Abstract
Genetic studies elucidate a link between testis-specific serine/threonine kinases (TSSKs) and male infertility in mammals, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Here, we identify a TSSK homolog in Drosophila, CG14305 (termed dTSSK), whose mutation impairs the histone-to-protamine transition during spermiogenesis and causes multiple phenotypic defects in nuclear shaping, DNA condensation, and flagellar organization in spermatids. Genetic analysis demonstrates that kinase catalytic activity of dTSSK, which is functionally conserved with human TSSKs, is essential for male fertility. Phosphoproteomics identify 828 phosphopeptides/449 proteins as potential substrates of dTSSK enriched primarily in microtubule-based processes, flagellar organization and mobility, and spermatid differentiation and development, suggesting that dTSSK phosphorylates various proteins to orchestrate postmeiotic spermiogenesis. Among them, the two substrates, protamine-like protein Mst77F/Ser9 and transition protein Mst33A/Ser237, are biochemically validated to be phosphorylated by dTSSK in vitro, and are genetically demonstrated to be involved in spermiogenesis in vivo. Collectively, our findings demonstrate that broad phosphorylation mediated by TSSKs plays an indispensable role in spermiogenesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Spermatogenesis is a dynamic process that involves the proliferation and differentiation of spermatogonia, meiosis of spermatocytes, and spermiogenesis1. The spermiogenesis phase transforms haploid round spermatids into elongated spermatids and fully functional mature spermatozoa, which is morphologically characterized by formation of the acrosome, development of a flagellum (tail), elimination of cytoplasm, condensation of chromatin (head), an delongation of sperm cells2. At the chromatin level, histones on premature sperm DNA are largely transiently replaced by transition proteins and subsequently by highly basic protamines via an epigenetic remodeling process known as the histone-to-protamine transition, which is critical for packaging of haploid DNA into mature sperm heads3. Spermiogenesis is strictly regulated by complex machinery. Aberrant spermiogenesis negatively affects the quantity, motility, and morphology of sperm, and the ability of sperm to fertilize an egg.
Due to the inactive transcriptional machinery during spermatogenesis, sperm cell development not only requires a few testis-associated proteins but is also highly dependent on different post-translational modifications (PTMs)4. Only a few PTMs have been identified in sperm that are of potential importance to sperm physiology4. For example, protein ubiquitination has been extensively studied during spermatogenesis and regulates sperm maturation5. RNF8-mediated histone ubiquitination epigenetically regulates nucleosome removal during spermiogenesis by inducing H4 acetylation in trans to initiate the histone-to-protamine transition6. Multiple human sperm proteins identified as targets of nitrosylation are involved in spermiogenesis7. In addition, small ubiquitin-like modifiers (SUMOs) are highly enriched in human, mouse, and fly sperm, and the SUMO modifications they mediate play crucial roles in nuclear shaping and spermatid elongation8.
Another type of PTM, kinase-mediated phosphorylation, has emerged as a critical regulatory mechanism during spermatogenesis that participates in the entire process of germ cell development, from spermatogonia to spermatids, including subsequent sperm capacitation, motility, the acrosome reaction, and fertilization processes. Some protein kinases such as mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), POLO-like kinases (PLKs), and aurora kinase C (AURKC) are involved in multiple stages of spermatogenesis and are essential for mouse fertility9,10,11,12,13. The testis-specific serine/threonine kinase (TSSK) family is an important protein kinase family whose members are predominantly expressed in testes and function in spermiogenesis14,15,16,17,18,19. The TSSK family comprises six members: TSSK1, TSSK2, TSSK3, TSSK4, and TSSK6 are conserved in mouse and human, while TSSK5 is protein coding in the mouse and is a pseudogene in human20. Knockout mouse models for some of these genes have been created and found to affect male fertility. Tssk1/Tssk2 double KO, Tssk3 and Tssk6 single KO mice display infertility, while Tssk4 single KO mice display subfertility21,22,23,24,25. Testis-specific kinase substrate (TSKS), myelin basic protein (MBP), cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CREB), outer dense fiber 2 (ODF2), and histones are reportedly specific substrates of TSSK in vitro18,21,24,26,27,28. However, little is known about functions of TSSK-mediated protein phosphorylation and/or phospho-modification in spermatids during spermiogenesis.
Similar to mammals, spermiogenesis in Drosophila involves a series of phase-separated morphological changes to form mature sperm, during which histones bound to spermatid chromatin are replaced by several highly basic MST-HMG-box proteins including the transition protein Tpl94D, Mst33A, the protamine-like protein Mst77F, and protamines (Mst35Ba and Mst35Bb)29. Among them, Mst77F plays a central role in spermatid nuclear shaping/condensing during spermiogenesis and male fertility30,31. Due to its readily identifiable stereotypical morphology, distinct stages, highly conserved functional genes with humans, and easy genetic manipulation, Drosophila has long been used as a model system to investigate the molecular underpinnings of PTMs in spermiogenesis and fertility32.
Here, we show that Drosophila CG14305 encodes a functional homolog of human TSSKs and screen its potential substrates by performing quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis. Using a combination of genetic and biochemical analysis, we validate that CG14305 phosphorylates a few potential substrates in vitro and illustrate their biological roles in spermiogenesis in vivo. Furthermore, we find that CG14305 mutations severely impair the histone-to-protamine transition during spermiogenesis, consistent with the phenotypic defects in spermatid nuclear morphology, and demonstrate that TSSK-mediated phosphorylation plays indispensable roles in Drosophila spermiogenesis, shedding light on the mechanisms underlying TSSK-associated male infertility.
Results
Drosophila CG14305 deficiency results in male infertility
Drosophila CG14305 was predicted to be an ortholog of human TSSKs33,34. Both modENCODE RNA-sequencing data and developmental proteome data in FlyBase (www.flybase.org) demonstrated that CG14305 is predominately expressed in testes, similar to mammalian TSSKs35,36,37. To further investigate the degree of conservation of Drosophila CG14305 with human TSSKs, we first compared the amino acid sequence of CG14305 with those of all five TSSKs in humans (Fig. S1a)38. Multiple sequence alignments revealed that CG14305 shared 37–46% identity and 54–66% similarity with human TSSKs (Fig. S1b). Phylogenetic analysis classified CG14305 into the human TSSK1B and TSSK2 subgroup (Fig. S1c), suggesting that it might be more conserved with TSSK1B and TSSK2 subgroup. Based on the alignment results, CG14305 possesses essential kinase characteristics, including an ATP-binding region (34–60 aa), a potential protein kinase active site (150–162 aa), and a potential activation loop phosphorylation motif (190–192 aa). Furthermore, structural prediction in the AlphaFold Protein Structure Database39 showed that the structure of the S_TKc kinase catalytic domain of CG14305 (28–291 aa) is very similar to the structures of the counterparts of human TSSKs (Figs. S2a and S2b). Given the sequence homology and structural similarity, we refer to CG14305 as dTSSK hereinafter.
To elucidate the biological function of dTSSK, we first examined its expression and localization in different tissues. Western blot (WB) analysis of dTSSK transgenetic flies tagged with Flag-GFP and driven by its endogenous promoter shows that dTSSK was specifically expressed in testicular tissue (Figs. 1a and S3a). Imaging of whole testes revealed that dTSSK signals exclusively localized to postmeiotic spermatid bundles, with bright spots scattered over the bundles (Fig. 1b). Further dissection of testicular tissue revealed that these bright spots were mainly located on the nucleus, flagellum, and individualization complex (IC) of spermatids (Fig. S3b). To better discern the subcellular localization of dTSSK in spermatids, we investigated protein localization throughout spermiogenesis, from the round stage to the needle stage. dTSSK signals first appeared around the basal body at one side of the nucleus, as evidenced by their colocalization with PACT (a centriole-targeting domain found in Drosophila pericentrin-like protein, D-PLP) in PACT-mCherry transgenic flies40, and then extended along one side of the spermatid nucleus and spread throughout the nucleus (Figs. 1c and S3c). The intensity of dTSSK signals peaked in the late canoe stage, and a low level of signals was retained until the needle stage (Figs. 1c and S3b). These results imply that dTSSK is involved in multiple spermiogenesis processes.
To further define the roles of dTSSK in spermiogenesis, the endogenous dTSSK gene was disrupted using CRISPR/Cas9 technology. Coinjection of Cas9-mRNA and dTSSK-specific gRNAs into Drosophila embryos, followed by germline transformation, resulted in generation of dTSSK-knockout (dTSSK−/−) flies with a premature stop codon that completely removed the S_TKc kinase catalytic domain of dTSSK (Fig. 1d). Mutagenesis of the dTSSK gene was further confirmed by genomic PCR sequencing (Fig. 1d). WB revealed that dTSSK expression was undetectable in dTSSK−/− flies (Figs. 1e and S3d). Adult dTSSK−/− flies were morphologically similar to wild-type flies but exhibited male-specific infertility (Fig. 1f). To investigate whether dTSSK−/− flies could produce mature sperm, we generated transgenic flies in which the protamine Mst35Bb was tagged with GFP41. By tracking GFP fluorescence, we detected no mature spermatozoa in seminal vesicles in testicular tissue of dTSSK−/− male flies (Fig. 1g), which explained their sterility. To exclude the possibility that the infertility of dTSSK−/− male flies was caused by off-target events, in-trans rescue experiments were performed using dTSSK−/− flies that expressed transgenic wild-type dTSSK under the control of its endogenous promoter. Infertility of dTSSK−/− male flies was completely rescued by transgenic expression of dTSSK, indicating that it is caused by dTSSK deficiency (Fig. 1f and g).
dTSSK depletion causes severe spermiogenesis defects
To determine why dTSSK−/− male flies fail to produce mature sperm, we cytologically examined cell morphological changes during spermiogenesis. The absence of dTSSK did not markedly affect nuclear morphology at the round, elongating, and early canoe stages (Fig. 2a). At the late canoe stage or before 64-cell individualization, nuclear bundles of mutant spermatids were severely curled, disorganized, and less condensed compared with tightly clustered control spermatids (Figs. 2a and S4a), indicating that dTSSK plays a critical role in sperm DNA compaction. Considering that the basal body functions as a microtubule-organizing center and the nucleating assembly of the spermatid flagellar axoneme during flagellum/cilium elongation29,42, we then investigated whether dTSSK disruption affects embedding of the basal body on sperm nuclei. Imaging of living PACT-GFP transgenic flies revealed that the GFP signal at the basal body was massively reduced in dTSSK-/- male flies at the late canoe stage (Fig. 2b), indicating that the basal body anchored to sperm nuclei is partially degenerated during spermiogenesis. Consistently, flagella were obviously disorganized in spermatid bundles of dTSSK−/− male flies (Figs. 2c and S4b), suggesting that dTSSK influences the structural integrity of flagella. In addition, we stained testicular tissue with fluorescently labeled phalloidin to reveal actin-based ICs43. In contrast with the condensed and well-organized ICs in wild-type testes, we did not observe IC formation after the late canoe stage in dTSSK−/− testes (Figs. 2d and S4a), demonstrating that spermiogenesis was blocked during or after the late canoe stage in dTSSK−/− male flies. Taken together, these results reveal that dTSSK might be involved in multiple processes of spermatogenesis, including morphology of spermatid nuclei, flagellar organization, individualization progression, and sperm maturation.
dTSSK depletion impairs the histone-to-protamine transition
The histone-to-protamine transition during spermatid chromatin remodeling is a dynamic process that occurs in a stepwise fashion, including histone expulsion, transition protein incorporation/removal, and protamine incorporation. Errors during the histone-to-protamine transition can impair sperm chromatin condensation and sperm quality, and even male sterility44. Since apparent chromatin decondensation in spermatids of dTSSK−/− flies at the late canoe stage, we further investigated whether there is any defect during histone-to-protamine transition in these flies. We generated a series of transgenic flies, including those expressing GFP-tagged histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, and the transition protein Tpl94D and mCherry-tagged protamine Mst35Bb, to track the histone-to-protamine transition. Live imaging showed that H2A, H2B, H3, H4, and Tpl94D were progressively removed from sperm chromatin and replaced by Mst35Bb as spermiogenesis progressed in the wild-type background (Figs. 3a–c, and S5a–S5c). Similarly, both H2A and H2B were removed from early-developing sperm chromatin in the dTSSK−/− background (Fig. S5b and S5c). However, H3, H4, and Tpl94D were retained on sperm DNA and not removed from spermatid nuclei in the dTSSK−/− background, without significantly affecting the incorporation of Mst35Bb (Fig. 3a–c). In addition, the histone variant H2Av was properly removed from DNA in spermatids of dTSSK−/− male flies (Fig. S6a), whereas H3.3 was retained in nuclei at the final sperm stage in these flies (Fig. S6b). Collectively, these results demonstrate that dTSSK deficiency causes significant defects in complete histone eviction and transition protein removal during histone-to-protamine transition.
Human TSSKs rescue the defective nuclear morphology of dTSSK−/− spermatids
To further investigate the functional conservation of TSSKs during spermiogenesis across various species and determine whether human TSSKs can rescue the defective phenotype of dTSSK−/− flies during spermiogenesis, we generated transgenic flies in which human TSSK1B, TSSK2, TSSK3, TSSK4 and TSSK6 were respectively expressed under the control of the endogenous dTSSK promoter. After crossing with dTSSK−/− flies, the five types of human TSSK-rescued flies remained infertile and lacked mature sperm in seminal vesicles (Fig. S7a). Next, we examined the sperm nuclear morphology in these flies. Our findings revealed that the sperm nuclei of TSSK2-, TSSK3-, and TSSK4-rescued flies remained abnormal, while TSSK1B- and TSSK6-rescued flies exhibited sperm nuclei morphology that was similar to that of wild-type flies (Fig. S7b). Cytological examination revealed that H2A, H2B, H3, H4, and Tpl94D were normally removed from sperm chromatin in TSSK1B-rescued flies, similar to wild-type flies (Fig. S8a). In addition, flagellar alignments were partially restored in TSSK1B-rescued flies (Fig. S8b). However, we did not detect normal IC formation in spermatids of TSSK1B-rescued male flies (Fig. S8c). This probably explains the lack of mature sperm in seminal vesicles of TSSK1B-rescued flies because IC formation is an essential membrane remodeling process for 64-cell spermatids to form mature spermatozoa in Drosophila45. Taken together, these results suggest that the biological function of TSSKs is conserved from flies to humans, although dTSSK also contributes to spermatid individualization.
The N- and C-terminal domains of dTSSK are both essential for male fertility
Human TSSKs did not rescue male infertility of dTSSK−/− flies; therefore, we wondered whether the N-terminal (1–26 aa) and C-terminal (292–302 aa) domains of dTSSK, which are poorly conserved with human TSSKs (Figs. S1a and S2a), are critical for spermiogenesis in Drosophila. We generated transgenic flies expressing dTSSKΔN (deleted N-terminal 26 aa) and dTSSKΔC (deleted C-terminal 11 aa). These two types of transgenic flies in the dTSSK-/- background both exhibited male sterility. Cytological examination revealed no mature sperm in seminal vesicles of dTSSKΔN- and dTSSKΔC- rescued flies (Fig. S9a). Live imaging of GFP-tagged dTSSKΔN transgenic flies revealed that dTSSKΔN exclusively localized to postmeiotic spermatid bundles, similar to wild-type dTSSK, but with weak signals in sperm nuclei (Fig. S9b and S9c), suggesting that the N-terminal domain of dTSSK affects protein localization to sperm nuclei. Consistently, although spermatids of dTSSKΔN-rescued flies developed a needle-shaped morphology, some sperm displayed abnormal DNA compaction (Fig. S9d), indicating that spermiogenesis can progress to a later stage upon expression of dTSSKΔN, although ICs did not form (Fig. S9e). Compared with dTSSKΔN, the phenotype of dTSSKΔC-rescued flies was better, with obvious GFP signals observed in sperm nuclei (Fig. S9c) and a higher proportion of needle-shaped spermatids with a normal morphology (Fig. S9d), although ICs still did not form (Fig. S9e). Collectively, these findings suggest that N- and C-terminal domains of dTSSK are both essential for sperm mature and male fertility.
The kinase catalytic activity of dTSSK plays a critical role in spermiogenesis
To determine whether dTSSK regulates spermiogenesis through its kinase activity in vivo, we generated a GFP-dTSSKK60M transgenic fly expressing a kinase-dead transcript in which the conserved Lys60 in the ATP-binding site of the S_TKc kinase domain was substituted by methionine (Fig. S2b)28,46,47. Live imaging revealed that dTSSKK60M signals exclusively localized to postmeiotic spermatid bundles, but there were no strong puncta in spermatid nuclei as in wild-type flies (Fig. S10a and S10b), suggesting that the kinase activity of dTSSK plays an essential role in its localization to sperm nuclei. To precisely define the function of dTSSKK60M, we generated native dTSSKK60M transgenic flies without any tags. After crossing with dTSSK−/− flies, we found that dTSSKK60M flies in the dTSSK−/− background exhibited male sterility and lacked mature sperm in seminal vesicles (Fig. S10c). Moreover, curled and decondensed nuclear bundles were observed during the final nuclear morphogenesis of dTSSKK60M mutants at the late canoe stage (or before the IC stage), similar to dTSSK−/− male flies (Fig. 4a). In addition, live imaging revealed that the dTSSKK60M mutation caused obvious basal body degeneration in the final stage of spermiogenesis (Fig. 4b). Flagella of dTSSKK60M flies displayed a slightly irregular arrangement (Fig. S10d). Similar to dTSSK−/− flies, H3, H4, and Tpl94D were not removed from sperm DNA at the final stage in dTSSKK60M flies (Figs. 4c and S11), suggesting that the kinase activity of dTSSK is necessary for the histone-to-protamine transition. Next, we generated two dTSSKT191A transgenic flies with and without GFP marker to determine whether another kinase dead site dTSSK-Thr191 in the conserved potential activation loop phosphorylation motif engaged in spermiogenesis regulation47. Similar to dTSSK−/− and dTSSKK60M-rescued flies, dTSSKT191A failed to localize to spermatid nuclei (Fig. S10a and S10b), and dTSSKT191A flies exhibited severe phenotypic defects during spermiogenesis (Figs. 4a–c, S10c, S10d and S11), suggesting that the activation loop phosphorylation motif is essential for the function of dTSSK. Taken together, these results suggest that the kinase catalytic activity of dTSSK plays an essential role in normal spermiogenesis and male fertility.
Phosphoproteomic screening identifies physiological potential substrates of dTSSK
The kinase activity of dTSSK is essential for spermiogenesis; therefore, we next identified its potential phosphorylated substrates by investigating differentially phosphorylated sites in the testes of wild-type (w1118) and dTSSK−/− male flies using proteomic and quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis. For phosphoproteomics, three biological replicates of dTSSK−/− or wild-type testes were obtained, cysteines were reduced and alkylated, and protein extracts were trypsinized. The six samples were isotopically labeled using tandem mass tags (TMTs) which allows quantitative, multiplexed, parallel analysis of tryptic peptides in all six samples with high accuracy48. Phosphopeptides were enriched and analyzed by LC-MS/MS on a high-resolution mass spectrometer (Fig. 5a). Reproducibility between replicates was high (Fig. S12a). Integrative phosphoproteomic analyses identified 8355 unique phosphosites in all replicates at a false-discovery rate (FDR) of <1% (Fig. S12b). We identified 916 significant differential phosphopeptides in dTSSK−/− testes compared with wild-type testes (fold-change > 1.5-fold, P < 0.05), of which 828 exhibited decreased phosphorylation, and 88 exhibited increased phosphorylation (Fig. 5b and Supplementary Data 1). The former were assigned to 485 proteins, which are potential dTSSK substrates. For proteomic profiling, we acquired 4226 proteins totally and found 563 proteins were differentially expressed (309 up-regulated and 254 downregulated, fold-change > 1.5-fold, P < 0.05) in dTSSK mutant testes compared to wild-type testes (Supplementary Data 2). Motif analysis of the identified potential substrates suggested that dTSSK is an S/T kinase (Fig. 5c), similar to mammalian TSSKs24. To gain more insight into the functions associated with this disruption of basal phosphorylation, we performed Gene Ontology (GO) analysis. For the phosphopeptides that exhibited decreased phosphorylation in dTSSK−/− testes, the most enriched pathways shared by these phosphoproteins were related to various spermatogenetic processes including microtubule-based process, cilium/flagellum-dependent sperm motility, spermatid differentiation/development, sperm individualization, and catabolic process (Fig. 5d and e). Proteins involved in microtubule-based process and spermatid differentiation/development whose phosphorylation was downregulated in dTSSK−/− testes are shown and quantified in Fig. 5f. Interestingly, mutants of many of these proteins exhibit male sterility (Table S1), including Mst77F49, cmb (Human homolog: PCM1)50, kl-3 (Human homolog: DNAH)51, ms(3)76 Cc52, and didum (Human homolog: Myosin V)53. Taken together, these data suggest that dTSSK-mediated phosphorylation participates in many spermiogenesis processes, consistent with its subcellular localization and the morphological defects of spermatids observed in dTSSK−/− flies.
dTSSK potentially regulates the phosphorylation of Mst77F-Ser9
Mst77F not only is a chromatin component of mature sperm but also associates with microtubules involved in the nuclear-shaping process during spermiogenesis49. Phosphoproteomics identified seven phosphosites in four phosphopeptides of Mst77F (Fig. 6a). Among these phosphosites, phosphorylation at Ser9 of Mst77F was most significantly decreased in dTSSK-/- flies (Fig. 6b and c), while proteomic profiling did not reveal the decreased protein expression of Mst77F (Supplementary Data 2). To evaluate whether dTSSK regulates the phosphorylation of Mst77F-Ser9 in flies, antibodies (Mst77F-pSer9) were raised in rabbits against the synthesized phosphopeptide corresponding to the sequence around Mst77F-Ser9. Dot blot analysis revealed that affinity-purified antibodies from the bleeds recognized the phosphopeptide immunogen but hardly recognized the nonphosphopeptide equivalent (Fig. S13a). We next used the Mst77F-pSer9-recognizing antibodies to examine whether dTSSK regulates Mst77F phosphorylation in vivo. WB analysis revealed that endogenous Mst77F was strongly phosphorylated in whole extracts of wild-type testes, but its phosphorylation was undetectable in dTSSK−/− testes (Fig. 6d). We next generated transgenic flies that expressed Flag-GFP-Mst77F and demonstrated that Mst77F-Ser9 was only phosphorylated in the wild-type background, and that its phosphorylation was undetectable in the dTSSK−/− background (Fig. 6e). In addition, phosphorylation of Mst77F-Ser9 was abolished when protein phosphatase (Ppase) was added to the testicular lysate (Fig. 6f), suggesting that dTSSK potentially regulates the phosphorylation of Mst77F-Ser9 in vivo. Accordingly, immunofluorescence (IF) revealed that Mst77F-Ser9 was phosphorylated in wild-type flies, and its phosphorylation was undetectable in dTSSK−/− flies (Fig. 6g), further indicating that dTSSK regulates Mst77F phosphorylation in vivo.
To illustrate that the S_TKc kinase activity of dTSSK is responsible for phosphorylation of Mst77F-Ser9, we investigated whether Mst77F-Ser9 is phosphorylated in two types of flies with dTSSK kinase dead mutations (dTSSKK60M and dTSSKT191A). WB analysis showed that phosphorylation of Mst77F-Ser9 was abolished in both mutants (Fig. 6h), further indicating that Lys60 and Thr191 play essential roles in the kinase activity of dTSSK. As expected, Mst77F-Ser9 was phosphorylated in dTSSK−/− flies expressing dTSSKΔN or dTSSKΔC (Fig. 6i) and in dTSSK−/− flies with complementation of human TSSK1B or TSSK6, the kinase domains of which are conserved with that of dTSSK (Fig. 6j).
To further investigate that dTSSK can regulate the phosphorylation of Mst77F, Flag-Mst77F was coexpressed with dTSSK-V5 in cultured Drosophila S2 cells. WB analysis showed that overexpression of dTSSK-V5 markedly increased the phosphorylation level of Mst77F (Fig. 6k). In addition, we enriched dTSSK from testes of dTSSK-Flag transgenic flies and performed dot blot experiments to examine whether dTSSK could phosphorylate the Mst77F-Ser9 peptide in vitro. The Mst77F-Ser9 peptide was phosphorylated in the presence of dTSSK (Figs. 6l and S13b), whereas the mutated peptide Mst77F-S9A (serine substituted by alanine) was not. In controls without dTSSK, neither the Mst77F-Ser9 nor the Mst77F-S9A peptide was phosphorylated (Figs. 6l and S13b). Taken together, these results reveal that dTSSK might phosphorylate Mst77F-Ser9 in vitro.
Phosphorylation of Mst77F by dTSSK contributes to spermiogenesis
To illustrate the involvement of Mst77F phosphorylation in spermiogenesis, a Mst77F mutant fly was generated by CRISPR/Cas9 technology (Fig. 7a). Mst77F-specific gRNA was designed to induce a 1 bp insertion and 6 bp deletion at the targeted site, resulting in generation of flies harboring mutated Mst77F (Mst77F−/−) with a premature stop codon. Mst77F gene disruption was further confirmed by genomic PCR sequencing. As predicted, we detected no fluorescent signal of Mst77F-pSer9 on sperm of Mst77F−/− flies (Fig. S14a). Mst77F−/− flies exhibited spermatids with decondensed chromatin during the final stage of sperm development and male sterility (Figs. 7b, c, and S14b), consistent with previous studies31. Next, we generated transgenic flies expressing wild-type Mst77F and Mst77FS9A. Upon transgenic supplementation of Mst77F−/− flies with wild-type Mst77F, male infertility was rescued, and obvious Mst77F-pSer9 signals were detected in spermatid nuclei, whereas no Mst77F-pSer9 signals were detected in Mst77FS9A flies, which had reduced fertility (Figs. 7c, S14a, and S14b). Cytological examination revealed that Mst77FS9A expression resulted in abnormal nuclear condensation in some spermatozoa (Fig. 7b).
To further elucidate the roles of Mst77F phosphorylation in sperm DNA compaction, we generated two types of transgenic flies with a GFP tag fused to Mst77F at the N-terminus (GFP-Mst77F) and C-terminus (Mst77F-GFP). GFP signals in GFP-Mst77F flies appeared at the early canoe stage and gradually disappeared from the late canoe stage to maturity (Fig. 7d), whereas strong GFP signals were continuously maintained until sperm maturation in Mst77F-GFP flies (Fig. 7e). This supports the hypothesis that pre-Mst77F, a precursor protein present in sperm chromatin during the canoe stage, undergoes N-terminal proteolytic processing from the late canoe stage to maturity, forming mature Mst77F responsible for mature sperm chromatin hypercompaction31. Indeed, IF analysis with an Mst77F-pSer9 antibody revealed that phosphorylated Mst77F signals gradually detached from sperm DNA to form discrete spots after the late canoe stage and were completely absent in needle-shaped mature sperm (Fig. 7f). We then investigated whether phosphorylation of Mst77F-Ser9 is involved in N-terminal proteolysis of Mst77F during sperm maturation. Live imaging of GFP-Mst77F transgenic flies in the dTSSK−/− background (Mst77F is not phosphorylated) revealed that GFP signals persisted until the final stages of sperm development (Figs. 7d and S14c). Moreover, we observed residual fluorescent dots on mature sperm DNA in GFP-Mst77FS9A transgenic flies, suggesting that Ser9 mutations affect N-terminal proteolysis of Mst77F at sperm maturation. N-terminal processing of Mst77F plays an important role in functional organization of mature sperm DNA;31 therefore, we speculated that phosphorylation of Mst77F-Ser9 might be involved in mature sperm DNA compaction. Collectively, these results suggest that phosphorylation of Mst77F by dTSSK is involved in spermiogenesis.
Mst33A is a potential substrate of dTSSK involved in spermiogenesis
Phosphoproteomic analysis also revealed that Mst33A-Ser237 was less phosphorylated in the absence of dTSSK (Fig. S15a), while proteomic profiling did not reveal the decreased protein expression of Mst33A (Supplementary Data 2). We first confirmed that dTSSK could phosphorylate the peptide corresponding to Mst33A-Ser237 using a commercial antibody that recognizes Ser-specific phosphorylation by performing an in vitro kinase assay (Fig. S15b). Live imaging of GFP-Mst33A transgenic flies revealed that Mst33A predominantly localized to chromatin in canoe stage spermatozoa but was absent from needle-stage spermatozoa (Fig. S15c), suggesting that Mst33A is a sperm chromatin-associated transition protein. Disruption of Mst33A using CRISPR/Cas9 technology reduced fertility of male flies (Figs. S15d and S15e). Cytological observation showed that some spermatozoa had an abnormal nuclear morphology in Mst33A−/− flies (Fig. S15f). To investigate whether phosphorylation of Mst33A-Ser237 by dTSSK is involved in spermiogenesis, we generated three types of transgenic flies that expressed Mst33A, Mst33AS237A, and GFP-tagged Mst33AS237A under the control of the endogenous Mst33A promoter. Live imaging showed that the Mst33AS237A mutation did not markedly affect the localization of Mst33A to sperm DNA (Fig. S15g). However, DNA compaction was deficient in some sperm at the needle stage in Mst33AS237A flies (Fig. S15f), which may correspond to a slight decrease in fertility (Fig. S15e). Taken together, these findings suggest that phosphorylation of Mst33A-Ser237 by dTSSK is involved in sperm DNA compaction.
Autophosphorylation of dTSSK-Ser18 is essential for sperm individualization
Comparative phosphoproteomic analysis revealed significant differences in the levels of phosphorylation at Ser17 and Ser18 of dTSSK between wild-type and dTSSK−/− flies (Fig. 8a). To evaluate whether Ser17 and Ser18 are phosphorylated in vivo, we generated transgenic flies expressing dTSSK-Flag, dTSSKS17A-Flag, dTSSKS18A-Flag, and dTSSKS17&S18A-Flag. WB analysis showed that the expression levels of dTSSKS17A, dTSSKS18A, and dTSSKS17&S18A were remarkably lower than that of wild-type dTSSK, implying that Ser17 or Ser18 mutations affect the stability of dTSSK in testes (Figs. 8b and S16a). Further analysis of whole testicular extracts by Phos-tag SDS-PAGE followed by WB analysis revealed a shifted band in extracts of dTSSK-Flag and dTSSKS17A-Flag male flies, and only a lower band in extracts of dTSSKS18A-Flag and dTSSKS17&S18A-Flag flies (Fig. 8c). dTSSK appeared mainly as a phospho-modified band in dTSSKS17A and wild-type flies, but only as a nonphospho-modified band in dTSSKS18A and dTSSKS17&S18A flies (Figs. 8c and S16b). Supplementation of testicular extracts with Ppase abolished the phosphorylation signals of dTSSK (Figs. 8c and S16b), further confirming that dTSSK is autophosphorylated at Ser18 in vivo.
To investigate the involvement of dTSSK-Ser18 phosphorylation in spermiogenesis, we generated transgenic flies expressing dTSSKS17A, dTSSKS18A, and dTSSKS17A&S18A without any tag. Fertility testing showed that dTSSKS17A male flies exhibited a slight decline in fertility, while dTSSKS18A male flies exhibited very poor fertility, and dTSSKS17A&S18A male flies were completely sterile (Fig. 8d), suggesting that Ser18 of dTSSK plays a critical role in male fertility. Next, by tracking Mst35Bb-GFP fluorescence, we observed few or no sperm in seminal vesicles of dTSSKS18A flies and a complete absence of sperm in dTSSKS17A&S18A flies (Fig. 8e), consistent with the results of fertility testing. Cytological examination of spermiogenesis revealed grossly normal sperm DNA condensation in dTSSKS17A, dTSSKS18A, and dTSSKS17A&S18A flies (Fig. 8f). Moreover, dTSSKS17A&S18A flies exhibited normal basal body subcellular localization similar to wild-type flies (Fig. 8g). In addition, dTSSKS17A, dTSSKS18A, and dTSSKS17A&S18A flies displayed normally organized flagellar structures (Fig. 8h). However, F-actin staining with phalloidin revealed that IC formation at the individualization stage was almost abolished in dTSSKS18A and dTSSKS17A&S18A flies (Fig. 8i), which might explain the inability of these flies to produce mature sperm. Furthermore, WB analysis revealed that the kinase catalytic activity of dTSSK was independent on Ser17 and Ser18 (Fig. 8j), consistent with the results obtained upon N-terminal deletion of dTSSK (Fig. 6i). Taken together, these results suggest that autophosphorylation of dTSSK-Ser18 contributes to spermiogenesis by facilitating the formation of ICs.
Discussion
In this study, we identified a TSSK homolog from Drosophila melanogaster. Subsequent experiments found that dTSSK mutations caused male infertility, with a variety of morphological defects during sperm cell development (including those in nuclear shaping, chromatin condensation, sperm individualization, basal body localization, and sperm flagellum organization), and severely impaired sperm DNA compaction by interrupting the histone-to-protamine transition during spermiogenesis. Moreover, we confirmed the functional conservation of TSSKs from flies to humans and validated the importance and necessity of key amino acids in the kinase catalytic domain of TSSK in spermiogenesis. More importantly, state-of-the-art phosphoproteomic screening identified multiple potential substrates of dTSSK including Mst77F and Mst33A, which were demonstrated to play important roles in sperm chromatin condensation. Thus, our work demonstrates that extensive phosphorylation mediated by dTSSK might be essential for male fertility, further advancing understanding of the molecular mechanism underlying phosphorylation-based regulation by TSSKs.
TSSKs in Drosophila and mammals
Transcriptome and IF analyses of mouse germ cells revealed that different TSSK family members (Tssk1, Tssk2, Tssk3, Tssk4 and Tssk6) are almost exclusively expressed postmeiotically in testes but exhibit different localization patterns during spermatid development38. Similar to mouse germ cells, all five TSSKs exhibit differential localization patterns during human spermiogenesis38. CG14305 (dTSSK), a homolog of mammalian TSSKs that we identified in Drosophila, was widely distributed in multiple key stages of sperm development, suggesting that it is involved in multiple spermiogenesis functions. Multiple phenotypic defects such as sperm flagellar disorganization (a phenotype similar to that caused by Tssk4 mutation in mice) and sperm chromatin decondensation (a phenotype similar to that caused by Tssk6 mutation in mice) were observed during spermiogenesis24,25. The similarity of these phenotypic defects also implies the functional conservation of dTSSK with multiple mammalian TSSKs. Interestingly, in dTSSK mutant flies, the IC failed to form during spermiogenesis, which corresponded with the localization of dTSSK to the IC. Subsequently, rescue experiments confirmed that human TSSK1B (or TSSK1) and TSSK6 rescued the loose nuclear morphology of sperm in dTSSK mutants to a near mature needle-shape morphology, further demonstrating the functional conservation of dTSSK and mammalian TSSKs in chromatin condensation during spermiogenesis.
Previous studies on the function of TSSKs have consistently failed to establish whether the their crucial role in spermiogenesis is dependent on their kinase catalytic activity21,24. In this study, we did not detect phosphorylation at Mst77F-Ser9 in dTSSKK60M or dTSSKT191A flies, indicating that both sites are crucial for kinase activity of TSSK in vivo. More important, dTSSKK60M and dTSSKT191A flies displayed severe defects in spermiogenesis similar to those observed in dTSSK−/− flies. This demonstrates that the kinase catalytic activity of dTSSK is indispensable for its function in male fertility in vivo.
Structurally, the N- and C-terminal domains of dTSSK are not conserved with human TSSKs, which might confer some additional functions to dTSSK in spermiogenesis. Rescue experiments in Drosophila showed that sperm of flies expressing dTSSK that lacked the N- or C-terminal domain could develop to the needle stage, similar to human TSSK1B- and TSSK6-rescued flies, suggesting that the N- or C-terminal domain of dTSSK is not involved in compaction of sperm chromatin. Surprisingly, deletion of the N- or C-terminal domain of dTSSK led to an inability of sperm bundles to form normal IC structures (unique to Drosophila sperm maturation) and ultimately resulted in male infertility.
Taken together, our findings suggest that the conserved kinase catalytic domain S_TKc is critical for the function of TSSKs in spermiogenesis and for male fertility in various species from Drosophila to human.
dTSSK regulates the histone-to-protamine transition
Drosophila is an excellent model to investigate sperm chromatin remodeling at the functional level because the histone-to-protamine transition in Drosophila shares conserved features with that in mammals54. A previous study has shown that the knockout of Tssk6 results in elevated levels of histones H3 and H4 in sperm55. We also found that dTSSK deficiency severely affected the histone-to-protamine transition. Although the protamine Mst35Bb was still incorporated into sperm chromatin in the late canoe stage, the histones H3 and H4 and the consequently loaded transition protein Tpl94D were not completely removed from sperm DNA in dTSSK−/− flies, resulting in incomplete incorporation of protamines due to the occupancy of these proteins on sperm DNA. Protamines are rich in bulky positively charged arginine residues (which mediate strong binding to the minor groove of negatively charged DNA) and cysteine residues (which form intra- and intermolecular disulfide bonds to stabilize DNA-protein binding)56,57; therefore, sperm protamine-DNA assembles into an ultratight toroid58, resulting in at least sixfold denser nuclear compaction compared with histone-bound DNA59. The failure of histones to be completely removed from sperm DNA would further impede sperm DNA compaction, which is perhaps related to the inability of dTSSK−/− sperm to transform into a needle shape. Unfortunately, we did not detect obvious phosphorylation modifications of H3, H4, and Tpl94D in dTSSK−/− and wild-type flies in our phosphoproteomic analysis. dTSSK may not directly phosphorylate histones and transition proteins but rather regulate the histone-to-protamine transition in an indirect manner, such as by phosphorylating and thereby activating ubiquitin-modifying enzymes. It remains unknown which dTSSK-regulated factors are required for histone eviction/protamine replacement during spermiogenesis.
Multiple potential substrates phosphorylated by dTSSK are involved in spermiogenesis
Our phosphoproteome analysis may provide some explanation for how dTSSK mutation causes various phenotypic defects. The nuclear morphology of the sperm head is mainly determined by two factors: nuclear shaping and chromatin condensation29. Nuclear shaping is driven by microtubules that emanate from the basal body and associate with the nuclear envelope. Interestingly, microtubule-based genes such as wampa, Grip75, and Grip91 are reportedly involved in microtubule nucleation and nuclear shaping during spermiogenesis60,61,62. For chromatin condensation, Mst77F is required for compaction of sperm DNA31. Our findings suggest that dTSSK has the potential to regulate the phosphorylation of Mst77F both in vitro and in vivo. More importantly, we discovered that proteolysis of the Mst77F N-terminal domain depended on dTSSK-mediated phosphorylation of Mst77F-Ser9, which probably explains why the Mst77FS9A mutation resulted in production of spermatozoa with an abnormal nuclear morphology. Interestingly, N-terminal proteolysis of protamine P2 in mammals is reportedly involved in spermiogenesis and is associated with some forms of human infertility63,64. Thus, we propose that a similar mechanism might regulate sperm DNA condensation in mammals. It is also possible that other potential substrates of dTSSK such as Mst33A co-operate to regulate sperm chromatin packaging. Unfortunately, we could not identify mammalian homologues of Mst33A using sequence blast searches.
In addition, disorganized assembly of flagella could affect spermatid maturation processes such as motility. Given that centriole deficiency always leads to flagellar defects65, and dTSSK mutation results in degeneration of basal body localization on sperm, some potential centriole-associated substrates such as Cp110, Spd-2, and CG3213 (Odf2 homolog in humans) might be involved in assembly of cilia and flagella via phosphorylation by dTSSK28,66,67. Other potential flagellate-associated substrates, kl-3, TTLL3B, Orb2, and Rsph3, are involved in the composition of sperm axonemes50,68,69,70, and kl-3 and TTLL3B deficiency causes male sterility68,71. Moreover, other potential substrates such as didum, Lasp, Pif1A, and klhl10 are involved in the individualization process53,72,73,74. Among them, human CCDC157 (Pif1A homolog in flies) and klhl10 are relevant to nonobstructive azoospermia74,75. Our phosphoproteomic analysis also identified other male infertility-associated genes, such as ms(3)76 Cc, cmb, and Fas350,52,76, whose regulation by dTSSK during spermiogenesis warrants further investigation.
Furthermore, it is noteworthy that some substrate proteins identified in our study by phosphoproteomics as being regulated by Drosophila dTSSK exhibit homology with proteins that are regulated by Tssk3 in mice23, such as kl-3 (Dnah8 homolog in mice), Osbp2 (Osbp homolog in mice), Ref. (2)p (Sqstm1 homolog in mice), didum (Radil homolog in mice), Sls (Ttn homolog in mice), and TTLL4B (Ttll5 homolog in mice). These findings suggest that the molecular mechanisms underlying spermiogenesis may be conserved across species, and further research into the regulation of these homologous substrate proteins by TSSKs could provide valuable insights into the evolution and function of these critical signaling pathways in male fertility.
Clinical relevance of TSSKs
Our findings revealed that dTSSK could organize and orchestrate the entire postmeiotic spermiogenesis process by phosphorylating multiple protein substrates involved in different stages of germ cell development, providing valuable and paradigm-shifting insights into spermiogenesis. Future work should aim to confirm the potential targets of dTSSK and identify the corresponding targets of human TSSKs, to further elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying human infertility. Indeed, single-nucleotide mutations of TSSK2, TSSK4, and TSSK6 are reportedly associated with azoospermia and severe oligospermia77,78,79. In addition, members of the TSSK family such as TSSK2, TSSK3, and TSSK6 play important roles in survival and proliferation of cancer cells, and TSSK6 is an immunogenic cancer/testis antigen in various cancers80,81,82,83. Our discovery of the broad-spectrum but selective phosphorylation of substrates by TSSKs enhances understanding of clinical human male infertility and tumorigenesis. Furthermore, TSSKs have been suggested as promising targets for male contraception20. Our current study provides further mechanistic evidence that TSSKs play a critical role in sperm development and maturation, and their inhibition could disrupt spermiogenesis and impede the production of functionally competent sperm. It is worth noting that although promising progress has been made in developing contraceptive drugs using TSSK inhibitors in animals, further research is needed to establish their efficacy and safety in humans.
Methods
Generation of transgenic lines
To generate P{Flag-GFP-dTSSK} transgenic flies, the endogenous promoter was amplified from w1118 genomic DNA with the primers CG14305-pro-F/CG14305-pro-R and cloned into the pUAST-GFP-attB vector between the NotI and AgeI sites. The genomic region covering the CG14305 gene locus (from ATG to 1 kb downstream of the coding region) was amplified from w1118 genomic DNA using the primers CG14305-F/CG14305-R. The PCR fragment was cloned between the SpeI and KpnI sites of the pUAST-GFP-attB vector. The plasmids were injected into attP40 embryos for targeted phiC31-mediated integration at genomic attP landing sites. To generate P{dTSSK} transgenic flies, the full CG14305 gene locus was amplified with the primers CG14305-pro-F/CG14305-R and cloned into the pUAST-attB vector between the NotI and KpnI sites. To generate P{PACT-mCherry} and P{PACT-GFP} transgenic flies, the C-terminal 226 amino acids of CG6735 (which contains the PACT domain) were amplified by PCR from Drosophila testicular cDNA as described previously40 with the primers PACT-F/PACT-R. The ubi promoter and 3′UTR (about 1 kb downstream of the coding region) were amplified from w1118 genomic DNA using the primers ubi-F/ubi-R and PACT-3′UTR-F/PACT-3′UTR-R. mCherry and GFP were amplified from the pHPdestmCherry (Addgene #24567) and pUAST-GFP-attB vectors using the primers mCherry-F/mCherry-R and GFP-F/GFP-R. The amplified products were cloned step by step into the pUAST-attB vector. To generate P{Mst35Bb-mCherry} and P{Mst35Bb-GFP} transgenic flies, the genomic region covering the Mst35Bb promoter and gene body was amplified using the primers Mst35Bb-F/Mst35Bb-R, and the 3′UTR was amplified using the primers Mst35Bb-3′UTR-F/Mst35Bb-3’UTR-R. Finally, the mCherry and GFP fragments were respectively cloned into the preconstructed pUAST-attB vector. To generate P{H2A-GFP}, P{H2B-GFP}, P{H3-GFP}, P{H4-GFP}, P{H2Av-GFP}, and P{H3.3-GFP} transgenic flies, the promoter and 3’UTR of H3.3 A were used to drive all histone expression in testes and cloned into the pUAST-GFP-attB vector. H2A, H2B, H3, H4, H2Av, and H3.3 A were respectively amplified from cDNA and cloned into the vector. To generate P{Tpl94D-GFP} transgenic flies, the Tpl94D promoter, coding region, and 3′UTR were amplified from w1118 genomic DNA and cloned into the pUAST-GFP-attB vector. Similarly, to generate P{Flag-GFP-Mst77F}, P{Mst77F-GFP}, and P{Flag-GFP-Mst33A} transgenic flies, the relevant promoter, coding region, and 3’UTR were amplified from w1118 genomic DNA and cloned into the pUAST-attB vector. To generate five human TSSK transgenic flies, the CG14305 endogenous promoter amplified from w1118 genomic DNA and human TSSK sequences synthesized by GenScript were respectively cloned into the pUAST-attB vector. To generate point mutants of dTSSK, Mst77F, and Mst33A transgenic flies, the gene coding region was amplified and cloned into the T vector (Transgene #CT101-01). Point mutation primers were used to amplify sequences from the constructed T vector. The mutation fragments were cloned into the pUAST-attB vector. P{Mst33A}, P{Mst33AS237A}, and P{Flag-GFP-Mst33AS237A} plasmids were injected into attP2 embryos, and other transgenic plasmids were injected into attP40 embryos for targeted phiC31-mediated integration. All primers used to generate transgenic flies are listed in Supplementary Data 3. Flies used in this study are listed in Supplementary Data 4.
Generation of Drosophila mutants
Mutants of dTSSK−/−, Mst77F−/−, and Mst33A−/− flies were generated by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis as previously described84. Briefly, in vitro transcription of Cas9 mRNA was performed using an Sp6 mMESSAGE mMACHINE Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific #AM1340). In vitro transcription of the designed gRNAs was performed using a RiboMAX Large Scale RNA Production Systems-T7 Kit (Promega #PR-P1320). Purified Cas9-mRNA and gene-specific gRNAs were mixed at final concentrations of 1 μg/μL and 50 ng/μL, respectively, and injected into w1118 embryos. The mutants were verified by PCR and DNA sequencing. Primers used for gRNA construction, PCR, and sequencing are listed in Supplementary Data 3.
Molecular cloning and S2 cell transfection
To generate the Flag-Mst77F plasmid, the Mst77F coding region was amplified from a homemade Drosophila testis cDNA library using the primers Pac-Mst77F-F/Pac-Mst77F-R and cloned into the pAC5.1/V5-His vector between the XbaI and AgeI sites for expression in Drosophila S2 cells (Thermo Fisher Scientific, R69007). dTSSK-V5 was amplified from the Drosophila testis cDNA library using the primers Pac-dTSSK-F/Pac-dTSSK-R and cloned into the pAC5.1/V5-His vector between the KpnI and XhoI sites. The primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Data 3. The plasmids used for transfection were prepared using a Plasmid Mini Kit (Tiangen #DP118) and transferred into cells using transfection reagents (Qiagen #301425). To improve efficiency, it is advisable to split the culture 1:1 with fresh medium 1 day before transfection. Transfected cells were allowed to grow for 72 h at 25 °C and were harvested via centrifugation at 3000 × g for 5 min.
Antibody generation
Two antibodies, Mst77F-pSer9 and dTSSK, were generated by Abclonal, a company based in Wuhan, China. The Mst77F-pSer9 antibody was produced using a modified peptide composed of amino acids 5-13: KQKD(S-p)KPEV, while the dTSSK antibody was produced using a peptide consisting of amino acids 14-21: GTRSSDVD.
Sequence alignment and phylogenetic analysis
Protein sequences were aligned using ClustalW of Mega software85. Identity and similarity were calculated using Blastp86. The phylogenetic tree was constructed using Phylogenetic Analysis of Mega software87.
Fertility testing
Every male or virgin female of different fly mutants was crossed with three w1118 virgin females or males. Parents were kept for 7 days and discarded. Then, adult flies of each cross were counted to assess fertility of the detected fly mutants. For the qualitative fertility assay, males were tested in batches of ten. Each virgin male was placed with one w1118 virgin female in one vial at 25 °C. For the next 15 days, the flies generated from each mating were transferred to new vials every 24 h. Upon eclosion, all progeny from each vial were counted. The average number of flies per parental pair and standard errors were calculated for each combination of genotypes.
IF and microscopy
For whole testis imaging, testes of 3 days after eclosion were dissected in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and transferred to a small drop of PBS on a microscope slide. Then, a coverslip was gently placed on the slide for cytological examination. For standard sperm imaging, testes of 3 days after eclosion were dissected in PBS and transferred to a small drop of PBS on a microscope slide. Then, a coverslip was placed on the slide to release the contents of testes. For IF sample preparation, 20 pairs of testes were dissected in cold PBS. Next, the sample was transferred to a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube and incubated in 4% PFA for 20 min. After three rinses for 10 min with 1× PBST (1× PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100) at RT, samples were blocked for 1 h in 1× PBST containing 1% BSA (Gibco). Primary antibody staining was performed overnight in block buffer at 4 °C. After three washes with 1× PBST, the secondary antibody and DAPI diluted in 1× PBST were added for 1 h at RT. Goat anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) Highly Cross-Adsorbed Secondary Antibody, Alexa Fluor™ 488 (Invitrogen #A-11029) or Alexa Fluor™ 568 (Invitrogen #A-11036) were used at a dilution of 1:500. For IC staining, samples were stained with TRITC phalloidin as previously described41. Briefly, ten pairs of testes were dissected in cold PBS, incubated in sodium isocitrate for 5 min, and then incubated in 4% PFA for 20 min. Tissue samples were flattened under a siliconized coverslip and frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then the coverslip was removed. The microscope slides were incubated in cold 1× PBST for 10 min and then in RT 1× PBST for 10 min, blocked in PBSTA (1× PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and 5% BSA), incubated in 1× PBSTA containing TRITC phalloidin (Yeasen #40734ES75) for 1 h at 37 °C, washed with 1× PBST, and stained with DAPI. Confocal images were obtained using a Leica SP8 or Zeiss LSM 980 confocal microscope. Images were processed with Fiji software88.
Quantification of fluorescence intensity of GFP in the sperm was performed using Image J. The area and integrated optical density in sperm were measured respectively to obtain mean signal intensity.
SDS-PAGE, Phos-tag SDS-PAGE, and WB analysis
For total protein extraction, transfected cells or fly tissues were suspended in 1.5× SDS loading buffer. After brief sonication, the samples were boiled for 10 min at 95 °C, centrifuged at 25,000 × g for 20 min, and loaded for SDS-PAGE according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Proteins were transferred to a PVDF membrane in transfer buffer at 25 V for 25 min using the Trans-Blot® Turbo™ Transfer System (Bio-Rad). After blocking with 5% BSA diluted in PBSTween (PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20) for 2 h at RT, membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with a primary antibody diluted in PBSTween containing 5% dry milk. The following day, blots were washed three times with PBSTween for 10 min, incubated with a secondary antibody diluted in PBSTween for 1 h at RT with shaking, and then washed again with PBSTween. Membranes were then incubated with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in PBSTween for 1 h and washed three times with PBSTween for 10 min at RT.
For Mn2+-Phos-tag SDS-PAGE, 40 μM MnCl2 and 20 μM acrylamide-pendant Phos-tag ligands were added to a 12% separating gel before polymerization. Testicular samples were suspended in 1.5× SDS loading buffer. After brief sonication, the samples were boiled for 10 min at 95 °C, centrifuged at 25,000 × g at 25 °C for 20 min, loaded for Phos-tag SDS-PAGE, and electrophoresed at 80 V. After electrophoresis, the gel was immersed in transfer buffer (39 mM glycine, 48 mM Tris, 0.037% SDS, and 20% methanol) containing 10 mmol/L EDTA and gently shaken for 10 min (this was repeated three times). Then, the gel was soaked in EDTA-free transfer buffer and shaken gently for 10 min. The subsequent procedures were performed using standard protocols. For Ppase processing, samples were lysed in NEBuffer for Protein MetalloPhosphatases containing 1 mM MnCl2 and incubated with Ppase (New England Biolabs #P0753) for 30 min at 30 °C. WB analysis was performed using standard procedures. A mouse polyclonal anti-lamin antibody (DSHB #LC28.26) was used at a 1:1000 dilution, a rabbit polyclonal anti-Histone H3 antibody (Abcam #ab1791) was used at a 1:1000 dilution, a mouse polyclonal anti-V5 antibody (Invitrogen # MA5-15253) was used at a 1:1000 dilution, a rabbit polyclonal anti-Flag antibody (Millipore #F7425) was used at a 1:1000 dilution, a rabbit polyclonal anti-dTSSK antibody (ABclonal) was used at a 1:2000 dilution, and a rabbit polyclonal anti-Mst77F-pSer9 antibody (ABclonal) was used at a 1:5000 dilution. Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit secondary antibodies (Yeasen #33201ES60 or #33101ES60) were used at a 1:5000 dilution. WB signals were detected with a GE AI680UV instrument and processed with Fiji software88.
Peptides
The peptides of Mst77F-S9: “KQKDSKPEV”, Mst77F-S9A: “KQKDAKPEV”, Mst77F-PS9: “KQKD(S-p) KPEV”, N o-S/T-Control: “DIEEDINRAEDE”, Mst33A-S237: “NIIYSGSAYKNFL” and dTSSK peptide: “GTRSSDVD” are synthesized by GenScript.
In vitro kinase assay
For sample preparation, 100 pairs of testes of Flag-dTSSK-expressing flies were dissected in cold PBS and centrifuged at 3000 × g for 5 min at 4 °C. After discarding the supernatant, 600 µL of RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) containing 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM Na3VO4, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM EGTA was added, and samples were briefly sonicated on ice. After centrifugation at 25,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C, an equal amount of Flag M2 gel (Sigma #A2220) was added to the supernatant, and samples were incubated for 5 h at 4 °C. After three washes with 1× Tris-buffered saline (TBS), the precipitate containing beads was collected by centrifugation at 250 × g for 1 min at 4 °C. The precipitates were incubated with synthetic peptides diluted in kinase buffer (25 mM HEPES, 10 mM MgCl2, and 0.5 mM EGTA) containing 1× protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche), 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM NaF, 1 mM DTT, 0.5 mM Na3VO4, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 0.5 mM EGTA for 30 min at 25 °C.
The supernatants were blotted onto nitrocellulose membrane. After drying, the membranes were blocked by incubation with TBS containing 0.1% Tween-20 (0.1% TBSTween) and 5% skim milk for 2 h. Blots were washed with TBST and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with an anti-Mst77F-pSer9 or antiphosphoserine antibody (Merck #05-1000) was used at a 1:1000 dilution. After three washes with 0.1% TBSTween, the membranes were incubated with a peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 h at RT. The membranes were washed again three times with 0.1% TBSTween and then treated with a chemiluminescent reagent. Signals were detected with a GE AI680UV instrument. Images were processed with Fiji software.
Quantitative phosphoproteomics
About 1000 pairs of testes from dTSSK−/− and wild-type flies of 3 days after eclosion were collected and stored at −80 °C. Frozen samples were lysed in lysis buffer (8 M urea, 1% SDS, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM PMSF, 10 mM NaF, and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail [1:100 dilution]) by disruption three times for 40 s using Tissuelyser (Jingxin). The lysed tissue was placed on ice for 10 min and vortexed for 10 s. This process was repeated twice. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 30 min at 4 °C. The protein-containing supernatant was collected, and the protein concentration was measured using the BCA assay (Pierce). For each sample, 300 μg of protein was used for downstream reduction, alkylation, and digestion. Triethylammonium bicarbonate buffer (TEAB) was added to each sample at a final concentration of 100 mM. Proteins were reduced and alkylated with tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine hydrochloride (Thermo Fisher; 10 mM, 37 °C, 1 h) and iodoacetamide (Sigma; 40 mM, RT in the dark, 40 min), respectively. Six volumes of precooled acetone were added to the sample, and proteins were precipitated at −20 °C for 4 h. Protein precipitates were collected by centrifugation at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C and completely dissolved in 100 μL of 100 mM TEAB. The protein samples were added to trypsin (Promega) at a ratio of 50:1 (protein: enzyme, w/w) and incubated at 16 h. Peptides were dried using Speed-Vac (Thermo Scientific), dissolved in 0.1% trifluoroacetic acid containing 2% acetonitrile, desalted on HLB columns (Waters), and dried again using Speed-Vac (Thermo Scientific).
Dried peptides from each sample were chemically labeled with one of six TMT Isobaric Mass Tags (Thermo Fisher Scientific #90111). TMT reagents were dissolved in anhydrous acetonitrile (Sigma), and each reagent was added to the corresponding aliquot of peptides. The reaction was incubated at RT for 2 h and quenched by incubation with hydroxylamine at RT for 30 min. Equal amounts of labeled peptides from each group were mixed in one tube. The labeled peptides were desalted on HLB columns (Waters) and dried using Speed-Vac (Thermo Scientific). Phosphorylated peptides were enriched using a High-Select TM Fe-NTA Phosphopeptide Enrichment Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific #A32992) following the instruction manual, desalted using C18 columns (Waters), and dried using Speed-Vac (Thermo Scientific). Dried phosphopeptide samples were resuspended in 0.1% formic acid for LC-MS analysis. Phosphopeptides were separated on a reverse phase C18 column (75 μm × 25 cm, Thermo) over 180 min with an acetonitrile gradient from 20 to 80%. Then, samples were electrosprayed and analyzed by tandem mass spectrometry on a Q_Exactive HF-X instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The parameters for phosphoproteomic samples were set to a mass range of 350–1500 m/z; resolution of 120,000, automatic gain control (AGC) target of 3.0e6, and maximum injection time of 50 ms for MS1; and resolution of 45,000, AGC target of 1.0e5, and maximum injection time of 100 ms for MS2.
Raw mass spectrometry data were analyzed using ProteomeDiscoverer™ Software 2.4. MS/MS spectra were matched against UniProt-Drosophila melanogaster-taxonomy 7227. Identifications were filtered at 1% FDR at the peptide level, accepting a minimum peptide length of 5. TMT intensities were extracted, normalized for each condition, and used for downstream analyses. Normalized TMT intensities were analyzed using the Student’s t test (two-tailed, homoscedastic), and phosphopeptides with P < 0.05 and fold change >1.5 were considered to significantly differ in abundance between the samples. Significant downregulated mass spectrometry hits were used for functional enrichment analysis in g:Profiler89 (https://biit.cs.ut.ee/gprofiler).
Motif and network analysis
Significant mass spectrometry hits (fold change > 1.5, P < 0.05) were analyzed using UniProt, motif-x, and the STRING database. Motif-x software (v1.2 10.05.06)90 was used with prealigned sequence tags around the phosphosites. The following parameters were applied: occurrences, 10; significance, P < 0.0001. The STRING database v11.5 was used91. Analysis was performed using default parameters (medium confidence). Network parameters, including the source and target node defining the direction of the interaction and the combined interaction score defining the weight of the network edge, were imported into Gephi v0.9.292 for network visualization. Networks were visualized as ForceAtlas2 with edge thickness proportional to the combined interaction score.
Proteomics
About 500 pairs of testes from dTSSK−/− and wild-type flies of 3 days after eclosion were collected and stored at −80 °C. Frozen samples were lysed in lysis buffer (8 M urea, 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate, 1 mM dithiothreitol) with protease inhibitor added (10 mL/tablet, 05892791001, Roche) by disruption three times for 40 s using Tissuelyser (Jingxin), respectively. The suspension was sonicated on ice for 10 s, repeated thrice. The protein concentration of the lysates was determined using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. About 1 mg of lysate was then reduced with 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) at 37 °C for 2 h, and alkylated with 20 mM iodoacetamide for 45 min in the dark. After diluting the concentration of urea to 1 M with 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate (ABC), trypsin (V5111, Promega) was added at a weight ratio of 1:50 and incubated for 16 h at 37 °C. The reactions were stopped by adding 20% formic acid (FA) until the pH was less than 2. The resulting peptides were desalted using Sep-Pak C18 (WAT054955, Waters) according to the manufacturer’s instructions and then dried under vacuum. Dried peptides were resuspended in 0.1% formic acid for LC-MS analysis. Peptides were separated and analyzed on an Easy-nLC 1000 system coupled to a Q Exactive HF (Thermo Scientific). The raw data were processed using MaxQuant with integrated Andromeda search engine (v.1.5.4.1). The UniProt Drosophila melanogaster-taxonomy 7227 protein database were used for database searches of samples. False-discovery rate (FDR) thresholds for peptide was specified at 1%. Minimum peptide length was set at 7. A paired Student’s t test was used to verify the significance of the differences between each comparison.
Statistics and reproducibility
Immunofluorescence and western blotting results were repeated at least twice using independently prepared samples, and similar results were obtained. The statistical methods used are indicated in the legends. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 8.0. Sample size was not predetermined by any statistical method.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Portfolio Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Data availability
The mass spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium (http://www.proteomexchange.org/) via the PRIDE partner repository with the dataset identifier PXD038767 and PXD041466. The remaining data are available within the paper, Supplementary Information or Source Data file. Source data are provided with this paper.
References
Neto, F. T. L., Bach, P. V., Najari, B. B., Li, P. S. & Goldstein, M. Spermatogenesis in humans and its affecting factors. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 59, 10–26 (2016).
Jan, S. Z. et al. Molecular control of rodent spermatogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1822, 1838–1850 (2012).
Hammoud, S. S. et al. Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature 460, 473–478 (2009).
Maciel, V. L. Jr., Tamashiro, L. K. & Bertolla, R. P. Post-translational modifications of seminal proteins and their importance in male fertility potential. Expert Rev. Proteom. 16, 941–950 (2019).
Haraguchi, C. M. et al. Possible function of caudal nuclear pocket: degradation of nucleoproteins by ubiquitin-proteasome system in rat spermatids and human sperm. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 55, 585–595 (2007).
Lu, L. Y. et al. RNF8-dependent histone modifications regulate nucleosome removal during spermatogenesis. Dev. Cell 18, 371–384 (2010).
Lefievre, L. et al. Human spermatozoa contain multiple targets for protein S-nitrosylation: an alternative mechanism of the modulation of sperm function by nitric oxide. Proteomics 7, 3066–3084 (2007).
Vigodner, M. & Morris, P. L. Testicular expression of small ubiquitin-related modifier-1 (SUMO-1) supports multiple roles in spermatogenesis: silencing of sex chromosomes in spermatocytes, spermatid microtubule nucleation, and nuclear reshaping. Dev. Biol. 282, 480–492 (2005).
Li, M. W., Mruk, D. D. & Cheng, C. Y. Mitogen-activated protein kinases in male reproductive function. Trends Mol. Med. 15, 159–168 (2009).
Carmena, M. et al. Drosophila Polo kinase is required for cytokinesis. J. Cell Biol. 143, 659–671 (1998).
Bettencourt-Dias, M. et al. SAK/PLK4 is required for centriole duplication and flagella development. Curr. Biol. 15, 2199–2207 (2005).
Jordan, P. W., Karppinen, J. & Handel, M. A. Polo-like kinase is required for synaptonemal complex disassembly and phosphorylation in mouse spermatocytes. J. Cell Sci. 125, 5061–5072 (2012).
Ben Khelifa, M. et al. A new AURKC mutation causing macrozoospermia: implications for human spermatogenesis and clinical diagnosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 17, 762–768 (2011).
Bielke, W. et al. Characterization of a novel murine testis-specific serine/threonine kinase. Gene 139, 235–239 (1994).
Kueng, P. et al. A novel family of serine/threonine kinases participating in spermiogenesis. J. Cell Biol. 139, 1851–1859 (1997).
Zuercher, G., Rohrbach, V., Andres, A. C. & Ziemiecki, A. A novel member of the testis specific serine kinase family, tssk-3, expressed in the Leydig cells of sexually mature mice. Mech. Dev. 93, 175–177 (2000).
Hao, Z. et al. Expression analysis of the human testis-specific serine/threonine kinase (TSSK) homologues. A TSSK member is present in the equatorial segment of human sperm. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 10, 433–444 (2004).
Chen, X. et al. TSSK5, a novel member of the testis-specific serine/threonine kinase family, phosphorylates CREB at Ser-133, and stimulates the CRE/CREB responsive pathway. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 333, 742–749 (2005).
Xu, B. et al. Validation of a testis specific serine/threonine kinase [TSSK] family and the substrate of TSSK1 & 2, TSKS, as contraceptive targets. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl. 63, 87–101 (2007).
Salicioni, A. M. et al. Testis-specific serine kinase protein family in male fertility and as targets for non-hormonal male contraception. Biol. Reprod. 103, 264–274 (2020).
Shang, P. et al. Functional transformation of the chromatoid body in mouse spermatids requires testis-specific serine/threonine kinases. J Cell Sci. 123, 331–339 (2010).
Nayyab, S. et al. TSSK3, a novel target for male contraception, is required for spermiogenesis. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 88, 718–730 (2021).
Nozawa, K. et al. Testis-specific serine kinase 3 is required for sperm morphogenesis and male fertility. Andrology, https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.13314 (2022).
Spiridonov, N. A. et al. Identification and characterization of SSTK, a serine/threonine protein kinase essential for male fertility. Mol Cell Biol. 25, 4250–4261 (2005).
Wang, X. L. et al. Tssk4 is essential for maintaining the structural integrity of sperm flagellum. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 21, 136–145 (2015).
Bucko-Justyna, M., Lipinski, L., Burgering, B. M. & Trzeciak, L. Characterization of testis-specific serine-threonine kinase 3 and its activation by phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-1-dependent signalling. Febs J. 272, 6310–6323 (2005).
Xu, B. et al. TSKS concentrates in spermatid centrioles during flagellogenesis. Dev. Biol. 319, 201–210 (2008).
Wang, X. et al. Testis-specific serine/threonine protein kinase 4 (Tssk4) phosphorylates Odf2 at Ser-76. Sci. Rep. 6, 22861 (2016).
Fabian, L. & Brill, J. A. Drosophila spermiogenesis: Big things come from little packages. Spermatogenesis 2, 197–212 (2012).
Doyen, C. M. et al. A Testis-Specific Chaperone and the Chromatin Remodeler ISWI Mediate Repackaging of the Paternal Genome. Cell Rep. 13, 1310–1318 (2015).
Kimura, S. & Loppin, B. The Drosophila chromosomal protein Mst77F is processed to generate an essential component of mature sperm chromatin. Open Biol. 6, 160207 (2016). ARTN 16020710.1098/rsob.160207.
Kanippayoor, R. L., Alpern, J. H. & Moehring, A. J. Protamines and spermatogenesis in Drosophila and Homo sapiens: A comparative analysis. Spermatogenesis 3, e24376 (2013).
Sonoshita, M. et al. A whole-animal platform to advance a clinical kinase inhibitor into new disease space. Nat. Chem. Biol. 14, 291 (2018).
Sopko, R. et al. Combining Genetic Perturbations and Proteomics to Examine Kinase-Phosphatase Networks in Drosophila Embryos. Dev. Cell 31, 114–127 (2014).
Katzenberger, R. J., Rach, E. A., Anderson, A. K., Ohler, U. & Wassarman, D. A. The Drosophila translational control element (TCE) is required for high-level transcription of many genes that are specifically expressed in testes. PloS ONE 7, e45009 (2012).
Brown, J. B. et al. Diversity and dynamics of the Drosophila transcriptome. Nature 512, 393 (2014).
Casas-Vila, N. et al. The developmental proteome of Drosophila melanogaster. Genome Res. 27, 1273–1285 (2017).
Li, Y. H. et al. Expression and localization of five members of the testis-specific serine kinase (Tssk) family in mouse and human sperm and testis. Mol. Hum. Reprod. 17, 42–56 (2011).
Varadi, M. et al. AlphaFold Protein Structure Database: massively expanding the structural coverage of protein-sequence space with high-accuracy models. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D439–D444 (2022).
Martinez-Campos, M., Basto, R., Baker, J., Kernan, M. & Raff, J. W. The Drosophila pericentrin-like protein is essential for cilia/flagella function, but appears to be dispensable for mitosis. J. Cell Biol. 165, 673–683 (2004).
Wen, K. et al. Critical roles of long noncoding RNAs in Drosophila spermatogenesis. Genome Res. 26, 1233–1244 (2016).
Rosenbaum, J. L. & Witman, G. B. Intraflagellar transport. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3, 813–825 (2002).
Steinhauer, J. Separating from the pack: Molecular mechanisms of Drosophila spermatid individualization. Spermatogenesis 5, e1041345 (2015).
Bao, J. & Bedford, M. T. Epigenetic regulation of the histone-to-protamine transition during spermiogenesis. Reproduction 151, R55–R70 (2016).
Fabrizio, J. J., Hime, G., Lemmon, S. K. & Bazinet, C. Genetic dissection of sperm individualization in Drosophila melanogaster. Development 125, 1833–1843 (1998).
Wei, Y. et al. Isolation and characterization of mouse testis specific serine/threonine kinase 5 possessing four alternatively spliced variants. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40, 749–756 (2007).
Wei, Y., Wang, X., Fu, G. & Yu, L. Testis specific serine/threonine kinase 4 (Tssk4) maintains its kinase activity by phosphorylating itself at Thr-197. Mol. Biol. Rep. 40, 439–447 (2013).
Rauniyar, N. & Yates, J. R. Isobaric Labeling-Based Relative Quantification in Shotgun Proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 13, 5293–5309 (2014).
Rathke, C. et al. Distinct functions of Mst77F and protamines in nuclear shaping and chromatin condensation during Drosophila spermiogenesis. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 89, 326–338 (2010).
Steinhauer, J. et al. Combover interacts with the axonemal component Rsp3 and is required for Drosophila sperm individualization. Development 146, https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.179275 (2019).
Pisano, C., Bonaccorsi, S. & Gatti, M. The Kl-3 Loop of the Y-Chromosome of Drosophila-Melanogaster Binds a Tektin-Like Protein. Genetics 133, 569–579 (1993).
Lindsley, D. L., Roote, J. & Kennison, J. A. Anent the genomics of spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS ONE 8, e55915 (2013).
Mermall, V. et al. Drosophila myosin V is required for larval development and spermatid individualization. Dev. Biol. 286, 238–255 (2005).
Rathke, C., Baarends, W. M., Awe, S. & Renkawitz-Pohl, R. Chromatin dynamics during spermiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1839, 155–168 (2014).
Jha, K. N., Tripurani, S. K. & Johnson, G. R. TSSK6 is required for gammaH2AX formation and the histone-to-protamine transition during spermiogenesis. J. Cell Sci. 130, 1835–1844 (2017).
Balhorn, R. A model for the structure of chromatin in mammalian sperm. J. Cell Biol. 93, 298–305 (1982).
Coelingh, J. P., Rozijn, T. H. & Monfoort, C. H. Isolation and partial characterization of a basic protein from bovine sperm heads. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 188, 353–356 (1969).
Ukogu, O. A. et al. Protamine loops DNA in multiple steps. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 6108–6119 (2020).
Ward, W. S. & Coffey, D. S. DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: comparison with somatic cell. s. Biol. Reprod. 44, 569–574 (1991).
Bauerly, E., Yi, K. & Gibson, M. C. Wampa is a dynein subunit required for axonemal assembly and male fertility in Drosophila. Dev. Biol. 463, 158–168 (2020).
Vogt, N., Koch, I., Schwarz, H., Schnorrer, F. & Nusslein-Volhard, C. The gamma TuRC components Grip75 and Grip128 have an essential microtubule-anchoring function in the Drosophila germline. Development 133, 3963–3972 (2006).
Vazquez, M., Cooper, M. T., Zurita, M. & Kennison, J. A. gammaTub23C interacts genetically with brahma chromatin-remodeling complexes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 180, 835–843 (2008).
Oliva, R. Protamines and male infertility. Hum. Reprod. Update 12, 417–435 (2006).
de Mateo, S., Ramos, L., de Boer, P., Meistrich, M. & Oliva, R. Protamine 2 precursors and processing. Protein Pept. Lett. 18, 778–785 (2011).
Mencarelli, C., Lupetti, P. & Dallai, R. New insights into the cell biology of insect axonemes. Int. Rev. Cel Mol. Bio. 268, 95–145 (2008).
Franz, A., Roque, H., Saurya, S., Dobbelaere, J. & Raff, J. W. CP110 exhibits novel regulatory activities during centriole assembly in Drosophila. J. Cell Biol. 203, 785–799 (2013).
Giansanti, M. G., Bucciarelli, E., Bonaccorsi, S. & Gatti, M. Drosophila SPD-2 is an essential centriole component required for PCM recruitment and astral-microtubule nucleation. Curr. Biol. 18, 303–309 (2008).
Carvalho, A. B., Lazzaro, B. P. & Clark, A. G. Y chromosomal fertility factors kl-2 and kl-3 of Drosophila melanogaster encode dynein heavy chain polypeptides. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 13239–13244 (2000).
Janke, C. et al. Tubulin polyglutamylase enzymes are members of the TTL domain protein family. Science 308, 1758–1762 (2005).
Xu, S., Hafer, N., Agunwamba, B. & Schedl, P. The CPEB protein Orb2 has multiple functions during spermatogenesis in Drosophila melanogaster. Plos Genet. 8, e1003079 (2012).
Maeda, I., Kohara, Y., Yamamoto, M. & Sugimoto, A. Large-scale analysis of gene function in Caenorhabditis elegans by high-throughput RNAi. Curr. Biol. 11, 171–176 (2001).
Kaplan, Y., Gibbs-Bar, L., Kalifa, Y., Feinstein-Rotkopf, Y. & Arama, E. Gradients of a ubiquitin E3 ligase inhibitor and a caspase inhibitor determine differentiation or death in spermatids. Dev. Cell 19, 160–173 (2010).
Lee, S., Zhou, L., Kim, J., Kalbfleisch, S. & Schock, F. Lasp anchors the Drosophila male stem cell niche and mediates spermatid individualization. Mech. Dev. 125, 768–776 (2008).
Pravder, H. D. et al. PFTAIRE Kinase L63 Interactor 1A (Pif1A Protein) Is Required for Actin Cone Movement during Spermatid Individualization in Drosophila melanogaster. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms23063011 (2022).
Yatsenko, A. N. et al. Non-invasive genetic diagnosis of male infertility using spermatozoal RNA: KLHL10 mutations in oligozoospermic patients impair homodimerization. Hum. Mol. Genet. 15, 3411–3419 (2006).
Wells, R. E. et al. Control of tissue morphology by Fasciclin III-mediated intercellular adhesion. Development 140, 3858–3868 (2013).
Su, D. et al. Mutation screening and association study of the TSSK4 Gene in Chinese infertile men with impaired spermatogenesis. J. Androl. 29, 374–378 (2008).
Su, D. et al. c.822+126T>G/C: a novel triallelic polymorphism of the TSSK6 gene associated with spermatogenic impairment in a Chinese population. Asian J. Androl. 12, 234–239 (2010).
Zhang, H. et al. Some single-nucleotide polymorphisms of the TSSK2 gene may be associated with human spermatogenesis impairment. J. Androl. 31, 388–392 (2010).
Grueneberg, D. A. et al. Kinase requirements in human cells: I. Comparing kinase requirements across various cell types. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16472–16477 (2008).
Baldwin, A. et al. Kinase requirements in human cells: II. Genetic interaction screens identify kinase requirements following HPV16 E7 expression in cancer cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 16478–16483 (2008).
Turner, N. C. et al. A synthetic lethal siRNA screen identifying genes mediating sensitivity to a PARP inhibitor. Embo J. 27, 1368–1377 (2008).
Li, B. et al. Landscape of tumor-infiltrating T cell repertoire of human cancers. Nat. Genet. 48, 725–732 (2016).
Yu, Z. et al. Highly efficient genome modifications mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 in Drosophila. Genetics 195, 289–291 (2013).
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G. & Gibson, T. J. Clustal-W - Improving the Sensitivity of Progressive Multiple Sequence Alignment through Sequence Weighting, Position-Specific Gap Penalties and Weight Matrix Choice. Nucleic Acids Res. 22, 4673–4680 (1994).
Altschul, S. F. et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402 (1997).
Hall, B. G. Building Phylogenetic Trees from Molecular Data with MEGA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 1229–1235 (2013).
Schindelin, J. et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9, 676–682 (2012).
Raudvere, U. et al. g:Profiler: a web server for functional enrichment analysis and conversions of gene lists (2019 update. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W191–W198 (2019).
Schwartz, D. & Gygi, S. P. An iterative statistical approach to the identification of protein phosphorylation motifs from large-scale data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 23, 1391–1398 (2005).
Szklarczyk, D. et al. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids. Res. 47, D607–D613 (2019).
Bastian, M., Heymann, S. & Jacomy, M. Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. Proc. Int. AAAI Conf. Web Soc. Media 3, 361–362 (2009).
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Chao-Po Lin, Dr. Jilong Liu and Dr. Gaofeng Fan for helpful discussions. This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32070846 and 91740107 to G.G.), National Postdoctoral Fellowship (2019M661652 to X.Z.), and Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (19JC1413600 to G.G.). We thank the Molecular Imaging Core Facility (MICF) and Molecular and Cell Biology Core Facility (MCBCF) at the School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, for providing technical support. Additionally, we also thank the staff members of the Mass Spectrometry team of ShanghaiTech University for technical support with the LC-MS/MS experiment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.G. designed the whole project. Z.X., P.J., and W.M. generated the mutants and transgenic flies. P.J. and S.A. performed the fertility testing and testicular imaging. Z.X., P.J., S.W., and Z.J. collected testes for phosphoproteomic analysis. Z.X., P.J., and Z.J performed biochemical experiments. W.X. and Z.X performed bioinformatics analysis. G.G., Z.X., P.J., and W.M. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and declared that there was no competing interests.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Marcus Smolka and Pablo Visconti for their contribution to the peer review of this work. A peer review file is available.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Source data
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X., Peng, J., Wu, M. et al. Broad phosphorylation mediated by testis-specific serine/threonine kinases contributes to spermiogenesis and male fertility. Nat Commun 14, 2629 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38357-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38357-0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.