Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Hepatic veno-occlusive disease following sirolimus-based immune suppression

Abstract

Sirolimus-based graft vs. host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis is associated with higher incidence of veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (VOD/SOS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). However, whether the clinical manifestations and prognosis of VOD/SOS differs when diagnosed in the setting of sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis is not well studied. To address this question, we examined presenting features and treatment outcome of VOD/SOS cases identified in a large retrospective cohort of consecutive HCT procedures (n = 818 total, sirolimus (SIR)/tacrolimus (TAC) n = 308, and methotrexate (MTX) or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/TAC n = 510). In multivariate analysis, sirolimus-based GVHD prophylaxis (p = 0.006, HR 3.33, 1.94–5.7) increased risk for VOD/SOS. A total of 58 patients were clinically diagnosed with VOD/SOS (SIR/TAC 38/308, 12.3%, vs. MTX or MMF/TAC 20/510, 3.9%). VOD/SOS diagnosed following SIR/TAC prophylaxis demonstrated later time of onset (median 39 vs. 26 days; p = 0.005), less severe hyperbilirubinemia (Bili > 2, 65% vs. 90% p = 0.04), lesser degree of weight gain (weight gain > 5%, 52% vs 80%, p = 0.04), and more frequent complete resolution of hepatic injury (79% vs. 55%, p = 0.05). Presenting features and natural history of VOD/SOS in the context of SIR/TAC GVHD prophylaxis differ and thus warrant particular clinical attention to later hepatic injury in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cutler C, Logan B, Nakamura R, Johnston L, Choi S, Porter D, et al. Tacrolimus/sirolimus vs tacrolimus/methotrexate as GVHD prophylaxis after matched, related donor allogeneic HCT. Blood. 2014;124:1372–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kiel PJ, Vargo CA, Patel GP, Rosenbeck LL, Srivastava S. Possible correlation of sirolimus plasma concentration with sinusoidal obstructive syndrome of the liver in patients undergoing myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Pharmacotherapy. 2012;32:441–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cutler C, Stevenson K, Kim HT, Richardson P, Ho VT, Linden E, et al. Sirolimus is associated with veno-occlusive disease of the liver after myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2008;112:4425–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fukuda D, Sata M, Tanaka K, Nagai R. Potent inhibitory effect of sirolimus on circulating vascular progenitor cells. Circulation. 2005;111:926–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Humar R, Kiefer FN, Berns H, Resink TJ, Battegay EJ. Hypoxia enhances vascular cell proliferation and angiogenesis in vitro via rapamycin (mTOR)-dependent signaling. FASEB J. 2002;16:771–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marks AR. Rapamycin: signaling in vascular smooth muscle. Transplant Proc. 2003;35:231S–3S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Carmona A, Díaz-Ricart M, Palomo M, Molina P, Pino M, Rovira M, et al. Distinct deleterious effects of cyclosporine and tacrolimus and combined tacrolimus-sirolimus on endothelial cells: protective effect of defibrotide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013;19:1439–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Khimani F, Kim J, Chen L, Dean E, Rizk V, Betts B, et al. Predictors of overall survival among patients treated with sirolimus/tacrolimus vs methotrexate/tacrolimus for GvHD prevention. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2017;52:1003–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Myers KC, Dandoy C, El-Bietar J, Davies SM, Jodele S. Veno-occlusive disease of the liver in the absence of elevation in bilirubin in pediatric patients after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015;21:379–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Corbacioglu S, Cesaro S, Faraci M, Valteau-Couanet D, Gruhn B, Rovelli A, et al. Defibrotide for prophylaxis of hepatic veno-occlusive disease in paediatric haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation: an open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1301–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Pai RK, van Besien K, Hart J, Artz AS, O’Donnell PH. Clinicopathologic features of late-onset veno-occlusive disease/sinusoidal obstruction syndrome after high dose intravenous busulfan and hematopoietic cell transplant. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53:1552–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shah MS, Jeevangi NKS, Joshi A, Khattry N. Late-onset hepatic veno-occlusive disease post autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation successfully treated with oral defibrotide. J Cancer Res Ther. 2009;5:312–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Toh HC, McAfee SL, Sackstein R, Cox BF, Colby C, Spitzer TR. Late onset veno-occlusive disease following high-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1999;24:891–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Carreras E, Rosiñol L, Terol MJ, Alegre A, de Arriba F, García-Laraña J, et al. Veno-occlusive disease of the liver after high-dose cytoreductive therapy with busulfan and melphalan for autologous blood stem cell transplantation in multiple myeloma patients. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007;13:1448–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Platzbecker U, von Bonin M, Goekkurt E, Radke J, Binder M, Kiani A, et al. Graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with everolimus and tacrolimus is associated with a high incidence of sinusoidal obstruction syndrome and microangiopathy: results of the EVTAC trial. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2009;15:101–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rezvani AR, McCune JS, Storer BE, Batchelder A, Kida A, Deeg HJ, et al. Cyclophosphamide followed by intravenous targeted busulfan for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation: pharmacokinetics and clinical outcomes. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant . 2013;19:1033–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. DeLeve LD, Wang X. Role of oxidative stress and glutathione in busulfan toxicity in cultured murine hepatocytes. Pharmacology. 2000;60:143–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. DeLeve LD. Chapter 8 - Liver Sinusoidal Endothelial Cells and Liver Injury. Drug-Induced Liver Disease. Third edn. Boston: Academic Press; 2013. pp. 135–46.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Reuben A. Chapter 31 - Hepatotoxicity of Immunosuppressive Drugs. In: Kaplowitz N, DeLeve LD, (eds). Drug-Induced Liver Disease. Third edn. Boston: Academic Press; 2013. pp. 569–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Mohty M, Malard F, Abecassis M, Aerts E, Alaskar AS, Aljurf M, et al. Revised diagnosis and severity criteria for sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease in adult patients: a new classification from the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51:906–12.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author contributions

FK, GBMcD and JP contributed in designing the research, data collection, analyzing the data, and writing the manuscript. HS, BB, FL, and HF contributed in research design, critical review, and manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farhad Khimani.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khimani, F., McDonald, G.B., Shulman, H.M. et al. Hepatic veno-occlusive disease following sirolimus-based immune suppression. Bone Marrow Transplant 54, 85–89 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0233-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0233-2

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links