Dear Editor,
The emergence of Omicron subvariants has required additional boosters to induce a highly neutralizing antibody response.1 However, the new Omicron subvariants BQ.1 and XBB, evade the humoral response induced by multiple mRNA vaccinations and infections.2,3 CansinoBio (Ad5-nCoV) is a single-dose adenovirus vector-based vaccine with high protection against severe disease4 but lower efficacy and antibody response than mRNA vaccines. Fortunately, hybrid immunity induced by infection plus vaccine or heterologous vaccines has produced a robust neutralizing antibody response.5
In this work, we evaluated neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain (B.1.189) and Omicron BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 subvariants in serum samples from nonhospitalized adult participants immunized with a single dose of Ad5-nCoV and a booster eight months later with the mRNA-1273 vaccine. Priming with Ad5-nCoV was administered by May 2021 as part of Mexico’s National COVID-19 vaccine program. In January 2022, the subjects received the booster dose. Blood samples were collected at baseline (before the booster, n = 314) and three weeks after the mRNA-1273 booster (n = 188). The Ethics Committee of CIAD evaluated and approved this study (CEI/005-2/2020), and all patients signed informed consent forms. We used ELISA to analyze the anti-N and anti-RBD antibodies and a microneutralization assay with live virus to evaluate neutralizing antibodies against the ancestral strain and the Omicron BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 subvariants. All the samples were collected in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico. Demographic data are summarized in supplementary Table 1.
First, we evaluated antibody persistence in individuals after eight months of one dose of the Ad5-nCoV vaccine. Approximately 70.38% (221/314) of the samples showed detectable neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) (titer > 1:10) against the ancestral strain, 61.10% (195/314) against BA.1, 58.91% (185/314) against BA.5.1.6, 4.45% (14/314) against BQ.1.3, and 4.77% (15/314) against XBB.1. The geometric mean neutralizing titers (GMTs) were 27.70, 14.20, 12.28, 3.25, and 3.17 for the ancestral strain, BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3 and XBB.1 subvariants, respectively. These values represent 1.95-, 2.25-, 8.52-, and 8.73-fold reductions in BA1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively, compared with the ancestral strain (Fig. 1a). Next, we classified individuals by their SARS-CoV-2 infection status: previously infected, 58.82% (169/314) and uninfected, 46.17% (145/314) (supplementary Fig 1). The GMTs in the previously infected group were 60.18, 26.76, 22.16, 3.75, and 3.69 against the ancestral strain, BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively, with reduction folds of 2.24, 2.71, 16.04, and 16.30 for BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively, compared with the ancestral strain. In the nonpreviously infected group, the GMTs were 11.11, 6.72, 6.17, 2.68, and 2.66 against the ancestral strain, BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 subvariants, respectively, with fold reductions of 1.65, 1.80, 4.14, and 4.17 for BA.1 BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively, compared with the ancestral strain.
Then, we analyzed the booster effects of the mRNA-1273 vaccine in individuals primed with a single dose of the Ad5-nCoV vaccine. The IgG reactivity against the RBD was 85.10% (160/188) at baseline and 100% (188/188) after the booster (supplementary Fig. 2). The GMTs of nAbs at baseline were 25.23, 13.04, 11.21, 3.20, and 3.16 against the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3 and XBB.1, respectively, with fold reductions of 1.93, 2.25, 7.88 and 7.98 for BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3 and XBB.1 when compared with the ancestral strain (Fig. 1c). The GMTs after the booster were 221.30, 90.68, 71.36, 6.69, and 6.49 against the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, with reduction folds of 2.44, 3.10, 33.18, and 34.09 for BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 when compared with the ancestral strain. The GMTs fold reduction for BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 in the group before the booster versus the ancestral strain of the group after the booster was 16.98, 19.74, 69.15, and 70.03, respectively (Fig. 1c). These results showed that BQ.1.3 and XBB.1 have a significant capacity to evade the nAbs induced by the combination of Ad5-nCoV and the mRNA-1273 vaccine.
Then, the individuals were grouped according to their COVID-19 status, previously infected and nonpreviously infected. In each group, we compared the GMTs before and after the booster. In the previously infected group (Fig. 1d), 85.14% (86/101), 80.19% (81/101), 75.24% (76/101), 17.82% (18/101), and 15.84% (16/101) showed nAbs against the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively, before the booster. The GMTs against the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 subvariants were 55.99, 25.08, 20.00, 3.80, and 3.72 with reduction folds of 2.32, 2.79, 14.73, and 15.05 for BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 subvariants when compared with the ancestral strain. After the booster, 99.00% (100/101), 97.02% (98/101), 93.06% (94/101), 54.45% (55/101), and 52.47% (53/101) showed nAbs against the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 subvariants, respectively. The GMTs against the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 subvariants were 282.80, 129.00, 106.00, 9.33, and 8.83 with reduction folds of 2.18, 2.66, 30.31, and 32.02 for BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1 subvariants, respectively, when compared with the ancestral strain. When compared to the GMTs before and after the booster, in the group of individuals previously infected, the fold changes were 5.05, 11.27, 14.11, 74.42, and 76.02 for the ancestral strain, BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively. In the nonpreviously infected group before the booster (Fig. 1e), 48.27% (42/87), 36.78% (32/87), 35.63% (31/87), 2.29% (2/87), and 2.29% (2/87) showed nAbs against the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively. After the booster, 98.85% (86/87), 89.65% (78/87), 81.60% (71/87), 33.33% (29/87), and 33.33% (29/87) showed nAbs against the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively. The GMTs in the nonpreviously infected group before the booster were 10.10, 6.10, 5.72, 2.62, and 2.62 for the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively, and 1.63-, 1.74-, 3.81-, and 3.1-fold reduction compared with BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively. In contrast, the GMTs after the booster were 166.50, 60.05, 45.08, 5.00, and 4.92 for the ancestral strain and BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively, and 2.77-, 3.68-, 33.30- and 33.84-fold reductions compared with BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively. When comparing the GMTs before and after the booster, in the group of individuals nonpreviously infected, the fold changes were 16.65, 27.29, 29.10, 63.54, and 63.54 for the ancestral strain, BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3, and XBB.1, respectively.
Limitations of our study. First, we did not know the exact time of infection since the participants only reported a COVID-19 infection before or after the Ad5-nCoV vaccine. Second, we could not obtain the same number of samples at baseline and after the booster; hence, the analysis after the booster was performed with a lower number of samples.
In conclusion, these results demonstrate that nAbs induced by the Ad5-nCoV vaccine can persist after eight months, similar to other COVID-19 vaccines.6 However, the nAbs against Omicron BA.1 and BA.5.1.6 were lower and negative against BQ.1.3 and XBB.1. A heterologous booster with the mRNA-1273 vaccine increases nAbs, especially in previously infected individuals. However, the nAbs against BQ.1.3 and XBB.1 were still low, showing that vaccines, boosters, and infection are insufficient to neutralize these subvariants robustly. Assuming that a low neutralization response against the BQ.1 and XBB subvariants was observed even with four doses of mRNA vaccine2 or BA.5 bivalent booster,7 the combination of Ad5-nCoV vaccine with mRNA vaccines can be recommended as an immunization protocol against COVID-19.
Data availability
The lead contact will share data reported in this paper upon reasonable request.
References
Planas, D. et al. Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization. Nature 602, 671–675 (2022).
Uraki, R. et al. Humoral immune evasion of the omicron subvariants BQ.1.1 and XBB. Lancet Infect. Dis. 23, 30–32 (2023).
Wang, Q. et al. Alarming antibody evasion properties of rising SARS-CoV-2 BQ and XBB subvariants. Cell 186, 279–286.e278 (2023).
Zhu, F. C. et al. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vectored COVID-19 vaccine: a dose-escalation, open-label, non-randomised, first-in-human trial. Lancet 395, 1845–1854 (2020).
Pilz, S., Theiler-Schwetz, V., Trummer, C., Krause, R. & Ioannidis, J. P. A. SARS-CoV-2 reinfections: overview of efficacy and duration of natural and hybrid immunity. Environ. Res. 209, 112911 (2022).
Pegu, A. et al. Durability of mRNA-1273 vaccine-induced antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants. Science 373, 1372–1377 (2021).
Kurhade, C. et al. Low neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron BA.2.75.2, BQ.1.1 and XBB.1 by parental mRNA vaccine or a BA.5 bivalent booster. Nat. Med. 29, 344–347 (2023).
Acknowledgements
This research was partially funded by Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT), grant number 312677. The authors thank all the Laboratory of Immunology members and Julia Real for their valuable technical assistance. We also thank the Secretaria de Educación y Cultura of Sonora for support during sample collection, especially Ing. Francisco Javier Ruiz Valenzuela.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, J.H.; methodology, F.D.C., A.B.V.L., M.R.S., B.G.G.; formal analysis, F.D.C., M.G.V., M.S.H., O.V., G.C.J.; investigation, F.D.C., M.R.S.; resources, V.M.H., B.G.G., M.S.H.; writing—original draft preparation, J.H.; writing—review and editing, G.C.J., O.V., V.M.H., J.H.; funding acquisition, J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics declarations
The Ethics Committee of Centro de Investigación en Alimentación y Desarrollo, A.C. evaluated and approved this study with the approbation number: CEI/005-2/2020. All subjects participating in this study signed informed consent forms.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Hernández, J., Dehesa-Canseco, F., Vázquez-López, A.B. et al. Neutralization of Omicron BA.1, BA.5.1.6, BQ.1.3 and XBB1.1 induced by heterologous vaccination Ad5-nCoV and mRNA-1273. Sig Transduct Target Ther 8, 174 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01447-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41392-023-01447-y