Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Seeing racial avoidance on New York City streets

Nature Human Behaviour volume 7, pages 1275–1281 (2023)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Here, using publicly available traffic camera feeds in combination with a real-world field experiment, we examine how pedestrians of different races behave in the presence of racial out-group members. Across two different New York City neighbourhoods and 3,552 pedestrians, we generate an unobtrusive, large-scale measure of inter-group racial avoidance by measuring the distance individuals maintain between themselves and other racial groups. We find that, on average, pedestrians in our sample (93% of whom were phenotypically non-Black) give a wider berth to Black confederates, as compared with white non-Hispanic confederates.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Experiment set-up and example tracking images.
Fig. 2: Pedestrians give a wider berth to Black confederates.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data necessary to replicate the analyses and figures in this paper and supporting information are available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/Y9QEUK.

Code availability

All code necessary to replicate the analyses and figures in this paper and supporting information are available at https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/Y9QEUK. R (open source, version 4.1.0) was used for data analysis.

References

  1. Wang, Q., Phillips, N. E., Small, M. L. & Sampson, R. J. Urban mobility and neighborhood isolation in America’s 50 largest cities. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 7735–7740 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Kinder, D. R. & Sanders, L. M. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals (Univ. of Chicago Press, 1996).

  3. Hutchings, V. L., Valentino, N. A., Philpot, T. S. & White, I. K. The compassion strategy: race and the gender gap in campaign 2000. Public Opin. Q. 68, 512–541 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schuman, H., Steeh, C., Bobo, L. & Krysan, M. Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations (Harvard Univ. Press, 1997).

  5. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K. & Gaertner, S. L. Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 82, 62 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dovidio, J. F., Kawakami, K., Johnson, C., Johnson, B. & Howard, A. On the nature of prejudice: automatic and controlled processes. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 33, 510–540 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Word, C. O. et al. The nonverbal mediation of self-fulfilling prophecies in interracial interaction. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 10, 109–120 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Willis, F. N. Initial speaking distance as a function of the speakers’ relationship. Psychon. Sci. 5, 221–222 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hendricks, M. & Bootzin, R. Race and sex as stimuli for negative affect and physical avoidance. J. Soc. Psychol. 98, 111–120 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown, C. E. Shared space invasion and race. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 7, 103–108 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bogardus, E. S. A social distance scale. Sociol. Soc. Res. 17, 265–271 (1933).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hall, E. T. & Hall, T. The Silent Language Vol. 948 (Anchor Books, 1959).

  13. Liberman, N., Sagristano, M. D. & Trope, Y. The effect of temporal distance on level of mental construal. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 38, 523–534 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y. & Algom, D. Automatic processing of psychological distance: evidence from a stroop task. J. Exp. Psychol. 136, 610 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matthews, J. L. & Matlock, T. Understanding the link between spatial distance and social distance. Soc. Psychol. 42, 185 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hoxter, A. L. & Lester, D. Social distance evaluations in white and african-american students. Percept. Mot. Skills 80, 478 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Koslin, S. C., Amarel, M. & Ames, N. A distance measure of racial attitudes in primary grade children: an exploratory study. Psychol. Sch. 6, 382–385 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gatrell, A. C. Distance and Space: A Geographical Perspective (Oxford Univ. Press, 1983).

  19. Kerkman, D. D., Stea, D., Norris, K. & Rice, J. L. Social attitudes predict biases in geographic knowledge. Prof. Geogr. 56, 258–269 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maddox, K. B., Rapp, D. N., Brion, S. & Taylor, H. A. Social influences on spatial memory. Mem. Cognit. 36, 479–494 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Enos, R. D. The Space between Us: Social Geography and Politics (Harvard Univ. Press, 2016).

  22. Aiello, J. R. & Jones, S. E. Field study of the proxemic behavior of young school children in three subcultural groups. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 19, 351 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kawakami, K., Phills, C. E., Steele, J. R. & Dovidio, J. F. (Close) distance makes the heart grow fonder: improving implicit racial attitudes and interracial interactions through approach behaviors. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 92, 957 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Goff, P. A., Steele, C. M. & Davies, P. G. The space between us: stereotype threat and distance in interracial contexts. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 94, 91 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Key, Jr, V. O. Southern Politics in State and Nation (Knopf, 1949).

  26. Massey, D. S. & Denton, N. A. American Apartheid: Segregation and the Making of the Underclass (Havard Univ. Press, 1993).

  27. Trounstine, J. Segregation and inequality in public goods. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 60, 709–725 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Allport, G. W. The Nature of Prejudice (Basic Books, 1979).

  29. Enos, R. D. What the demolition of public housing teaches us about the impact of racial threat on political behavior. Am. J. Pol. Sci. 60, 123–142 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Enos, R. D. Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 3699–3704 (2014).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Dabbs Jr, J. M. & Stokes III, N. A. Beauty is power: the use of space on the sidewalk. Sociometry 38, 551–557 (1975).

  32. Knowles, E. S. Boundaries around group interaction: the effect of group size and member status on boundary permeability. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 26, 327 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Henley, N. Body Politics: Power, Sex, and Nonverbal Communication (Prentice Hall, 1977).

  34. Washburn, S. L. & DeVore, I. The social life of baboons. Sci. Am. 204, 62–71 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Evans, G. W. & Howard, R. B. Personal space. Psychol. Bull. 80, 334 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Goffman, E. Relations in Public: Microstudies of the Social Order (Allen Lane, 1971).

  37. Willis, F. N., Gier, J. A. & Smith, D. E. Stepping aside: correlates of displacement in pedestrians. J. Commun. 29, 34–39 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Silveira, J. Thoughts on the politics of touch. Women’s Press 1, 13 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  39. Sobel, R. S. & Lillith, N. Determinants of nonstationary personal space invasion. J. Soc. Psychol. 97, 39–45 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thayer, S. & Alban, L. A field experiment on the effect of political and cultural factors on the use of personal space. J. Soc. Psychol. 88, 267–272 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Cameron, A. C., Gelbach, J. B. & Miller, D. L. Bootstrap-based improvements for inference with clustered errors. Rev. Econ. Stat. 90, 414–427 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Abadie, A., Athey, S., Imbens, G. W. & Wooldridge, J. When Should You Adjust Standard Errors for Clustering? Technical Report (National Bureau of Economic Research, 2017).

  43. Cottrell, C. A. & Neuberg, S. L. Different emotional reactions to different groups: a sociofunctional threat-based approach to ‘prejudice’. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 88, 770 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Harris-Lacewell, M. No place to rest: African American political attitudes and the myth of black women’s strength. Women Polit. 23, 1–33 (2001).

    Google Scholar 

  45. Goff, P. A., Jackson, M. C., Di Leone, B. A. L., Culotta, C. M. & DiTomasso, N. A. The essence of innocence: consequences of dehumanizing Black children. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 106, 526 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sands, M. L. Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 663–668 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Dotsch, R. & Wigboldus, D. H. J. Virtual prejudice. J. Exp. Soc.Psychol. 44, 1194–1198 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. McCall, C., Blascovich, J., Young, A. & Persky, S. Proxemic behaviors as predictors of aggression towards Black (but not white) males in an immersive virtual environment. Soc. Influ. 4, 138–154 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. McCall, C. in Social Behavior from Rodents to Humans (eds Wöhr, M. & Krach, S.) 295–308 (Springer, 2015).

  50. Steele, C. M. Whistling Vivaldi: How Stereotypes Affect Us and What We Can Do (W. W. Norton & Company, 2011).

  51. Sue, D. W. et al. Racial microaggressions in everyday life: implications for clinical practice. Am. Psychol. 62, 271 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Weisbuch, M., Pauker, K. & Ambady, N. The subtle transmission of race bias via televised nonverbal behavior. Science 326, 1711–1714 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Dietrich, B. J. in Exploring the C-SPAN Archives: Advancing the Research Agenda (ed. Browning, R. X.) 241–258 (Purdue Univ. Press, 2016).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to J. Anastasopoulos, D. Carpenter, M. Craig, D. de Kadt, R. Enos, J. Grimmer, M. Hibbing, H. Jefferson, G. King, A. Theodoridis, C. Wong and audiences at the American Political Science Association annual meeting, the Midwest Political Science Association annual meeting, the New York University Center for Experimental Social Science conference, Stanford University, the University of California, Riverside, the University of California, Berkeley and the University of Iowa for helpful feedback. The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Political Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA

    Bryce J. Dietrich

  2. Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK

    Melissa L. Sands

Authors
  1. Bryce J. Dietrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melissa L. Sands
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

B.J.D. and M.L.S. contributed equally to the authorship of this manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Bryce J. Dietrich or Melissa L. Sands.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Human Behaviour thanks Christopher Marshburn and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–21, discussion and Tables 1–8.

Reporting Summary

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dietrich, B.J., Sands, M.L. Seeing racial avoidance on New York City streets. Nat Hum Behav 7, 1275–1281 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01589-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01589-7

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing