Abstract
The realization of p–n junctions in graphene, combined with the gapless and chiral nature of its massless Dirac fermions has led to the observation of many intriguing phenomena such as the quantum Hall effect in the bipolar regime, Klein tunnelling and Fabry–Pérot interferences, all of which involve electronic transport across p–n junctions. Ballistic snake states propagating along the p–n junctions have been predicted to induce conductance oscillations, manifesting their twisting nature. However, transport studies along p–n junctions have so far only been performed in low mobility devices. Here, we report the observation of conductance oscillations due to ballistic snake states along a p–n interface in high-quality graphene encapsulated by hexagonal boron nitride. These snake states are exceptionally robust as they can propagate over 12 μm, limited only by the size of our sample, and survive up to at least 120 K. The ability to guide carriers over a long distance provide a crucial building block for graphene-based electron optics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Snake states, a counterpart of skipping orbit states, were first proposed to exist along the boundary between positive and negative magnetic field1,2,3,4,5. However, the difficulty to achieve a magnetic field gradient experimentally6 has led to a new proposal on the basis of a p–n junction in graphene7,8 where, instead of inverting the magnetic field polarity, we interconvert carrier types between hole and electron across the junction, generating snake-like trajectories at finite magnetic field. An increase in conductance along the p-n interface of graphene devices on SiO2 at finite magnetic field has been observed and attributed to snake states9. It has been theoretically predicted that, in a higher quality device, these snake states, even though propagating along the p–n interface, can manifest themselves through oscillatory conductance across the interface as a result of alternating end points of the snake states7,10,11,12,13. The high-quality p–n junction in graphene, only feasible recently following the development of graphene heterostructures14,15, provides a perfect platform for snake states due to its gapless and chiral nature, which leads to a transparent p–n junction at normal incident angle, owing to Klein tunnelling16,17,18,19.
In this work, we investigate conductance oscillations arising from ballistic snake states by employing a top-gated graphene encapsulated by hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) to access the ballistic regime14,15,20. The observed conductance oscillations are present only at finite magnetic field and in bipolar regime. The density and magnetic field dependence of these oscillations supports a theory of snake states propagating along the p–n junction. The oscillations persist up to at least 120 K, showing the robustness of the snake states.
Results
Device description
Figure 1a,b show a schematic diagram and an atomic force microscopy image of our device. Graphene is transferred onto a 32-nm-thick hBN and etched into a Hall bar geometry whose width and length is 900 nm and 12.2 μm, respectively. The device is then encapsulated by an 8-nm-thick hBN. A top gate is defined onto the device, parallel to the Hall bar (see Methods for fabrication). The thin top hBN flake allows us to create a sharp p–n interface, which increases the transmission probability across the p–n junction17. We measure conductance (G) using a two probe method in which carriers are injected into graphene through an injector (i) and collected at a collector (c). Back gate (BG) and top gate (TG) allow us to control densities in back-gated and top-gated regions (BGR and TGR) independently.
Conductance oscillations
Under a finite magnetic field normal to graphene surface (B=B z), carriers injected into graphene will undergo a skipping orbit motion along the edge (Fig. 1c, blue curve). After reaching a p–n interface, some of the carriers will convert into snake states (Fig. 1c, black curve), propagating along the interface and inducing conductance oscillations. Figure 1d shows conductance as a function of top-gate voltage (VTG) at VBG=17.2 V, when the BGR is n-doped. As we sweep VTG, carrier density in the TGR can be tuned from p-type doping to n-type doping, creating n–p or n–n′ junctions, respectively. At B=0 T (black line), the conductance shows no oscillations as a function of VTG in both unipolar and bipolar regime. However, at B=2 T (red line), clear oscillations emerge in the bipolar regime (−4 V≤VTG≤−1 V, thick red line) but is absent in the unipolar regime (1 V≤VTG≤4 V). When BGR is p-doped (Fig. 1e), similar oscillations can also be observed at finite field in the bipolar regime (1 V≤VTG≤4 V).
The oscillations we observe here only exist in the bipolar regime, which allows us to rule out Shubnikov-de Haas (SdH) oscillations as a main mechanism. Similar oscillations in the bipolar regime are also observed in graphene heterojunctions as a result of Fabry–Pérot (FP) interferences19. However, one distinct difference is that our oscillations are absent at zero magnetic field while FP oscillations can be observed at zero field. This dismisses the possibility that our oscillations originate from the FP interferences.
Density dependence
To gain more insight into the nature of these oscillations, we measure conductance as a function of VBG and VTG. To eliminate the background conductance, the numerical derivative of G with respect to VTG is analysed (see Supplementary Fig. 1 for data before numerical derivatives). At B=0 T (Fig. 2a,b), we observe two lines, which divide the (VBG, VTG) plane into four quadrants. The vertical line corresponds to the density in the BGR (nBG) equal to zero while the diagonal line follows the zero density in the TGR (nTG). The crossing between these two lines at indicates the charge neutrality point of the full sample. The four quadrants correspond to nn′, pn, pp′ and np doping, where the first and second letters are carrier types of the BGR and TGR, respectively. Evidently, no oscillation is present at zero field. As we increase B to 2 T (Fig. 2c,d), oscillations become apparent in the pn and np quadrants. The curvatures of these oscillations are distinctively different from FP oscillations19 or SdH oscillations in the presence of p–n junctions21,22,23.
Snake states
The combination of magnetic field and a p–n junction leads us to consider the contribution from the snake states. Figure 2e shows a diagram of a snake state propagating along the p–n interface. Here, we assume a step-like potential at the interface. With applied magnetic field, the carrier trajectory is bent into a circular orbit with cyclotron radius where ℏ is the reduced Planck’s constant, kF is the Fermi wave vector, n is the carrier density and e is the elementary charge. The oscillations in conductance can be understood by considering the end point at which a snake state exits the p–n junction. For instance, if a snake state ends up on the collector side (Fig. 2e), this will increase the transmission probability from the injector to the collector, enhancing the conductance. However, if it exits the p–n interface on the injector side (Fig. 2f), the conductance should diminish. The choice of the end point of the snake states will depend on the starting point, the length of the p–n interface (L) and the cyclotron radii of BGR and TGR which vary with B and n. For example, we can move the end point of the snake state in Fig. 2e to the one in Fig. 2f by increasing nTG. This enlarges the cyclotron radius in the TGR and causes the snake state to end up on the injector side instead of the collector side.
In the bipolar regime, we can determine the end point of a snake state by considering the following conditions. For , where N is the integer part of the ratio , a snake state will end on the collector side if L>L0 and on the injector side if L<L0. Using these conditions, we simulate the end point in the bipolar regime as a function of VBG and VTG, where , , C is the capacitive coupling and V*=V−VD. Figure 2g shows the result from such simulation at B=2 T. Here, we make the assumption, on the basis of the semiclassical billiard model with a finite size injector12, that all snake states have the same starting point. We note that there is no fitting parameter in our simulation as all the parameters (L, B, nBG and nTG) can be determined experimentally. The simulation agrees relatively well with the data, especially at high density. The discrepancy at low density is likely due to disorder as cyclotron radius becomes smaller and comparable to the width of the depletion region of the p–n junction (see below for detailed discussion). The contour line of a constant dG/dVTG is therefore described by , explaining the curvature of the oscillations observed in Fig. 2g. We note that, under the experiment conditions that we apply, the snake states need to transmit at least ~50 times across the p–n interface to propagate from one end to the other end, which is ~12.2 μm long. This shows the robustness of the snake states compared with the skipping orbit states along a graphene edge in which the focusing peaks of the transverse magnetic focusing are greatly diminished after a few reflections of the edge20,24. While the skipping orbits along the edge of graphene have to suffer potential fluctuation from dangling bonds, a lack of dangling bonds as well as a collimating effect of the p–n junctions possibly contribute to the stability of the snake states.
In the unipolar regime, the absence of the oscillations can also be explained by similar consideration of the carrier trajectories along the interface. As both sides of the interface have the same type of carriers, they circulate in the same direction. However, the relative magnitude of the densities on both sides produces two distinct types of trajectories. For nBG>nTG (Fig. 2h), we have the cyclotron radius in the BGR larger than that in the TGR and the carrier can drift along the p–n interface similar to the snake states. However, the main difference is that carriers in this density configuration always end up on the injector side. Hence, the transmission probability remains unchanged as VBG and VTG are varied. When nBG<nTG (Fig. 2i), the carrier will transmit through the p–n interface without drifting along the interface and always ends up on the collector side. As a result, no oscillation is achieved in both the cases.
Magnetic field dependence
We now turn to the magnetic field dependence of the oscillating conductance. Figure 3a shows dG/dVTG as a function of VTG and B at VBG=−20 V. The conductance oscillations in the bipolar regime (0.5 V≤VTG≤4 V) are apparent from ~1 T onwards and they are much more well behaved at low field (<2 T) than at high field. To understand the observed feature, we simulate the end points of the snake states on the basis of the aforementioned conditions. The simulation illustrated in Fig. 3b shows that the oscillations are periodic in B for a fixed VTG with the period given by12
The simulation matches the data reasonably well at low field. However, it fails to capture the onset of the conductance oscillations and aperiodicity at high field. The onset seems to relate to the snake states undergoing a deconfinement transition below a critical field25 where W is half the width of the TGR. As the magnetic field is lowered, the cyclotron radius becomes larger. Consequently, once the radius is comparable to half the width of the TGR, the snake states can back scatter to the other side of the TGR edge causing the oscillations to vanish. The fit of Bc to the onset of our data yields (blue dashed lines in Fig. 3a,b) W=180 nm, which is roughly half the width of the TGR (~250 nm). Note that a similar argument can also be applied to the BGR, which yields Bc=0.57 T for the 200-nm-wide half width (vertical line in Fig. 3b). Moreover, the onset as a function of density at B=1.5 T agrees quite well with the line of constant (see Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Note 1).
Effect of disorder
The aperiodicity at high field is likely related to disorder. As the field is increased, carriers propagate closer to the depletion region of the p–n junction. In this region, the effect of the disorders becomes prominent because of the reduced screening at low carrier density26. The density fluctuation27,28 increases the roughness of the p–n interface, which leads to complex carrier trajectories29,30. The interface roughness can reflect the incoming snake states due to exponential suppression of transmission rate at finite incident angle17. Therefore, it acts as a scattering site, which behaves as a new injector on the p–n interface, establishing a shorter effective length (Leff) the snake states needed to travel. The inset in Fig. 3b shows Leff calculated from the period in Fig. 3a (the difference in B between two adjacent minima) at VTG=4 V. At low field, the cyclotron radius is still large and most snake states can skip over scattering sites, resulting in Leff comparable to the length of our p–n interface. As B is increased, the snake states now with smaller cyclotron radius cannot avoid the scattering sites and, as a result, Leff decreases. The simulations in which we model the effect of disorder by putting a scattering centre of finite size on the p–n interface show similar increasing periods with increasing B as observed in the data (see Supplementary Fig. 3 and Supplementary Note 2).
Temperature dependence
Finally, we comment on the temperature dependence of the conductance oscillations. Figure 3c–e display the conductance oscillations in the pn regime at 5, 60 and 120 K, respectively. The presence of the oscillations at such elevated temperature supports our claim that, instead of quantum interference, they are induced by snake states, which rely on ballistic transport and appearance of caustics11. Simple estimation on the basis of temperature broadening of kF19,31 yields that quantum interference should be visible only up to ~10 K. Some of the irregular features at low temperature, such as phase shift (Fig. 3c, red arrow) or bifurcations (Fig. 3c, red circle) also disappear at high temperature. This suggests that such features could be related to quantum interference between different snake states32. More theoretical study is needed to understand the origin of these features. In addition, a new fabrication method based on the van der Waals assembly process33, which produces a large area of encapsulated graphene without bubbles and wrinkles, could potentially lower the onset of the conductance oscillations in B and preserve the ballistic motion up to room temperature. This may lead to the room temperature application of the snake states such as electron waveguides4 and electrically reconfigurable wiring29.
Discussion
The observation of the conductance oscillations is quite surprising given that the size of our injector is larger than rc, which could have led carriers to exit the interface on both sides equally. However, under magnetic field, carriers injected into graphene will undergo a skipping orbit motion, which restricts them to propagate along the edge20. The lateral extension of the skipping orbit motions will be on the order of rc, which can be much smaller than the size of our injector (~300 nm). In addition, due to the exponential collimation of a graphene p–n junction17,19, only carriers which encounter the p–n interface near normal incident angle will be able to pass through, owing to Klein tunnelling. For carriers which collide the interface at large incident angle, they will mostly be reflected back and behave as skipping orbit states along the p–n interface. Therefore, the effect of a finite size injector is likely to introduce a large conductance background and reduce amplitude of the conductance oscillations as only a small portion of electrons will turn into snake states. Moreover, simulations based on the semiclassical billiard model of a graphene p–n junction have shown that the conductance oscillations still persist even for an injector whose width is wider than a cyclotron radius12,13.
Furthermore, we observe that the conductance oscillation pattern is independent of an injector location (see Supplementary Fig. 4). A wide injector acts as a line source, instead of a point source, producing all possible skipping orbits. Hence, the distribution of electron trajectories before encountering a p–n junction should be identical along the graphene edge. This leads to the same initial conditions for incident electrons at the p–n junction. Therefore, an injector location does not affect the oscillation pattern as we observe.
In our analysis of the snake states so far, we have restricted ourselves to a semiclassical picture. As most of the oscillations we observe occur at high filling factors (up to 150, see Supplementary Fig. 5), the semiclassical picture is applicable. However, at low filling factors, evidence of the SdH oscillations, which requires a quantum approach, can be seen around (VBG, VTG)=(0, 0) V in Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 3f. These SdH oscillations disappear at high density and the oscillations due to the snake states become dominant.
In a second device used to measure, there is evidence that both edge states and snake states can coexist (see Supplementary Fig. 6). At low field, we observe the oscillations due to the snake states, similar to the first device. As we increase the magnetic field, SdH oscillations and the oscillations due to the snake states are both apparent and cross each other, which imply the coexistence of edge states and snake states. Further study is required to understand the interplay between the edge states and the snake states along a p–n interface32,34 and also how energy gaps of the Landau levels affect the snake states21,22,23,35.
Methods
Device fabrication
Figure 1b shows an atomic force microscopy image from one of our devices before transferring the top hBN. The position of the top gate is shown as an orange region. We first transfer graphene onto high-quality hBN36 and subsequently pattern it into a Hall bar shape in oxygen plasma. Chromium and gold are used for contacts and top gate, defined by electron-beam lithography. We anneal the sample in forming gas to reduce residues from fabrication. In addition, for the device shown in Fig. 1b, we also perform mechanical cleaning37 to further clean the device.
Measurement setup and device characterization
We measure conductance by applying a small voltage-bias excitation (<2 mV) at 13 Hz to an injector and measuring the current through a collector. The magnetic field is applied normal to graphene. All the measurements were done at 5 K unless otherwise stated. A field effect mobility of our sample is ~40,000 cm2 V−1 s−1. The capacitive couplings of back gate and top gate are CBG=9 × 10−5 F m−2 and CTG=3 × 10−3, determined from Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations using four-probe measurement at high magnetic field. We observe the conductance oscillations due to snake states in two devices (see Supplementary Fig. 6 for data from a second device).
Additional information
How to cite this article: Taychatanapat, T. et al. Conductance oscillations induced by ballistic snake states in a graphene heterojunction. Nat. Commun. 6:6093 doi: 10.1038/ncomms7093 (2014).
References
Vil’ms, P. P. & Éntin, M. V. Quantum wells due to an inhomogeneous magnetic field. Sov. Phys. Semicond. 22, 1209–1211 (1988).
Müller, J. E. Effect of a nonuniform magnetic field on a two-dimensional electron gas in the ballistic regime. Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 385–388 (1992).
Oroszlány, L., Rakyta, P., Kormányos, A., Lambert, C. J. & Cserti, J. Theory of snake states in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 77, 081403 (2008).
Ghosh, T. K., De Martino, A., Häusler, W., Dell'Anna, L. & Egger, R. Conductance quantization and snake states in graphene magnetic waveguides. Phys. Rev. B 77, 081404 (2008).
Davies, N. et al. Skipping and snake orbits of electrons: singularities and catastrophes. Phys. Rev. B 85, 155433 (2012).
Nogaret, A., Bending, S. J. & Henini, M. Resistance resonance effects through magnetic edge states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2231–2234 (2000).
Carmier, P., Lewenkopf, C. & Ullmo, D. Graphene n-p junction in a strong magnetic field: a semiclassical study. Phys. Rev. B 81, 241406 (2010).
Beenakker, C. W. J. Colloquium: Andreev reflection and Klein tunneling in graphene. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1337–1354 (2008).
Williams, J. R. & Marcus, C. M. Snake states along graphene p-n junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 046602 (2011).
Chen, J.-c., Xie, X. C. & Sun, Q.-f. Current oscillation of snake states in graphene p-n junction. Phys. Rev. B 86, 035429 (2012).
Patel, A. A., Davies, N., Cheianov, V. & Fal’ko, V. I. Classical and quantum magneto-oscillations of current flow near a p-n junction in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 86, 081413 (2012).
Milovanović, S. P., Ramezani Masir, M. & Peeters, F. M. Spectroscopy of snake states using a graphene Hall bar. Appl. Phys. Lett. 103, 233502 (2013).
Milovanović, S. P., Ramezani Masir, M. & Peeters, F. M. Magnetic electron focusing and tuning of the electron current with a pn-junction. J. Appl. Phys. 115, 043719 (2014).
Dean, C. R. et al. Boron nitride substrates for high-quality graphene electronics. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 722–726 (2010).
Mayorov, A. S. et al. Micrometer-scale ballistic transport in encapsulated graphene at room temperature. Nano Lett. 11, 2396–2399 (2011).
Katsnelson, M. I., Novoselov, K. S. & Geim, A. K. Chiral tunnelling and the Klein paradox in graphene. Nat. Phys. 2, 620–625 (2006).
Cheianov, V. V. & Fal'ko, V. I. Selective transmission of Dirac electrons and ballistic magnetoresistance of n-p junctions in graphene. Phys. Rev. B 74, 041403 (2006).
Shytov, A. V., Rudner, M. S. & Levitov, L. S. Klein backscattering and Fabry-Pérot interference in graphene heterojunctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 156804 (2008).
Young, A. F. & Kim, P. Quantum interference and Klein tunnelling in graphene heterojunctions. Nat. Phys. 5, 222–226 (2009).
Taychatanapat, T., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Jarillo-Herrero, P. Electrically tunable transverse magnetic focusing in graphene. Nat. Phys. 9, 225–229 (2013).
Williams, J. R., DiCarlo, L. & Marcus, C. M. Quantum Hall effect in a gate-controlled p-n junction of graphene. Science 317, 638–641 (2007).
Abanin, D. A. & Levitov, L. S. Quantized transport in graphene p-n junctions in a magnetic field. Science 317, 641–643 (2007).
Özyilmaz, B. et al. Electronic transport and quantum Hall effect in bipolar graphene p-n-p junctions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 166804 (2007).
Calado, V. E. et al. Ballistic transport in graphene grown by chemical vapor deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 023103 (2014).
Gu, N., Rudner, M., Young, A., Kim, P. & Levitov, L. Collapse of Landau levels in gated graphene structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 066601 (2011).
Zhang, L. M. & Fogler, M. M. Nonlinear screening and ballistic transport in a graphene p-n junction. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 116804 (2008).
Xue, J. et al. Scanning tunnelling microscopy and spectroscopy of ultra-flat graphene on hexagonal boron nitride. Nat. Mater. 10, 282–285 (2011).
Decker, R. et al. Local electronic properties of graphene on a BN substrate via scanning tunneling microscopy. Nano Lett. 11, 2291–2295 (2011).
Williams, J. R., Low, T., Lundstrom, M. S. & Marcus, C. M. Gate-controlled guiding of electrons in graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6, 222–225 (2011).
Low, T. Ballistic-ohmic quantum Hall plateau transition in a graphene p-n junction. Phys. Rev. B 80, 205423 (2009).
Cheianov, V. V., Falk’o, V. & Altshuler, B. L. The focusing of electron flow and a Veselago lens in graphene p-n junctions. Science 315, 1252–1255 (2007).
Milovanović, S. P., Ramezani Masir, M. & Peeters, F. M. Interplay between snake and quantum edge states in a graphene hall bar with a pn-junction. Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 123507 (2014).
Wang, L. et al. One-dimensional electrical contact to a two-dimensional material. Science 342, 614–617 (2013).
Zarenia, M., Pereira, J. M., Peeters, F. M. & Farias, G. A. Snake states in graphene quantum dots in the presence of a p-n junction. Phys. Rev. B 87, 035426 (2013).
Amet, F., Williams, J. R., Watanabe, K., Taniguchi, T. & Goldhaber-Gordon, D. Selective equilibration of spin-polarized quantum hall edge states in graphene. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 196601 (2014).
Tan, J. Y. et al. Electronic transport in graphene-based heterostructures. Appl. Phys. Lett. 104, 183504 (2014).
Goossens, A. M. et al. Mechanical cleaning of graphene. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 073110 (2012).
Acknowledgements
We thank L. Levitov, J. Martin and I.J. Vera Marun for discussions, A. Avsar, E.C.T. O’Farrell and J. Wu for experimental help. B.Ö. acknowledges the support by the National Research Foundation, Prime Minister’s Office, Singapore under its Competitive Research Programme (CRP Award No. NRF-CRP9-2011-3) and the SMF-NUS Research Horizons Award 2009-Phase II.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Th.T., J.Y.T. and Y.Y. fabricated the samples. Th.T. performed the experiments, analysed the data and wrote the manuscript with input from J.Y.T. and B.Ö. K.W. and Ta.T. synthesized the hBN samples. B.Ö. supervised the project.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
Supplementary Figures 1-6, Supplementary Notes 1-2, Methods and Supplementary References. (PDF 6445 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Taychatanapat, T., Tan, J., Yeo, Y. et al. Conductance oscillations induced by ballistic snake states in a graphene heterojunction. Nat Commun 6, 6093 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7093
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7093
This article is cited by
-
Ballistic transport spectroscopy of spin-orbit-coupled bands in monolayer graphene on WSe2
Nature Communications (2023)
-
Electronic materials with nanoscale curved geometries
Nature Electronics (2022)
-
Interplay of filling fraction and coherence in symmetry broken graphene p-n junction
Communications Physics (2020)
-
Fabry–Pérot resonances and a crossover to the quantum Hall regime in ballistic graphene quantum point contacts
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
A two-dimensional Dirac fermion microscope
Nature Communications (2017)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.