Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Epidemiology

Is the food frequency consumption essential as covariate to estimate usual intake of episodically consumed foods?

Abstract

Backgrounds/Objectives:

The aim of this paper is to verify the performance of the frequency of consumption as variable for prediction of the usual intakes of foods.

Subjects/Methods:

In total, 725 individuals who answered two nonconsecutive 24-h recall and one food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) in the ‘Healthy Survey-Sao Paulo-Brazil’. An additional indicator variable indicating if one is usual consumer was created before analyzing. The Multiple Source Method and National Cancer Institute method were used to estimate usual intake of selected food considering different models of prediction: with no covariates; with FFQ; with FFQ plus indicator variable; and with only indicator variable.

Results:

For foods that are consumed every day or almost every day, the inclusion of the FFQ and/or the indicator variable as covariates resulted in similar percentiles of consumption when compared with the model with no covariates. For episodically consumed foods, the models with FFQ plus indicator variable and with only indicator variable estimated similar percentiles of intake.

Conclusions:

The use of the indicator variable instead the FFQ appears as a good alternative to estimate usual intake of episodically consumed foods.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nusser SM, Carriquiry AL, Dodd KW, Fuller WA . A semiparametric transformation approach to estimating usual daily intake distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 1996; 91: 1440–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moshfegh AJ, Rhodes DG, Baer DJ, Murayi T, Clemens JC, Rumpler WV et al. The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88: 324–332.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Beaton GH, Milner J, Corey P, McGuire V, Cousins V, Stewart E et al. Source of variation in 24-hour dietary recall data: implications for nutrition study design and interpretation. Am J Clin Nutr 1979; 32: 2546–2459.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Freedman LS, Subar AF, Kipnis V, Midthune D et al. Statistical methods for estimating usual intake of nutrients and foods: a review of the theory. J Am Diet Assoc 2006; 106: 1640–1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tooze JA, Midthune D, Dodd KW, Freedman LS, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF et al. A new statistical method for estimating the usual intake of episodically consumed foods with application to their distribution. J Am Diet Assoc 2006; 106: 1575–1587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hartig U, Haubrock J, Knüppel S, Boeing H et al. The MSM program: web-based statistics package for estimating usual dietary intake using the Multiple Source Method. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011; 65: S87–S91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kipnis V, Midthune D, Buckman DW, Dodd KW, Guenter PM, Krebs-Smith SM et al. Modeling data with excess zeros and measurement error: application to evaluating relationship between episodically consumed foods and health outcomes. Biometrics 2009; 65: 1003–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Subar A, Dodd KW, Guenther PM, Kipnis V, Midthune D, McDowell M et al. The Food Propensity Questionnaire: concept, development, and validation for use as a covariate in a model to estimate usual food intake. J Am Diet Assoc 2006; 106: 1556–1563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Souverein OW, Dekkers AL, Geelen A, Haubrock J, Vries JH, Ocké MC et al. Comparing four methods to estimate usual intake distriburtions. Eur J Clin Nutr 2011; 65: S92–S101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sousa CA, Cesar CLG, Barros MBA, Carandina L, Goldbaum M, Pereira JCR . Prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and risk factors in São Paulo, Brazil, 2008–2009. Rev Saúde Pública 2011; 45: 887–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Verly-Jr E, Castro MA, Fisberg RM, Marchioni DML . Precision of usual food intake estimates according to the percentage of individuals with a second dietary measurement. J Am Nut Diet 2012; 112: 1015–1020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fisberg RM, Colucci AC, Morimoto JM, Marchioni DM . Food frequency questionnaire for adults from a population-based study. Rev Saude Publica 2008; 42: 550–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Drewnowski A . Diet Image: A New Perspective On The Food-Frequency Questionnaire. Nutr Rev 2001; 59: 370–374.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was financially supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP—procedural n° 2009/11239-9 and 2009/15831-0) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq—procedural n° 503128/2010-4).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E Verly- Jr.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Verly-, E., Fisberg, R. & Marchioni, D. Is the food frequency consumption essential as covariate to estimate usual intake of episodically consumed foods?. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 1254–1258 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.119

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/ejcn.2012.119

Keywords

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links