Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Radiation therapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy: adjuvant or salvage?

Abstract

Approximately 15–25% of men who undergo radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer will experience a PSA-defined biochemical recurrence (BCR) of their cancer—men with poorly differentiated cancer, non-organ-confined disease, and positive surgical margins are at the highest risk. Accumulating evidence indicates that postoperative radiation therapy to the prostate bed favorably influences the course of disease in men with pathological features of poor prognosis. Three phase III randomized trials of adjuvant radiotherapy versus observation have reported improved freedom from BCR, and one study has reported improved metastasis-free survival and overall survival. Similar evidence from randomized trials for salvage radiotherapy is lacking; however, several observational studies have reported durable responses to salvage radiotherapy and reduced cancer-specific mortality in a substantial proportion of high-risk patients, provided that it is administered at the earliest evidence of BCR. The appeal of salvage radiotherapy is that a substantial proportion of patients with non-organ-confined cancer or positive surgical margins are cured after radical prostatectomy alone, thereby limiting the adverse effects of postoperative radiotherapy—which include urinary and bowel dysfunction, sexual dysfunction and secondary pelvic malignancies—to only those whose cancer was not cured by surgery. In the absence of data from randomized trials demonstrating the superiority of adjuvant radiotherapy over a surveillance strategy (with planned salvage radiotherapy at the earliest evidence of BCR), we advocate shared decision making between physicians and patients, based on the relative advantages and disadvantages of each approach.

Key Points

  • The predominant pattern of treatment failure in men with a rising PSA level after radical prostatectomy is locoregional

  • Postoperative radiotherapy (as adjuvant or salvage therapy) can reduce the risk of PSA progression and distant metastasis and improve overall and cancer-specific survival

  • Adjuvant radiotherapy for men with positive surgical margins, extraprostatic extension, or seminal vesicle invasion is supported by evidence from three large randomized trials

  • Salvage radiotherapy can have similar outcomes to immediate adjuvant radiotherapy if it is administered at the earliest evidence of biochemical recurrence

  • We advocate shared decision making with patients based on the advantages and disadvantages of adjuvant radiotherapy over a surveillance strategy, with planned salvage radiotherapy at the earliest evidence of recurrence

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Hypothetical timeline of cancer recurrence after local therapy to metastasis progression for prostate cancer compared with breast cancer.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burkhardt, J. H. et al. Comparing the costs of radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy for the initial treatment of early-stage prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 2869–2875 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Stephenson, A. J. et al. Preoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 98, 715–717 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Vickers, A. J. et al. The surgical learning curve for prostate cancer control after radical prostatectomy. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 99, 1171–1177 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moul, J. W. Prostate specific antigen only progression of prostate cancer. J. Urol. 163, 1632–1642 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kupelian, P. A. et al. Comparison of the efficacy of local therapies for localized prostate cancer in the prostate-specific antigen era: a large single-institution experience with radical prostatectomy and external-beam radiotherapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 20, 3376–3385 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pound, C. R., Partin, A. W., Epstein, J. I. & Walsh, P. C. Prostate-specific antigen after anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. Patterns of recurrence and cancer control. Urol. Clin. North Am. 24, 395–406 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Patel, A., Dorey, F., Franklin, J. & deKernion, J. B. Recurrence patterns after radical retropubic prostatectomy: clinical usefulness of prostate specific antigen doubling times and log slope prostate specific antigen. J. Urol. 158, 1441–1445 (1997).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Roberts, S. G. et al. PSA doubling time as a predictor of clinical progression after biochemical failure following radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Mayo Clin. Proc. 76, 576–581 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ornstein, D. K. et al. Evaluation and management of men whose radical prostatectomies failed: results of an international survey. Urology 52, 1047–1054 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bill-Axelson, A. et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 352, 1977–1984 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lightner, D. J., Lange, P. H., Reddy, P. K. & Moore, L. Prostate specific antigen and local recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol. 144, 921–926 (1990).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Leventis, A. K., Shariat, S. F. & Slawin, K. M. Local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: correlation of US features with prostatic fossa biopsy findings. Radiology 219, 432–439 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Raj, G. V., Partin, A. W. & Polascik, T. J. Clinical utility of indium 111-capromab pendetide immunoscintigraphy in the detection of early, recurrent prostate carcinoma after radical prostatectomy. Cancer 94, 987–996 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sella, T. et al. Suspected local recurrence after radical prostatectomy: endorectal coil MR imaging. Radiology 231, 379–385 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stephenson, A. J. et al. Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 291, 1325–1332 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stephenson, A. J. et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 2035–2041 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Stephenson, A. J. & Slawin, K. M. The value of radiotherapy in treating recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. Nat. Clin. Pract. Urol. 1, 90–96 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Katz, M. S. et al. Predictors of biochemical outcome with salvage conformal radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 483–489 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Swanson, G. P. et al. Predominant treatment failure in postprostatectomy patients is local: analysis of patterns of treatment failure in SWOG 8794. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 2225–2229 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Thompson, I. M. et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J. Urol. 181, 956–962 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Bolla, M. et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet 366, 572–578 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wiegel, T. et al. Phase III postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy compared with radical prostatectomy alone in pT3 prostate cancer with postoperative undetectable prostate-specific antigen: ARO 96–02/AUO AP 09/95. J. Clin. Oncol. 27, 2924–2930 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. MacDonald, O. K. et al. Salvage radiotherapy for men with isolated rising PSA or locally palpable recurrence after radical prostatectomy: do outcomes differ? Urology 64, 760–764 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Trock, B. J. et al. Prostate cancer-specific survival following salvage radiotherapy vs observation in men with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. JAMA 299, 2760–2769 (2008).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Messing, E. M. et al. Immediate hormonal therapy compared with observation after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in men with node-positive prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 1781–1788 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Messing, E. M. et al. Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol. 7, 472–479 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Eggener, S. E. et al. Predicting prostate cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy based on the pathological features of prostate cancer. J. Urol. 185, 869–875 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Schroder, F. H. et al. Early versus delayed endocrine treatment of pN1–3 M0 prostate cancer without local treatment of the primary tumor: results of European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer 30846—a phase III study. J. Urol. 172, 923–927 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schroder, F. H. et al. Early versus delayed endocrine treatment of T2-T3 pN1–3 M0 prostate cancer without local treatment of the primary tumour: final results of European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer protocol 30846 after 13 years of follow-up (a randomised controlled trial). Eur. Urol. 55, 14–22 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bolla, M. et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet 360, 103–106 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shipley, W. U. et al. Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer: a multi-institutional pooled analysis. JAMA 281, 1598–1604 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Hanks, G. E. et al. Phase III trial of long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation after neoadjuvant hormonal cytoreduction and radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92–02. J. Clin. Oncol. 21, 3972–3978 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bolla, M. et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 360, 2516–2527 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Da Pozzo, L. F. et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases treated by pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: the positive impact of adjuvant radiotherapy. Eur. Urol. 55, 1003–1011 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Potosky, A. L. et al. Quality of life following localized prostate cancer treated initially with androgen deprivation therapy or no therapy. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 94, 430–437 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Smith, M. R. Diagnosis and management of treatment-related osteoporosis in men with prostate carcinoma. Cancer 97 (Suppl. 3), 789–795 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. D'Amico, A. V. et al. Influence of androgen suppression therapy for prostate cancer on the frequency and timing of fatal myocardial infarctions. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 2420–2425 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Berry, D. A. et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 353, 1784–1792 (2005).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Krook, J. E. et al. Effective surgical adjuvant therapy for high-risk rectal carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 324, 709–715 (1991).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pound, C. R. et al. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA 281, 1591–1597 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Anscher, M. S. Salvage radiotherapy for recurrent prostate cancer: the earlier the better. JAMA 291, 1380–1382 (2004).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Anscher, M. S. Adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy is more effective and less toxic than salvage radiotherapy for a rising prostate specific antigen. Int. J. Cancer 96, 91–93 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Trabulsi, E. J. et al. A multi-institutional matched-control analysis of adjuvant and salvage postoperative radiation therapy for pT3–4N0 prostate cancer. Urology 72, 1298–1304 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Taylor, N. et al. Adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 56, 755–763 (2003).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Valicenti, R. K. et al. The efficacy of early adjuvant radiation therapy for pT3N0 prostate cancer: a matched-pair analysis. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 45, 53–58 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Anscher, M. S., Robertson, C. N. & Prosnitz, R. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologic stage T3/4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate: ten-year update. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 33, 37–43 (1995).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Catton, C. et al. Adjuvant and salvage radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Radiother. Oncol. 59, 51–60 (2001).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Stephenson, A. J. et al. Location, extent, and number of positive surgical margins do not improve accuracy of predicting prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy compared to their presence or absence. J. Urol. 182, 1357–1363 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bianco, F. J. Jr, Scardino, P. T. & Eastham, J. A. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (“trifecta”). Urology 66 (Suppl. 5), 83–94 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Hull, G. W. et al. Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J. Urol. 167 (2 Pt 1), 528–534 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Thompson, I. M. Jr et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologically advanced prostate cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 296, 2329–2335 (2006).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Van Poppel, H. et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in patients with pathologically high risk prostate cancer: 10-Year follow-up results. Eur. Urol. Suppl. 10, 93 (Abstract 227) (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Van Cangh, P. J. et al. Adjuvant radiation therapy does not cause urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective randomized study. J. Urol. 159, 164–166 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Van der Kwast, T. H. et al. Identification of patients with prostate cancer who benefit from immediate postoperative radiotherapy: EORTC 22911. J. Clin. Oncol. 25, 4178–4186 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Cox, J. D. et al. Consensus statements on radiation therapy of prostate cancer: guidelines for prostate re-biopsy after radiation and for radiation therapy with rising prostate-specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy. American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Consensus Panel. J. Clin. Oncol. 17, 1155 (1999).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Stephenson, A. J. et al. Postoperative nomogram predicting the 10-year probability of prostate cancer recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol. 23, 7005–7012 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Brenner, D. J., Curtis, R. E., Hall, E. J. & Ron, E. Second malignancies in prostate carcinoma patients after radiotherapy compared with surgery. Cancer 88, 398–406 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Moon, K., Stukenborg, G. J., Keim, J. & Theodorescu, D. Cancer incidence after localized therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer 107, 991–998 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

C. P. Vega, University of California, Irvine, CA, is the author of and is solely responsible for the content of the learning objectives, questions and answers of the Medscape, LLC-accredited continuing medical education activity associated with this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Both authors contributed equally to researching data for the manuscript, writing, and editing of this article before submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew J. Stephenson.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Patel, A., Stephenson, A. Radiation therapy for prostate cancer after prostatectomy: adjuvant or salvage?. Nat Rev Urol 8, 385–392 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.80

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2011.80

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing