Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • News & Views
  • Published:

Multiple sclerosis

Extracranial venous angioplasty is ineffective to treat MS

A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, Brave Dreams, has shown no clinical or radiological benefit of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) to correct chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). These results finally settle the scientific debate over whether PTA can improve clinical, radiological and symptomatic outcomes in this patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Relevant articles

Open Access articles citing this article.

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Zamboni, P. et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80, 392–399 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Zivadinov, R. & Chung, C. P. Potential involvement of the extracranial venous system in central nervous system disorders and aging. BMC Med. 11, 260 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zivadinov, R. et al. Prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in MS. Neurology 77, 138–144 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Zivadinov, R. et al. Recommendations for multimodal noninvasive and invasive screening for detection of extracranial venous abnormalities indicative of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: a position statement of the International Society for Neurovascular Disease. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 25, 1785–1794 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Traboulsee, A. L. et al. Prevalence of extracranial venous narrowing on catheter venography in people with multiple sclerosis, their siblings, and unrelated healthy controls: a blinded, case–control study. Lancet 383, 138–145 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Siddiqui, A. H. et al. Prospective randomized trial of venous angioplasty in MS (PREMiSe). Neurology 83, 441–449 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Traboulsee, A. et al. Venoplasty of chronic cerebral spinal venous insufficiency to improve MS patient reported outcomes is not superior to sham treatment at week 2 or week 12. J. Neurol. Sci. 381 (Suppl.), 1066 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zamboni, P. et al. Efficacy and safety of extracranial vein angioplasty in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3825 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zamboni, P. et al. A prospective open-label study of endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. J. Vasc. Surg. 50, 1348–1358.e3 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghezzi, A. Funding CCSVI research is/was a waste of valuable time, money and intellectual energy: yes. Mult. Scler. 19, 855–857 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, University of Buffalo, New York, USA, has received financial support for CCSVI-related research from Direct-MS, the Jacquemin Family Foundation, the Bronfman Foundation, the Flower MS Foundation and various smaller donors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Zivadinov.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

R.Z. has received financial support for research activities from Genzyme-Sanofi, Novartis, Quintiles/IMS, Protembis and Mapi Pharma. He has also received personal compensation from Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, EMD Serono, Celgene and Novartis for speaking and consultant services. B.W.-G. has received honoraria as a speaker and consultant for Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis and Acorda. She has also received research funding from Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Genzyme-Sanofi, Novartis and Acorda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zivadinov, R., Weinstock-Guttman, B. Extracranial venous angioplasty is ineffective to treat MS. Nat Rev Neurol 14, 129–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.180

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.180

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing