A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial, Brave Dreams, has shown no clinical or radiological benefit of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) to correct chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). These results finally settle the scientific debate over whether PTA can improve clinical, radiological and symptomatic outcomes in this patient population.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Changes in expression profiles of internal jugular vein wall and plasma protein levels in multiple sclerosis
Molecular Medicine Open Access 09 August 2018
Access options
Access Nature and 54 other Nature Portfolio journals
Get Nature+, our best-value online-access subscription
$29.99 / 30 days
cancel any time
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Zamboni, P. et al. Chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 80, 392–399 (2009).
Zivadinov, R. & Chung, C. P. Potential involvement of the extracranial venous system in central nervous system disorders and aging. BMC Med. 11, 260 (2013).
Zivadinov, R. et al. Prevalence, sensitivity, and specificity of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency in MS. Neurology 77, 138–144 (2011).
Zivadinov, R. et al. Recommendations for multimodal noninvasive and invasive screening for detection of extracranial venous abnormalities indicative of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency: a position statement of the International Society for Neurovascular Disease. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 25, 1785–1794 (2014).
Traboulsee, A. L. et al. Prevalence of extracranial venous narrowing on catheter venography in people with multiple sclerosis, their siblings, and unrelated healthy controls: a blinded, case–control study. Lancet 383, 138–145 (2014).
Siddiqui, A. H. et al. Prospective randomized trial of venous angioplasty in MS (PREMiSe). Neurology 83, 441–449 (2014).
Traboulsee, A. et al. Venoplasty of chronic cerebral spinal venous insufficiency to improve MS patient reported outcomes is not superior to sham treatment at week 2 or week 12. J. Neurol. Sci. 381 (Suppl.), 1066 (2017).
Zamboni, P. et al. Efficacy and safety of extracranial vein angioplasty in multiple sclerosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3825 (2017).
Zamboni, P. et al. A prospective open-label study of endovascular treatment of chronic cerebrospinal venous insufficiency. J. Vasc. Surg. 50, 1348–1358.e3 (2009).
Ghezzi, A. Funding CCSVI research is/was a waste of valuable time, money and intellectual energy: yes. Mult. Scler. 19, 855–857 (2013).
Acknowledgements
Buffalo Neuroimaging Analysis Center, Department of Neurology, University of Buffalo, New York, USA, has received financial support for CCSVI-related research from Direct-MS, the Jacquemin Family Foundation, the Bronfman Foundation, the Flower MS Foundation and various smaller donors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
R.Z. has received financial support for research activities from Genzyme-Sanofi, Novartis, Quintiles/IMS, Protembis and Mapi Pharma. He has also received personal compensation from Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, EMD Serono, Celgene and Novartis for speaking and consultant services. B.W.-G. has received honoraria as a speaker and consultant for Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis and Acorda. She has also received research funding from Biogen Idec, Teva Pharmaceuticals, EMD Serono, Genzyme-Sanofi, Novartis and Acorda.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zivadinov, R., Weinstock-Guttman, B. Extracranial venous angioplasty is ineffective to treat MS. Nat Rev Neurol 14, 129–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.180
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneurol.2017.180