Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13962-0, published online 21 January 2020.

In the original version of the manuscript, the image shown in Figure 4g, bottom row (Aβ1–42 + rAggregatin), under “6h” was incorrect. This image incorrectly showed the same sample as shown in the original Figure 4g, top row (Aβ1–42), under “0.5h”.

The correct version of figure 4g is as follows:

which replaces the previous incorrect version: