Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Resistance of microorganisms to disinfection in dental and medical devices

Abstract

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommends that only heat sterilization be used for all reusable devices entering the oral cavity1. However, chemical disinfection is still employed for reprocessing dental devices in many areas of the world. In an analysis of a Florida dental practice responsible for nosocomial human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmissions, the possible role of contaminated devices was deemed unlikely in part because they were subjected to high–level disinfection with 2% glutaraldehyde2. Disease transmissions have, however, been documented for endoscopes used in diagnostic and surgical procedures even after this treatment3. In some dental devices, lubricants mix with potentially infectious patient materials, and organic debris has been observed in endoscopes after cleaning4–6. We have investigated whether lubricants can render high–level chemical disinfection procedures ineffective and have addressed the role that some common devices may play in disease transmission. We report here that HIV in whole–blood samples and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in blood and plasma survived high–level disinfection when entrapped in lubricants used in dental handpieces and endoscopes. We also found that lubricated dental devices used to clean and polish teeth (prophylaxis angles) have the potential to transfer sufficient amounts of blood to infect human lymphocyte cultures with HIV. These results emphasize the need to subject reusable dental devices to a heat–sterilization protocol that penetrates the lubricant7.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Rent or buy this article

Prices vary by article type

from$1.95

to$39.95

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Recommended infection-control practices for dentistry. Morbid. Mortal. Wkly Rep. 42, 1–12 (1993).

  2. Gooch, B. et al. Lack of evidence for patient-to-patient transmission of HIV in a dental practice. J. Am. dent. Assoc. 123, 38–44 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Spach, D.H., Silverstein, F.E. & Stamm, W.E. Transmission of infection by gastrointestinal endoscopy and bronchoscopy. Ann. intern. Med. 118, 117–128 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, E.J. Good vibrations. Acad. Gen. Dentistry, AGD Impact 23, 6–16 (1995).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bond, W.W., Ott, B.J., Franke, K.A. & McCracken, J.E. Effective use of liquid chemical germicides on medical devices: instrument design problems. in Disinfection, Sterilization, and Preservation 4th edn (ed. Block, S.S.) 1097–1106 (Lea & Febiger, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Favero, M.S. Strategies for disinfection and sterilization of endoscopes: The gap between basic principles and actual practice. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 12, 279–281 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Barnes, C.M., Anderson, N.A., Li, Y. & Caufield, P.W. Effectiveness of steam sterilization in killing spores of Bacillus stearothermophilus in prophylaxis angles. Gen. Dent. 42, 456–458 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, D.L., Arens, M., Harllee, R. & Michaels, G.E. Risks of infection with blood- and saliva-borne pathogens from internally contaminated impressions and models. National Association of Dental Laboratories. Trends & Techniques 12, 30–34 (1995).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Vesley, D., Norlien, K.G., Nelson, B., Ott, B. & Streifel, A.J. Significant factors in the disinfection and sterilization of flexible endoscopes. Am. J. Infect. Control. 20, 291–300 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerberding, J.L. Reducing occupational risk of HIV infection. Hosp. Pract. 26, 103–118 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lewis, D.L. et al. Cross-infection potential with dental equipment. Lancet 340, 1252–1256 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis, D.L. Lack of HIV transmission in a dental practice (letter.) Ann intern. Med. 122, 960 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lewis, D.L. & Boe, R.E. Cross-infection risks associated with current procedures for using high-speed dental handpieces. J. clin. Microbiol. 30, 401–406 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Erice, A.K., Sannerud, J., Leske, V.L., Aeppli, D. & Balfour, H.H. Jr., Sensitive microculture method for isolation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 from blood leucocytes. J. clin. Microbiol. 30, 444–448 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lewis, D., Arens, M. Resistance of microorganisms to disinfection in dental and medical devices. Nat Med 1, 956–958 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0995-956

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0995-956

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing