Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Environmental causes of birth defects: challenges and opportunities

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Nakamura, Y. et al. Prenatal metal concentrations and physical abnormalities in the Japan Environment and Children’s Study. Pediatr. Res. in press (2024).

  2. Holmes, L. B. et al. Predictive value of minor anomalies: II. Use in cohort studies to identify teratogens. Teratology 36, 291–297 (1987).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Weinhold, B. Environmental factors in birth defects: what we need to know. Environ. Health Perspect. 117, A440–A447 (2009).

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Feldkamp, M. L., Carey, J. C., Byrne, J. L. B., Krikov, S. & Botto, L. D. Etiology and clinical presentation of birth defects: population based study. BMJ 357, j2249 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Landrigan, P. et al. Reducing disease and death from Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining (ASM) - the urgent need for responsible mining in the context of growing global demand for minerals and metals for climate change mitigation. Environ. Health 21, 78 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. World Health Organization (WHO). Congenital disorders. https://www.who.int/health-topics/congenital-anomalies#tab=tab_2 (2023).

  7. Sanders, A. P. et al. Association between arsenic, cadmium, manganese, and lead levels in private wells and birth defects prevalence in North Carolina: a semi-ecologic study. BMC Public Health 14, 955 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, C. et al. Maternal exposure to heavy metals and risk for severe congenital heart defects in offspring. Environ. Res. 212, 113432 (2022).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wild, C. P. The exposome: from concept to utility. Int. J. Epidemiol. 41, 24–32 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Claus Henn, B. Invited perspective: metals, micronutrients, and mixtures-future directions. Environ. Health Perspect. 131, 81305 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martinez-Morata, I. et al. A state-of-the-science review on metal biomarkers. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 10, 215–249 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Arora, M. & Austin, C. Teeth as a biomarker of past chemical exposure. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 25, 261–267 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Birgit Claus Henn.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Claus Henn, B., Werler, M.M. Environmental causes of birth defects: challenges and opportunities. Pediatr Res (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03051-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03051-4

Search

Quick links