FOXM1 regulates glycolysis and energy production in multiple myeloma

Cheng, Yan; Sun, Fumou; Thornton, Krista; Jing, Xuefang; Dong, Jing; Yun, Grant; Pisano, Michael; Zhan, Fenghuang; Kim, Sung Hoon; Katzenellenbogen, John A.; Katzenellenbogen, Benita S.; Hari, Parameswaran; Janz, Siegfried

doi:10.1038/s41388-022-02398-4

Download PDF

Article
Open access
Published: 06 July 2022

FOXM1 regulates glycolysis and energy production in multiple myeloma

Oncogene volume 41, pages 3899–3911 (2022)Cite this article

3602 Accesses
16 Citations
3 Altmetric
Metrics details

Subjects

Abstract

The transcription factor, forkhead box M1 (FOXM1), has been implicated in the natural history and outcome of newly diagnosed high-risk myeloma (HRMM) and relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM), but the mechanism with which FOXM1 promotes the growth of neoplastic plasma cells is poorly understood. Here we show that FOXM1 is a positive regulator of myeloma metabolism that greatly impacts the bioenergetic pathways of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos). Using FOXM1-deficient myeloma cells as principal experimental model system, we find that FOXM1 increases glucose uptake, lactate output, and oxygen consumption in myeloma. We demonstrate that the novel 1,1-diarylethylene small-compound FOXM1 inhibitor, NB73, suppresses myeloma in cell culture and human-in-mouse xenografts using a mechanism that includes enhanced proteasomal FOXM1 degradation. Consistent with the FOXM1-stabilizing chaperone function of heat shock protein 90 (HSP90), the HSP90 inhibitor, geldanamycin, collaborates with NB73 in slowing down myeloma. These findings define FOXM1 as a key driver of myeloma metabolism and underscore the feasibility of targeting FOXM1 for new approaches to myeloma therapy and prevention.

Cyclin D1 targets hexokinase 2 to control aerobic glycolysis in myeloma cells

Article Open access 24 July 2020

A distinct metabolic response characterizes sensitivity to EZH2 inhibition in multiple myeloma

Article Open access 12 February 2021

An mTORC1 to HRI signaling axis promotes cytotoxicity of proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma

Article Open access 18 November 2022

Introduction

FOXM1 is a promising molecular target in newly diagnosed high-risk myeloma (HRMM) [1] and relapsed/refractory myeloma (RRMM) [2, 3], but the mechanism with which FOXM1 promotes plasma cell neoplasia is poorly understood. FOXM1 is a transcription factor from the forkhead box family of proteins (n ≅ 50) characterized by a conserved winged helix DNA binding domain. FOXM1 is a validated oncoprotein in solid and liquid cancers [4] and governs, in part, the maintenance of cancer stem cell-like cells in breast cancer [5]. Whether FOXM1 is similarly important for the putative myeloma stem cell is not known as the elusiveness of this cell stands in the way of resolving the issue [6]. Recent large-scale pan-cancer analyses have shown that overexpression of FOXM1 is common in cancer and tightly associated with dismal outcome [7]. Although this has augmented efforts to target FOXM1 therapeutically [8], FOXM1 inhibitors are not yet available in the clinic. Here, we demonstrate that the novel small-compound FOXM1 inhibitor NB73 [9, 10] binds and destabilizes FOXM1 in myeloma cells and suppresses myeloma in cell culture and human-in-mouse xenografts. We show that FOXM1 is a positive regulator of myeloma metabolism with major impact on the bioenergetic pathways of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos). Relying on CRISPR/Cas9 editing as research tool, we provide definitive genetic evidence that, even though FOXM1 is not essential for growth and survival of neoplastic plasma cells, it upregulates glycolytic ATP production and promotes aerobic glycolysis (Warburg effect). Inspired by findings that heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) physically interacts with and stabilizes FOXM1 in myeloma cells, we show that HSP90 inhibitor, geldanamycin (GDA), collaborates with NB73 in slowing down myeloma. These findings further our understanding of the mechanism with which FOXM1 drives myeloma and support the feasibility of targeting FOXM1 pharmacologically for cancer therapy and prevention.

Results

Elevated FOXM1 expression predicts poor survival in MMRF CoMMpass study

We sought to determine whether upregulation of FOXM1 may be a prognosticator of dismal survival in the Multiple Myeloma Research Foundation (MMRF) CoMMpass study (NCT01454297). We chose this study because it evaluates myeloma progression in over one thousand patients in a comprehensive, publicly accessible, longitudinal, and prospective fashion [11, 12], and thereby provides an unequaled platform for clinical and outcome studies (for a recent update, see Skerget et al. at The Preprint Server for Health Sciences, medRxiv: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.02.21261211). Kaplan–Meier analysis of CoMMpass patients for which FOXM1 expression data were available (n = 773) demonstrated a significant reduction in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in the top quartile (Q1) exhibiting peak levels of FOXM1 mRNA in neoplastic plasma cells (Fig. 1a). Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that FOXM1 expression is an independent survival factor in this dataset (Table S1). Moreover, elevation of FOXM1 message was associated with elevated expression of MYC (Fig. S1) and statistical comparison of paired baseline and progression samples from 65 patients revealed that FOXM1 underwent, on average, a ~2-fold upregulation during tumor progression (Fig. S2). These results validated previous findings on heightened expression of FOXM1 in subsets of HRMM [1] and drug resistant RRMM [2, 3]. Elevated FOXM1 expression was strongly associated with increased severity of clinical parameters, such as increased abundance of plasma cells in bone marrow and peripheral blood, heightened tumor cell aneuploidy, increased serum levels of β2-microglobulin, lactate dehydrogenase and calcium and, last but not least, decreased amounts of hemoglobin, the hallmark of anemia (Fig. 1b, Fig. S3). Next, we employed global RNA-seq expression profiles from the CoMMpass dataset to determine differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in tumors with high (Q1-2) and low (Q3-4) FOXM1 message levels. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of DEGs not only demonstrated activation of cell cycle progression pathways such as S phase and Cell cycle checkpoints in FOXM1 high (FOXM1^High) myeloma (Fig. 1c, top) but also pointed to broad upregulation of metabolic pathways including Metabolism, Carbohydrate, Amino acids and derivatives and Fatty acids, Triacylglycerol and Ketone bodies (Fig. 1c, center and bottom). These findings were consistent with the well-established role of FOXM1 as an oncogene that drives cancer by promoting cell proliferation [13] and further suggested that FOXM1 is an important regulator of myeloma metabolism.

**Fig. 1: While elevated *FOXM1* message predicts poor survival of patients with myeloma, loss of FOXM1 inhibits myeloma in vitro.**

FOXM1 is not essential in myeloma but promotes its growth and survival

The myeloma-promoting role of FOXM1 has been documented [1, 2], but whether FOXM1 is essential in myeloma has not yet been established. To address this knowledge gap, we used Western blotting to measure FOXM1 protein levels in 11 human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) (Fig. 1d). We chose the two lines that expressed the largest amount of the transcription factor, OPM2 and Delta47, for gene editing effected by CRISPR-Cas9. In both cases, two independent FOXM1-deficient daughter lines, designated KO-1 and KO-2, were generated (Fig. 1e). They contained 2 different 10-bp deletions at the target site of their respective guide RNA in case of OPM2 and a 10-bp deletion and 1-bp insertion in case of Delta47 (Fig. S4). Western analysis confirmed the lack of FOXM1 in all “knockout” clones, referred to hereafter as FOXM1^KO. FOXM1-deficient myeloma cells proliferated more slowly than their parental counterparts that contained normal levels of FOXM1, henceforth called FOXM1^N and used as control (Fig. 1f). Flow cytometric measurements of programmed cell death after staining with 7-aminoactinomycin D (AAD) and antibody to annexin A5 (AV), showed increased rates of early apoptosis (AV⁺AAD^-) and late apoptosis (AV⁺AAD⁺) in FOXM1^KO cells compared to FOXM1^N cells (Fig. 1g). FOXM1-dependent loss of survival was somewhat higher in OPM2 than Delta47 cells (Fig. 1h). Flow cytometric analysis of cell cycle progression using propidium iodide (Fig. 1i) demonstrated a higher fraction of FOXM1^KO cells in G2-M relative to FOXM1^N cells (Fig. 1j). The proliferation and survival enhancing effect of FOXM1 was also evident in assessments of clonogenic myeloma growth in soft agar and progression of intravenous myeloma cell xenografts in NSG mice. Thus, FOXM1^KO OPM2 (top) and Delta47 (bottom) produced fewer colonies than their FOXM1^N counterparts in colony formation assays (Fig. 2a). In agreement with that, clonogenicity increased upon forced expression of FOXM1 in MM1.S myeloma cells (Fig. S5) that contain low amounts of the transcription factor (Fig. 1d, lane 6). OPM2 FOXM1^KO lagged behind FOXM1^N in human-in-mouse xenografts, using serial whole-body bioluminescence imaging (BLI, Fig. 2b) as unbiased measurement tool (Fig. 2c). Integrated BLI and computed tomography (CT) scans of xenografted NSG mice demonstrated reduced bone marrow involvement of FOXM1^KO OPM2 cells (Fig. 2d, right) compared to FOXM1^N cells. The latter exhibited marked proclivity to home to the central skeleton (Fig. 2d, left), a distinct advantage of this cell line compared to other HMCLs. Diminished growth of OPM2 FOXM1^KO cells relative to FOXM1^N cells was also seen upon subcutaneous tumor propagation (Fig. 2e), with growth rate measurements based on tumor volume (Fig. 2f) and tumor weight (Fig. 2g) as outcome metrics. These results showed that – even though FOXM1 plays an important role in growth and survival of myeloma—it is not essential. This is consistent with published work that genetic deletion of FOXM1 in hematopoietic stem cells [14] and early B-cell progenitors [15] is compatible with B cell and plasma cell development.

**Fig. 2: Loss of FOXM1 inhibits clonogenic myeloma growth in soft agar and slows down human-in-mouse xenografts.**

FOXM1-dependent gene expression changes in myeloma

Following up on the results in Fig. 1c, we wondered whether FOXM1-dependent gene expression changes in OPM2 and Delta47 would also point to metabolism as a central aspect of myeloma biology regulated by FOXM1. With that goal in mind, we employed genome-wide RNA sequencing to compare the transcriptional output of FOXM1^N and FOXM1^KO OPM2 and Delta47 cells. The results are summarized in volcano plots (Fig. 3a) using fold changes in gene expression of more than 1.5 log 2 (x axis) and statistical Q values of less than 0.05 (y axis) as cutoffs (dotted vertical lines) for differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Based on these parameters, OPM2 and Delta47 exhibited 393 DEGs (273 up and 122 down) and 413 DEGs (160 up and 252 down), respectively. GSEA revealed Hypoxia (Table S2) as a significantly enriched pathway in Delta47 (Fig. 3b, top). This pathway peaked our interest because it included HK2 and SLC2A1 among the top-20 differentially expressed pathway genes, not only in Delta47 (Fig. 3c, top) but also in OPM2 (Fig. 3c, bottom) even though the pathway as such was not significantly enriched in these cells (Fig. 3b, bottom). HK2 encodes hexokinase 2, which catalyzes the first step of glycolysis – a key bioenergetic pathway in the cytoplasm that generates ATP by breaking down glucose into pyruvate. SLC2A1 encodes GLUT1, which transports glucose from the extracellular milieu to the cytoplasm. The heatmap for OPM2 additionally contains LDHA (encoding lactate dehydrogenase A), which promotes growth [16] and drug resistance [17] of myeloma by virtue of lactate production. Analysis of DEGs using the KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) and GO (Gene Ontology) online tools (Fig. 3d) revealed that the genetic pathways of Cellular response to oxidative stress (GO) and Cell cycle and Oxidative phosphorylation (KEGG) were significantly involved in both OPM2 and Delta47 cells (Tables S3 and S4). GSEA also suggested involvement of a cell cycle-related pathway, dubbed G2M checkpoint, in both cell lines, although the evidence was stronger for Delta47 (Fig. S6). Just like glycolysis, OxPhos is a central pathway of energy production, generating ATP in the electron transport chain during mitochondrial respiration. To better appreciate the biological implications of the genomic findings, we used a Seahorse instrument to assess the role of FOXM1 in glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration. The results, which firmly implicated FOXM1 in the regulation of energy production in myeloma, will be described below.

**Fig. 3: FOXM1-dependent gene expression, glycolysis and energy production.**

FOXM1 governs glycolysis and energy production in myeloma

Measurements of cellular respiration under steady-state conditions showed that the oxygen consumption rate (OCR) in OPM2 and Delta47 was reduced by ~50% in FOXM1^KO cells relative to FOXM1^N cells (Fig. 3e). Likewise, the spare reserve capacity in mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes was cut in half in FOXM1^KO cells compared to FOXM1^N cells (Fig. 3e). This capacity is the difference between basal and maximal respiratory rate and can be determined by sequential addition of oligomycin (inhibitor of complex V) and FCCP (proton-leaking uncoupling agent that disrupts ATP synthesis). Non-mitochondrial oxygen consumption, revealed by addition of rotenone (complex I inhibitor), was negligible regardless of FOXM1 status (Fig. 3e). To complement these findings with a measure of glycolytic activity, we determined the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR). It was significantly lower in FOXM1^KO cells compared to FOXM1^N cells under basal conditions (Fig. 3f). Peak glycolytic activity, which can be estimated upon sequential addition of excess substrate (glucose), oligomycin and 2-deoxyglucose (2-DG, competitive inhibitor of glycolysis), was also significantly reduced in FOXM1^KO cells relative to FOXM1^N cells (Fig. 3f). These results were supported by measurements of glucose uptake and lactate production, showing that both were reduced by ~50% in FOXM1^KO relative to FOXM1^N myeloma cells (Fig. 3g).

To strengthen confidence in the above findings, we added back FOXM1 to the FOXM1^KO cells by transfecting them with a constitutively expressed FOXM1c cDNA gene. The reconstituted OPM2 and Delta47 cells, designated FOXM1^KO-R, contained high amounts of FOXM1 protein (Fig. 4a), exhibited involvement of Hypoxia by GSEA (Fig. 4b, c) and demonstrated gene expression changes similar to those seen in FOXM1^KO vs FOXM1^N cells (Fig. 3b, c and results not shown). GO and KEGG analyses implicated Cell cycle in OPM2 and Delta47 cells, and KEGG additionally involved Oxidative phosphorylation in both cell lines (Fig. 4d). By demonstrating that the reconstituted cells (KO-R) harbored biologically active FOXM1, the findings validated FOXM1^KO-R for functional follow-up studies. These revealed that basal and spare respiration capacity were markedly enhanced in FOXM1^KO-R cells compared to FOXM1^KO cells (Fig. 4e, f). ECAR (Fig. 4g, h), glucose uptake and lactate output (Fig. 4i, j) were also significantly higher in FOXM1^KO-R cells than in FOXM1^KO cells. In sum, these findings strongly indicated that FOXM1 promotes myeloma cell glycolysis and energy production.

**Fig. 4: Gene expression and glycolytic activity in FOXM1 “add back” myeloma cells, FOXM1^KO-R.**

FOXM1 inhibitor, NB73, phenocopies genetic loss of FOXM1 in myeloma

We evaluated NB73, a newly developed small-drug inhibitor of FOXM1 (Fig. 5a) [10], to facilitate the bench-to-bedside translation of FOXM1-targeted myeloma therapy. NB73 is a 1,1-diarylethylene compound [10] that binds FOXM1 [10] and kills breast cancer cells that contain high amounts of the transcription factor [9]. Treatment of FOXM1^N OPM2 and Delta47 cells using 2 μM NB73 abrogated FOXM1 by Western analysis (Fig. 5b). Consistent with that, treatment of these cells with ≤2 μM NB73 hampered cell proliferation (Fig. 5c), aggravated programmed cell death (Fig. 5d, e) and hindered cell cycle progression (Fig. 5f, g). The finding that the IC₅₀ of NB73 in myeloma cells that harbor low amounts of FOXM1 (MM1.S and XG-7) was approximately 2-fold higher than that in OPM2 and Delta47 cells (Fig. S7) supports the contention that the inhibitor exhibits specificity. The results described above mimicked the changes seen in FOXM1^KO cells left untreated (Fig. 2). In addition, they confirmed published findings on the impact of NB73 on triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) [9] indicating that NB73 is superior to previously developed FOXM1 inhibitors such as FDI-6 [18] and the peptide thiazole antibiotics, thiostrepton [19] and siomycin A [20]. FOXM1-inhibiting antibiotics of this sort demonstrate broad cancer-suppressing activity in the low micromolar concentration range in solid and liquid tumors [21] – including myeloma (Fig. S8) – yet are not suitable for use in humans due to severe toxicity issues. Next, we decided to evaluate whether NB73 may be able to down regulate bioenergetic pathways in myeloma cells. Because our previous work suggested that in order to be fully effective FOXM1 inhibition must be combined with inhibition of other players in the FOXM1 myeloma network [1, 3], we searched for lead compounds that may synergize with NB73 in myeloma. To that end, we took an advantage of the Connectivity Map (CMap) housed at the Broad Institute, Cambridge, MA [22, 23].

**Fig. 5: FOXM1 inhibitor, NB73, hampers myeloma growth and survival in vitro.**

CMap nominates GDA for combination treatments using NB73

CMap is a multifunctional online tool that enables users to compare gene expression signatures that arise from genetic perturbations in cancer cells (e.g., loss of FOXM1) to a large library of gene signatures that reflect the impact of small-drug inhibitors on cancer cells. We hypothesized that perturbational drug signatures in the CMap database that are statistically “connected” to (i.e., significantly correlated with) the unique gene signature of FOXM1 deficiency in myeloma may nominate drug candidates that mimic the genetic loss of FOXM1 in myeloma. Candidates of this sort would be expected to cooperate with NB73 in inhibiting myeloma. CMap analysis of DEGs in FOXM1^N vs FOXM1^KO cells (Fig. 4a) and FOXM1^KO vs FOXM1^KO-R cells (not shown) uncovered just one drug nominated in both datasets: geldanamycin (GDA, Fig. 6a and Tables S5 and S6). Figure 6b shows that a low dose of GDA (50 nM) was mildly inhibitory in myeloma in vitro. However, in combination with NB73 (0.5 μM), GDA was potent and enhanced NB73-dependent growth inhibition by approximately 50%. Co-treatment using NB73 and GDA was highly effective in triggering myeloma cell apoptosis (Fig. 6c, left) and blocking cell cycle progression (right). Similar results were observed in functional studies on cellular respiration and glycolysis, using the same amounts of drugs used in panels b and c. Thus, the combination of NB73 (0.5 μM) and GDA (50 nM) inhibited mitochondrial respiration in OPM2 (Fig. 6d) and Delta47 cells (Fig. 6e) more effectively than either drug alone. Similarly, cotreatment using NB73 and GDA resulted in stronger inhibition of glycolytic activity in OPM2 (Fig. 6f) and Delta47 cells (Fig. 6g) than treatment with either drug alone. Glucose uptake and lactate production in OPM2 (Fig. 6h) and Delta47 cells (Fig. 6i) were also strongly inhibited by the combined drug administration. These results demonstrated that nanomolar amounts of GDA are well tolerated in myeloma cells and significantly enhance the efficacy with which NB73 inhibits glycolysis and energy production.

**Fig. 6: GDA enhances myeloma-inhibiting activity of NB73.**

GDA cooperates with NB73 in downregulating FOXM1 in myeloma cells

We examined whether the co-treatment of myeloma cells using NB73 and GDA suppresses gene expression in the glycolytic pathway. qPCR analysis of FOXM1^N OPM2 cells treated with the same amount of drug used in Fig. 7 showed that this was the case for GLUT1 (a.k.a. solute carrier family 2 member 1, or SLC2A1), HK2 (hexokinase 2) and LDHA (lactate dehydrogenase A, Fig. 7a)—key regulators of glycolysis important for transporting glucose inside the cell, phosphorylating glucose at the C6 position, and converting pyruvate to lactate, respectively (Fig. 7b). Delta47 yielded the same result (data not shown). In contrast, GLUT4 and LDHB message was not affected by NB73 and GDA in either cell line (data not shown). These results suggested that FOXM1 governs, in part, the transcriptional regulation of glycolysis. In support of that, FOXM1 mRNA levels in the MMRF dataset presented in Fig. 1 correlated with expression of GLUT1, HK2 and LDHA (Fig. 7c). Next, we wondered why the co-treatment of OPM2 using NB73 and GDA was more potent in down regulating HK2 and LDHA than GLUT1 (Fig. 8a). ChIP-PCR analysis suggested that this is related to the efficacy with which GDA removes FOXM1 from the promoter regions of HK2 and LDHA (Fig. 7d) but not GLUT1 (result not shown). The mechanism with which GDA displaces FOXM1 from gene promoters does not appear to involve in transcriptional downregulation of FOXM1 (Fig. 7e). Instead, GDA acts at the post-translational level (Fig. 7f), presumably by promoting the proteasomal degradation of FOXM1 due to abrogated HSP90 chaperone function, as seen in leukemia [24]. In agreement with that, co-immunoprecipitation followed by Western blotting, relying on either FOXM1 (upper panel) or HSP90 (lower panel) as bait, produced matching results (Fig. 7g). In sum, these findings demonstrate that in myeloma cells FOXM1 regulates glycolysis at the transcriptional level. Furthermore, HSP90 inhibitor GDA cooperates with NB73 by destabilizing FOXM1 in myeloma.

**Fig. 7: GDA inhibits FOXM1-dependent expression of glycolytic genes.**

**Fig. 8: Cotreatment with NB73 and GDA slows down myeloma in NSG mice.**

NB73 and GDA synergize in inhibiting myeloma-in-mouse xenografts

To complement the in vitro drug studies described above with results using intact laboratory animals, we transfected parental FOXM1^N OPM2 cells with a bicistronic lentiviral expression vector that encodes GFP (green fluorescence protein) and Luc (luciferase) reporter genes. The reporters enabled the determination of myeloma cell growth and dissemination in host mice, using flow cytometry (GFP) and BLI (Luc) as research tools. GFP⁺Luc⁺ OPM2 cells were injected IV into immunodeficient NSG mice to generate human-in-mouse xenografts (n = 20). Tumor-bearing mice were randomly divided into 4 equal groups (n = 5) and, beginning on day 14 after tumor inoculation, treated twice weekly with NB73 (10 mg/kg SC), GDA (2 mg/kg IP) or both. One group of mice was left untreated and used as control. BLI on days 28 and 42 after tumor challenge demonstrated both the therapeutic efficacy of monotherapy using NB73 or GDA and the additive effect of combination therapy (Fig. 8a, b). At study end on day 42, mice were euthanized, and spleen, peripheral blood and bone marrow samples were analyzed for GFP⁺ tumor cells using flow cytometry. Cells of this sort were not detected in peripheral blood but did occur in spleen (≤2%) and, more abundantly, in bone marrow (≤50%, Fig. 8c). The latter agreed with the proclivity of FOXM1^N OPM2 cells to home to the bone marrow (Fig. 3d). Figure 8d demonstrates the striking myeloma-inhibiting activity of co-treatment using NB73 and GDA. The synergy between FOXM1 inhibition (NB73) and HSP90 inhibition (GDA) suggests a new treatment approach for patients with myeloma expressing ample amounts of FOXM1.

Discussion

The main finding of this study is the demonstration that (1) FOXM1 prognosticates inferior survival of patients with myeloma in the MMRF CoMMpass trial (NCT01454297); (2) FOXM1 is a positive regulator of myeloma metabolism with major impact on glycolysis and cellular respiration; (3) the novel small-compound FOXM1 inhibitor, NB73, slows down myeloma; (4) the heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) inhibitor, GDA, cooperates with NB73 in down regulating FOXM1 and suppressing myeloma. The cooperativity of NB73 and GDA suggests that combined FOXM1 and HSP90 inhibition might be a new treatment option for FOXM1-driven HRMM and RRMM, two critical unmet needs in myeloma. NB73 and GDA are included in the working model on the role of FOXM1 in myeloma metabolism presented in Fig. 8e.

Our results on FOXM1-dependent activation of myeloma metabolism agree with evidence that metabolic reprogramming, a hallmark of human cancer, is important for MM [25]. Compared to normal long-lived plasma cells, which exhibit a high rate of glucose consumption [26] due to a high physiological demand for antibody glycosylation [27], neoplastic plasma cells feature further increases in metabolic activity [28] together with characteristics of metabolic remodeling that are typical of the Warburg effect: aerobic glycolysis, elevated glucose consumption, and increased lactate production [29]. FDG-PET imaging takes advantage of these changes for both myeloma patient care and translational myeloma research using laboratory mice [30]. Myeloma cells can also make use of the reverse Warburg effect; i.e., taking up lactate from the tumor microenvironment via the monocarboxyl transporter 1 (MCT1) and utilizing it as substrate for mitochondrial energy production [31]. The role of FOXM1 in this pathway, if any, is not known. Upregulation of mitochondrial biogenesis [32], CD38-driven mitochondrial trafficking [33], mutations in mitochondrial genes [34] and OxPhos stimulation [35] are also involved in the mechanism with which myeloma adapts metabolically and maintains bioenergetic plasticity. The underlying molecular pathways include protein tyrosine phosphatase 4A3 (PTP4A3) [36], ectonucleotide pyrophosphatase / phosphodiesterase 1 (ENPP1) [37] and, as suggested by the current study, FOXM1. Elucidating these pathways in greater depth may lead to new, metabolically targeted myeloma therapies that include FOXM1 inhibition.

This study adds myeloma to a group of solid neoplasms including ovarian cancer [38] and pancreatic cancer [39] for which FOXM1-driven reprogramming of glucose metabolism and promotion of the Warburg effect have been well documented [40]. Our findings on FOXM1-driven expression of glucose import (GLUT1) and glycolytic pathway genes (HK2, LDHA) in OPM2 and Delta47 cells extend published work on the transcriptional regulation of glycolysis in myeloma and suggest that co-inhibition of FOXM1 and glycolysis affords a new treatment approach (Fig. 8E). In addition to FOXM1, LDHA is upregulated in myeloma via HIF1A (hypoxia inducible factor 1 subunit alpha) [41] and PPARGC1B (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 beta) [16]. PPARGC1A, the alpha isoform of this coactivator, which is included in both heatmaps in Fig. 3C, may also promote LDHA expression, but this has not been demonstrated. Other investigators have gathered preclinical evidence that targeting glycolytic enzymes can suppress myeloma. Thus, silencing PKM2, a pyruvate kinase muscle isozyme that is positively regulated by the Myc-NEK2 axis in myeloma cells [42], inhibits myeloma [43]. In sync with that, FOXM1-dependent upregulation of PKM2 promotes glycolysis and the Warburg effect in colon cancer [44]. HK2, an isoform of hexokinase that is overexpressed in many malignancies including MM [45], is another promising target in myeloma given that small-drug inhibition of HK2 [46] or knockdown of HK2 using anti-sense oligonucleotides [47] kills neoplastic plasma cells with great efficacy. Dampening glucose import using the HIV protease inhibitor ritonavir [48] and inhibiting PFK (phosphofructokinase) [49] or ENO (enolase) [50] have also been evaluated as experimental myeloma therapy, albeit with limited success and not in the context of upregulated FOXM1.

This is the first study to demonstrate that NB73 is active in myeloma. NB73 is a small-drug FOXM1 inhibitor from the 1,1-diarylethylene class of compounds [10] that effectively kills breast cancer cells containing high amounts of FOXM1 [9]. Time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) has shown that NB73 binds directly to FOXM1 [10] and thus facilitates its proteasomal degradation. NB73 exhibits suitable pharmacokinetic properties, affords an adequate therapeutic window, and is well tolerated in tumor-bearing mice. What is more, NB73 compares favorably to previously developed FOXM1 inhibitors including FDI-6 [18] and RCM-1 [51], which for a variety of reasons are not acceptable for clinical use [13]. This renders NB73 attractive for further development as a cancer drug. Pharmacological inhibition of HSP90 enhanced the potency with which NB73 hinders myeloma. GDA was used here to that end despite its difficult track record in cancer therapy [52] including myeloma [53] that can be attributed to detrimental toxicity due to GDA’s interference with the chaperone activity of all (paninhibition) HSP90 isoforms [54]. Newly developed isoform-selective or C-terminus-targeted HSP90 inhibitors may overcome this problem [52]. An additional, alternative strategy for making FOXM1-targeted myeloma inhibition more effective may be afforded by compounds that feature high CMap enrichment scores in Fig. 5a. Compounds of this sort that also boast a positive track record in preclinical myeloma research include lycorine, quinidine and thapsigargin (Table S5) and semustine, ciclopirox and pyrvinium (Table S6). Future studies will reveal whether any of these compounds synergize with NB73 in hampering FOXM1-driven myeloma.

In conclusion, this study has provided clear-cut evidence that FOXM1 governs myeloma metabolism by upregulating glycolysis and bioenergy supply. Additionally, it has shown that the small-compound FOXM1 inhibitor, NB73, suppresses myeloma by virtue of promoting FOXM1 degradation. This may be of value for targeted therapy of chr1q-amp myeloma that depends on a novel PBX1-FOXM1 axis described just recently [55]. Enhancement of FOXM1 degradation by GDA suggests that co-inhibition of FOXM1 and HSP90 may be a promising precision medicine approach to treating myeloma that contains elevated levels of FOXM1.

Materials and methods

Human myeloma cell lines (HMCLs)

HMCLs were obtained from Dr. Brian Van Ness, University of Minnesota, and propagated under standard cell culture conditions (37 °C, 5% CO₂) in RPMI1640 (Gibco) supplemented with 10% heat inactivated (65 °C, 30 min) fetal bovine serum (Gibco) and 1% v/v antibiotic/antimycotic solution (Gibco). To detect and treat contamination with mycoplasma, the eMyco VALiD Mycoplasma PCR Detection Kit (Bulldog Bio, NH, USA) and Plasmocure (InvivoGen, CA, USA) were used, respectively, as needed. Cell lines were authenticated with assistance of the Human STR Profiling Cell Authentication Service (ATCC, VA, USA).

CRISPR/Cas9 knockout and isolation of individual clones

Three CRISPR-modified synthetic single guide RNAs (gRNAs) were purchased from Synthego (CA, USA) to target FOXM1 exon 2. Guide RNA was complexed individually with Cas9 protein (a kind gift from Dr. Miles Pufall, Department of Biochemistry, University of Iowa) to make ribonucleoprotein (RNP). For transfection with RNP, myeloma cells were washed and pelleted, followed by gentle resuspension in Nucleofector Solution SF supplemented with Lonza solution and IDT electroporation enhancer buffer. RNP complex was added, and cells were electroporated using a Lonza 4D-Nucleofector in CM-138 mode. Individual cell clones were obtained by limited dilution from the batch edited cells and screened for loss of FOXM1 using Western blotting and Sanger sequencing. Guide RNA sequence and Sanger sequencing primer are listed in Table S7.

Overexpression of FOXM1

A gene expression vector encoding FOXM1c on a pCDNA3.1 backbone was purchased from GenScript (NJ, USA). The gene was cloned into lentiviral vector pMK1115 expressing GFP. The vector was packaged into viral particles using the Mirus 293 T Trans-IT kit according to the protocol. Myeloma cells were transfected by spinfection, allowed to recover for a week, and then fractionated based on GFP expression using a cell sorter.

Myeloma xenografting

NSG mice (strain number 005557) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, Maine and housed according to the rules and regulations of the Medical College of Wisconsin Biomedical Resource Center under IRB AUA6541. Equal numbers of male and female mice 8–10 weeks of age were used. Statistical methods for estimating the sample size were not used. Mice were randomly allocated to experimental groups. For tumor growth studies, host mice were challenged intravenously with 1 × 10⁶ OPM2 cells transfected with eGFP and luciferase reporter genes. For drug treatment studies, 2 × 10⁶ cells were used. Two weeks later, tumor-bearing mice were treated twice weekly with subcutaneous injections of NB73 (10 mg/kg), intraperitoneal injections of GDA (2 mg/kg) or both agents. Tumor burden was measured using the IVIS Spectrum CT in vivo imaging system (PerkinElmer). Humane endpoints included paraplegia and weight loss of more than 10%. The study was not blinded.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism and presented as means ± standard deviation (SD) unless otherwise indicated. For statistical comparison of 2 groups, two-tailed Student’s t test was used. For comparison of multiple groups, one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett posttest was used. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. Sample sizes were determined empirically to ensure sufficient statistical power. No sample was excluded from analysis. Variance between different groups was similar. Results are based on independent biological experiments conducted in triplicate.

Supplemental materials and method

Additional details on materials and methods used for this study are presented online in the supplemental section of the manuscript.

References

Gu C, Yang Y, Sompallae R, Xu H, Tompkins VS, Holman C, et al. FOXM1 is a therapeutic target for high-risk multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2016;30:873–82.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Gu C, Holman C, Sompallae R, Jing X, Tomasson M, Hose D, et al. Upregulation of FOXM1 in a subset of relapsed myeloma results in poor outcome. Blood Cancer J. 2018;8:22.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gu C, Jing X, Holman C, Sompallae R, Zhan F, Tricot G, et al. Upregulation of FOXM1 leads to diminished drug sensitivity in myeloma. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1152.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Koo CY, Muir KW, Lam EW. FOXM1: From cancer initiation to progression and treatment. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1819:28–37.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bergamaschi A, Madak-Erdogan Z, Kim YJ, Choi YL, Lu H, Katzenellenbogen BS. The forkhead transcription factor FOXM1 promotes endocrine resistance and invasiveness in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer by expansion of stem-like cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res: BCR (Res Support, Non-US Gov’t). 2014;16:436.
Article CAS Google Scholar
Hajek R, Okubote SA, Svachova H. Myeloma stem cell concepts, heterogeneity and plasticity of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2013;163:551–64.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Barger CJ, Branick C, Chee L, Karpf AR. Pan-cancer analyses reveal genomic features of FOXM1 overexpression in cancer. Cancers. 2019;11:251.
Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Borhani S, Gartel AL. FOXM1: a potential therapeutic target in human solid cancers. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2020;24:205–17.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dey P, Wang A, Ziegler Y, Kim SH, El-Ashry D, Katzenellenbogen JA, et al. Suppression of tumor growth, metastasis, and signaling pathways by reducing FOXM1 activity in triple negative breast cancer. Cancers. 2020;12:2677.
Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Ziegler Y, Laws MJ, Sanabria Guillen V, Kim SH, Dey P, Smith BP, et al. Suppression of FOXM1 activities and breast cancer growth in vitro and in vivo by a new class of compounds. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2019;5:45.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lagana A, Perumal D, Melnekoff D, Readhead B, Kidd BA, Leshchenko V, et al. Integrative network analysis identifies novel drivers of pathogenesis and progression in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2018;32:120–30.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Misund K, Keane N, Stein CK, Asmann YW, Day G, Welsh S, et al. MYC dysregulation in the progression of multiple myeloma. Leukemia. 2020;34:322–6.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Kalathil D, John S, Nair AS. FOXM1 and cancer: faulty cellular signaling derails homeostasis. Front Oncol. 2020;10:626836.
Article PubMed Google Scholar
Hou Y, Li W, Sheng Y, Li L, Huang Y, Zhang Z, et al. The transcription factor Foxm1 is essential for the quiescence and maintenance of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat Immunol. 2015;16:810–8.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Buchner M, Park E, Geng H, Klemm L, Flach J, Passegue E, et al. Identification of FOXM1 as a therapeutic target in B-cell lineage acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6471.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang H, Li L, Chen Q, Li M, Feng J, Sun Y, et al. PGC1beta regulates multiple myeloma tumor growth through LDHA-mediated glycolytic metabolism. Mol Oncol. 2018;12:1579–95.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Maiso P, Huynh D, Moschetta M, Sacco A, Aljawai Y, Mishima Y, et al. Metabolic signature identifies novel targets for drug resistance in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2015;75:2071–82.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gormally MV, Dexheimer TS, Marsico G, Sanders DA, Lowe C, Matak-Vinkovic D, et al. Suppression of the FOXM1 transcriptional programme via novel small molecule inhibition. Nat Commun (Res Support, N. I H, Extramural). 2014;5:5165.
CAS Google Scholar
Hegde NS, Sanders DA, Rodriguez R, Balasubramanian S. The transcription factor FOXM1 is a cellular target of the natural product thiostrepton. Nat Chem (Res Support, Non-US Gov’t). 2011;3:725–31.
CAS Google Scholar
Radhakrishnan SK, Bhat UG, Hughes DE, Wang IC, Costa RH, Gartel AL. Identification of a chemical inhibitor of the oncogenic transcription factor forkhead box M1. Cancer Res. 2006;66:9731–5.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bhat UG, Halasi M, Gartel AL. Thiazole antibiotics target FoxM1 and induce apoptosis in human cancer cells. PLoS One. 2009;4:e5592.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Lamb J, Crawford ED, Peck D, Modell JW, Blat IC, Wrobel MJ. et al. The Connectivity Map: using gene-expressionsignatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science. 2006;313:1929–35.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Subramanian A, Narayan R, Corsello SM, Peck DD, Natoli TE, Lu X, et al. A next generation connectivity map: L1000 platform and the first 1,000,000 profiles. Cell. 2017;171:1437–1452 e1417.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hassanzadeh A, Hosseinzadeh E, Rezapour S, Vahedi G, Haghnavaz N, Marofi F. Quercetin promotes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis and attenuates the proliferation of human chronic myeloid leukemia cell line-K562 through interaction with HSPs (70 and 90), MAT2A and FOXM1. Anticancer Agents Med Chem. 2019;19:1523–34.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
El Arfani C, De Veirman K, Maes K, De Bruyne E, Menu E. Metabolic features of multiple myeloma. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19:1200.
Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Pracht K, Meinzinger J, Schulz SR, Daum P, Corte-Real J, Hauke M, et al. miR-148a controls metabolic programming and survival of mature CD19-negative plasma cells in mice. Eur J Immunol. 2021;51:1089–109.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lam WY, Becker AM, Kennerly KM, Wong R, Curtis JD, Llufrio EM, et al. Mitochondrial pyruvate import promotes long-term survival of antibody-secreting plasma cells. Immunity. 2016;45:60–73.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bloedjes TA, de Wilde G, Guikema JEJ. Metabolic effects of recurrent genetic aberrations in multiple myeloma. Cancers. 2021;13:396.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sanchez WY, McGee SL, Connor T, Mottram B, Wilkinson A, Whitehead JP, et al. Dichloroacetate inhibits aerobic glycolysis in multiple myeloma cells and increases sensitivity to bortezomib. Br J Cancer. 2013;108:1624–33.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Duncan K, Rosean TR, Tompkins VS, Olivier A, Sompallae R, Zhan F, et al. (18) F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in an IL-6-and MYC-driven mouse model of human multiple myeloma affords objective evaluation of plasma cell tumor progression and therapeutic response to the proteasomeinhibitor ixazomib. Blood Cancer J. 2013;3:e165.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fujiwara S, Wada N, Kawano Y, Okuno Y, Kikukawa Y, Endo S, et al. Lactate, a putative survival factor for myeloma cells, is incorporated by myeloma cells through monocarboxylate transporters 1. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2015;4:12.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Zhan X, Yu W, Franqui-Machin R, Bates ML, Nadiminti K, Cao H, et al. Alteration of mitochondrial biogenesis promotes disease progression in multiple myeloma. Oncotarget. 2017;8:111213–24.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Marlein CR, Piddock RE, Mistry JJ, Zaitseva L, Hellmich C, Horton RH, et al. CD38-driven mitochondrial trafficking promotes bioenergetic plasticity in multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2019;79:2285–97.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Hoang PH, Cornish AJ, Chubb D, Jackson G, Kaiser M, Houlston RS. Impact of mitochondrial DNA mutations in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer J. 2020;10:46.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jang JS, Li Y, Mitra AK, Bi L, Abyzov A, van Wijnen AJ, et al. Molecular signatures of multiple myeloma progression through single cell RNA-Seq. Blood Cancer J. 2019;9:2.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Abdollahi P, Vandsemb EN, Elsaadi S, Rost LM, Yang R, Hjort MA, et al. Phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 regulates cancer cell metabolism in multiple myeloma. FASEB J. 2021;35:e21344.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang H, Gonzalez-Garcia I, Traba J, Jain S, Conteh S, Shin DM, et al. ATP-degrading ENPP1 is required for survival (or persistence) of long-lived plasma cells. Sci Rep. 2017;7:17867.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Wang Y, Yun Y, Wu B, Wen L, Wen M, Yang H, et al. FOXM1 promotes reprogramming of glucose metabolism in epithelial ovarian cancer cells via activation of GLUT1 and HK2 transcription. Oncotarget. 2016;7:47985–97.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cui J, Shi M, Xie D, Wei D, Jia Z, Zheng S, et al. FOXM1 promotes the warburg effect and pancreatic cancer progression via transactivation of LDHA expression. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20:2595–606.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Black M, Arumugam P, Shukla S, Pradhan A, Ustiyan V, Milewski D, et al. FOXM1 nuclear transcription factor translocates into mitochondria and inhibits oxidative phosphorylation. Mol Biol Cell. 2020;31:1411–24.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Qin X, Lin L, Cao L, Zhang X, Song X, Hao J, et al. Extracellular matrix protein Reelin promotes myeloma progression by facilitating tumor cell proliferation and glycolysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:45305.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gu Z, Xia J, Xu H, Frech I, Tricot G, Zhan F. NEK2 Promotes Aerobic Glycolysis in Multiple Myeloma Through Regulating Splicing of Pyruvate Kinase. J Hematol Oncol. 2017;10:17.
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
He Y, Wang Y, Liu H, Xu X, He S, Tang J, et al. Pyruvate kinase isoform M2 (PKM2) participates in multiple myeloma cell proliferation, adhesion and chemoresistance. Leuk Res. 2015;39:1428–36.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang W, Zhang X, Huang S, Chen J, Ding P, Wang Q, et al. FOXM1D potentiates PKM2-mediated tumor glycolysis and angiogenesis. Mol Oncol. 2021;15:1466–85.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nakano A, Miki H, Nakamura S, Harada T, Oda A, Amou H, et al. Up-regulation of hexokinaseII in myeloma cells: targeting myeloma cells with 3-bromopyruvate. J Bioenerg Biomembr. 2012;44:31–38.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Lis P, Dylag M, Niedzwiecka K, Ko YH, Pedersen PL, Goffeau A, et al. The HK2 dependent “Warburg Effect” and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in cancer: targets for effective therapy with 3-bromopyruvate. Molecules. 2016;21:1730.
Article PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Xu S, Zhou T, Doh HM, Trinh KR, Catapang A, Lee JT, et al. An HK2 antisense oligonucleotide induces synthetic lethality in HK1(-)HK2(+) multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 2019;79:2748–60.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Dalva-Aydemir S, Bajpai R, Martinez M, Adekola KU, Kandela I, Wei C, et al. Targeting the metabolic plasticity of multiple myeloma with FDA-approved ritonavir and metformin. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21:1161–71.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Caillot M, Bourgeais J, Dakik H, Coste E, Mazure NM, Lelievre E, et al. Cyclin D1 targets hexokinase 2 to control aerobic glycolysis in myeloma cells. Oncogenesis. 2020;9:68.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ray A, Song Y, Du T, Chauhan D, Anderson KC. Preclinical validation of Alpha-Enolase (ENO1) as a novel immunometabolic target in multiple myeloma. Oncogene. 2020;39:2786–96.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Shukla S, Milewski D, Pradhan A, Rama N, Rice K, Le T, et al. The FOXM1 Inhibitor RCM-1 Decreases Carcinogenesis and Nuclear beta-Catenin. Mol Cancer Ther. 2019;18:1217–29.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sanchez J, Carter TR, Cohen MS, Blagg BSJ. Old and new approaches to target the Hsp90 chaperone. Curr Cancer Drug Targets. 2020;20:253–70.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Mitsiades CS, Mitsiades NS, McMullan CJ, Poulaki V, Kung AL, Davies FE, et al. Antimyeloma activity of heat shock protein-90 inhibition. Blood. 2006;107:1092–1100.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Grenert JP, Sullivan WP, Fadden P, Haystead TA, Clark J, Mimnaugh E, et al. The amino-terminal domain of heat shock protein 90 (hsp90) that binds geldanamycin is an ATP/ADP switch domain that regulates hsp90 conformation. J Biol Chem. 1997;272:23843–50.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Trasanidis N, Katsarou A, Ponnusamy K, Shen YA, Kostopoulos IV, Bergonia B, et al. Systems medicine dissection of chr1q-amp reveals a novel PBX1-FOXM1 axis for targeted therapy in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2022;139:1939–53.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Halasi M, Varaljai R, Benevolenskaya E, Gartel AL. A Novel Function of Molecular Chaperone HSP70: SUPPRESSION OF ONCOGENIC FOXM1 AFTER PROTEOTOXIC STRESS. J Biol Chem. 2016;291:142–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Ryu D, Kim SJ, Hong Y, Jo A, Kim N, Kim HJ, et al. Alterations in the transcriptional programs of myeloma cells and the microenvironment during extramedullary progression affect proliferation and immune evasion. Clin Cancer Res. 2020;26:935–44.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Waldschmidt JM, Kloeber JA, Anand P, Frede J, Kokkalis A, Dimitrova V, et al. Single-cell profiling reveals metabolic reprogramming as a resistance mechanism in BRAF-mutated multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:6432–44.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bajpai R, Sharma A, Achreja A, Edgar CL, Wei C, Siddiqa AA, et al. Electron transport chain activity is a predictor and target for venetoclax sensitivity in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1228.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lissanu Deribe Y, Sun Y, Terranova C, Khan F, Martinez-Ledesma J, Gay J, et al. Mutations in the SWI/SNF complex induce a targetable dependence on oxidative phosphorylation in lung cancer. Nat Med. 2018;24:1047–57.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Boreel DF, Span PN, Heskamp S, Adema GJ, Bussink J. Targeting oxidative phosphorylation to increase the efficacy of radio- and immune-combination therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:2970–8.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Xiang Y, Fang B, Liu Y, Yan S, Cao D, Mei H, et al. SR18292 exerts potent antitumor effects in multiple myeloma via inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation. Life Sci. 2020;256:117971.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to acknowledge expert technical assistance from MCW Cancer Center core facility staff, especially Monika Zielonka, Redox and Bioenergetics Shared Resource (CCRBSR); Galina Petrova, Flow Cytometry Shared Resource; and Donna McAllister, Biomedical Imaging Shared Resource. This work was supported by Breast Cancer Research Foundation grants 083 (to BSK) and 084 (to JAK); by NCI R01CA236814, DoD CA180190, Myeloma Crowd Research Initiative and Riney Family Multiple Myeloma Research Program awards (to FZ); and by NCI R01CA151354 (to SJ). Additional support was provided by the MCW Milwaukee William G. Schuett, Jr., Multiple Myeloma Research Endowment.

Author information

These authors contributed equally: Yan Cheng, Fumou Sun.

Authors and Affiliations

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Yan Cheng, Fumou Sun, Jing Dong, Grant Yun, Michael Pisano, Parameswaran Hari & Siegfried Janz
Department of Pathology Master of Science Graduate Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Krista Thornton
Department of Pathology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Xuefang Jing
Interdisciplinary Graduate Program in Immunology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
Michael Pisano
Myeloma Center, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, and Winthrop P. Rockefeller Cancer Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, USA
Fenghuang Zhan
Departments of Chemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
Sung Hoon Kim & John A. Katzenellenbogen
Molecular and Integrative Physiology, and Cancer Center at Illinois, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA
Benita S. Katzenellenbogen
Medical College of Wisconsin Cancer Center, Milwaukee, WI, USA
Parameswaran Hari & Siegfried Janz

Authors

Yan Cheng
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Fumou Sun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Krista Thornton
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Xuefang Jing
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Jing Dong
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Grant Yun
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Michael Pisano
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Fenghuang Zhan
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Sung Hoon Kim
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
John A. Katzenellenbogen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Benita S. Katzenellenbogen
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Parameswaran Hari
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar
Siegfried Janz
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YC, FS, GY, KT, XJ, and MP performed the experiments. YC and FS performed primary data analysis. SHK, JAK, and BSK provided reagents and contributed to study design, data interpretation and manuscript revision. FZ and PH shared insight into the biology and treatment landscape of myeloma and assisted with data analysis. YC and SJ wrote the first version of the manuscript. All authors contributed to and approved the final version of the paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Siegfried Janz.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplements

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cheng, Y., Sun, F., Thornton, K. et al. FOXM1 regulates glycolysis and energy production in multiple myeloma. Oncogene 41, 3899–3911 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02398-4

Download citation

Received: 06 January 2022
Revised: 16 June 2022
Accepted: 21 June 2022
Published: 06 July 2022
Issue Date: 05 August 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41388-022-02398-4

This article is cited by

NB compounds are potent and efficacious FOXM1 inhibitors in high-grade serous ovarian cancer cells
- Cassie Liu
- Makenzie Vorderbruggen
- Adam R. Karpf
Journal of Ovarian Research (2024)
Targeting the oncogenic transcription factor FOXM1 to improve outcomes in all subtypes of breast cancer
- Benita S. Katzenellenbogen
- Valeria Sanabria Guillen
- John A. Katzenellenbogen
Breast Cancer Research (2023)
THOC3 interacts with YBX1 to promote lung squamous cell carcinoma progression through PFKFB4 mRNA modification
- Tao Yu
- Qi Zhang
- Kai-Hua Lu
Cell Death & Disease (2023)
Effective combination treatments for breast cancer inhibition by FOXM1 inhibitors with other targeted cancer drugs
- Valeria Sanabria Guillen
- Yvonne Ziegler
- Benita S. Katzenellenbogen
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment (2023)