Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation

Nature Climate Change volume 10, pages 7–10 (2020)Cite this article

Subjects

Many recently updated climate models show greater future warming than previously. Separate lines of evidence suggest that their warming rates may be unrealistically high, but the risk of such eventualities only emphasizes the need for rapid and deep reductions in emissions.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The equilibrium climate sensitivity from CMIP5 and 21 currently available CMIP6 climate models.
Fig. 2: Temperature response to low- and high-end emissions scenarios.
Fig. 3: Idealized emissions scenarios with different net-zero dates and associated surface temperature change.

Data availability

Data for Fig. 2, and additional figures comparing SSPs and RCPs, are available from https://github.com/Priestley-Centre/CMIP5_CMIP6_FaIR_gsat_data.

References

  1. Collins, M. et al. in Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) 1029–1136 (IPCC, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).

  2. Knutti, R., Rugenstein, M. A. A. & Hegerl, G. C. Nat. Geosci. 10, 727–736 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2019/11/sensitive-but-unclassified/

  4. https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/04/new-climate-models-predict-warming-surge

  5. Why results from the next generation of climate models matter. https://go.nature.com/2rU3E65

  6. https://phys.org/news/2019-09-earth-quickly-climate.html

  7. Bodas‐Salcedo, A. et al. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. 11, 1735–1758 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sellar, A. A. et al. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019MS001739 (2019).

  9. Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B. & Wigley, T. M. L. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417–1456 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Smith, C. J. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-11-2273-2018 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grose, M. R., Gregory, J., Colman, R. & Andrews, T. Geophys. Res. Lett. 45, 1559–1566 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sutton, R. T. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 100, 1637–1642 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Swart, N. C. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-177 (2019).

  14. Rogelj, J., Forster, P. M., Kriegler, E., Smith, C. J. & Séférian, R. Nature 571, 335–342 (2019).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Herger, N. et al. Earth Syst. Dynam. 9, 135–151 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Eyring, V. et al. Geosci. Model Dev. 9, 1747–1802 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Jones, K. Tokarska, T. Mauritsen, A. Klein Tank, A. Gettelman, V. Eyring, C. Schleussner, J. Rogelj and J. Marotzke for discussions. Funding was provided by European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement no. 820829 (CONSTRAIN) and UKRI NERC grant NE/N006038/1 (SMURPHS). We acknowledge the World Climate Research Programme, which, through its Working Group on Coupled Modelling, coordinated and promoted CMIP6. We thank the climate modelling groups for producing and making available their model output, the Earth System Grid Federation (ESGF) for archiving the data and providing access, and the multiple funding agencies who support CMIP6 and ESGF. M. Schlund is thanked for providing CMIP ECS data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Priestley International Centre for Climate, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

    Piers M. Forster, Amanda C. Maycock, Christine M. McKenna & Christopher J. Smith

Authors
  1. Piers M. Forster
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amanda C. Maycock
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christine M. McKenna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher J. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

P.M.F. conceived of the work and wrote the comment, with extensive contributions to both writing and ideas from A.C.M. C.M.M. provided the analysis of CMIP6 projections, made Fig. 2 and commented on the paper. C.J.S. provided the FaIR analysis and made Fig. 3.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piers M. Forster.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Forster, P.M., Maycock, A.C., McKenna, C.M. et al. Latest climate models confirm need for urgent mitigation. Nat. Clim. Chang. 10, 7–10 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0660-0

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Anthropocene

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Anthropocene