Your assertion that models of the Ebola epidemic have failed to project its course misrepresents their aims (see Nature 515, 18; 2014). They helped to inspire and inform the strong international response that may at last be slowing the epidemic (see M. F. C. Gomes et al. PLoS Curr. Outbreaks http://doi.org/vvd; 2014).
Subsequent models assessed the likely impact of different public-health interventions and policy decisions (J. A. Lewnard et al. Lancet Infect. Dis. 14, 1189–1195 (2014) and A. Pandey et al. Science http://doi.org/wts; 2014). As those interventions were implemented and as people's behaviour changed, case counts below the modelled baseline were early indicators that the response to the outbreak was having an effect.
Epidemics are affected by countless variables, so uncertainty is a given. Models synthesize available information. Without them, there is little to guide decision-makers during an outbreak. Their importance goes beyond providing forecasts.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Supplementary information
Supplementary Information
(PDF 395 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rivers, C. Ebola: models do more than forecast. Nature 515, 492 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/515492a
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/515492a
This article is cited by
-
Modelling microbial infection to address global health challenges
Nature Microbiology (2019)
-
Utilizing general human movement models to predict the spread of emerging infectious diseases in resource poor settings
Scientific Reports (2019)
-
Integrity in Biomedical Research: A Systematic Review of Studies in China
Science and Engineering Ethics (2019)
-
A Synthetic Population for Modelling the Dynamics of Infectious Disease Transmission in American Samoa
Scientific Reports (2017)