Abstract
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a syndrome that is characterized by gait impairment, cognitive decline and urinary incontinence, and is associated with ventriculomegaly in the absence of elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure. There is significant variation in the clinical presentation and progression of this disorder, and its diagnosis often represents a challenge for neurologists and neurosurgeons. Various supplemental tests, including the CSF tap test, external CSF drainage via spinal catheter, and CSF outflow resistance determination, can improve the accuracy of predicting a response to surgical treatment. CSF shunting provides significant symptom improvement in the majority of appropriately evaluated patients. In 2005, an international study group published evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis and management of INPH. This review will highlight the clinical presentation, radiographic findings, supplemental prognostic tests, differential diagnosis, surgical treatment and outcomes of INPH.
Key Points
-
Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is characterized by gait disturbance, cognitive deterioration and urinary incontinence, and is associated with ventricular enlargement in the absence of elevated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure
-
INPH may represent a unique reversible form of neuronal injury, the mechanism of which is not well understood
-
Only a few epidemiological studies on INPH are available, so the incidence and prevalence of this disorder are difficult to determine
-
An essential part of the evaluation of patients with suspected INPH is neuroimaging with either CT or MRI to assess ventricular size
-
Because INPH is a disease of the elderly population, a diverse differential diagnosis of the individual symptoms should be considered, including neurodegenerative diseases, vascular etiologies and urological disorders
-
Treatment for INPH is surgical diversion of CSF, which is accomplished by implanting a shunt to drain CSF from either the intracranial ventricular system or the lumbar subarachnoid space to a distal site, where the CSF can be reabsorbed
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
$209.00 per year
only $17.42 per issue
Rent or buy this article
Prices vary by article type
from$1.95
to$39.95
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hakim S et al. (1965) The special clinical problem of symptomatic hydrocephalus with normal cerebrospinal fluid pressure: observations on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics. J Neurol Sci 2: 307–327
Adams RD et al. (1965) Symptomatic occult hydrocephalus with “normal” cerebrospinal-fluid pressure: a treatable syndrome. N Engl J Med 273: 117–126
Hebb AO et al. (2001) Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome. Neurosurgery 49: 1166–1184
Beyerl B et al. (1984) Posttraumatic hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 15: 257–261
Klinge P et al. (2005) Outcome of shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus and the value of outcome assessment in shunted patients. Neurosurgery 57: S40–S52
Bergsneider M et al. (2005) Surgical management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57: S29–S39
Marmarou A et al. (2005) The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57: S17–S28
Relkin N et al. (2005) Diagnosing idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57: S4–S16
Marmarou A et al. (2005) Development of guidelines for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: introduction. Neurosurgery 57: S1–S3
Life NPH [http://www.lifenph.com]
Boon AJ et al. (1997) Dutch normal-pressure hydrocephalus study: prediction of outcome after shunting by resistance to outflow of cerebrospinal fluid. J Neurosurg 87: 687–693
Mori K (2001) Management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a multiinstitutional study conducted in Japan. J Neurosurg 95: 970–973
Marmarou A et al. (2005) Diagnosis and management of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study in 151 patients. J Neurosurg 102: 987–997
McGirt MJ et al. (2005) Diagnosis, treatment, and analysis of long-term outcomes in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57: 699–705
Fisher CM (1982) Hydrocephalus as a cause of disturbances of gait in the elderly. Neurology 32: 1358–1363
Ogino A et al. (2006) Cognitive impairment in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 21: 113–119
Ahlberg J et al. (1988) Outcome of shunt operation on urinary incontinence in normal pressure hydrocephalus predicted by lumbar puncture. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 51: 105–108
Evans WA (1942) An encephalographic ratio for estimating ventricular and cerebral atrophy. Arch Neurol Psychiatry 47: 931–937
Tullberg M et al. (2001) Normal pressure hydrocephalus: vascular white matter changes on MR images must not exclude patients from shunt surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22: 1665–1673
Luetmer PH et al. (2002) Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid flow at the cerebral aqueduct by use of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: technique validation and utility in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 50: 534–543
Gideon P et al. (1994) Cerebrospinal fluid flow and production in patients with normal pressure hydrocephalus studied by MRI. Neuroradiology 36: 210–215
Jinkins JR (1991) Clinical manifestations of hydrocephalus caused by impingement of the corpus callosum on the falx: an MR study in 40 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 12: 331–340
Stolze H et al. (2001) Comparative analysis of the gait disorder of normal pressure hydrocephalus and Parkinson's disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 70: 289–297
Geldmacher DS et al. (1996) Evaluation of dementia. N Engl J Med 335: 330–336
Fox JL et al. (1973) Cerebrospinal fluid shunts: an experimental evaluation of flow rates and pressure values in the anti-siphon valve. Surg Neurol 1: 299–302
Portnoy HD et al. (1973) Anti-siphon and reversible occlusion valves for shunting in hydrocephalus and preventing post-shunt subdural hematomas. J Neurosurg 38: 729–738
Lumenta CB et al. (1990) Clinical experience with a pressure-adjustable valve SOPHY in the management of hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 6: 270–274
Matsumae M et al. (1989) Quantification of cerebrospinal fluid shunt flow rates: assessment of the programmable pressure valve. Childs Nerv Syst 5: 356–360
Black PM et al. (1994) The use of the Codman-Medos Programmable Hakim valve in the management of patients with hydrocephalus: illustrative cases. Neurosurgery 34: 1110–1113
Reinprecht A et al. (1995) Clinical experience with a new pressure-adjustable shunt valve. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 134: 119–124
Zemack G et al. (2000) Seven years of clinical experience with the programmable Codman Hakim valve: a retrospective study of 583 patients. J Neurosurg 92: 941–948
Inoue T et al. (2005) Effect of 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging on various pressure programmable shunt valves. J Neurosurg 103: 163–165
Akbar M et al. (2005) Magnetic resonance imaging and cerebrospinal fluid shunt valves. N Engl J Med 353: 1413–1414
Williams MA et al. (1998) Evaluation of shunt function in patients who are never better, or better than worse after shunt surgery for NPH. Acta Neurochir Suppl 71: 368–370
Graham P et al. (1982) Evaluation of CSF shunt patency by means of technetium-99m DTPA. J Neurosurg 57: 262–266
Vernet O et al. (1996) Radionuclide shuntogram: adjunct to manage hydrocephalic patients. J Nucl Med 37: 406–410
Caruso R et al. (1997) Idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus in adults: result of shunting correlated with clinical findings in 18 patients and review of the literature. Neurosurg Rev 20: 104–107
Petersen RC et al. (1985) Surgical treatment of idiopathic hydrocephalus in elderly patients. Neurology 35: 307–311
Vanneste JA (2000) Diagnosis and management of normal-pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol 247: 5–14
Duinkerke A et al. (2004) Cognitive recovery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus after shunt. Cogn Behav Neurol 17: 179–184
Thomas G et al. (2005) Baseline neuropsychological profile and cognitive response to cerebrospinal fluid shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 20: 163–168
Raftopoulos C et al. (1994) Cognitive recovery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a prospective study. Neurosurgery 35: 397–404
Krauss JK et al. (1996) Cerebrospinal fluid shunting in idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus of the elderly: effect of periventricular and deep white matter lesions. Neurosurgery 39: 292–299
Ibach B et al. (2004) Acetylcholinesterase inhibition in Alzheimer's Disease. Curr Pharm Des 10: 231–251
Krauss JK et al. (2004) Normal pressure hydrocephalus: survey on contemporary diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 146: 379–388
Vanneste J et al. (1992) Shunting normal-pressure hydrocephalus: do the benefits outweigh the risks? A multicenter study and literature review. Neurology 42: 54–59
Trenkwalder C et al. (1995) Starnberg trial on epidemiology of Parkinsonism and hypertension in the elderly: prevalence of Parkinson's disease and related disorders assessed by a door-to-door survey of inhabitants older than 65 years. Arch Neurol 52: 1017–1022
Clarfield AM (1988) The reversible dementias: do they reverse? Ann Intern Med 109: 476–486
Beck JC et al. (1982) Dementia in the elderly: the silent epidemic. Ann Intern Med 97: 231–241
Knopman DS et al. (2006) Incidence and causes of nondegenerative nonvascular dementia: a population-based study. Arch Neurol 63: 218–221
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
In the 12 months prior to the submission of this manuscript (March 2006), MA Williams and D Rigamonti received financial support for hydrocephalus research from Medtronic, and Dr Williams received honoraria from Medtronic for speaking on the topic of adult hydrocephalus. MA Williams is an unpaid volunteer member of the Medical Advisory Board of the Hydrocephalus Association.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Box 1
Description of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) classification: probable, possible and unlikely categories. (DOC 37 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gallia, G., Rigamonti, D. & Williams, M. The diagnosis and treatment of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Nat Rev Neurol 2, 375–381 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0237
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncpneuro0237
This article is cited by
-
Normal pressure hydrocephalus associated with COVID-19 infection: a case report
BMC Infectious Diseases (2022)
-
Quantification of pathological gait parameter thresholds of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus patients in clinical gait analysis
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Can preoperative brain imaging features predict shunt response in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus? A PRISMA review
Neuroradiology (2022)
-
Magnetic resonance elastography in normal pressure hydrocephalus—a scoping review
Neurosurgical Review (2021)
-
Systematic volumetric analysis predicts response to CSF drainage and outcome to shunt surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus
European Radiology (2021)