Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Management of renal stone disease in obese patients

Abstract

Obesity represents an increasing burden to health care resources. Nephrolithiasis is associated with obesity and type 2 diabetes and the consumption of diets rich in protein, fat and carbohydrates; this article addresses some of the pathophysiological mechanisms associated with stone formation in these patients. Management of stone disease can be more difficult in obese patients; even diagnosis can be problematic because imaging techniques are less sensitive in these patients. Treatment with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and surgery in obese patients can be challenging, and outcome data for the different treatments are discussed in this Review.

Key Points

  • Obesity is increasingly common in Western society, and many patients are unaware of the relationship between obesity, type 2 diabetes and stone disease

  • The diagnosis and management of stone disease is more challenging in obese patients compared with those of a healthy weight

  • Obesity surgery carries a risk of subsequent metabolic abnormalities depending on the surgical technique

  • Weight loss and dietary modification should be discussed a part of long-term stone prevention

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ogden CL et al. (2006) Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 295: 1549–1555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Flegal KM et al. (2002) Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA 288: 1723–1727

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haslam DW and James WP (2005) Obesity. Lancet 366: 1197–1209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Taylor EN et al. (2005) Obesity, weight gain and the risk of kidney stones. JAMA 293: 455–462

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Negri E et al. (1988) Body weight and the prevalence of chronic diseases. J Epidemiol Community Health 42: 24–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Serio A and Fraioli A (1999) Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. Nephron 81 (Suppl 1): 26–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Scales CD et al. (2007) Changing gender prevalence of stone disease. J Urol 177: 979–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Powell CR et al. (2000) Impact of body weight on urinary electrolytes in urinary stone formers. Urology 55: 825–830

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maalouf NM et al. (2004) Association of urinary pH with body weight in nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 65: 1422–1425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Siener R et al. (2004) The role of overweight and obesity in calcium oxalate stone formation. Obes Res 12: 106–113

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ekeruo WO et al. (2004) Metabolic risk factors and the impact of medical therapy on the management of nephrolithiasis in obese patients. J Urol 172: 159–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolton-Smith C and Woodward M (1994) Dietary composition and fat to sugar ratios in relation to obesity. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 18: 820–828

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Iguchi M et al. (1993) Glucose metabolism in renal stone patients. Urol Int 51: 185–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schlesinger N (2005) Dietary factors and hyperuricaemia. Curr Pharm Des 11: 4133–4138

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Emmerson BT (1996) The management of gout. N Engl J Med 334: 445–451

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reaven GM (1988) Banting lecture 1988. Role of insulin resistance in human disease. Diabetes 37: 1595–1607

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Taylor EN et al. (2005) Diabetes mellitus and the risk of nephrolithiasis. Kidney Int 68: 1230–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Abate N et al. (2004) The metabolic syndrome and uric acid nephrolithiasis: novel features of renal manifestation of insulin resistance. Kidney Int 65: 386–392

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerstetter J et al. (1991) Mineral homeostasis in obesity: effects of euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. Metabolism 40: 707–713

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Adams JP and Murphy PG (2000) Obesity in anaesthesia and intensive care. Br J Anaes 85: 91–108

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Strauss RJ and Wise L (1978) Operative risks of obesity. Surg Gynecol Obstet 146: 286–291

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Streem SB (1997) Contemporary clinical practice of shock wave lithotripsy: a re-evaluation of contraindications. J Urol 157: 1197–1203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas R and Cass AS (1993) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 150: 30–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mezentsev VA (2005) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal pelvicalyceal stones in morbidly obese patients. Int Braz J Urol 31: 105–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. El-Nahas AR et al. (2007) A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol 51: 1688–1694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen TA and Belis JA (1998) Endoscopic management of urolithiasis in the morbidly obese patient. J Endourol 12: 33–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Andreoni C et al. (2001) Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: first-line therapy for proximal ureteral and renal calculi in the morbidly obese and superobese patient. J Endourol 15: 493–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Dash A et al. (2002) Ureteroscopic treatment of renal calculi in morbidly obese patients: a stone-matched comparison. Urology 60: 393–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brodsky JB et al. (2001) Morbid obesity and the prone position: a case report. J Clin Anesth 13: 138–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gofrit ON et al. (2002) Lateral decubitus position for percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese or kyphotic patient. J Endourol 16: 383–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kerbl K et al. (1994) Percutaneous stone removal with the patient in the flank position. J Urol 151: 686–688

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Curtis R et al. (1997) Modification of the technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the morbidly obese patient. Br J Urol 79: 138–140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Kidd CF and Conlin MJ (2003) Ureteroscopically assisted percutaneous renal access. Urology 61: 1244–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Grasso M et al. (1995) Flexible ureteroscopically assisted percutaneous renal access. Tech Urol 1: 39–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Segura JW (1990) Role of percutaneous procedures in the management of renal calculi. Urol Clin North Am 17: 207–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Giblin JG et al. (1995) A modification of standard percutaneous nephrolithotripsy technique for the morbidly obese patient. Urology 46: 491–493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Koo BC et al. (2004) Percutaneous stone surgery in the obese: outcome stratified according to body mass index. BJU Int 93: 1296–1299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Pearle MS et al. (1998) Outcomes of contemporary percutaneous nephrostolithotomy in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 160: 669–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Faerber GJ and Goh M (1997) Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in the morbidly obese patient. Tech Urol 3: 89–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Hofmann R and Stoller ML (1992) Endoscopic and open stone surgery in morbidly obese patients. J Urol 148: 1108–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Santry HP et al. (2005) Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA 294: 1909–1917

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Bennett JM et al. (2007) Surgery for morbid obesity. Postgrad Med J 83: 8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Schneider BE and Mun EC (2005) Surgical management of morbid obesity. Diabetes Care 28: 475–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mole DR et al. (2001) Complications of jejuno-ileal bypass for obesity. QJM 94: 69–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Requarth JA et al. (1995) Long-term morbidity following jejunoileal bypass. The continuing potential need for surgical reversal. Arch Surg 130: 318–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Backman L et al. (1980) Difference in kidney stone incidence after three types of intestinal bypass operations. Scand J Urol Nephrol Suppl 53: 149–157

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sugerman HJ et al. (1992) Gastric bypass for treating severe obesity. Am J Clin Nutr 55 (Suppl 2): 560S–566S

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Durrani O et al. (2006) Analysis of stone disease in morbidly obese patients undergoing gastric bypass surgery. J Endourol 20: 749–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Asplin JR and Coe FL (2007) Hyperoxaluria in kidney stone formers treated with modern bariatric surgery. J Urol 177: 565–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Keoghane.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vujovic, A., Keoghane, S. Management of renal stone disease in obese patients. Nat Rev Urol 4, 671–676 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0988

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpuro0988

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing