Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Electronic metadevices for terahertz applications

Abstract

The evolution of electronics has largely relied on downscaling to meet the continuous needs for faster and highly integrated devices1. As the channel length is reduced, however, classic electronic devices face fundamental issues that hinder exploiting materials to their full potential and, ultimately, further miniaturization2. For example, the carrier injection through tunnelling junctions dominates the channel resistance3, whereas the high parasitic capacitances drastically limit the maximum operating frequency4. In addition, these ultra-scaled devices can only hold a few volts due to the extremely high electric fields, which limits their maximum delivered power5,6. Here we challenge such traditional limitations and propose the concept of electronic metadevices, in which the microscopic manipulation of radiofrequency fields results in extraordinary electronic properties. The devices operate on the basis of electrostatic control of collective electromagnetic interactions at deep subwavelength scales, as an alternative to controlling the flow of electrons in traditional devices, such as diodes and transistors. This enables a new class of electronic devices with cutoff frequency figure-of-merit well beyond ten terahertz, record high conductance values, extremely high breakdown voltages and picosecond switching speeds. This work sets the stage for the next generation of ultrafast semiconductor devices and presents a new paradigm that potentially bridges the gap between electronics and optics.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Concept of electronic metadevices based on the microscopic manipulation of radiofrequency fields leading to extraordinary electrical properties.
Fig. 2: High-frequency characterization of electronic metadevices.
Fig. 3: Electronic metadevices with ultrahigh conductances and breakdown voltages.
Fig. 4: High-performance THz data transmitters using electronic metadevices.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All the data supporting the claims of this paper are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. del Alamo, J. A. Nanometre-scale electronics with III–V compound semiconductors. Nature 479, 317–323 (2011).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chau, R., Doyle, B., Datta, S., Kavalieros, J. & Zhang, K. Integrated nanoelectronics for the future. Nat. Mater. 6, 810–812 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shen, P. C. et al. Ultralow contact resistance between semimetal and monolayer semiconductors. Nature 593, 211–217 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sengupta, K., Nagatsuma, T. & Mittleman, D. M. Terahertz integrated electronic and hybrid electronic–photonic systems. Nat. Electron. 1, 622–635 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Samizadeh Nikoo, M. et al. Nanoplasma-enabled picosecond switches for ultrafast electronics. Nature 579, 534–539 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mehdi, I., Siles, J. V., Lee, C. & Schlecht, E. THz diode technology: status, prospects, and applications. Proc. IEEE 105, 990–1007 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vakil, A. & Engheta, N. Transformation optics using graphene. Science 332, 1291–1294 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pendry, J. B., Schurig, D. & Smith, D. R. Controlling electromagnetic fields. Science 312, 1780–1782 (2006).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  CAS  PubMed  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Pendry, J. B. Negative refraction makes a perfect lens. Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966–3969 (2000).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Alù, A. & Engheta, N. Achieving transparency with plasmonic and metamaterial coatings. Phys. Rev. E 95, 016623 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Samizadeh Nikoo, M. et al. Beyond 8 THz displacement-field nano-switches for 5G and 6G communications. In 2021 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 4.5.1– 4.5.4 (IEEE, 2021).

  12. Guo, J. et al. MBE-regrown ohmics in InAlN HEMTs with a regrowth interface resistance of 0.05 Ω mm. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33, 525–527 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dasgupta, S. et al. Ultralow nonalloyed ohmic contact resistance to self aligned N-polar GaN high electron mobility transistors by In(Ga)N regrowth. Appl. Phys. Lett. 96, 143504 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tang, Y. et al. Ultrahigh-speed GaN high-electron-mobility transistors with fT/fmax of 454/444 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 36, 549–551 (2015).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Siles, J. V. & Grajal, J. Physics-based design and optimization of Schottky diode frequency multipliers for terahertz applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 58, 1933–1942 (2010).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dang, S., Amin, O., Shihada, B. & Alouini, M.-S. What should 6G be? Nat. Electron. 3, 20–29 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grant, P. D., Denhoff, M. W. & Mansour, R. R. A Comparison between RF MEMS switches and semiconductor switches. In 2004 International Conference on MEMS, NANO and Smart Systems (ICMENS’04) 515–521 (IEEE, 2004).

  18. Madan, H. et al. 26.5 Terahertz electrically triggered RF switch on epitaxial VO2-on-sapphire (VOS) wafer. In 2015 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 9.3.1–9.3.4 (IEEE, 2015).

  19. Kim, M. et al. Zero-static power radio-frequency switches based on MoS2 atomristors. Nat. Commun. 9, 2524 (2018).

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim, M. et al. Analogue switches made from boron nitride monolayers for application in 5G and terahertz communication systems. Nat. Electron. 3, 479–485 (2020).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Koenig, S. et al. Wireless sub-THz communication system with high data rate. Nat. Photon. 7, 977–981 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cocker, T. L., Jelic, V., Hillenbrand, R. & Hegmann, F. A. Nanoscale terahertz scanning probe microscopy. Nat. Photon. 15, 558–569 (2021).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Baker, C. et al. Detection of concealed explosives at a distance using terahertz technology. Proc. IEEE 95, 1559–1565 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Siegel, P. H. Terahertz technology in biology and medicine. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 52, 2438–2446 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. Klein, P. B., Freitas, J. A. Jr, Binari, S. C. & Wickenden, A. E. Observation of deep traps responsible for current collapse in GaN metal-semiconductor field-effect transistors. Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 4016–4018 (1999).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Prasad, A., Thorsell, M., Zirath, H. & Fager, C. Accurate modeling of GaN HEMT RF behavior using an effective trapping potential. Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 66, 845–857 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Romanczyk, B. et al. N-Polar GaN-on-sapphire deep recess HEMTs with high W-band power density. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 41, 1633–1636 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Makioka, S., Anda, Y., Miyatsuji, K. & Ueda, D. Super self-aligned GaAs RF switch IC with 0.25 dB extremely low insertion loss for mobile communication systems. IEEE Trans. Electron Devices 48, 1510–1514 (2001).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kelly, D., Brindle, C., Kemerling, C. & Stuber, M. The state-of the-art of silicon-on-sapphire CMOS RF switches. In IEEE Compound Semiconductor Integrated Circuit Symposium (CSIC ‘05) 200–202 (IEEE, 2005).

  30. Campbell, C. & Dumka, D. Wideband high power GaN on SiC SPDT switch MMICs. In 2010 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium 145–148 (IEEE, 2010).

  31. Zheng, X. et al. N-polar GaN MISHEMTs on sapphire with a proposed figure of merit fmax·VDS,Q of 9.5 THz.V. In 75th Annual Device Research Conference 1–2 (IEEE, 2017).

  32. Tsukahara, Y. et al. Millimeter-wave MMIC switches with pHEMT cells reduced parasitic inductance. In IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest 1295–1298 (IEEE, 2003).

  33. Kamitsuna, H., Yamane, Y., Tokumitsu, M., Sugahara, H. & Muraguchi, M. Low-power InP-HEMT switch ICs integrating miniaturized 2 × 2 switches for 10-Gb/s systems. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits 41, 452–460 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Xiao, Q., Samiotes, G., Galluccio, T. & Rizzi, B. A high performance DC–20 GHz SPDT switch in a low cost plastic QFN package. In 2009 European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference (EuMIC) 320–323 (IEEE, 2009).

  35. Sankaran, S. & O, K. K. Schottky diode with cutoff frequency of 400 GHz fabricated in 0.18 m CMOS. Electron. Lett. 41, 506–508 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Sankaran, S. & O, K. K. Schottky barrier diodes for millimeter wave detection in a foundry CMOS process. IEEE Electron Devices Lett. 26, 492–494 (2005).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lee, Y., East, J. R. & Katehi, L. P. High-efficiency W-band GaAs monolithic frequency multipliers. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 52, 529–535 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Santoruvo, G., Samizadeh Nikoo, M. & Matioli, E. Broadband zero-bias RF field-effect rectifiers based on AlGaN/GaN nanowires. IEEE Microw. Wireless Compon. Lett. 30, 66–69 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pfeiffer, U. R., Mishra, C., Rassel, R. M., Pinkett, S. & Reynolds, S. K. Schottky barrier diode circuits in silicon for future millimeter-wave and terahertz applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 56, 364–371 (2008).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Liang, S. et al. GaN planar Schottky barrier diode with cut-off frequency of 902 GHz. Electron. Lett. 52, 1408–1410 (2016).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Kobayashi, K. W. et al. K-Band double balanced mixer using GaAs HBT THz Schottky diodes. In Proceedings of 1994 IEEE Microwave and Millimeter-Wave Monolithic Circuits Symposium 1163–1166 (IEEE, 1994).

  42. Mizojiri, S. et al. GaN Schottky barrier diode for sub-terahertz rectenna. In 2019 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC), 36–39 (IEEE, 2019).

  43. Ma, J. et al. 1200 V Multi-channel power devices with 2.8 Ω.mm ON-resistance. In 2019 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 1–4 (IEEE, 2019).

  44. Lee, D. et al. 300-GHz InAlN/GaN HEMTs with InGaN back barrier. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 1525–1527 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Yue, Y. et al. InAlN/AlN/GaN HEMTs with regrown ohmic contacts and fT of 370 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33, 988–990 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Higashiwaki, M., Mimura, T. & Matsui, T. 30-nm-gate AlGaN/GaN heterostructure field-effect transistors with a current-gain cutoff frequency of 181 GHz. Jpn J. Appl. Phys. 45, L1 111–L1 113 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Medjdoub, F. et al. First demonstration of high-power GaN-on-silicon transistors at 40 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33, 1168–1170 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Lei, J., Wei, J., Tang, G. and Chen, J. K. Reverse-blocking AlGaN/GaN normally-off MIS-HEMT with double-recessed gated Schottky drain. In Proc. Int. Symp. Power Semiconductor Devices ICs (ISPSD), 13–17 (IEEE, 2018).

  49. Maroldt, S. et al. Integrated-Schottky-diode GaN HFET for high-efficiency digital PA MMICs at 2 GHz. In European Microwave Integrated Circuits Conference (EuMIC) 636–639 (IEEE, 2010).

  50. Bahat-Treidel, E., Lossy, R., Wurfl, J. & Trankle, G. AlGaN/GaN HEMT with integrated recessed Schottky-drain protection diode. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 30, 901–903 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Hwang, J. H., Lee, K.-J., Hong, S.-M. & Jang, J.-H. Balanced MSM-2DEG varactors based on AlGaN/GaN heterostructure with cutoff frequency of 1.54 THz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 38, 107–110 (2017).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Hwang, J. H. et al. Self-aligned metal–semiconductor–metal varactors based on the AlGaN/GaN heterostructure. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 40, 1740–1743 (2019).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sun, H. F. et al. 102-GHz AlInN/GaN HEMTs on silicon with 2.5-W/mm output power at 10 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 30, 796–798 (2009).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Corrion, A. L. et al. Enhancement-mode AlN/GaN/AlGaN DHFET with 700-mS/mm gm and 112-GHz fT. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 31, 1116–1118 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Denninghoff, D., Lu, J., Ahmadi, E., Keller, S. & Mishra, U. K. N-polar GaN/InAlN/AlGaN MIS-HEMTs with 1.89 S/mm extrinsic transconductance, 4 A/mm drain current, 204 GHz fT and 405 GHz fmax. In 71st Device Research Conference 197–198 (IEEE, 2013).

  56. Shinohara, K. et al. Electron velocity enhancement in laterally-scaled GaN DH-HEMTs with fT of 260 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 1074–1077 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Chabak, K. D. et al. Strained AlInN/GaN HEMTs on SiC with 2.1-A/mm output current and 104-GHz cutoff frequency. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 31, 561–563 (2010).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Wang, R. et al. Quaternary barrier InAlGaN HEMTs with fT/fmax of 230/300 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34, 378–380 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Lee, D. S. et al. 317 GHz InAlGaN/GaN HEMTs with extremely low on-resistance. Phys. Status Solidi C 10, 827–830 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Wang, R. et al. 220-GHz quaternary barrier InAlGaN/AlN/GaN HEMTs. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 1215–1217 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Dumka, D. C., Chou, T. M., Faili, F., Francis, D. & Ejeckam, F. AlGaN/GaN HEMTs on diamond substrate with over 7 W/mm output power density at 10 GHz. Electron. Lett. 49, 1298–1299 (2013).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Marti, D., Tirelli, S., Alt, A. R., Roberts, J. & Bolognesi, C. R. 150 GHz cutoff frequencies and 2 W/mm output power at 40 GHz in a millimeter wave AlGaN/GaN HEMT technology on silicon. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33, 1372–1374 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lecourt, F. et al. InAlN/GaN HEMTs on sapphire substrate with 2.9-W/mm output power density at 18 GHz. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 32, 1537–1539 (2011).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Xie, G. et al. Breakdown-voltage-enhancement technique for RF-based AlGaN/GaN HEMTs with a source-connected air-bridge field plate. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33, 670–672 (2012).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Arulkumaran, S. et al. Low specific on-resistance AlGaN/AlN/GaN high electron mobility transistors on high resistivity silicon substrate. Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 13, H169–H172 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Johnson, J. W. et al. 12 W/mm AlGaN-GaN HFETs on silicon substrates. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 25, 459–461 (2004).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Fukuoka, Y. & Itoh, T. Slow-wave coplanar waveguide on periodically doped semiconductor substrate. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 31, 1013–1017 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  68. Angelotti, A. M. et al. Experimental characterization of charge trapping dynamics in 100-nm AlN/GaN/AlGaN-on-Si HEMTs by wideband transient measurements. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 67, 3069–3074 (2020).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Tirado, J. M., Sanchez-Rojas, J. L. & Izpura, J. I. Trapping effects in the transient response of AlGaN/GaN HEMT devices. IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 54, 410–417 (2007).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Sun, X. et al. Study of gate oxide traps in HfO2/AlGaN/GaN metal-oxide-semiconductor high-electron-mobility transistors by use of AC transconductance method. Appl. Phys. Lett. 102, 103504 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  71. Ikamas, K. et al. Sub-picosecond pulsed THz FET detector characterization in plasmonic detection regime based on autocorrelation technique. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 33, 124013 (2018).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  72. Han, J., Ferry, D. & Newman, P. Ultra-submicrometer-gate AlGaAs/GaAs HEMT’s. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 11, 209–211 (1990).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Howell, R. S. et al. The super-lattice castellated field effect transistor (SLCFET): a novel high performance transistor topology ideal for RF switching. In 2014 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting 11.5.1–11.5.4, (IEEE, 2014).

  74. Hongtao, W., Xuebang, G., Hongjiang, W., Bihua, W. & Yanan, L. W-band GaAs PIN diode SPST switch MMIC. In 2012 International Conference on Computational Problem-Solving (ICCP) 93–95 (IEEE, 2012).

  75. Kim, M. et al. Monolayer molybdenum disulfide switches for 6G communication systems. Nat. Electron. 5, 367–373 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Sobolewski, J. & Yashchyshyn, Y. State of the art sub-terahertz switching solutions. IEEE Access 10, 12983–12999 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Gerafentis, I. & Feresidis, A. Design of tunable millimetre-wave pass-band FSS unit-cell loaded with GaAs air-bridged Schottky diodes. In 2022 16th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP) 1–5 (IEEE, 2022).

  78. Samizadeh Nikoo, M. et al. Electrical control of glass-like dynamics in vanadium dioxide for data storage and processing. Nat. Electron. 5, 596–603 (2022).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Czaplewski, D. A., Nordquist, C. D., Patrizi, G. A., Kraus, G. M. & Cowan, W. D. RF MEMS switches with RuO2–Au contacts cycled to 10B cycles. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 22, 655–661 (2013).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Krestinskaya, O., James, A. P. & Leon, C. O. Neuro-memristive circuits for edge computing: a review. IEEE Trans Neural Netw. Learn. Syst. 31, 4–23 (2020).

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Vitale, W. A. et al. Steep slope VO2 switches for wide-band (DC-40 GHz) reconfigurable electronics. In 72nd Device Research Conference 29–30 (IEEE, 2014).

  82. Alekseev, E. W-band InGaAs/InP PIN diode monolithic integrated switches. In GaAs IC Symposium Digest 253–256 (IEEE, 1995).

  83. Wang, G., Romeo, M., Henderson, C. & Papapolymerou, J. Novel reliable RF capacitive MEMS switches with photodefinable metal-oxide dielectrics. J. Microelectromech. Syst. 16, 550–555 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  84. Woods, W., Taha, M. M. A., Tran, S. J. D., Burger, J. & Teuscher, C. Memristor panic—a survey of different device models in crossbar architectures. In 2015 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Nanoscale Architectures 106–111 (IEEE, 2015).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank H. Massler and Fraunhofer IAF Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) for helping with terahertz measurements. We also thank B. Rejaei and M. Rezaei for discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.S.N. and E.M. conceived the project. M.S.N. fabricated the devices, designed and performed the experiments. M.S.N. and E.M. interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mohammad Samizadeh Nikoo or Elison Matioli.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review information

Peer review information

Nature thanks Suresh Venkatesh, Ke Wu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data figures and tables

Extended Data Fig. 1 Port definition and electric field patterns and current densities in metadevices.

a, Three-dimensional schematic of a straight-gap device showing the integration of the two terminals with a coplanar waveguide. The ports are defined in between the terminals and the ground pads. Simulated vertical electric field (real part) at the barrier in the b, ON state and c, OFF state. The lateral depletion length due to fringing fields72 in the OFF state was considered to be 20 nm. The field pattern in the OFF state does not exhibit the oscillatory shape. It can be seen that an electrostatic voltage can control electromagnetic interactions in the devices, which is the basis for the switching mechanism in electronic metadevices. Simulated current density (absolute value) at the semiconductor channel in the d, ON state, and e, OFF state. The current density in the OFF state does not show any confinement. f, Real and g, imaginary parts of the current density at the barrier (Jz) in the ON state. The real part of the input current is totally dominant in the ON state, which makes the device impedance to be resistive. h, Real and i, imaginary parts of the current density at the barrier (Jz) in the OFF state. The imaginary part of the input current is dominant in the OFF state, which makes the device impedance mostly reactive.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Three terminal metadevices.

a, Micrograph of a fabricated three-terminal metadevice. One terminal is pumped with a radiofrequency signal and the state of the device is controlled by the gate terminal. In an integrated-circuit form factor, the gate terminal of the metadevice can be controlled similarly to a field-effect transistor, by either applying an over-threshold bias (OFF state) or by floating the terminal (ON state). b, Simulated electric field pattern (real part) at the barrier for a gated metadevice in the ON state showing that the gate does not perturb the electric field pattern. c, Simulated electric field pattern (real part) at the barrier for a gated metadevice in the OFF state, in which the gate electrode depletes the 2DEG underneath it. d, Measured output signal of the gated metadevice showing a sub-10 ps switching. The measurement were done using a three-port setup with one GSGSG 67-GHz probe (for the gate and the input RF signals) and one GSG 67-GHz probe (for the output RF signal).

Extended Data Fig. 3 Simulation of electronic metadevices operating at terahertz frequencies.

a, Simulated vertical electric field pattern (real part) at the barrier of the terahertz metadevice at different frequencies from 200 GHz to 1.6 THz. The input port of the devices were excited by a current source (15 mA with zero phase), and the real part of Ez is plotted. The absolute value of the input current was selected to result in a current density of ~1 A mm–1 in the 2DEG. b, Simulated current density at the semiconductor channel at different frequencies from 200 GHz to 1.6 THz. At 200 GHz, there is almost no interaction between the subwavelength mode and the stripe array, and therefore, current density is not confined. The current density has the most confinement at the highest frequency, 1.6 THz. c, Simulated electric field pattern (real part) at the barrier of a straight-gap device at different frequencies from 200 GHz to 1.6 THz. The input port of the devices were excited by a current source (3.2 mA with zero phase), and the real part of Ez is plotted. The absolute value of the input current was selected to have a current density of ~1 A mm–1 in the 2DEG. d, Simulated current density at the semiconductor channel at different frequencies from 200 GHz to 1.6 THz. The straight-gap device does not show the level of current confinement seen in the Metadevices at high frequencies. e, Simulated contact resistance of straight-gap and metadevices showing the superior performance of metadevices with RC < 30 Ω μm, which agrees well with the measurements. f, Simulated contact resistance versus total ON-state resistance of the terahertz metadevice.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Effect of number of stripes on the collective interaction, and the superlinear scaling.

a, Schematic (top view) of an electronic metadevice with an effective width of Weff. Microwave metadevices (Extended Data Table 1) were simulated at 70 GHz by COMSOL, where the first port was excited by a current source I = Weff× (1 A mm−1) to scale the total current of electronic metadevices with respect to their effective width. The second port was short circuited. b, Vertical electric field at the barrier Ez (real part; in-phase with input current) simulated for a device with two stripes. c, Current density (absolute value) at the 2DEG. d, Zoomed in current density (absolute value) at the 2DEG, showing confinement in about 2 μm. e, Vertical electric field at the barrier Ez (real part; in-phase with input current) simulated for an electronic metadevice with 8 stripes. f, Current density (absolute value) at the 2DEG. g, Zoomed in current density (absolute value) at the 2DEG, showing confinement in about 1 μm. The device shows two times more confinement compared to the device with two stripes. The results also indicates the capability of the devices in high-power operation, since at very high current densities of ~1 A mm–1, the devices exhibit Ez much below the critical electric field of wide-band-gap materials. h, Simulated conductance and stripe array capacitance (entire gap depleted) of devices with different number of stripes. By increasing the number of stripes from 2 to 8, the capacitance is increased by 4.9-fold, while the device gains 7.8-times in conductance. Such superlinear increase in the conductance, enhances the cutoff frequency FOM of the devices.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Electric field patterns and electrical characteristics of metadevices at partial depletion.

Simulated vertical electric field (Ez) at the barrier with different electron densities (sheet resistances) under port 1. a, \({N}_{S}={N}_{S}^{{\rm{ref}}}\) (identical to Fig. 1f), b, \({N}_{S}=0.8{N}_{S}^{{\rm{ref}}}\), c, \({N}_{S}=0.5{N}_{S}^{{\rm{ref}}}\), d, \({N}_{S}=0.1{N}_{S}^{{\rm{ref}}}\), e, \({N}_{S}=0.01{N}_{S}^{{\rm{ref}}}\), f, \({N}_{S}=0.001{N}_{S}^{{\rm{ref}}}\). g, Extracted impedance (real part, red, imaginary part, blue) from simulations at different electron densities. The field distributions and the impedances are quite flat up to ~50% depletion.

Extended Data Fig. 6 Circuit model of electronic metadevices.

Schematic of the cross section of metadevices in a, ON, b, OFF states. c, Proposed compact circuit model including four elements Rch (channel resistance), RC (contact resistances), \({X}_{S}=L\omega -{(C\omega )}^{-1}\) (reactive impedance due to the metal-semiconductor coupling and the extension of the metallic pads), and CP (capacitance between the interdigital metals). d, Extracted CS and LS at different voltages (discrete points). The inductance play a negligible role in the OFF-state reactance, and therefore, it can be considered constant (LS =50 pH) for the entire voltage range. The measured capacitance was empirically fitted by \({C}_{S}\left(V\right)=260{\left(1+\frac{1}{25}\left({|V|}{/V}_{{\rm{th}}}\right)+{\left(V{/V}_{{\rm{th}}}\right)}^{20}\right)}^{-1}+9.5{\rm{fF}}\), with Vth = 4.3 V (dashed line). e, Measured (discrete points) and modeled (solid lines) impedances at the resonance frequency (ω = ω0S). Red (real part), blue (imaginary part). The total resistance was modeled by \({R}_{{\rm{ch}}}+{R}_{S}=6.5+45{\left(1+{\left(V{/V}_{{\rm{th}}}\right)}^{-10}\right)}^{-1}\Omega \) . The device exhibits a very linear ON state followed by an abrupt switching. f, Broad-band measured impedance of the device in ON (|V| ≤ 3 V) and OFF states (V = 10 V) (discrete points), showing a very good agreement with the model (solid lines). In a wide range of frequencies around the resonance, the imaginary part of the impedance is very small and negligible compared to RON, which shows the wide band nature of the transmissive mode. g, Absolute values of the impedance of the 6-stripe microwave metadevice, as well as 4-stripe mm-wave and terahertz metadevices (parameters described in Extended Data Table 1) at intermediate frequencies. Considering data modulation with a 10% bandwidth, the devices show a high impedance for the control (data) signal, while exhibiting a low impedance for the carrier signal.

Extended Data Fig. 7 Dynamic performance of electronic metadevices under harsh switching conditions.

a, Schematic of the experimental setup to evaluate the dynamic performance of the metadevices under harsh switching conditions. b, Measured reflection (S11) from the device, under burst conditions. The device is relaxed for 10 ms followed by a sequence of 100 switching cycles. The measurement corresponds to the switching amplitude of 20 V. c, Measured reflection in a time period of 10 µs. At each period, the device holds a stress for about 4 µs, and then goes to the ON state for about 500 ns. The ON resistance of the device is extracted based on the reflection coefficient. d, Extracted ON resistance of the device (normalized by the reference resistance of the relaxed device, as shown in part b) for different amplitudes over the 100 cycles. Without any passivation, the device shows a very good performance with only a negligible RON degradation. e, Waveforms in a double-sweep experiment to evaluate possible hysteresis in the threshold voltage. The device is submitted to a large signal voltage and the reflection is measured in both switching cycles (ramp up and ramp down). f, Extracted double-sweep reflection showing a hysteresis-free operation.

Extended Data Fig. 8 Validation of the theoretical description for the subwavelength mode at the metal-semiconductor junction.

a, Schematic of a thin MIS structure showing the direction of electromagnetic fields. b, c, Simulated electric field Ez (cross section) with d = 100 nm (we considered a larger-than-usual thickness to have more data points in our numerical model which is used to support our analytical approach) at 50 GHz and 300 GHz, respectively. The structure is excited from the left end and terminated from the right end. d, e, Simulated electric field Ez (cross section) at 50 GHz and 300 GHz at the windows A and B of parts b and c, respectively. The results show a uniform Ez at the thin barrier, which is one of the assumptions in our theoretical modeling. The semiconductor layer (10 nm thin) is just below the barrier. f, g, Simulated electric field components Ez and Ex in the cutline shown in parts d and e at 50 GHz and 300 GHz, respectively, indicating a uniform Ez and a linear Ex at the barrier which is in agreement with the theoretical calculation of Eq. (13). h, i, Simulated displacement current at the barrier and derivation of current in the semiconductor layer (real and imaginary parts, respectively) validating the current continuity in Eq. (14). The results are presented at 50 GHz. j, k, Simulated displacement current at the barrier and derivation of current in the semiconductor layer (real and imaginary parts, respectively) at 300 GHz validating Eq. (14).

Extended Data Table 1 Geometries of metadevices for microwave, mm-wave, and THz operation
Extended Data Table 2 Comparison of terahertz switches realized based on metadevice concept with classic devices

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Samizadeh Nikoo, M., Matioli, E. Electronic metadevices for terahertz applications. Nature 614, 451–455 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05595-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05595-z

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing