What progress has been made in efforts to engage the public in decisions about nanotechnology over the past five years? Chris Toumey asks various experts in the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Relevant articles
Open Access articles citing this article.
-
Nanoscale Science and Technology and People with Disabilities in Asia: An Ability Expectation Analysis
NanoEthics Open Access 01 August 2012
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$259.00 per year
only $21.58 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
References
Toumey, C. Nature Nanotech. 1, 6–7 (2006).
Toumey, C. Quaderni 61, 81–101 (2006).
Guston, D. & Sarewitz, D. Technol. Soc. 24, 93–109 (2002).
Corley, E. & Scheufele, D. Scientist 24, 22 (2010).
Pidgeon, N. et al. Nature Nanotech. 4, 95–98 (2009).
Corner, A. & Pidgeon, N. Environment 52, 24–37 (2010).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toumey, C. Democratizing nanotech, then and now. Nature Nanotech 6, 605–606 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.168
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.168
This article is cited by
-
Models of Public Engagement: Nanoscientists’ Understandings of Science–Society Interactions
NanoEthics (2018)
-
Staff’s Views from One Canadian Organ Procurement Organization on Organ Donation and Organ Transplant Technologies: a Content Analysis
NanoEthics (2017)
-
The complexity of public engagement
Nature Nanotechnology (2012)
-
Nanoscale Science and Technology and People with Disabilities in Asia: An Ability Expectation Analysis
NanoEthics (2012)
-
Responsible nanotechnology development
Journal of Nanoparticle Research (2012)
