interactions enriched in NIPBL-depleted cells. Log2 FC > 3.52 (Z-score > 2.576 with two-sided P = 0.01). c, Heat map shows clustering of interacting chromosomes normalized for size. d, Log2 fold change of transcripts abundance associated with A-A, B-B and A-B compartmental domains at interchromosomal interaction hubs in NIPBL-depleted cells. Z-score>1.96. In each box, the upper edge, horizontal centre line and lower edge represent the 75th percentile, median and 25th percentile, respectively. The upper whiskers represent the 75th percentile + 1.5× the IQR. The lower whiskers represent the 25th percentile - 1.5× the IQR. e, Volcano plot shows the differential expression of 3,951 genes located at interchromosomal hubs that were enriched in NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP cells cultured in the presence versus absence of dTAG-13. f, GO enrichment analysis for genes located at interchromosomal contact hubs that were enriched in NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP cells cultured in the presence versus absence of dTAG-13. g, Heat maps show KR-normalized interchromosomal interactions (100 kbp resolution) involving chromosomes 2 and 17 for indicated cell types and culture conditions. Bottom, genome browser (IGV) tracks depicting RNA-seq and ATAC-seq reads at genomic regions of interchromosomal hubs involving chromosomes 2 and 17. h,i, Transcription factor motif analysis of gained (h) and lost (i) ATAC-seq peaks associated with gained interchromosomal interaction hubs enriched in NIPBL-depleted cells. j, Depletion of NIPBL reduces nuclear volume in ECOMG progenitors. Plots show nuclear volumes (μm3) measured for NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP cells cultured in the presence (n = 33 cells) versus absence (n = 30 cells) of dTAG-13. Unpaired t-test was performed (P < 0.0001).

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 9 Halting loop extrusion activates gene expression at genomic regions enriched for interchromosomal interactions.

Box plots show log2-transformed fold changes in FKPM reads (+dTAG versus −dTAG treated cells). In each box, the upper edge, horizontal centre line and lower edge represent the 75th percentile, median and 25th percentile, respectively. The upper whiskers represent the 75th percentile + 1.5× the IQR. The lower whiskers represent the 25th percentile − 1.5× the IQR. Genes whose transcription start sites were located in the euchromatic (A) compartment were segregated into 3 groups based on low, median and high gene density. At similar gene density, the euchromatic regions that were enriched for interchromosomal interactions were associated with upregulated gene expression compared to the euchromatic regions without interchromosomal interactions. Two-sample t-test was performed. P = 2.90 × 10−9 (Total), P = 0.0014 (Group 1), P = 1.83 × 10−6 (Group 2), P = 5.18 × 10−10 (Group 3).

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 10 Depletion of NIPBL in primary bone marrow haematopoietic progenitors enriches for polymorphonuclear cells.

a, NIPBL-FKBP12F36V-EYFP ECOMG progenitors were electroporated with crRNAs that target four different genomic regions in NIPBL, named NIPBL-crRNA1–4, tracrRNAs conjugated with ATTO-550 and Cas9. Electroporated ECOMG progenitors were cultured for three days in the presence of β-oestradiol and examined for CD11b and Ly6G expression. Upper panels show transfection efficiencies as reflected by ATTO-550 expression. ECOMG cells that were not electroporated served as a control. As an additional control ECOMG cells were electroporated with negative crRNPs (control RNPs) lacking specificity for genomic sequences (IDT). b, ECOMG cells electroporated with NIPBL-crRNPs 1 + 2 and control crRNPs were analysed for the expression of CD11b and Ly6G. c, ECOMG cells were electroporated with NIPBL-crRNPs 1 + 2. Ly6G+ cells were sorted after 72 hrs. Sorted samples were examined by DNA sequencing for the presence of indels. d, Lin- primary bone marrow progenitors were electroporated with crRNPs 1 + 2 targeting NIPBL. Electroporated cells were cultured for three days in the presence of SCF and Flt3L and examined for transfection efficiencies and for CD11b and Ly6G expression. e, Three days after electroporation ATTO-550 and ATTO-550+ cells were sorted and analysed for the presence of indels. f, ATTO-550 and ATTO-550+ cells were sorted and analysed for nuclear morphology using Wright–Giemsa staining. Table indicates the percentages of progenitors and differentiated progeny in cells transfected with crRNPs (1 + 2) that target NIPBL. A total of 400–500 cells for each condition was examined. All experiments were performed independently at least three times.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 11 Depletion of NIPBL in primary bone marrow haematopoietic progenitors instructs the onset of neutrophil development.

a, UMAP plot derived from two independent replicates of ATTO-550 (control) and ATTO-550+ (NIPBL-depleted) populations is shown. Different clusters representing hematopoietic populations are shown for GMPs, myeloblasts/promyelocytes, myelocytes, immature neutrophils, mature neutrophils, transitional neutrophils, macrophage progenitors, pDCs, cDCs, basophils and myeloid/lymphoid progenitors. b, Violin plots show the expression levels of cluster-specific transcripts. c, UMAP plots of cluster-specific transcript distribution among GMPs, cycling cells, myeloblasts/promyelocytes, myelocytes, immature neutrophils, mature neutrophils, transitional neutrophils, macrophage progenitors, pDCs, cDCs, basophils and myeloid/lymphoid progenitors are shown. d, Heat map indicating cell-type specific expression of a selected group of transcripts. Cluster-specific differentially expressed genes were identified using Wilcoxon rank-sum test implemented in Seurat min.pct of 0.25 and a logfc.threshold of 0.25 (FindMarkers). e, UMAP plots were derived by integrating and clustering of scRNA-seq reads from bone-marrow-derived mouse neutrophils25, ATTO-550 (control) and ATTO-550+ (NIPBL-depleted) populations. f, The proportion of indicated cell types in ATTO-550 (control) and ATTO-550+ (NIPBL-depleted) populations is shown. g, Cellular dynamics analysis indicates developmental trajectories adopted by differentiating neutrophils. Putative differentiation trajectories are shown. h, Pseudotime visualization of neutrophil differentiation instructed by NIPBL depletion in primary hematopoietic progenitors is shown. scRNA-seq data were generated from two independent biological replicates.

Source Data

Extended Data Fig. 12 Depletion of NIPBL initiates a neutrophil-specific gene program in myeloid progenitors.

af, Violin plots indicate the expression patterns of neutrophil-signature genes in GMPs (a), transitional neutrophils (b), myeloblasts/promyelocytes (c), myelocytes (d), immature neutrophils (e) and mature neutrophils (f) derived from ATTO-550 (control) and ATTO-550+ (NIPBL-depleted) populations. (t-test; ns: p > 0.05, *: p <= 0.05, **: p <= 0.01, ***: p <= 0.001, ****: p <= 0.0001). g, Model depicting the role of loop extrusion in mononuclear versus polymorphonuclear cell differentiation. Loop extrusion enforces the checkpoint that orchestrates mononuclear versus polymorphonuclear cell fate choice. Chromosomes in mononuclear cells are shown as rigid chromatin fibres (stacked rosettes)18. In polymorphonuclear cells, chromosomes are depleted for rosettes to adopt flexible conformations that enable the assembly of mega-loops and interchromosomal interactions. Illustration was created using BioRender.

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary

Supplementary Table 1

Differential expression analysis and list of DE genes from ECOMG-derived differentiated neutrophils versus progenitors.

Supplementary Table 2

Differential expression analysis and list of DE genes from NIPBL-depleted progenitors versus progenitors.

Supplementary Table 3

Differential expression analysis and list of DE genes from MAU2-depleted progenitors versus progenitors.

Supplementary Table 4

Differential expression analysis and list of DE genes from both NIPBL plus MAU2-depleted progenitors versus progenitors.

Supplementary Table 5

Analysis of 50Kb bin resolution A/B compartmentalization in NIPBL-depleted progenitors (+dTAG) and progenitors (-dTAG).

Supplementary Table 6

A/B compartmentalization analysis in NIPBL-depleted progenitors (+dTAG) and progenitors (-dTAG).

Supplementary Table 7

List of lost and gained loops in NIPBL-depleted progenitors (+dTAG) and progenitors (-dTAG).

Supplementary Table 8

List of genes associated with gained loops in NIPBL-depleted progenitors (+dTAG).

Supplementary Table 9

List of gained and lost mega-loops in NIPBL-depleted progenitors (+dTAG) versus progenitors (-dTAG).

Supplementary Table 10

Analysis of intra-TAD contact frequencies at gained mega-loops.

Supplementary Table 11

List of genes associated with gained and lost euchromatic mega-loops.

Supplementary Table 12

Gene-ontology enrichment analysis of DE genes associated with gained and lost euchromatic mega-loops.

Supplementary Table 13

List of interchromosomal interactions enriched in NIPBL-depleted progenitors (+dTAG).

Supplementary Table 14

List of top 447 interchromosomal interactions enriched in NIPBL-depleted progenitors (+dTAG).

Supplementary Table 15

List of 3951 genes associated with interchromosomal hubs.

Supplementary Table 16

Differential expression analysis and list of DE genes associated with interchromosomal hubs.

Supplementary Table 17

Gene-ontology enrichment analysis of DE genes associated with interchromosomal hubs.

Supplementary Table 18

Oligo sequences of NIPBL CRISPR RNAs.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patta, I., Zand, M., Lee, L. et al. Nuclear morphology is shaped by loop-extrusion programs. Nature 627, 196–203 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07086-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07086-9

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing