Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Behavior and Psychology

Weight-based discrimination: an ubiquitary phenomenon?

International Journal of Obesity volume 40, pages 333–337 (2016)Cite this article

Subjects

Abstract

Background:

Despite strong indications of a high prevalence of weight-related stigmatization in individuals with obesity, limited attention has been given to the role of weight discrimination in examining the stigma obesity. Studies, up to date, rely on a limited basis of data sets and additional studies are needed to confirm the findings of previous studies. In particular, data for Europe are lacking, and are needed in light of a recent ruling of the European Court of Justice that addressed weight-based discrimination.

Methods:

The data were derived from a large representative telephone survey in Germany (n=3003). The dependent variable, weight-based discrimination, was assessed with a one-item question. The lifetime prevalence of weight discrimination across different sociodemographic variables was determined. Logistic regression models were used to assess the association of independent and dependent variables. A sub-group analysis was conducted analyzing all participants with a body mass index ⩾25 kg m−2.

Results:

The overall prevalence of weight-based discrimination was 7.3%. Large differences, however, were observed regarding weight status. In normal weight and overweight participants the prevalence was 5.6%, but this number doubled in participants with obesity class I (10.2%), and quadrupled in participants with obesity class II (18.7%) and underweight (19.7%). In participants with obesity class III, every third participant reported accounts of weight-based discrimination (38%). In regression models, after adjustment, the associations of weight status and female gender (odds ratio: 2.59, P<0.001) remained highly significant.

Conclusions:

Discrimination seems to be an ubiquitary phenomenon at least for some groups that are at special risk, such as heavier individuals and women. Our findings therefore emphasize the need for research and intervention on weight discrimination among adults with obesity, including anti-discrimination legislation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

  • Purchase on Springer Link
  • Instant access to full article PDF
Buy now

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Puhl RM, King KM . Weight discrimination and bullying. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2013; 27: 117–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Puhl RM, Heuer CA . Obesity stigma: important considerations for public health. Am J Public Health 2010; 100: 1019–1028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Puhl RM, Heuer CA . The stigma of obesity: a review and update. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009; 17: 941–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Link BG, Phelan JC . Conceptualizing stigma. Annu Rev Sociol 2001; 27: 363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hatzenbuehler ML, Phelan JC, Link BG . Stigma as a fundamental cause of population health inequalities. Am J Public Health 2013; 103: 813–821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carr D, Friedman MA . Is obesity stigmatizing? Body weight, perceived discrimination, and psychological well-being in the United States. J Health Social Behav 2005; 46: 244–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Roehling MV, Roehling PV, Pichler S . The relationship between body weight and perceived weight-related employment discrimination: the role of sex and race. J Vocat Behav 2007; 71: 300–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hatzenbuehler ML, Keyes KM, Hasin DS . Associations between perceived weight discrimination and the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in the general population. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2009; 17: 2033–2039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hansson LM, Näslund E, Rasmussen F . Perceived discrimination among men and women with normal weight and obesity. A population-based study from Sweden. Scand J Public Health 2010; 38: 587–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Andreyeva T, Puhl RM, Brownell KD . Changes in perceived weight discrimination among Americans, 1995-1996 through 2004-2006. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: 1129–1134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Puhl RM, Andreyeva T, Brownell KD . Perceptions of weight discrimination: prevalence and comparison to race and gender discrimination in America. Int J Obes 2008; 32: 992–1000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dutton GR, Lewis TT, Durant N, Halanych J, Kiefe CI, Sidney S et al. Perceived weight discrimination in the CARDIA study: differences by race, sex, and weight status. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014; 22: 530–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jackson SE, Steptoe A, Beeken RJ, Croker H, Wardle J . Perceived weight discrimination in England: a population-based study of adults aged ⩾50 years. Int J Obes (Lond) 2014; 39: 858–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Caliendo M, Lee W . Fat chance! Obesity and the transition from unemployment to employment. Econ Hum Biol 2013; 11: 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pomeranz JL, Puhl RM . New developments in the law for obesity discrimination protection. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013; 21: 469–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Suh Y, Puhl R, Liu S, Milici FF . Support for laws to prohibit weight discrimination in the united states: public attitudes from 2011 to 2013. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014; 22: 1872–1879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkland AR . Fat Rights. Dilemmas of Difference and Personhood. New York University Press: New York, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kish L . A procedure for objective respondent selection within the household. J Am Stat Assoc 1949; 44: 380–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sikorski C, Luppa M, Schomerus G, Werner P, Konig HH, Riedel-Heller SG . Public attitudes towards prevention of obesity. PLoS One 2012; 7: e39325.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chinn S . A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Stat Med 2000; 19: 3127–3131.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Faul FG *Power. Version 3.1.9.2. Kiel: Universität Kiel 2014.

  22. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13, 2013.

  23. Zwickert K, Rieger E . Stigmatizing attitudes towards individuals with anorexia nervosa: an investigation of attribution theory. J Eat Disord 2013; 1: 5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Star A, Hay P, Quirk F, Mond J . Perceived discrimination and favourable regard toward underweight, normal weight and obese eating disorder sufferers: implications for obesity and eating disorder population health campaigns. BMC Obes 2015; 2: 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Burke MA, Heiland FW, Nadler CM . From 'overweight" to "about right": evidence of a generational shift in body weight norms. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2010; 18: 1226–1234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. International association for the study of obesity. Obesity prevalence worldwide. Germany obesity information.

  27. Jackson SE, Beeken RJ, Wardle J . Perceived weight discrimination and changes in weight, waist circumference, and weight status. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2014; 22: 2485–2488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hilbert A, Braehler E, Haeuser W, Zenger M . Weight bias internalization, core self-evaluation, and health in overweight and obese persons. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2013; 22: 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Major B, Eliezer D, Rieck H . The psychological weight of weight stigma. Soc Psychol Person Sci 2012; 3: 651–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Major B, Hunger JM, Bunya DP, Miller CT . The ironic effects of weight stigma. J Exp Soc Psychol 2014; 51: 74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tomiyama AJ . Weight stigma is stressful. A review of evidence for the Cyclic Obesity/Weight-Based Stigma model. Appetite 2014; 82C: 8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Friedman KE, Ashmore JA, Applegate KL . Recent experiences of weight-based stigmatization in a weight loss surgery population: psychological and behavioral correlates. Obesity (Silver Spring) 2008; 16: S69–S74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vanhove A, Gordon RA . Weight discrimination in the workplace: a meta-analytic examination of the relationship between weight and work-related outcomes. J Appl Soc Psychol 2014; 44: 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yale Rudd Center for Food Policy and Obesity. Weight Discrimination Legislation. http://www.yaleruddcenter.org/what_we_do.aspx?id=121.

  35. Sikorski C, Luppa M, Brähler E, König H, Riedel-Heller SG . Obese children, adults and senior citizens in the eyes of the general public: results of a representative study. Plos One 2012; 7: e46924.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. French government. Loi n° 2001-1066 du 16 novembre 2001. relative à la lutte contre les discriminations (1). http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=JORFTEXT000000588617.

  37. Hartlev M . Stigmatisation as a public health tool against obesity — a health and human rights perspective. Eur J Health Law 2014; 21: 365–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. European Court of Justice. PRESS RELEASE No 183/14. http://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2014-12/cp140183en.pdf.

  39. Cathaoir Ó, On K . Obesity as a disability. Eur J Risk Regul 2015; 145–150.

  40. Mensink GBM, Schienkiewitz A, Scheidt-Nave C . Overweight and obesity in Germany. Results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1). Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz 2013; 56: 786–794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gorber SC, Tremblay M, Moher D, Gorber B . A comparison of direct vs self-report measures for assessing height, weight and body mass index: a systematic review. Obes Rev 2007; 8: 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF), Germany, FKZ: 01EO1501.

Author information

Author notes

  1. C Sikorski and J Spahlholz: These authors contributed equally to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Leipzig University Medical Center, IFB AdiposityDiseases, Leipzig, Germany

    C Sikorski & J Spahlholz

  2. Institute of Social Medicine, Occupational Health and Public Health (ISAP), University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany

    C Sikorski, J Spahlholz & S G Riedel-Heller

  3. Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    M Hartlev

Authors
  1. C Sikorski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J Spahlholz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M Hartlev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S G Riedel-Heller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C Sikorski.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sikorski, C., Spahlholz, J., Hartlev, M. et al. Weight-based discrimination: an ubiquitary phenomenon?. Int J Obes 40, 333–337 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.165

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2015.165

This article is cited by

Search

Advanced search

Quick links